Mon, Aug 31st - 9:06AM
Genesis
21:14d-16 †. Gen
21:14d . . And she wandered about in the wilderness of Beer-sheba. The
wilderness of Beer-sheba is about 50 miles south of Hebron. The
Hebrew word for "wandered about" is from ta'ah (taw-aw') which means to vacillate. Webster's defines
"vacillate" as: to waver in mind, will, or feeling; viz: to hesitate
in choice of opinions or courses. (cf. Jas 1:8) As
often as Hagar traveled up and down the land of Palestine with Abraham over the
years, she no doubt knew her way around; so she's not blundering through the
woods like a lost hiker. At
this point, Hagar is thoroughly rattled and doesn't really know what to do next
or even how she and Ishmael are going to survive in a land where no State
programs for unemployed single mothers existed. And to top it off; she's a
freed slave who now has to make all her own decisions and fend for her child
and for herself on her own rather than simply comply with the demands of a
master who provided for all her daily necessities. Slavery
has its pluses and minuses; its upsides and its downsides; and it's not always
to a slave's benefit to give them their walking papers. There's a provision in
the covenant that Moses' people agreed upon with God that allows for a slave to
remain a slave for life of their own free will. The law applies to anyone
living as a citizen in the land of Israel, whether Jew or Gentile. (Ex 21:2-6,
Lev 24:22) Many
of the slaves that were liberated after the American Civil War found themselves
in the throes of instant poverty: unable to either read or to write, with no
place to live, and zero prospects for gainful employment. I'm not saying
slavery is a good thing. I'm only saying that, all things considered, it might
be the better option for some people. I
met guys in the Army who re-enlisted for the security of a steady paycheck,
free meals, free health care, paid vacations, and rent-free/mortgage-free
accommodations. They had to relinquish a degree of their freedom for those
benefits, but in their minds, it was not a bad trade-off. †. Gen 21:15-16 . .When the water was gone from
the skin, she left the child under one of the bushes, and went and sat down at
a distance, a bowshot away; for she thought: Let me not look on as the child
dies. And sitting thus afar, she burst into tears. The
word "child" is misleading. The Hebrew is yeled (yeh'-led) which can also mean: a lad. Webster's defines a
lad as: a male person; of any age between early boyhood and maturity; viz: boys
and/or youths. Ishmael
was hardly what modern Americans might call a child. He was near to eighteen
years old at this time; if he was circumcised at fourteen and Isaac was weaned
at three. (cf. Gen 16:16, Gen 21:5, Gen 21:8) One
can only guess at the grief in Hagar's heart. Her life had come down to this: a
lonely, impoverished, homeless death out in the middle of nowhere. In her
distress Hagar had forgotten about her friend 'Ataah 'Eel R'iy the god who sees
people and knows their troubles. And she had forgotten all the predictions He
made back in Gen 16:10-12 concerning Ishmael's future. There is just no way her
son can be allowed to die at this time. When
God's people lose confidence in His statements, they usually always get
themselves into trouble. If only Hagar had trusted God, she wouldn't have
despaired regarding Ishmael's life. He was perfectly safe. Don't you see? He
had to live so God could keep His promise to multiply him; and so he could
become a wild-burro of a man, and so he could live near the people of Israel
like God predicted. So even if Hagar had perished all alone in the wilderness,
Ishmael would have gone on to survive without his mother because his divine
guardian would have seen to it. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Sun, Aug 30th - 7:50AM
Genesis
21:13-14c †. Gen 21:13 . . As for the son of the
slave-woman, I will make a nation of him, too, for he is your seed. Abraham
certainly must have been worried what would become of Ishmael; so God reassured
him his biological boy would be just fine. I
think it's significant that God didn't refer to either Hagar or to Ishmael by
name, probably because the emphasis here is upon Divine purpose instead of upon
people. †. Gen 21:14a . . Early next morning Abraham
took some bread and a skin of water, and gave them to Hagar. The
Hebrew word for "bread" is lechem
(lekh'-em) which just simply means food (for man or beast), which therefore
includes grain. So Abraham didn't necessarily send the poor woman out on her
own with a ration of bread and water like some sort of hardened criminal, but
very likely provisioned Hagar and his son Ishmael with enough camper-grade food
stuffs to keep them going for a while. NOTE: Bread back
in those days was very nutritious. It was all made from heirloom, organic
grains; even leavened bread was organic. It was made with naturally-soured
dough rather then cultured yeast. But
it's puzzling why Abraham didn't provide them with an escort; at least until
they reached the safety of a village or a town. That suggests to me that Abraham
fully believed God's promise to "make a nation of him" which implies
that God Himself would look out for them from here on in. †. Gen
21:14b . . He placed them over her shoulder, together with the child, I
would have hated to observe that scene. Abraham didn't dispatch a servant or a
butler to equip Hagar. He did it himself. And he didn't just bring the
provisions out to her and set it down at her feet. No. He put them up on her
shoulder himself. You have to stand close to someone to do that; close enough
to look them right in the eyes. There's
no record of ever any ill will between Hagar and Abraham, nor any between him
and his boy Ishmael either. Those three were truly family in every sense of the
word-- mom, dad, and child. There couldn't have been a dry eye nor a cheerful
face at any time during this excruciating farewell. If you've ever experienced
something so upsetting as to make you nauseous, lead-bellied, and lose your
appetite; then you know what I'm talking about. Anybody who can read this story
without feeling the slightest twinge of compassion for any one of those three;
has got to be the most insensitive clod on earth. †. Gen
21:14c . . and sent her away. The
phrase "sent her away" is from the Hebrew word shalach (shaw-lakh') which is a versatile word that can be used of
divorce as well as for the emancipation of slaves. In other words: Hagar wasn't
banished as is commonly assumed; no, she was set free; and it's very important
to nail that down in our thinking because if Abraham had merely banished Hagar,
then her son Ishmael would have retained his legal status as Abraham's eldest
son. Technically,
Ishmael retained his status as one of Abraham's biological sons (Gen 25:9) but
not legally; no, Ishmael's legal association with his father was dissolved when
Abraham emancipated his boy's mother. I
believe it's important to emphasize that Hagar and Ishmael weren't cut loose
because they were no longer worthy to live in Abraham's camp any more. No. It
was only as a measure to expedite God's future plans for Isaac. Even if Sarah
hadn't proposed the idea of emancipating Hagar, I suspect that God would have
eventually required it so anyway. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Sat, Aug 29th - 10:08AM
Genesis
21:9-12 †. Gen 21:9 . . Sarah saw the son whom Hagar
the Egyptian had borne to Abraham playing. At
this point, Ishmael was around 17 or 18 years old. (cf. Gen 16:16, Gen 21:5,
Gen 21:8) It's
hard to tell what kind of sport Ishmael was involved in. Some feel that he, the
firstborn son, was picking on Isaac the younger sibling; and that's probably
true because Gal 4:29 suggests that Ishmael was a bit of a bully. Others feel
he was mocking the weaning party. But actually, nobody knows for sure. Maybe he
was just swinging on an old tire in the backyard, and while Sarah was absently
mindedly looking over there, a scheme spawned in her head. Not
only was Ishmael Abraham's son, but, by law, he was Sarah's boy too. (Gen
16:1-2). But Sarah rejected Ishmael and never was much of a mom to him. So Ms.
Hagar went through all that for nothing. On top of that, she was still a slave;
and had no husband. She was, in reality, a single mom saddled with a child that
she never really wanted in the first place. All
of this created a home life that had become intolerable for everyone involved.
Hagar gloated over Sarah's barrenness. Sarah, in turn, blamed Abraham for
Hagar's attitude, and Ishmael, according to Gal 4:29, harassed Isaac (no doubt
out of a spirit of sibling rivalry). Abraham loved Ishmael and was no doubt
soft on Hagar. Plus, to make matters even worse; there were some very serious
legal complications. Ishmael's
legal position was quite an advantage. As Abraham's firstborn son, he had a
right to a double portion of his father's estate (cf. Gen 48:22). NOTE: The reason
Joseph inherited a double portion is because Jacob transferred the right of the
firstborn to him after Reuben messed around with one of his father's
servant-wives. (Gen 49:3-4, 1Chr 5:1) †. Gen 21:10-11 . . Sarah said to Abraham: Cast
out that slave-woman and her son, for the son of that slave shall not share in
the inheritance with my son Isaac. The matter distressed Abraham greatly, for
it concerned a son of his own. NOTE: By the
customs of that day, Ishmael was Sarah's son too; though not by blood. How
does a good and decent man like Abraham disown his own flesh and blood? If
Ishmael were a gang-banger, a drug addict, an Islamic terrorist, or a career
criminal it would be different. But he was really a pretty good kid and Abraham
totally loved him. Being the lad's biological father, I'm sure Abraham felt
very responsible for Ishmael's welfare. He and Ishmael had been a team together
for seventeen or eighteen years. You just don't dissolve a bond like that as if
giving away old clothes to Good Will. †.
Gen 21:12 . . But God said to Abraham:
Don't be distressed over the boy or your slave; whatever Sarah tells you, do as
she says, for it is through Isaac that offspring shall be continued for you. The
lad would always and forever be one of Abraham's biological sons; that couldn't
be undone with any more ease than recalling the ring of a bell. However; in the
case of slave mothers; there was a way to break Ishmael's legal ties to
Abraham; and the way was actually quite to Hagar's advantage. The
common law of Abraham's day (e.g. the Code of Hammurabi and the laws of
Lipit-Ishtar) stipulated that if a slave-owner disowned his child's in-slavery
biological mother; then the mother and the child would lose any and all claims
to a paternal property settlement with the slave-owner. The
catch is: Abraham couldn't just send Hagar packing, nor sell her. In order for
the common law to take effect; Abraham had to emancipate her; which he did. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Fri, Aug 28th - 7:43AM
Genesis
21:1-8 †. Gen 21:1 . . God took note of Sarah as He
had promised, and God did for Sarah as He had spoken. Because
God's word is sometimes slow and long in coming to pass, people are often
inclined to scoff at what it says and lose confidence in His testimony. The
Word told Noah that a flood was coming. Well . . it was many years before it
arrived and by the time it came, only Noah and his family were prepared for it. God
also promised a Messiah. But so many years have gone by since, that many now
believe one will never come. God also promised He will personally round up the
people of Israel and lead many of them back to their own land, and restore
their covenanted boundaries, where they will become the center of world power
and the seat of religious instruction. Some, giving up on that possibility,
have suggested that today's troubled Israeli occupation is the fulfillment of
that promise. Abraham
came into Canaan when he was seventy-five, and Sarah sixty-five. That was
twenty five years before this section. He is now one-hundred, and she ninety.
Women that age cannot have children. So no one can ever give credit to those
two for engendering Isaac. Although Isaac was conceived and born in the natural
way, he was not a natural child. The credit must be given to a miracle. The
people of Israel exist today only because El Shaddai willed them into
existence. †. Gen 21:2a . . Sarah conceived That's
not all that happened. The author said back in Gen 18:11 that Sarah's periods
had stopped. So sometime prior to Isaac's conception, her periods came back. I
wish I could have seen the look of shocked excitement and incredible joy in
their faces when she showed Abraham the blood. He may have been grossed out a
little, but I can guarantee you he was extremely thrilled because it meant
Sarah's plumbing was back online. Her
blood was the sunrise of a new day. Not just another day like all the others,
but the beginning of an era of complete change in their lives. They would never
be the same again. Parenthood is an irreversible state. It makes no difference
if the children die, or leave home, or disown their moms and dads. After once
children are engendered, those parents are always the parents. They were the
two people who brought the children into the world and it can never be undone. Abraham
had pinned all his hopes upon God's promise and now he realized he should have
never doubted. God truly is a man of His word after all. (cf. 49:22-23) Yes,
those who trust in the Bible's God don't have to worry about whether or not
they have done something stupid and made a fool of themselves. He made good on
His promise to give Sarah a baby boy, and some day He will make good on the
promise to bring His people all home again. †. Gen 21:2b-3 . . and bore a son to Abraham in
his old age, at the set time of which God had spoken. Abraham gave his newborn
son, whom Sarah had borne him, the name of Isaac. This
is now the second son of Abraham for whom God chose the name. The first was
Ishmael. That's quite an honor. It may not set well for many parents though. I
think most of us would rather pick names for our own children ourselves; but
Abraham is pretty good at obedience for the most part. God said the boy's name
would be Isaac and that's what Abraham named him. Isaac, by the way, is the
only one of the three patriarchs whose name God does not change later in their
life. Naming
a boy is very significant. The man who does the naming is legally declaring the
boy to be his own son even if he isn't the biological father. (cf. Matt 1:21
and Matt 1:25) †. Gen 21:4 . . And when his son Isaac was
eight days old, Abraham circumcised him, as God had commanded him. Isaac
is the very first male in the family on record to be circumcised precisely on
the eighth day in compliance with the covenant's stipulation. I just want to
point out that circumcision was not Abraham's idea. It was his response to El
Shaddai's earlier mandate in Gen 17:10-14. †. Gen 21:5 . . Now Abraham was a hundred years
old when his son Isaac was born to him. Ishmael
would have been fourteen (Gen 16:16) and Sarah ninety, since she and her
husband were ten years difference in age. (Gen 17:17) †. Gen 21:6 . . Sarah said: God has brought me
cheer; everyone who hears will laugh with me. Sarah's
words are a double entendre. Isaac's name in Hebrew means laughter; so God not
only gave her a bundle of joy, but cheer for her soul too. †. Gen 21:7 . . And she added: Who would have
said to Abraham that Sarah would suckle children! Yet I have borne a son in his
old age. Well
nobody in their right mind would have. Sarah was just too old. And actually,
Abraham was too old too. "And
being not weak in faith, he considered not his own body now dead, when he was
about an hundred years old" (Rom 4:19) "And
so from this one man, and he as good as dead, came descendants as numerous as
the stars in the sky and as countless as the sand on the seashore." (Heb
11:11-12) †. Gen 21:8 …The child grew up and was weaned,
and Abraham held a great feast on the day that Isaac was weaned. The
age of weaning varied in ancient times; usually in the neighborhood of 2 to 5
years. Bible weaning implies a whole lot more than just putting a child on a
bottle. It means they can speak and understand a language, feed themselves,
brush their teeth, clothe themselves, and potty alone. In other words, you
could pack them a bag and send them off to live with your aunt. (e.g. 1Sam
1:22-2:11). Samuel was at least three years old when his mom packed him off to
live with the high priest. (2Chr 31:16) So
Isaac was very likely around the same age as Samuel when Abraham and Sarah
threw a weaning party for him. It was a day of good celebration and they were
very proud of their little boy. He was past a major milestone and well along
his way to independent manhood. Weaning
isn't always a joyous occasion for some families. It can be a time passed over
in deep sorrow for the parents of handicapped kids. Abraham and Sarah were very
fortunate that their boy wasn't afflicted with Down's syndrome, Autism, or a
neurodegenerative disease like Tay-Sachs. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Thu, Aug 27th - 12:28PM
Genesis
20:9-18 †. Gen 20:9a . .Then Abimelech summoned Abraham
and said to him: What have you done to us? What wrong have I done that you
should bring so great a guilt upon me and my kingdom? The
very first God-given prohibition against adultery was given at Gen 3:16.
Whether Abimelech was aware of it is unknown; but regardless, his culture
believed it to be immoral. This is very interesting. Compare Rom 2:14-15. †. Gen 20:9b-10 . .You have done to me things
that ought not to be done. What, then-- Abimelech demanded of Abraham --was
your purpose in doing this thing? Abimelech
is totally perplexed. The thing Abraham and Sarah perpetrated made no sense to
him whatsoever. The best part of this is the scolding that Abimelech laid on
the sacred couple. Abraham was a prophet. Prophets are supposed to be not only
inspired; but also exemplary. But in this case, Abimelech, a pagan, was more
righteous than a "holy" man. †.
Gen 20:11 . . I thought-- said Abraham
--surely there is no fear of God in this place, and they will kill me because
of my wife. Abimelech
didn't dispute that point; so I think it's probably safe to assume Abraham was
correct in his estimation of Gerar's
culture. †. Gen 20:12a . . And besides, she is in truth
my sister, Abraham,
true to form, exercised his usual brand of flexible morality. Yes, what he said
was technically true. But it was not the whole truth; it was a half-truth: a
deliberate deception, told with the intent to mislead. †. Gen 20:12b . . my father's daughter though
not my mother's; The
covenant that Moses' people later agreed upon with God, forbids intimacy
between half-siblings. "The
nakedness of your sister-- your father's daughter or your mother's, whether
born into the household or outside --do not uncover their nakedness." (Lev
18:9) That
rule mandates excommunication for men who marry their half sister. And within
the terms and conditions of the covenant; there is neither forgiveness nor
atonement for it. "If
a man marries his sister, the daughter of either his father or his mother, so
that he sees her nakedness and she sees his nakedness, it is a disgrace; they
shall be excommunicated in the sight of their kinsfolk. He has uncovered the
nakedness of his sister, he shall bear his guilt." (Lev 20:17) However,
Israel's covenanted law doesn't have ex post facto jurisdiction. Abraham lived
many years before it was enacted; so he was immune to its taboos and
punishments (Deut 5:2-4, Gal 3:15-18). That's an important Bible axiom; viz:
when something isn't illegal; then it doesn't go on one's record as a broken
law. (Rom 4:15, Rom 5:13) †. Gen 20:13 . . So when God made me wander
from my father's house, I said to her: Let this be the kindness that you shall
do me-- whatever place we come to, say there of me: He is my brother. Right
about here Abimelech probably began scratching his head and wondered what kind
of crazy religion Abraham practiced anyway. And he probably wondered what in
the world God ever saw in this man to go to such lengths to protect him. A liar
is not a good influence for God. It disgraces God, and makes His religion look
stupid to outsiders. "You
who make your boast in the law, do you dishonor God through breaking the law?
For it's written that the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because
of you." (Rom 2:23-24) "And
now what do I have here? --declares the Lord. For my people have been taken
away for nothing, and those who rule them mock --declares the Lord. And all day
long my name is constantly blasphemed." (Isa 52:5) The
people of God shouldn't be living in such a way as to bring disgrace to their
sovereign. "Those
who claim they belong to the Lord must turn away from all wickedness."
(2Tim 2:19) "Therefore
I, a prisoner for serving the Lord, beg you to lead a life becoming of your
calling, for you have been called by God." (Eph 4:1) †. Gen 20:14-15 . . Abimelech took sheep and
oxen, and male and female slaves, and gave them to Abraham; and he restored his
wife Sarah to him. And Abimelech said: Here, my land is before you; settle
wherever you please. In
other words: I don't care where you go as long as it's a great ways off from
me! Abimelech
didn't owe Abraham a single penny for anything. And God didn't order him to
make restitution. He isn't trying to gain Abraham's good will by these gifts.
With friends like Abraham; who needs enemies? But rather; he was showing God
his intentions to mean well by Abraham; in spite of Abraham's foul deed. †. Gen 20:16 . . And to Sarah he said: I
herewith give your brother a thousand pieces of silver; this will serve you as
vindication before all who are with you, and you are cleared before everyone. Abimelech
is really too kind. By the money, he told everyone that it was just a
misunderstanding. In paying a fine to Abraham, he is publicly apologizing for taking
the man's wife home with him; and Sarah's honor was protected because it is
saying that she wasn't promiscuous like some woman I could name who have an
itch to sleep with men in power. †. Gen 20:17-18 . . Abraham then prayed to God,
and God healed Abimelech and his wife and his slave girls, so that they bore
children; for the Lord had closed fast every womb of the household of Abimelech
because of Sarah, the wife of Abraham. Abraham's
ultimate chagrin was having to pray for the very people whose lives he almost
ruined with his nefarious scheme. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Wed, Aug 26th - 7:44AM
Genesis
20:4-8 †. Gen 20:4a . . Now Abimelech had not
approached her. It
wasn't unusual in the ancient world for new additions to a harem to undergo a
period of beautification; like Esther did. But I think something else happened.
God may have tampered with Abimelech's ability to breed. In verse 17 it's
revealed that God fixed it so no one in Abimelech's house could have children,
including him. Do I have to spell it out? Hint: the problem can sometimes be
remedied with Viagra; which wasn't available in that day. †. Gen 20:4b . . He said: O Lord, will You slay
people even though innocent? There
is an important principle in play here; and it's this: ignorance is no excuse.
Though Abimlech wasn't aware of that principle; God was and saved the man's
life by stopping him before he inadvertently crossed a line. Compare Num 15:27-29
where Israel's covenanted law stipulates that even when people sin
inadvertently they have to bring a sin offering to the Levites. "Who
can understand his errors? Cleanse me from secret faults." (Ps 19:12) The
"secret faults" about which the psalmist prayed weren't skeletons in
his closet; but rather, sins about which he was totally unaware. †. Gen 20:5 . . He himself said to me "She
is my sister" and she also said "He is my brother." When I did
this, my heart was blameless and my hands were clean. I
can just about guarantee that Abimelech is developing a very strong dislike for
the Abrahams right about now. He knew of Abraham's prosperity and about his
skill in war. But what he hadn't known till now was that Abraham could be a bit
dishonest at times. You can bet that really ticked Abimelech off. He just never
expected a man like Abraham to pull a stunt like that. And the wife was in on
it too! They were like grifters setting up a mark for a sting. That had to
agitate the old boy just a bit; don't you think? †.
Gen 20:6 . . And God said to him in
the dream: I knew that you did this with a blameless heart, and so I kept you
from sinning against Me. That was why I did not let you touch her. If
Abimelech had touched Sarah, God would have taken it very personal. Those kinds
of sins are the very worst because it's one thing to appear in court for
stealing a car, but it's quite another to appear for stealing the judge's car.
In other words: a sin against God is a trespass rather than just an ordinary
act of conduct unbecoming. †. Gen 20:7 . .Therefore, restore the man's
wife-- since he is a prophet, he will intercede for you --to save your life. If
you fail to restore her, know that you shall die, you and all that are yours. This
is the Bible's very first appearance of a prophet; which in Hebrew is nabiy'
(naw-bee') and simply means an inspired man; viz: a man influenced, moved,
and/or guided by a divine connection. Abraham
wasn't the first of God's inspired men. The earliest was Abel. (Luke 11:50-51) There's
no record of Abraham ever foretelling future events like Isaiah and Habakkuk.
So then, just because someone is inspired doesn't necessarily mean they're some
sort of prognosticator. Divine
inspiration is a very mysterious thing. People can be inspired and not even
know it because God's influence is paranormal, and impossible to detect with
the five natural senses of sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell. Every
Christian is supposed to be inspired (1Cor 2:11-15, 1Cor 12:7, 1John 2:26-27) which makes an inspired Bible
teacher's job a whole lot easier. This
is also the very first place in the whole Bible where the word
"intercede" appears. Webster's defines it as: to intervene between
parties with a view to reconciling their differences; viz: mediate. When
you stop to think about it; mediation between God and Man by a human being is
quite remarkable. It implies that the human being who mediates has to first be
at peace with God or they would be in need of a mediator themselves before they
could mediate for someone else (cf. Gal 6:1). I
think it goes without saying, that mediators, then, have to be righteous first
before they can qualify as candidates for the activity. This section in Genesis
says a lot about Abraham's standing before God in spite of his bad habit of
lying about Sarah. Who
mediated for Abraham in those days? There's but one textual possibility and
that's Mr. Melchizedek, the priest of the Most High God back in chapter 14. But
I don't think Abimelech was much impressed with Abraham's inspiration. The man
was now a proven liar; and lost whatever credibility he might have once had in
Gerar. "Dead
flies cause the ointment of the apothecary to send forth a stinking smell: so
does a little folly him that is in reputation for wisdom and honor." (Ecc
10:1) However,
do you think Abimelech needed to be told twice? No way. He got on it lickety
split at first light. But not because he feared Abraham. No, because he feared
Abraham's god. Maybe Abraham's word was no good; but his god's word certainly
was and Abimelech really took it to heart. †.
Gen 20:8a . . Early next morning,
Abimelech called his servants and told them all that had happened; Under
normal circumstances Abimelech probably wouldn't have bothered to tell them
what was going on. But since they were all in the same boat as he, and all
inflicted with the same reproductive malady, I think he felt they deserved an
explanation. I think he also wanted to set their minds at ease about their
condition so they would know it wasn't permanent if only they sent Sarah back
to her husband; a move which they would certainly question if he didn't give
them a reason why. †. Gen 20:8b . . and the men were greatly
frightened. They
had good reason to be frightened. God gave them a token that He meant business
by tampering with their ability to breed. So they knew something serious was
afoot and that their king's nightmares weren't just bad dreams brought on by
cheap Russian vodka tainted with fallout from Chernobyl. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Tue, Aug 25th - 7:48AM
Genesis
20:1-3 †. Gen 20:1a . . Abraham journeyed from there
to the region of the Negeb and settled between Kadesh and Shur. In
Moses' day, Kadesh was a jumping off point just prior to crossing over Wadi
Araba into the region of Moab. (Num 20:14-16) According
to freytag & berndt's map of Israel/Sinai: Kadesh is located approximately
46 miles southwest of Beer-sheva near El Quseima Egypt about 15 miles south of
the town of Nizzana. Just northeast is the wilderness of Shur; a region
adjoining the Mediterranean to the north, and the Suez Canal to the west. Shur
extends somewhat south along the eastern shore of the Gulf of Suez. The
very first mention of Kadesh was during El Ched's punitive expedition in
Canaan. (Gen 14:7) No
doubt the En-mishpatite people returned to Kadesh and told everyone about the
heroic sheik who defeated the Babylonian contingent and set them free from El
Ched's grasp. So Abraham was a legend in that area and everyone greeting him
would very likely show him much respect. Abraham
didn't actually settle down in Kedesh itself, but rather, nearby. He may have
been camped in the exact spot where Ms. Hagar met the angel of the Lord in
chapter 16; and at this point, she's still living at home with Abraham and
Sarah. †.
Gen 20:1b . .While he was sojourning
in Gerar, Gerar
hasn't been fully identified, but the site may be along one of the branches of
Wady Sheri'a, at a place called Um Jerrar, near the coast southwest of Gaza and
9 miles from it. Gerar was apparently a prosperous city situated along a major
caravan route; and Abraham was by this time a wealthy and powerful chieftain
who would quite naturally make periodic trips to Gerar's railhead to auction
off some of his livestock; and in turn, purchase much needed goods and hardware
to supply his ranch. Gerar's location along the Mediterranean seaboard also
made it a lucrative city in trade with foreign merchants. Genesis
indicates that Gerar belonged to the Philistines, and it leads us to assume
that Abimelech was their king, but experts are quite certain that Philistines
didn't occupy this region until after the time of Abraham; in fact only a short
time before the Exodus. It's likely, however, that the author of Genesis would
quite naturally refer to the region as it was known in his own day. The town
certainly existed in the Philistine period, because it's mentioned in
connection with Asa, who defeated the Ethiopian host under Zerar and pursued
them in their flight unto Gerar (2Chrn 14:13). In addition to Um Jerrar,
another place in the vicinity known as Jurf el-Jerrar has been thought by some
to be the site of Gerar. According
to ERETZ Magazine, issue 64, Abimelech's land is an ample valley with fertile
land and numerous springs of water †. Gen 20:2 . . Abraham said of Sarah his wife:
She is my sister. So King Abimelech of Gerar had Sarah brought to him. Does
this sound familiar? Abraham has lied about his relationship to Sarah more than
once. If he really believed God's promise to make of him a great nation, then
he wouldn't worry about anybody killing him because dead men don't become great
nations without children. Yes, he had Ishmael. But God said he and Sarah would
have a boy together named Isaac. That boy was yet to be born. So Abraham will
stay alive to engender Isaac. We
might ask: what in the world did Abimelech want with a woman Sarah's age
anyway. She was at least 89 years old by this time. But God had given Abraham's
wife renewed vitality to bring a child into the world. So I don't think Sarah
looked her age at all. I think she looked a whole lot younger; and with creamy,
glowing skin too. But it could also be that Abimelech was up in years himself
so that a girl of 89 would look pretty good. At my own current age of 70, a
woman in her 40's is a chick to me. †. Gen 20:3 . . But God came to Abimelech in a
dream by night and said to him: You are to die because of the woman that you
have taken, for she is a married woman. This
was an extremely dangerous situation for Sarah now that she was fertile. She
was destined to bear Isaac and there could be no question about who the father
was. It had to be Abraham. So if Abimelech were allowed to sleep with her, it
would never be conclusive that Abraham was the true biological father. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Mon, Aug 24th - 7:57AM
Genesis
19:31-38 †. Gen 19:31 . . And the older one said to the
younger: Our father is old, and there is not a man on earth to consort with us
in the way of all the world. It's
doubtful the girls meant the whole planet was void of men; probably just the
region where their cave was. It was isolated and lonely; and the nearest cities
where they might have met men were either now gone or simply unsuitable for
polite society. The girls became concerned that their dad would pass away with
no heir to carry on his name. I haven't a clue why they'd be concerned about
that because to be honest, there was certainly no advantage to being related to
Lot right then; he was flat broke with no estate to bequeath whatsoever. Poor
things. With no television, or radio, or newspapers, they had no way of knowing
what was going on elsewhere in the world or where to go for help. Ironically;
hardly fifty miles from there, right across the valley, was Abraham's camp. He
had at least four hundred men mature enough to go to war-- and certainly many
more than that who would just love to meet Lot's girls. But for some reason the
lasses didn't think of them. Some
people have assumed that Lots daughters were very young because Lot had said
back in Gen 19:8 that they had not known a man. Duh. Look where they lived.
Sodom. Those girls were at risk of becoming old maids in that city. Other of
Lots daughters were married, but apparently, there just wasn't enough normal
men to go around. Its
interesting that the girls seemed to think that oedipal relations weren't a bad
thing, which is no doubt because of their upbringing in a society that
apparently thought nothing of it. †. Gen 19:32 . . Come, let us make our father
drink wine, and let us lie with him, that we may maintain life through our
father. It's
certainly to Lot's credit that he would never approve of their plan while
sober. We might wonder what they were doing with wine. Of all the things to
take with them, why that? Well; it was part of their first-aid kit. In those
days, wine was an essential; and not just for boozing it up. (e.g. Luke 10:34,
and 1Tim 5:23) It's
amazing that some people have actually accused recently-widowed Lot of raping
his own daughters. Webster's defines rape as: forceful sexual intercourse with
a woman by a man without her consent. The element of force is missing in this
event; and the girls were certainly consenting since the whole sordid affair
was their own idea. You know whose consent is missing? Lot's. This is clearly a
case of male rape if ever there was one. Then
there are others who attempt to invalidate the truthfulness of the narrative by
claiming a man Lot's age couldn't possibly breed two nights in a row. Maybe in our
own day that might be true for some men, but in Lot's day men were a lot more
virile than they are now. Jacob had to accommodate four women in his home,
often on consecutive nights; and he was well over seventy-five years old at the
time. †.
Gen 19:33 . .That night they made
their father drink wine, and the older one went in and lay with her father; he
did not know when she lay down or when she rose. Well
now; there's something about the birds and bees that isn't widely taught in
high school Health classes. It's actually possible for women to rape men
because the male reproductive system can be stimulated to function even when
men don't even think about it. Those parts of a man's body pretty much have a
mind of their own, so to speak, and it's not impossible for even men with no
feelings below the neck to father children. Apparently, the male reproductive
system has a back-up control center separate from the brain down low on the
spine somewhere. I recall reading about that in either Discover or Scientific
American, but can't remember the specifics. †. Gen 19:34-38 . .The next day the older one
said to the younger: See, I lay with Father last night; let us make him drink
wine tonight also, and you go and lie with him, that we may maintain life
through our father. That night also they made their father drink wine, and the
younger one went and lay with him; he did not know when she lay down or when
she rose. . . .Thus
the two daughters of Lot came to be with child by their father. The older one
bore a son and named him Moab; he is the father of the Moabites of today. And
the younger also bore a son, and she called him Ben-ammi; he is the father of
the Ammonites of today. The
Ammonites' and the Moabites' land overlapped somewhat. Ammon's land was more or
less between the Arnon and the Jabbok rivers. The center of it would be just
about where the modern cities of Madaba and 'Amman exist today. At
this point, Lot's life disappears from the pages of Bible history. His death
and burial aren't recorded; nor any more of his exploits. The lives of Lot's
daughters disappear from the pages of Scripture too. Just think. They came from
a wealthy, privileged family and ended up foraging and surviving practically
like human wildlife all because their dad and mom just had to live in Sodom; a
place whose morals totally vexed Lot, yet he chose to raise his family there
anyway (2Pet 2:6-8). Christ's
grandmother Ruth was a Moabite woman; ergo: Christ was biologically related to
Abraham's nephew just as much as he was related to Abraham. However, in the
Bible, the fathers determine a male child's tribal identity rather than the
mothers so you won't find Lot in Christ's genealogies because the official line
to Jesus is through Isaac. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Sun, Aug 23rd - 9:04AM
Genesis
19:27-30 †. Gen 19:27-28 . . Next morning, Abraham
hurried to the place where he had stood before the Lord, and, looking down
toward Sodom and Gomorrah and all the land of the Plain, he saw the smoke of
the land rising like the smoke of a kiln. Poor
guy. Now he began the very same vigil that so many relatives of airline crashes
suffer, waiting for some news, hoping against hope, that their loved ones
somehow survived. And if they didn't, were their bodies recovered? Abraham
really did love his nephew. I think it saddened the old boy's heart when Lot
went off on his own down into the valley. If only he had stayed in the place of
blessing, up in the highlands, this wouldn't have happened. And you know what
goes through your mind at a time like that? "Would of - Should of - Could
of". Sort of like closing the gate after the horses are already out. †. Gen 19:29 . .Thus it was that, when God
destroyed the cities of the Plain and annihilated the cities where Lot dwelt,
God was mindful of Abraham and removed Lot from the midst of the upheaval. Lot
was very fortunate to have an uncle like Abraham. Funny though, I don't
remember Abraham praying specifically for Lot. In fact Abraham's intercession
was generic, targeting only the citizens of Sodom in general, rather than Lot
in particular. Lady
GaGa once sang that a boy she liked couldn't read her poker face. Well, God
looks on the heart instead of one's face. He saw through Abraham's silence,
detected the old man's real concerns, and commiserated with him. That's why
believers should always be candid with God in their prayers. He will find out
what's really on our minds no matter; so we might just as well get down to
business and spell it out to begin with. (cf. Heb 4:16) †. Gen 19:30a . . Lot went up from Zoar and
settled in the hill country with his two daughters Apparently
Zoar didn't turn out to be the Pleasantville Lot hoped it might be. The
word for "hill country" is har (har)
which means: a mountain or range of hills. It's the very same word used to describe
the kind of terrain where Noah's ark came to rest in Gen 8:4, except there it's
plural. Why
Lot didn't move back on up to his uncle's ranch is uncertain. You know, that
kind of makes me wonder why Lot stayed in Sodom after his uncle rescued him from
the clutches of El Ched. Surely they must have talked about Lot returning to
the highlands with Abraham where he and his family would be safer. Genesis
doesn't specify just exactly which direction Lot went. Both the east and the
west from the Jordan valley are hilly. But it was most likely the eastern side,
that is: if a later mention of Lot's domain is any indicator. "When
all the warriors among the people had died off, the Lord spoke to me, saying:
You are now passing through the territory of Moab, through Ar. You will then be
close to the Ammonites; do not harass them or start a fight with them. For I
will not give any part of the land of the Ammonites to you as a possession; I
have assigned it as a possession to the descendants of Lot." (Deut 2:16-19) Moab
was a district east of the Dead Sea, extending from a point some distance north
of it and down to its southern end and is today part of the Hashemite Kingdom
of Jordan. Its eastern boundary was indefinite, being the border of the desert;
which is irregular. The length of the territory was about 50 miles and the
average width about 30. It's a high tableland, averaging some 3,000 ft. above
the level of the Mediterranean and 4,300 ft. above that of the Dead Sea. The
aspect of the land, looking at it from the western side of the Dead Sea, is
that of a range of mountains whose western side plummets very abruptly down to
the Jordan valley. Deep chasms lead down from the tableland to the Dead Sea
shore, the principal one being the gorge of the river Arnon, right across from
the kibbutz at En Gedi. Ruth
was from Moab, and it was also where Naomi lost her husband. The Moabites were
Abraham's kin because they're the progeny of not only his nephew Lot; but also
of his dad Terah (Gen 11:27). Unfortunately, there has been some bad blood over
the years between Lot's family and the people of Israel. The most notable
incident being when King Balak hired that wicked prophet for profit Balaam to
curse Israel as they traveled past his country prior to entering the promised
land after their exodus from Egypt. (Num 22-24) †. Gen 19:30b . . for he was afraid to dwell in
Zoar; Well
I can believe that just from reading about Haiti's earthquake. Large scale
disasters just seem to breed looting, theft, vandalism, and violence. That
entire region around Sodom was in utter chaos and the local farms and ranches
were destroyed so that fresh food was scarce. And if Zoar's morals were
anything like Sodom's then Lot probably figured it would be next on God's hit
list. Imagine
the situation if all of a sudden supermarkets had nothing to sell you. No meat,
no produce, no milk, no cereal, no rice, no pasta, no yogurt, no eggs, no
bottled water, no batteries, no bathroom tissue, no soap, no nothing. Whatever
people have, they'll hoard. And the have-nots would then begin to take it away
from those who have. In Lot's day, there was no such thing as FEMA, the
National Guard, the Red Cross, nor any other kinds of relief organizations.
When the ancients were beset by droughts and famines; the poor often had no
choice but to migrate to new diggings, indenture themselves, or turn to robbery
and theft. †. Gen 19:30c . . and he and his two daughters
lived in a cave. It's
really not too bad to start out in a cave-- kind of like being born in a barn --but
it's sad to end up in one at the end of your days with nothing to show for all
of the years of your life. My own dad was a case in point. He chased the brass
ring all his life, and ended up dying penniless on welfare. Lot and the girls
became homeless drifters. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Sat, Aug 22nd - 8:48AM
Genesis
19:17-26 †. Gen 19:17 . .When they had brought them
outside, one said: Flee for your life! Do not look behind you, nor stop
anywhere in The Plain; flee to the hills, lest you be swept away. The
messengers won't be going along. They're to stay behind to supervise the
holocaust. Up
till now, it appeared that God intended to destroy only Sodom. But now His
complete plan is unveiled. The whole plain was doomed-- all five cities of the
Siddim confederation, and all of their agriculture to boot --including the
livestock and all the wildlife and all the pets; plus the children, and all the
adults. A total civil, cultural, environmental, and economic melt-down. Compare
that to Rev 18:2-24 where it appears that the global economy is left a complete
collapse just as rapidly as the twin towers of the World Trade Center were
brought down. †. Gen 19:18 . . But Lot said to them: Oh not
so, my Lord! The
word Lot used for "Lord" is 'Adonay
(ad-o-noy') which is a proper name of God only; in comparison to the word 'adown (aw-done'); which is a
lesser-ranking lord than Yhvh. When the men first arrived in Sodom, Lot
addressed them as 'adown because he wasn't aware as yet that they were of
Divine origin. It's
significant that the men didn't scold Lot for calling them 'Adonay. So then,
speaking with those messengers was all the same as speaking with God, and that,
it seems, is exactly how Lot now perceived them. Lot
was a righteous man (2Pet 2:8) but lacked commitment. He never really grew in
grace and the knowledge of God. Abraham's nephew was no more spiritually mature
at this point than when he left his mentor and relocated to the Jordan Valley. God instructed Abraham to walk before Him and
to be perfect (Gen 17:1). But when Lot moved out, he apparently never really
took up a walk with God; but instead found a home for his family among impious
pagans; who would certainly discourage Lot from getting too serious about his
religion. "Do
not be misled; bad company corrupts good character." (1Cor 15:33) "good
character" in this instance is related to Lot's association with God.
Watch how he resists God's leading. †. Gen 19:19 . .You have been so gracious to
your servant, and have already shown me so much kindness in order to save my
life; but I cannot flee to the hills, lest the disaster overtake me and I die. Listen
to this man! He calls himself "your servant" yet opposes his master's
wishes. Next, he expresses gratitude for the successful rescue, yet implies his
rescuer doesn't know what He's doing by sending him into the hills. Why on
earth would God send Lot to the hills if the disaster was headed that way too?
Lot isn't being rational and objective; no, he's being emotional and reactive;
which people under stress usually are. †. Gen 19:20 . . Look, that town there is near
enough to flee to; it is such a little place! Let me flee there-- it is such a
little place --and let my life be spared. Lot
surely must have known that town was just as wicked as Sodom but he still
wanted to live there anyway as if his future was any more secure in that town
than the one he was just leaving. And why he thought a "little place"
was a good place to live is a mystery. But then such is the human mind. Little
country towns seem more cozy and wholesome than the big city to some of us. But
all towns are populated with human beings; and human beings are human
everywhere. †. Gen 19:21-22 . . He replied: Very well, I
will grant you this favor too, and I will not annihilate the town of which you
have spoken. Hurry, flee there, for I cannot do anything until you arrive
there. Hence the town came to be called Zoar. Zoar
is from Tso' ar (tso'ar) which means
little. So maybe we could nick-name it Smallville? †. Gen 19:23-25 . . As the sun rose upon the
earth and Lot entered Zoar, the Lord rained upon Sodom and Gomorrah sulfurous
fire from the Lord out of heaven. He annihilated those cities and the entire
Plain, and all the inhabitants of the cities and the vegetation of the ground. What
a sight that must have been. The people in Smallville probably thought the
world was coming to an end! Fiery hail fell out of nowhere. Everything all
around them ignited and went up in flame and heat with a suffocating, smelly
pall filling the whole valley like a nuclear winter. Talk about scorched earth! Jude
1:7 says the fire that destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah was an "eternal"
variety of fire. The Greek word is aionios (ahee-o'-nee-os) which means
unending; viz: perpetual. Opponents
contend that if the fire really was unending then it would still be out there.
But it's far more likely that "eternal" refers not to the fire's
characteristics; but to its source-- the smoldering impoundment depicted at Isa
66:22-24 and Rev 20:10-11. †. Gen 19:26 . . Lot's wife looked back, and
she thereupon turned into a pillar of salt. If
the chronology of the text is strict, then Lot's wife turned into salt after their
arrival in Zoar rather than along the way. I
can just imagine the look of fear that came over people in town when they saw
her like that. She didn't die in the conflagration, but she died just the same. Her
"looking back" was obviously more than just a curious gaze. Lot's
wife was no doubt thinking of returning; and hoping against hope that enough of
Sodom would survive the incendiary attack so they could search the ruins for
their daughters' remains. It's sad when the only way to stop some people from
doing something contrary to God's wishes is to strike them with a disability
and/or take their life. (cf. 1Cor 11:26-30) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Fri, Aug 21st - 8:33AM
Genesis
19:14-16 †. Gen 19:14a . . So Lot went out and spoke to
his sons-in-law, who had married his daughters, It's
been questioned that in a town famous for its gay men; what's with these
marriages? Well; Genesis doesn't really say that Sodom's men were gay. Stay
with me on this because it requires an explanation. "Sodom
and Gomorrah, and the cities around them in a similar manner to these, having
given themselves over to fornication and gone after strange flesh, are set
forth as an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire." (Jude 1:7) The
koiné Greek word for "fornication" in Jude's statement is ekporneuo (ek-porn-yoo'-o) which means:
to be utterly unchaste. A
lack of chastity is exemplified by any number of immoral activities including,
but not limited to immodesty, indecency, public exposure, nudity, adultery,
incest, living together, casual sex, swinger sex, wife swapping, sex between
consenting adults, sex between consenting minors, sex between teachers and
consenting students, sex with a sex toy, sex with a mannequin and/or sex with
an inflatable doll, male and/or female prostitution, LGBT, suggestive postures,
etc. To
be "utterly" unchaste implies not just a preference for those kinds
of carnal gratifications, but an addiction to them. The
word for "strange" is heteros
(het'-er-os) which means: other or different. That could be taken to indicate
bestiality but I think what it really refers to is unnatural sex; in other
words: men sleeping with women isn't strange but rather quite the norm. But men
sleeping with men is rather strange; viz: queer; which Webster's defines as:
unconventional; in other words out of the ordinary. Now,
maybe the men of Sodom weren't gay; but their preference for the males under
Lot's roof instead of the females strongly suggests they were at least
bisexual. A man, or a woman, need not be psychologically gay to fall under the
condemnation of going after strange flesh just so long as they go after it. Sons-in-law
and daughters are plural. So Lot had at least two more daughters living outside
the home with husbands. They will stay behind; and burn to death; and so will
Lot's grandchildren, if any. Where
were the sons-in-law when the flash went off back in verse 11? Didn't it effect
them? The flash actually only effected those who tried to break down the door.
Lot's sons-in-law were out in the streets that night along with everyone else
because Genesis said in verse 4 that everyone in Sodom to the last man was
present. Apparently, after the mob's attempt to lay hands on the angels proved
unsuccessful, Lot's sons-in-law remained nearby to see what would happen next. †.
Gen 19:14b . . and said: Up, get out
of this place, for the Lord is about to destroy the city. But he seemed to his
sons-in-law as a jester. Lot's
daughters had married Sodom men, with very sorrowful results. Lot's in-laws
didn't share his religious principles, and had no interest whatsoever in his
god. The husbands were counted among Sodom's citizens who were "very
wicked sinners against the Lord." Sodom
was not only a bad environment for a man of God to build a life and a career,
but it was also a very bad place to raise a family. Lot gave his daughters in
matrimony to unholy men and now the girls are going to die right along with the
rest of Sodom; and possibly some of Lot's grandchildren burned to death too.
That's an awful high price to pay to achieve one's personal ambition. But
after watching a number of documentaries on NetFlix; I'm convinced that there
are capitalists, Wall Street traders, lobbyists, sweat shop managers, and
influence peddlers capable of walking over the bones of their own children in
order to succeed and/or survive in the worlds of finance, apparel, and
politics. †. Gen 19:15-16a . . As dawn broke, the angels
urged Lot on, saying: Up, take your wife and your two remaining daughters, lest
you be swept away because of the iniquity of the city. Still he delayed. In
verses 10, 12, and 16, the messengers are called men. In verses 1 and 15,
they're called "angels". In verses 17 and 21, they're called
"he". In verse 18, Lot called them 'Adonay. In verses 21 and 22, they
speak in the first persona as "I". When you put it all together, it's
apparent that God visited Sodom as a pair of male human beings. Just exactly
how He is able to do that is a bit of a mystery. Some say that the messengers
were avatars. The
word for "delayed" is mahahh
(maw-hah') which means: to question or hesitate, i.e. (by implication) to be
reluctant; viz: hang back. I
can best picture this with a scene from John Steinbeck's novel: "The
Grapes Of Wrath". When the day came for the Joad clan to move out of
their shack from the impoverished Oklahoma Dust Bowl to California during the
economic depression of the 1930s, Ma Joad spent a few last minutes alone inside
going through a box of mementos. She
had lived in Oklahoma many years, since she was a young bride-- raised her
family there and enjoyed the company of her kin. As she held up an old pair of
earrings, looking at herself in a mirror, it pierced her heart to see etched in
her face the many years that she had lived as a hard-scrabble sharecropper; and
that it was all now coming to naught. Her clapboard home was soon to be
flattened by a bulldozer. I
can imagine that the Lots walked through the rooms in their house, reminiscing
all the things that took place in their home over the years. As the girls grew
up, maturing into young women, they made marks each year on a doorjamb to
record their height. They looked at the beds where each girl slept for so many
nights from their youth; and Mrs. Lot thought back to the days when she gave
homebirth to each one in turn, read bedtime stories, and rocked them all to
sleep accompanied by soft lullabies. Leaving
a home of many years rends the soul; most especially if kids grew up there too.
When I was about eleven, my parents sold the place where I had lived since
toddlerhood. I had a life there out in nature with boyhood pals: fishing and
hunting and exploring. It was so idyllic. Then we moved. I
was never the same after that. My heart was in that first home and never left
it. Subsequently, I became withdrawn, introverted, and disconnected; never
really succeeding in replacing my boyhood pals with new friends who could give
me a sense of belonging. When
ol' Harry Truman perished in the Mount Ste. Helens blast back in 1980, I
totally understood why he chose to remain instead of fleeing to safety. That
mountain, and his lodge, had been an integral part of Harry's life for just too
many years. Mr. Truman felt that if that mountain went, then life wouldn't be
worth living any more. He decided to go with the mountain rather than see it go
and leave him behind to live without it. †. Gen 19:16b . . So the men seized his hand,
and the hands of his wife and his two daughters-- in the Lord's mercy on him--
and brought him out and left him outside the city. The
word for "mercy" in that verse is from chemlah (khem-law') which means: commiseration; which Webster's
defines as: feeling sympathy for and/or feeling sorrow or compassion for.
Unless one's feelings are in the mix, their commiseration is merely polite. Does
anybody out there reading this feel the plight of Lot's family? Can you feel
any of their pain? Can you feel their sorrow? Do you feel any sympathy for them
at all? None? Well . . anyway; God did. Yes, He was going to burn their home
down and kill the daughters who stayed behind. But God took no pleasure in it
whatsoever. "Is
it nothing to you, all you who pass by? Look around and see. Is any suffering
like my suffering that was inflicted on me, that The Lord brought on me in the
day of his fierce anger?" (Lam 1:12) Is
the Lot family's fate nothing to you-- all you online who journey with me today
through the 19th chapter of Genesis? Just another Bible story? Well . . those
were real people you know. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Thu, Aug 20th - 8:43AM
Genesis
19:5-13 †. Gen 19:5a . . And they shouted to Lot and
said to him: Where are the men who came to you tonight? Everyone
was bellowing and clamoring; like impatient fans at wrestling matches, cage
fights, and Roman coliseums; demanding their pound of flesh and pools of blood. †. Gen 19:5b . . Bring them out to us, that we
may be intimate with them. Since
all the people of Sodom were in on this-- men, women, children, old and young
alike --it becomes frightfully obvious the townsfolk desired far more than just
stimulating gratification. They were looking for entertainment of the vilest
sort imaginable-- quite possibly a filthy stage show of unspeakable acts; maybe
including bestiality and bondage. Exactly
what the people of Sodom intended to do with the messengers is not said; but
Jude 1:7 states that the people were accustomed to "strange flesh"
which suggests that they used men and women's bodies for rather perverse
purposes. Other
than Jude's information, the Bible is silent on this matter. It's as if the
author drew a curtain over Sodom and said: This is just too shocking. I'm not
going to spell out what the people of Sodom wanted to do with the two men under
Lot's roof. You will just have to use your imagination. †. Gen 19:6-7 . . So Lot went out to them to
the entrance, shut the door behind him, and said: I beg you, my friends, do not
commit such a wrong. No
doubt those people interpreted Lot's comment that they were "wrong"
as judgmental. It was certain to provoke a hostile response in the typically
indignant manner in which evil people can be expected to act when somebody
criticizes their conduct. †. Gen 19:8 . . Look, I have two daughters who
have not known a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you may do to them as
you please; but do not do anything to these men, since they have come under the
shelter of my roof. A
culture that would sacrifice its own family members to protect the guests under
its roof is difficult for westerners to understand; for example pashtunwali,
the culture of the Pashtun people of Afghanistan. One of its principles-- nanawatai (asylum) --refers to the
protection given to a person against his or her enemies. People are protected
at all costs; even those running from the law must be given refuge until the
situation can be clarified. This was demonstrated when Osama bin Laden was
provided special protection by a group of Pashtuns in Abbottabad. Nanawatai
can also be applied when the vanquished party in a dispute is prepared to go in
to the house of the victors and ask for their forgiveness. (It is a peculiar
form of "chivalrous" surrender, in which an enemy seeks
"sanctuary" at his enemy's house). A notable example is that of Navy
Petty Officer First Class Marcus Luttrell, the sole survivor of a US Navy SEAL
team ambushed by Taliban fighters. Wounded, he evaded the enemy and was aided
by members of the Sabray tribe who took him to their village. The tribal chief
protected him, fending off attacking tribes until word was sent to nearby US
forces. †. Gen 19:9a . . But they said: Step aside!
This fellow; they said; came here as an alien, and already he acts the judge! People
like the Sodomites instinctively know that what they're doing is wrong, but God
pity the soul that dares to tell them so because their kind's feelings don't
get hurt by criticism; instead, they get angry. Lot
called them friends, but when push came to shove, they regarded him as an
outsider. And one thing you just don't do as an outsider is impose either your
values or your beliefs upon others. They will deeply resent you for it--
whether you are right or wrong has nothing to do with it. †.
Gen 19:9a . . Now we will deal worse
with you than with them. And they pressed hard against the person of Lot, and
moved forward to break the door. Talk
about a thoughtless lynch mob! Those people totally forgot that not that long
ago Lot's uncle saved them all from slavery in a foreign land-- and this is how
they reciprocate Abraham's kindness; by assaulting his nephew? †. Gen 19:9b-11 . . But the men stretched out
their hands and pulled Lot into the house with them, and shut the door. And the
people who were at the entrance of the house, young and old, they struck with
blinding light, so that they were helpless to find the entrance. (chuckle)
That'll learn em' to keep one eye shut when somebody trips a flare. The flash
was totally unexpected and must have startled Lot right out of his socks. Up to
now, he was given no hint that the two men under his roof were anything but
ordinary travelers. "Giminy! Where did all that light come from? There was
no thunder. Was it some sort of stealth lightening? How'd you guys do that
anyway? Is it patented?" Normally
it takes about twenty minutes for visual purple in the human eye to adjust to
darkness after a sudden burst of bright light. The flash didn't actually damage
anyone's eyesight so that they went blind. It just made their surroundings
difficult to see, like when someone pops your photo in dim light with a camera. The
situation now takes on a desperate atmosphere of survival. The crowd has turned
into an ugly mob; and it's fight or flight-- no other options. The Lord's
messengers chose flight because their purpose was not to remain in Sodom, but
to leave it in ashes. †. Gen 19:12-13 . .Then the men said to Lot:
Whom else have you here? Sons-in-law, your sons and daughters, or anyone else
that you have in the city-- bring them out of the place. For we are about to
destroy this place; because the outcry against them before The Lord has become
so great that the Lord has sent us to destroy it. Lot
was like Noah in that his kin, no matter whether they were pious or impious,
had the option of going out with him to safety if they wanted. Lot's
head must have been reeling. Only just a few hours ago he was laid back, catching
up on all the latest news and gossip at the gate; and on the way home to eat
dinner with his family at the end of another routine day. In a succession of
rapidly developing events beyond his control; within 24 hours, before the next
sunrise, he would lose his home, his way of life, all his friends, his career,
and all the wealth and possessions and property and livestock the Lots had
accumulated in the 24 years they had lived in the land of Canaan. My
gosh! He is so caught off guard and must have been terribly shocked at the tone
of those two men. The awful realization of who they were and why they came to
Sodom slowly began to gel in his befuddled mind. I
feel so sorry for him and his family. Calamity, like a 9.0 earthquake right out of the blue, pounced on them, and came to
ruin their life. They will take nothing with them but some suit cases, the
clothes on their backs, and the breath in their lungs. Lot was a well-to-do
cattle baron; but he is just a few hours away from poverty and losing his entire
life's work in a fiery inferno. (cf. 1Cor 3:11-15) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Wed, Aug 19th - 7:57AM
Genesis
19:1-4 †. Gen 19:1a . . And there came two angels to
Sodom The
word for "angels" is from mal'ak
(mal-awk') from a root meaning to dispatch as a deputy; viz: a messenger;
specifically of God, i.e. an angel and/or a prophet, priest or teacher--
someone who speaks for and/or represents another. Mal'ak
doesn't eo ipso indicate a celestial being; because the word is focused more on
an office or a function rather than a person. According to verse 3, these
angels were capable of consuming food the same as were Abraham's human guests
up in Hebron. According to verse 10, they were gender specific; viz: males. So
from all outward appearances, these particular mal'aks were normal, fully
functioning human beings. †. Gen 19:1b . . in the evening, The
word for "evening" is 'ereb
(eh'-reb) which technically means dusk; which Webster's defines as: the darker
part of twilight after sundown. It's the same word as the evenings of Gen
1:5-31. 'ereb
is a bit ambiguous. In spite of its technical meaning; 'ereb doesn't eo ipso
indicate twilight. It can also indicate any daytime hour between high noon and
sunset e.g. Sam 17:16 where Goliath taunted Israel twice a Day-- once in the
morning, and once in the afternoon. On
the surface, the two men appear to be ordinary travelers pulling into town for
the night after a day's journey. That's a sensible choice. Sodom was walled,
and much safer than camping out in the field where they would be vulnerable to
brigands and/or wild animals. In those days, the Jordan valley had lions in it
and Canaan was still pretty much out on the lawless frontier. †. Gen 19:1c . . as Lot was sitting in the gate
of Sodom. In
those days the gate vicinity was an important civic location where people could
pick up the latest news and conduct public business like elections, marriages,
notary public, municipal court, rallies, and soap-box speeches. It was in the
gate of Bethlehem where Ruth's husband Boaz defended her cause and claimed the
woman of Moab for his wife. (Ruth 4) Lot
probably wrapped up every one of his days at the gate before going on home;
kind of like an ancient Miller time. Even today, either a newspaper or a
television news program caps the day for many men in America. †. Gen 19:1d . .When Lot saw them, he rose to
greet them Don't
miss this man's courteous manners. Even living amongst the wickedest people in
the whole region, Lot still practiced his uncle's brand of hospitality. No
doubt a result of the years he spent under Abraham's wing. Actually Lot was a
very good man in spite of his town's reputation. He stood out like a carnation
blooming in a landfill. †. Gen 19:1e-2a . . bowing low with his face to
the ground, he said: Please, my lords, turn aside to your servant's house to
spend the night, and bathe your feet; then you may be on your way early. Bowing
low is both an act of worship and/or deference to one's superiors. The word is shachah (shaw-khaw') the same word used
at Gen 22:5 for Abraham's worship during the course of offering his son Isaac
as a burnt offering; and during Abraham's bargaining with Heth's kin at Gen
23:7. The
word for "lords" that Genesis' author chose for the messengers is 'adown (aw-done') which is a nondescript
title of respect and can apply to ordinary human beings like as in Rachel's
respect for her father Laban in Gen 32:35. Coupled
with hospitality, was no doubt Lot's fear for these stranger's safety. Lot knew
Sodom, and knew what might happen to those men if they stayed anywhere else but
in his home and behind his walls. Exactly
why Lot took an interest in these men's safety isn't stated. It could be that
they were gentle and unarmed; thus, by all appearances, easy prey for the
town's rather undignified forms of entertainment. †. Gen 19:2b . . But they said: No, we will
spend the night in the square. Their
response was most likely a customary refusal, with the intention of accepting
Lot's hospitality only after some polite resistance to test the sincerity of
his offer. Their response to Lot is somewhat different than the response of the
men who visited Abraham. Those accepted Abraham's offer immediately, and
without resistance. †.
Gen 19:3 . . But he insisted, so they
turned his way and entered his house. He prepared a feast for them and baked
unleavened bread, and they ate. The
Hebrew word for "unleavened" is matstsah
(mats-tsaw') which essentially refers to an unfermented cake or loaf; in other
words: bread made with sweet dough rather than sour dough. In
this day and age of cultured yeast it's not easy to explain what the Bible
means by leavened and unleavened. Well; the primary difference between the two
terms isn't ingredients; rather, the primary difference is age; for example: "Let
us therefore celebrate the feast, not with old leaven" (1Cor 5:8) If
there is an old leaven, then there must be a new leaven; just as there is an
old wine and a new wine. Old
leaven can refer to a batch of dough that's going bad, i.e. fermented; which,
given time, dough will do on its own without the addition of yeast because all
flour, no matter how carefully it's milled and packaged, contains a percentage
of naturally-occurring fungi. New leaven, then, would refer to a time in the
life of the dough before the flour's naturally-occurring fungi has time to
spoil the product; for example: "So
the people took their dough before it was leavened, with their kneading bowls
bound up in the clothes on their shoulders." (Ex 12:34) That
gives an idea of how quickly God moved the people out of Egypt after slaying
all the firstborn. They had made bread with unfermented dough for that night's
meal in accord with the law of the Passover instituted in the 12th chapter of
Exodus. Anyway,
point being; Lot served his guests fresh bread made with fresh dough rather
than day-old bread or bread made with dough that's been sitting around for a
while. Bread made with sour dough is reasonably safe to eat, we know that, so
serving his guests bread made with aged dough wouldn't have been a health
issue. I like to think that Lot served his honored guests unleavened bread as
an act of courtesy rather than necessity. Giving people your best, rather than
your less than best, shows that you think highly of them; which is doubtless
the very meaning of unleavened in 1Cor 5:7-8. (cf. John 14:15 and John 14:23) †. Gen 19:4 . .They had not yet lain down, when
the townspeople, the men of Sodom, young and old-- all the people to the last
man --gathered about the house. The
word for "men" is from 'enowsh
(en-oshe') : an ambiguous word that means: a mortal; a human being in general
(singly or collectively). It can also mean: husband, person, and people. So
it wasn't just the males; it was everybody, young and old, gathered around
Lot's door. All of the women, all of the kids, and all of the men. The entire
town. It was an event, and nobody wanted to miss it. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Tue, Aug 18th - 10:03AM
Genesis
18:23-33 †. Gen 18:23a . . Abraham came forward Abraham
"came forward" in that he became somewhat assertive in this next
scene. He was sort of like a godfather to the Sodomites, in spite of their
decadence. That is amazing; yet, is so typical of the really holy men in the
Bible to intercede for people who certainly didn't deserve it. (e.g. Ex
32:30-35) There's
nothing intrinsically wrong in taking the initiative to speak with God. After
all, if people always waited for God to speak first before they ever said a
word in prayer, hardly anybody would talk to God at all. Not that God is shy,
it's just that He rarely ever says anything out loud, so a normal person would
tend to think The Almighty was indifferent to His creations. But that just
isn't true. We know from the Bible that God desires a rapport with everyone. Some
people wait until they're desperate and out of options before turning to God.
But it is so insulting to treat God like a spare tire or a First Aid kit. It's
better to begin a rapport with Him early, now, before a crisis occurs. (cf.
Prov 1:24-33) †. Gen 18:23b . . and said: Will You sweep away
the innocent along with the guilty? The
answer to that is of course a resounding YES! "I,
the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on
the children, and on the third and the fourth generations of those who hate
Me." (Deut 5:9) FAQ: How is that
fair: holding children responsible for what their parents do? A: Ex 20:5--
along with Ex 34:7, Num 14:18, and Deut 5:9 --is often construed to mean that
children are held responsible for their parents' sins; but that isn't it. What
we're looking at here is collateral damage. It is apparently God's prerogative
to get back at people by going after their posterity and/or the people they
govern. There's
a horrific example of collateral damage located at Num 16:25-34. Another is the
Flood. No doubt quite a few underage children drowned in that event due to
their parents' wickedness. The same no doubt happened to the children in Sodom
and Gomorrah. Ham's punishment for humiliating Noah was a curse upon his son
Canaan. And during Moses' face-off with Pharaoh, God moved against the man's
firstborn son along with all those of his subjects. There
are times when God chooses to punish people by going after not only themselves;
but also the things that pertain to them; including, but not limited to, their
progeny. I don't quite understand the logic of that kind of justice; but then again:
I don't try; I just go along with it; primarily because it's futile to find
fault with God. Although
Lot was living in a very bad environment, and among very bad people who caused
him much mental and emotional stress (2Pet 2:4-9) it didn't eo ipso make Lot
himself a bad man. In the final analysis, when it was time to make an end of
Sodom, God made a difference between Lot and Sodom and got him out before it
was too late. It's horrible to contemplate that some civilizations are so far
gone that it's necessary to nuke 'em from orbit and start all over from
scratch. †. Gen 18:24-25 . . What if there should be
fifty innocent within the city; will You then wipe out the place and not
forgive it for the sake of the innocent fifty who are in it? Far be it from You
to do such a thing, to bring death upon the innocent as well as the guilty, so
that innocent and guilty fare alike. Far be it from You! Shall not the Judge of
all the earth deal justly? I
think Abraham's question was more rhetorical than anything else. Of course the
Judge of all the earth deals justly; no true man of faith would ever seriously
question his maker's integrity. †. Gen 18:26-33 . . And the Lord answered: If I
find within the city of Sodom fifty innocent ones, I will forgive the whole place
for their sake. Abraham spoke up, saying: Here I venture to speak to my Lord, I
who am but dust and ashes: What if the fifty innocent should lack five? Will
You destroy the whole city for want of the five? And He answered: I will not
destroy if I find forty-five there. But he spoke to Him again, and said: What
if forty should be found there? And He answered: I will not do it, for the sake
of the forty. . . . And he
said: Let not my Lord be angry if I go on; what if thirty should be found
there? And He answered: I will not do it if I find thirty there. And he said: I
venture again to speak to my Lord; what if twenty should be found there? And He
answered: I will not destroy, for the sake of the twenty. And he said: Let not
my Lord be angry if I speak but this last time; what if ten should be found
there? And He answered: I will not destroy, for the sake of the ten. When the
Lord had finished speaking to Abraham, He departed; and Abraham returned to his
place. I'm
guessing Abraham stopped at ten because he assumed there had to be at least
that many righteous in Sodom who didn't deserve to die; but according to Peter;
he was wrong. There was only one: and that's all there was in Noah's day too.
(Gen 7:1) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Mon, Aug 17th - 8:59AM
Genesis
18:21-22 †.
Gen 18:21a . . I will go down to see whether they have acted altogether
according to the outcry that has reached Me; The
word for "outcry" is from tsa'aqah
(tsah-ak-aw') which means: a shriek. The same word was in chapter 4 to describe
the cry of Abel's blood from the ground and also in Exodus to describe the cry
of Moses' people under the heel of Egyptian slavery. Have
you ever been so annoyed by someone's speaking that you wanted to cover your
ears, close your eyes, grit your teeth and just yell out: SHUT. . . UP! Sodom
was so bad that even the Earth itself couldn't tolerate them any longer; it
just wanted to cover its ears, close its eyes, grit its teeth and shout ENOUGH
ALREADY! Sadly, there are some people of whom it can be honestly said that the
world is a much better place without them. But
isn't Yhvh supposed to be omniscient? Then why does He have to go investigate
for Himself to see if the reports coming across His desk regarding Sodom are
true? And isn't He supposed to be omnipresent? Then why is Yhvh talking as if
He hasn't been down to visit Sodom lately? Because . . Abraham wasn't talking
to the supreme of all beings in person. He was talking to a celestial messenger
with the authority to act on God's behalf: to speak for God, to speak as God,
to be spoken to as God, and to use God's name for itself. The
supreme of all beings is remote, and removed; concealed within a forbidden city
and intense illumination where nobody can either see Him, approach Him, nor
relate to Him, nor even so much as listen to His actual voice. (John 1:18, John
5:37, 1Tim 6:16) The
Old Testament's Yhvh is a most surprising, enigmatic being. The
Old Testament's Yhvh fills Man's need for someone who relates well to Man, and
also relates well to the hidden being, so that Man and the inaccessible, hidden
being can maintain a viable diplomatic relationship with each other. Targum
authors, at a loss to explain the existence of what they perceived as two
persons named Yhvh, labeled the second one "The Word of the Lord God"
which is a pretty good expedient since words are used to communicate, and to
convey thoughts and ideas. Talmudic writers identified the second Yhvh as the
angel Metatron-- a celestial being whose name is his Master's. The New
Testament follows the thinking of the Targums in identifying one of the Yhvhs
as God's word. "In
the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He
was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him
nothing was made that has been made." (John 1:1-3) †. Gen
18:21b . . if not, I will take note. Doesn't
everyone have a right to face their accuser and defend themselves? Yes. That is
one of America's basic human rights; and also a Divine law (Num 35:30, Deut
17:6-7, Deut 19:15). Yhvh can't just act upon rumors and hearsay like some sort
of heavenly kangaroo court. No, He has to investigate, and establish the truth
of every fact for Himself before moving against Sodom. Their judgment will be
fair, and the case against them so air-tight, that even Sodom will have to
agree they have whatever's coming to them. Along
that same line; the dead won't go into the flaming sulfur depicted at Rev
20:11-15 without a fair trial. They'll be given ample opportunity to defend
themselves; and to know exactly why God feels they deserve to die. "But
I tell you that men will have to give account on the day of judgment for every
thoughtless word they have spoken. For by your words you will be acquitted, and
by your words you will be condemned." (Matt 12:36-37) "Enoch,
the seventh from Adam, prophesied about these men: See, the Lord is coming with
thousands upon thousands of his holy ones to judge everyone, and to convict all
the irreverent of all the irreverent acts they have done in an irreverent way,
and of all the harsh words irreverent sinners have spoken against him."
(Jude 1:14-15) The
Greek word for "convict" is from elegcho
(el-eng'-kho) and means: to confute, to admonish. So nobody will be sent to
Hell arbitrarily. The case against them will be made in a summary and
professional manner-- evidence will be introduced, and witnesses called for
testimony. Yhvh was given reports that the Sodomites were doing bad things; and
now He will go and see for Himself if those reports are, in fact, true or not.
The Bible's Yhvh is, after all, a rational, objective jurist rather than an
emotional, reactive vigilante. †.
Gen 18:22 . .The men went on from
there to Sodom, while Abraham remained standing before The Lord. A
plausible scenario is that all three men began walking towards Sodom, and then
one (earlier identified as Yhvh) stayed behind to conduct a private meeting
with Abraham. The
Targums say Abraham interceded for his nephew, but it would appear from the
Scripture that he interceded not just for Lot, but also for the citizens of
Sodom too. And that's to be expected. After all, Abraham was their savior; the
one who rescued them all from that awful Chedorlaomer back in chapter fourteen.
He couldn't just sit on his hands now and let them all die without making any
effort to save them from the wrath of God. This
is somewhat ironic. It's as if Abraham saved the people from El Ched only to be
barbecued in Sodom; viz: sort of like the cops shooting a felon during his
arrest, taking him to the hospital to save his life, then hauling him into
court after he's well enough to stand trial so he can be given the gas chamber. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Sun, Aug 16th - 10:25AM
Genesis
18:16-20 †.
Gen 18:16 . .The men set out from
there and looked down toward Sodom, Abraham walking with them to see them off. Looking
down towards Sodom is probably just another way to say aiming for Sodom. Many
of us just see our visitors out the front door. But, you know, it wouldn't hurt
to see them out to their cars too. Maybe even carry a few things for them. The
site of Sodom has never been found. Some believe it was at the south end of the
Dead Sea; but that's really only a guess. The destruction was so severe and so
complete that it's just impossible now to tell where it was. †.
Gen 18:17 . . Now the Lord had said:
Shall I hide from Abraham what I am about to do, Now
there's a pretty good yardstick of your standing with God. Do you know what is
on His agenda for tomorrow? Me neither. God doesn't confide in me for the
slightest thing. I don't even know what brand of toothpaste He uses in the
morning let alone His daily schedule. †.
Gen 18:18 . . since Abraham is to
become a great and populous nation and all the nations of the earth are to
bless themselves by him? Divine
purposes for Abraham elevated him to a very high degree of importance above
ordinary human beings; and God regarded the old boy not as a servant, but as a
member of Yhvh's inner circle of confidants. In point of fact; one of His
buddies (Isa 41:8). That is amazing. †. Gen 18:19 . . For I have singled him out,
that he may instruct his children and his progeny to keep the way of the Lord by
doing what is just and right, in order that the Lord may bring about for
Abraham what He has promised him. In
order for Yhvh's statement to be meaningful it has to imply that Abraham
possessed a knowledge of what is just and right in harmony with what Yhvh feels
is just and right rather than a humanistic knowledge. The US Supreme Court's
justices obviously don't have a knowledge of what is just and right in harmony
with Yhvh's because they seldom agree on anything and their rulings are
opinions rather than absolutes. Getting
all of Abraham's progeny to do what is just and right has been a bit of a
challenge for Yhvh down through the centuries. Some have; but typically not
all. NOTE: Yhvh's
prediction no doubt included Ishmael, so I wouldn't be surprised if by the time
Abraham emancipated his mom, the boy had more of "the way of the
Lord" under his belt than quite a few modern pew warmers. †. Gen 18:20 . .Then the Lord said: The outrage
of Sodom and Gomorrah is so great, and their sin so grave! It's
true that the people of Sodom indulged in sexual impurity; but that's not the
only thing about their manner of life that chafed God. They
weren't just your every-day, average garden variety of sinners. According to
Gen 13:13, they were not only very wicked sinners; but very wicked sinners
"against The Lord"; in other words: they were insolent; which
Webster's defines as: exhibiting boldness or effrontery; viz: impudence. People
like that are defiant to the bone-- they make a point of standing up to others
and asserting their independence and they don't care whose feelings get hurt by
it. Some
of The Lord's statements, spoken to shame His people, shed additional light on the
nature of Sodom's wickedness. "For
Jerusalem has stumbled, and Judah has fallen, because their speech and their
actions are against The Lord, to rebel against His glorious presence. The
expression of their faces bears witness against them, and they display their
sin like Sodom; they do not even conceal it." (Isa 3:8-9) "What
I see in the prophets of Jerusalem is something horrifying: adultery and false
dealing. They encourage evildoers, so that no one turns back from his
wickedness. To Me they are all like Sodom, and [all] its inhabitants like
Gomorrah." (Jer 23:14) "Only
this was the sin of your sister Sodom: arrogance! She and her daughters had
plenty of bread and untroubled tranquility; yet she did not support the poor
and the needy. In their haughtiness, they committed abomination before Me; and
so I removed them, as you saw." (Ezk 16:49-50) Sodom
is widely reputed for its carnal depravity. but as you can see from those
passages above, they were a whole lot more unrighteous than that. One of the most
interesting of their sins was that they did nothing to discourage wickedness.
They actually applauded evildoers and encouraged them to keep it up. Added to
that was arrogance, and a lack of charity-- indifference to the plight of the
poor --and haughtiness, dishonesty, partiality, insulting the glory and dignity
of God, and bragging about all of it. Since
God had not yet proclaimed any official laws specifically prohibiting the
Sodomites' conduct, then He really couldn't prosecute them in that respect. So
then, what was His justification for nailing them? It was for the very same
attitude that nails everybody; both pre Flood and post-Flood. "This
is the condemnation: that the light has come into the world, and men loved
darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For everyone
practicing evil hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds
should be exposed." (John 3:18-21) So
then, the Sodomites were not only indifferent to God's wishes; but they
deliberately avoided knowing them just as Moses' people themselves did in later
years to come. "But
they refused to hearken, and pulled away the shoulder, and stopped their ears,
that they should not hear. Yea, they made their hearts as an adamant stone,
lest they should hear the law and the words which The Lord of hosts hath sent
in His spirit by the former prophets: therefore came a great wrath from The
Lord of hosts." (Zech 7:11-12) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Sat, Aug 15th - 9:37AM
Genesis
18:9-15 †. Gen 18:9a . .They said to him: Where is your
wife Sarah? So
far, Sarah has been hearing about her impending child only from her husband.
But now, the speaker is intent that she should hear the news from somebody a
little higher up the food chain. †. Gen 18:9b . . And he replied: There, in the
tent. At
this point, the speaker no doubt intentionally raised his voice a bit to ensure
little Miss Eavesdropper would hear what he had to say. †. Gen 18:10 . .Then one said: I will return to
you next year, and your wife Sarah shall have a son! Some
versions read: "The Lord said". But the word Yhvh is nowhere in the Hebrew of that verse. NOTE: Some
translations of the Bible are not purely translations. They're actually
amalgams of translation + interpretation. Caveat Lector So
on the face of it, the stranger is making two predictions. 1) he'll be back
around again, and 2) Sarah is going to have a son. †. Gen 18:11 . . Sarah was listening at the
entrance of the tent, which was behind him. Now Abraham and Sarah were old,
advanced in years; Sarah had stopped having the periods of women. Some
things can't be postponed indefinitely. "To
everything there is a season: a time for every purpose under heaven" (Ecc
3:1) There
is a time in life for children: if it's missed, there's no going back and
making up for lost time. Many an independent woman has been painfully awakened
by her biological clock-- putting off children to get ahead in her career, and
then one day; it's either too late, too inconvenient, or too difficult. Let's
say that a girl puts off conception until she's, say; 32-34. Think about that.
By the time her first child is ready for kindergarten, she'll be pushing 40.
Mothers that old could actually be classified as late bloomers because the
average age of first-time mothers, depending upon where they live, is around
20-24; and in many cultures; it's a lots earlier than that. Let me tell you
something that should go without saying: it's much easier to be a young mother
than an old one. And
age makes a difference for the children too. As women age, their minds mature
bringing them ever closer to that dreaded generation gap; viz: it is much
easier for a young mother to relate to her young children than an older woman;
who oftentimes can no longer hear the bell, if you know what I mean. Some
things wait for no man. Sunset is one of those things. Relentlessly, hour upon
hour, the sun moves across the sky towards its inevitable rendezvous with the
western horizon. Our lives are just like that. Sunrise - Sunset. Game over. †. Gen 18:12a . . And Sarah laughed to herself,
saying: Now that I am withered, am I to have enjoyment Sarah
was no doubt thinking to herself that if this stranger knew how old she was; he
wouldn't be making such a ridiculous prediction. †. Gen 18:12b . . with my lord so old? Actually,
at this time in his life; Abraham himself had some problems and probably could
benefit from a little Viagra; if you know what I mean. (cf. Rom 4:19, Heb
11:12) There's
another problem associated with the aging process that doesn't get a lot of
press these days in an era of older parents. Men aren't born with all their
sperm cells at once the way women are born with all their eggs at once. The
men's little guys are manufactured fresh on a daily basis, so as men age, their
sperm cells are progressively of a lower quality than the previous batch
because the men's bodies are deteriorating with age; subsequently there's a
higher risk of birth defects in children fathered by aging men. There's
also the reality of a progressively decreasing sperm count in aging men so that
even if their little guys are viable, it's increasingly difficult to put enough
soldiers on the front lines to win the battle. But even that's only if elderly
men's wells haven't run dry; if you know what I mean. The people in Sarah's day
probably knew all this by practical life-experience rather than by scientific
study and discovery. †.
Gen 18:13-14 . .Then Yhvh said to
Abraham: Why did Sarah laugh, saying; Shall I in truth bear a child, old as I
am? Is anything too wondrous for Yhvh? I will return to you at the time next
year, and Sarah shall have a son. Yhvh
didn't quote Sarah verbatim-- He actually paraphrased her words to say what she
meant; rather than what she spoke. That's important to note; and tells me that
it really isn't all that important to quote Scripture precisely so long as you
don't lose, or change, its meanings. There's a lot of that in the New
Testament; and certainly in the Targums too. It
isn't said exactly from whence the voice of Yhvh came: whether it was one of
the men speaking or a voice in the air. However, Yhvh did show up and do
"as He had spoken." (Gen 21:1) †. Gen 18:15a . . Sarah lied, saying; "I
didn't laugh" for she was frightened. Sarah
hadn't actually laughed out loud, but "to herself". When she realized
that one of the men could read her thoughts, she became nervous: and who
wouldn't? †. Gen 18:15b . . But He replied: You did
laugh. Most
men would have jumped right to their wife's defense. Abraham had at least 300
armed men in his camp who would do anything he asked; but knowing by now
exactly who these men really were, Abraham kept his cool. The
word used to describe Abraham's visitors is 'iysh
(eesh) which is a gender-specific word that means: a man as an individual or a
male person. It is also the word used to specify the male gender among the
animals taken aboard the Ark. (Gen 7:2) This
passage strongly suggests that Abraham and Sarah saw Yhvh as a fully
functioning man. As to whether the person they saw was an actual human being or
a human avatar; I don't know and I'm afraid to even hazard a guess. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Fri, Aug 14th - 9:14AM
Genesis
18:1-8 †. Gen 18:1a . .The Lord appeared to him by the
terebinths of Mamre; The
Hebrew word for "appeared" is ra'ah
(raw-aw') which doesn't necessarily indicate a visible apparition. The word is
really ambiguous. It has several meanings; one of which simply indicates a
meeting. It's certain that Jehovah was present during this meeting but uncertain
whether He was physically present; though not impossible. (cf. Ex 24:9-11) The
three men upon whom we are about to eavesdrop are said by some to be angels;
but the Hebrew word for angel is nowhere in the entire narrative. This
visit occurred very shortly after the last one because Isaac wasn't born yet
and his birth had been predicted in 17:21 to be little more than a year away. Mamre's
terebinths were a grove of oak trees situated near modern day Hebron about 20
miles south of Jerusalem at an elevation of 3,050 feet above sea level. †. Gen 18:1b-2a . . he was sitting at the
entrance of the tent as the day grew hot. Looking up, he saw three men standing
near him. It
wouldn't be accurate to think of Abraham's tent as something akin to a
hiker/camper's basic portable shelter. Bedouin sheiks lived in pavilions, since
they served as the family's home. The
entrance of the tent likely had a large canopy over it like a roofed porch so
that Abraham wasn't sitting out in the sun, but rather in the shade. Poor guy's
heart must have stopped when he looked up at these three guys just standing
there saying nothing. I'm not sure if Abraham was aware at this point that one
of those men was Yhvh. So his next reactions are very interesting. They reveal
just how hospitable this rich and famous sheik was to total strangers. †. Gen 18:2b-3a . . As soon as he saw them, he
ran from the entrance of the tent to greet them and, bowing to the ground, he
said: My lords, Abraham
was 99 so I don't think he actually sprinted. The word ruwts (roots) can mean
either to run or just simply to hurry. The
word for "lords" is from 'adown
(aw-done') and/or the shortened 'adon
(aw-done') which mean: sovereign (human or divine. 'Adown is a versatile word
often used as a courteous title of respect for elders and or superiors; for
example Sarah spoke the very same word of her husband at Gen 18:12, Rachel
addressed her dad by it at Gen 31:5, and Jacob addressed his brother Esau by
'adown at Gen 33:8. †. Gen 18:3b-5a . . if it please you, do not go
on past your servant. Let a little water be brought; bathe your feet and
recline under the tree. And let me fetch a morsel of bread that you may refresh
yourselves; then go on-- seeing that you have come your servant's way. There
was a custom in the Olde American West that when travelers came by your spread,
it was considered neighborly to offer them a meal and some tobacco, along with
water and provender for their horses. This sometimes was the only means of
support for off-season, unemployed cowboys known as drifters and saddle bums;
but what the hey, you took the good with the bad; no questions asked. Traveling
was neither a tourist's vacation nor a Sunday drive in Abraham's day. No cushy
motels, no gas stations or convenience stores. It was very far in between
communities and few people along the way so a camp like Abraham's was a welcome
sight in that day. You
can imagine how refreshing it would be on a hot day to soak your feet in a tub
of cool water and recline in the shade of a big oak tree. In an era without
refrigeration, electric fans, and/or air conditioning, that was just about the
best there was to offer. Anyway it all just goes to show that Abraham was a
very hospitable man, and really knew how to make people feel at home. †.
Gen 18:5b . .They replied: Do as you
have said. There
is something here important to note. Although the text says "they"
replied, it doesn't mean all three men spoke at once, nor spoke in turn. If
only one in a group speaks, and the others are silent, it's understood to mean
the others are consensual; and that the one speaks for all if no one objects or
has anything to add. †.
Gen 18:6-8a . . Abraham hastened into
the tent to Sarah, and said: Quickly, three seahs of choice flour! Knead and
make cakes! Then Abraham hurried to the herd, took a calf, tender and choice,
and gave it to a servant-boy, who hastened to prepare it. He took curds and
milk and the calf that had been prepared and set these before them; The
word for "calf" is from baqar (baw-kawr')
which means: beef cattle or an animal of the ox family; of either gender. It's
interesting that Abraham served beef. In the early days of olde California; the
Spanish Franciscans raised cows primarily for their hides and tallow; and found
a ready market for those products in the east. Tallow of course was used for
candles, soap, and lubricants; and the hides for leather goods like shoes,
gloves, saddles, reins, and hats. In those days, pork and fowl were the
preferred table meats. It was actually the change-over from pork to relatively
cheap Texas longhorn beef that fueled the cattle baron era of the 1800's. The
word for "curds" is from chem'ah
(khem-aw') which means: curdled milk, or cheese. Later to come Kosher laws
would forbid serving dairy and meat together; but in Abraham's day it didn't
matter. The
only ingredient listed for the cakes (which probably resembled English muffins)
is choice flour, suggesting that Sarah made them with fresh dough rather than
from a batch of dough that's been sitting around for a while. With
a little imagination, one could confect a pretty decent deli sandwich from what
Abraham put on their plates. Anyway, all this took an appreciable amount of
time; like preparing a thanksgiving dinner from scratch; including butchering
the turkey. Plus, they cooked in those days by means of open flame and/or
wood-fired ovens so it's not like Abraham served the men packaged meals warmed
up in a microwave oven. Poor
Sarah; she must have been stressed due to the unexpected guests messing up her
daily routine. She probably hadn't planned to do any serious cooking that day
till later on towards evening when it was cooler. Women of that day literally
did slave over a hot stove, and many still do today in parts of the world. In
point of fact, the September 2017 issue of National Geographic Magazine
contains an article about this very thing. †.
Gen 18:8b . . and he waited on them under the tree as they ate. Targum
authors-- convinced the men were celestial beings --couldn't believe they would
actually partake of food. According to them, the foods were before them, but
they didn't actually eat it. T. and
[Abraham] served before them, and they sat under the tree; and he quieted
himself to see whether they would eat. (Targum Jonathan) In
major English versions of the Hebrew Bible-- e.g. The JPS and the Stone --Gen
18:8 is translated "they ate". It isn't translated that Abraham stood
by to see if they would eat, nor is it translated they pretended to eat, nor
that they appeared to eat. Genesis is quite clear: the men actually dined on
the food that Abraham set before them. (cf. Chabad.org) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Thu, Aug 13th - 9:26AM
Genesis
17:18-27 †. Gen 17:18 . . And Abraham said to God: O
that Ishmael might live by Your favor! Ishmael
is sometimes thought of as a sort of red-headed step child, but I tend to think
that Abraham really did love the boy. I can see that love at work here when
Abraham requested God's providence for him lest he become marginalized and
forgotten. †. Gen 17:19a . . God said: Nevertheless, Sarah
your wife shall bear you a son, God
had nothing personal against Ishmael; but he was not quite what The Lord had in
mind for the covenant's future. The one to perpetuate it had to be special;
viz: he couldn't be a "wild-burro of a man" nor "his hand
against every man's hand". In other words: God much preferred a peaceable
man. †. Gen 17:19b . . and you shall name him Isaac; Isaac's
name is Yitschaq (yits-khawk') which
means: laughter or mirth; sometimes in a bad way such as mockery. In other
places in the Old Testament, he goes by the name of Yischaq (yis-khawk') which
means: he will laugh, or, he thinks it's funny. (perhaps as a memorial to
Abraham's mirth at hearing the news of Sarah's imminent pregnancy.) †.
Gen 17:19c . . and I will maintain My
covenant with him as an everlasting covenant for his offspring to come. Much
of the covenant is of little interest to the average Gentile; but one portion
of it is very significant. It's this: "And
in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed" (Gen 22:18) The
blessing is generally related to the people of Israel. "Salvation
is of the Jews." (John 4:22) And
specifically related to Christ. "And
he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the
sins of the whole world." (1John 2:2) †. Gen 17:20 . . As for Ishmael, I have heeded
you. I hereby bless him. I will make him fertile and exceedingly numerous. He
shall be the father of twelve chieftains, and I will make of him a great nation. That
quite literally came true. Ishmael really did engender twelve chieftains. (Gen
25:12-16) I
don't know why so many people seem to think that Ishmael was only so much trash
to throw out and discard, like as if he were second-hand dish water or
something. No one should ever forget that he was Abraham's flesh and blood; his
first son and Abraham really loved that boy. God blessed him too; and took care
of him. He was circumcised in Abraham's home, which made him a permanent member
of Abraham's community; so modern Arabs do have a legitimate claim to Abraham
as their patriarch; but of course they have no such claim upon Isaac, or upon
Isaac's blessings. †. Gen 17:21a . . But My covenant I will
maintain with Isaac, whom Sarah shall bear to you at this season next year. Looks
like the Abrahams will be going shopping for a crib, a stroller, and a car seat.
Nothing like news of a baby to make the daddies start looking at their budgets.
:-) †. Gen 17:22 . . And when He was done speaking
with him, God was gone from Abraham. Don't
you just hate it when a supervisor lays down the law and then turns on their
heel and leaves the room? It immediately tells everyone that their boss's
agenda is not open to discussion. †. Gen 17:23 . .Then Abraham took his son
Ishmael, and all his home-born slaves and all those he had bought, every male
in Abraham's household, and he circumcised the flesh of their foreskins on that
very day, as God had spoken to him. That
was well over 300 grown men; not counting boys. (Gen 14:14) †.
Gen 17:24-27 . . Abraham was
ninety-nine years old when he circumcised the flesh of his foreskin, and his
son Ishmael was thirteen years old when he was circumcised in the flesh of his
foreskin. Thus Abraham and his son Ishmael were circumcised on that very day;
and all his household, his home-born slaves and those that had been bought from
outsiders, were circumcised with him. Abraham
was typically very prompt and did things in a timely manner. Trouble is; every
male in camp was disabled all at once. Thank goodness nobody attacked right
then or the PowerPuff Girls would have been forced to man the guns. NOTE: Ishmael was
thirteen when he was circumcised. It would be another year before Isaac was
born, and possibly three after that before Isaac was weaned; making Ishmael at
least seventeen or eighteen when Abraham emancipated his mom. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Wed, Aug 12th - 8:55AM
Genesis
17:15-17 †. Gen 17:15 . . And God said to Abraham: As
for your wife Sarai, you shall not call her Sarai, but her name shall be Sarah. Sarah's
original name was Saray (saw-rah'-ee)
which means: dominative. Webster's
defines "dominative" as: to exert the supreme determining or guiding
influence on-- in other words: bossy. Dominative isn't a desirable female
personality; assertive and controlling isn't something for a truly spiritual
woman to be proud of. Sarah (saw-raw')
means: a female noble; such as a Lady, a Princess, or a Queen. It's much
preferable for a woman to be known as a lady or a princess than as a
dominatrix. Changing
Sarai's name didn't actually change her personality; but it certainly reflected
her new God-given purpose. It was like a promotion to knighthood. The child she
would produce for Abraham became a very important, world-renowned human being
out of whom came kings and statesmen; and ultimately the savior of the world. If
I were required to pick just one woman in the Bible to venerate, it wouldn't be
Christ's mom; no, it would be Isaac's mom. Sarah is the supreme matriarch over
every one of the Messianic mothers who came after her. †. Gen 17:16 . . I will bless her; indeed, I
will give you a son by her. I will bless her so that she shall give rise to
nations; rulers of peoples shall issue from her. Sarah
now had a calling from God just like her slavette Hagar; who herself was given
a calling from God on the road to Shur. Sarah's calling was not much of a
calling. She wasn't called to go off to some foreign country as a missionary,
nor to open and operate hostels and orphanages in impoverished lands, nor head
up a local chapter of the March Of Dimes, nor muster an army like a Joan of
Arc. All in the world Sarah had to do for God was just be Isaac's mom. I
once heard a story about a lady who summarily announced to her pastor that God
called her to preach. The pastor thought for a second and then inquired: Do you
have any children? She answered: Yes. So he said: My; isn't that wonderful? God
called you to preach and already gave you a congregation. Motherhood
isn't a marginal calling. It is a serious calling that carries tremendous
responsibility, because the hands that rock the cradles quite literally do rule
the world. A mother can either ruin a child's potential or enhance it; she can
raise a decent human being, or raise a sociopathic monster. The
media typically focuses on physical child abuse while usually overlooking the
kind caused by mental cruelty. There are children out there whose self esteem
and sense of worth are in the toilet just by being in the home of a thoughtless
mother. One
child can enrich the lives of millions of people, and it's the moms who bring
them into the world, pick their boogers, change their dydees, teach them how to
brush their teeth and say their prayers, stay up late with their fevers, get
them in for their shots, pack them off to school, take them to the park, drive
them to ToysRus a thousand times, and cry at their weddings. The
dads have it easy. It's the moms who really pay the price for a child's future.
But a mom can just as easily destroy her child's future by abuse and neglect.
There are moms who have about as much love for their children as a dirty sock
or a broken dish; and regard them just as expendable. But
Sarah won't be like that. When she gets done with Isaac, he will be a well
adjusted grown-up having a genuine bond of love and trust with his mom and zero
gender issues with women. Isaac will see in Sarah the very kind of girl he
would like to marry; and when that one does come along, he won't let her get
away. †. Gen 17:17 . . Abraham threw himself on his
face and laughed, as he said to himself: Can a child be born to a man a hundred
years old, or can Sarah bear a child at ninety? God
had previously promised Abraham an heir but this is the first time He actually
specified who the biological mother would be. Was Abraham skeptical? Not this
time. No; he just thought it was hilarious for two old sag-bottomed, bloated
cod-fish gasbags like he and Sarah to have children. In other words: You've
gotta be kidding! "Without
weakening in his faith, he faced the fact that his body was as good as dead--
since he was about a hundred years old --and that Sarah's womb was also dead.
Yet he did not waver through unbelief regarding the promise of God, but was
strengthened in his faith and gave glory to God, being fully persuaded that God
had power to do what he had promised." (Rom 4:19-21) Mark
Twain once commented that faith is believin' what you know ain't so. Well; that
probably doesn't apply to Abraham because the Bible says he was
"persuaded" which is quite a bit different than faith in something
for which you have no good reason to believe is true. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Tue, Aug 11th - 9:35AM
Genesis
17:9b-14 †. Gen 17:9b . . you and your offspring to come
throughout the ages shall keep My covenant. The
word "keep" is from shamar
(shaw-mar') which means, properly: to hedge about (as with thorns), i.e.
guard, to protect, attend to. The
general meaning in this particular instance is: to preserve. †. Gen 17:10 . . Such shall be the covenant
between Me and you and your offspring to follow which you shall keep: every
male among you shall be circumcised. Circumcision
didn't begin with Abraham. It was practiced in Egypt as early as 2400 BC. Circumcision
doesn't serve to improve a man's physical appearance. Men were created whole;
and after God finished the six days of creation, He inspected everything and
graded it all very good. So circumcision doesn't correct design errors; but
actually mars a man's natural appearance. It renders him somewhat disfigured so
that he no longer bears a precise resemblance to his ancestor Adam-- nor will
he ever again. A circumcised man is still a human being; just altered somewhat. The
surgery doesn't impair sexual function so we can rule out the possibility that
God imposed circumcision on Abraham and his male progeny for the purpose of
discouraging romance. After all if a man's genital nerves were to be disabled,
it would be very difficult for men to procreate-- and that would conflict with
God's promise to Abraham that he would be fruitful and become very numerous. †. Gen 17:11 . .You shall circumcise the flesh
of your foreskin, and that shall be the sign of the covenant between Me and
you. The
word for "sign" is from 'owth
(oth). It's the very same word for the mark upon Cain, and the rainbow of
Noah's covenant. An 'owth not only labels things, but also serves as a memory
preserver; like the Viet Nam war memorial. Abraham's circumcision, like
rainbows and war memorials, is one of those "lest we forget"
reminders of important events. NOTE: The
"covenant between Me and you" isn't the covenant between God and the
Jews as per Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. That's an important
distinction. †.
Gen 17:12-13a . . And throughout the
generations, every male among you shall be circumcised at the age of eight
days. As for the home-born slave and the one bought from an outsider who is not
of your offspring, they must be circumcised, home-born, and purchased alike. Home-born
slaves were those born while Abraham owned its parents. The classification was
reckoned Abraham's offspring; viz: his sons; thus indicating that the Hebrew
word zera' is ambiguous and doesn't always identify one's biological progeny. The
Bible doesn't call ritual circumcision a baptism but it sure looks like a
species of baptism to me. Take for example the crossing of the Red Sea. The New
Testament calls it a baptism (1Cor 10:2) yet none of the people under Moses'
command got wet; they never even got damp. So baptisms come in a variety of
modes, and for a variety of purposes. The
implication is obvious: all males in Abraham's community (viz: his kingdom)
have to resemble Abraham in order to be bona fide registered members; which
means that a male Jew's genetics alone are not an eo ipso connection to
Abraham. He has to undergo the surgery too. †. Gen 17:13b-14 . .Thus shall My covenant be
marked in your flesh as an everlasting pact. And if any male who is
uncircumcised fails to circumcise the flesh of his foreskin, that person shall
be cut off from his kin; he has broken My covenant. The
"kin" in this regard is primarily Abraham but in later years came to
include one's tribal identity. Say a man's biological father was a biological
member of the tribe of Issachar, and for one reason or another never got around
to circumcising his son. Well;
until the son submits to the ritual, he cannot be counted among Issachar's
progeny. In point of fact, he cannot be counted as anybody's progeny; not even
Abraham's though Abraham is his biological ancestor. This
may seem a petty issue but in matters of inheritance, can have very serious
repercussions for the un-circumcised man. He's not only cut off from his kin,
but also from Abraham's covenant guaranteeing his posterity ownership of
Palestine and points beyond to the north, the south, the east, and the west.
The little piece of turf now occupied by the State of Israel is but a parking
lot in comparison to what God promised Abraham back in Gen 13:14-15. Also
included in the "covenant between Me and You" is the promise to
always be the god of Abraham's posterity. Well; until the uncircumcised son
undergoes circumcision, Yhvh is not his god. To
give an idea of just how serious God is about this ritual: After Moses was
commissioned to represent God in the Exodus; Yhvh rendezvoused with him and
came within an inch of taking his life over this very issue. "Now
it came about at an inn on the way that Yhvh met him and sought to put him to
death. Then Zipporah took a flint and cut off her son's foreskin and threw it
at Moses' feet, and she said: You are indeed a bloody bridegroom to me. So He
let him alone." (Ex 4:24-26) That
should be a sobering warning that anyone representing God is supposed to set
the example in all things. It's not do as I say, nor even do as I do; but do as
I have done. Anyway,
non-circumcised Jewish males aren't counted among Abraham's community; and that
was a law way before it was incorporated into the Jews' covenanted law as per
Ex 12:48-49 and Lev 12:2-3. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Mon, Aug 10th - 8:46AM
Genesis
17:6-9a †. Gen 17:6 . . I will make you exceedingly
fertile, and make nations of you; and kings shall come forth from you. The
only king who really matters is Messiah. "The
book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of
Abraham." (Matt 1:1) †. Gen 17:7a . . I will maintain My covenant
between me and you, and your offspring to come, The
word for "maintain" is quwm (koom)
which means: to rise (in various applications, literal, figurative, intensive
and causative). The very first instance of that word is Gen 4:8. "Cain
rose up against his brother Abel and killed him." That's
kind of negative. Here's a passage that really says what God meant. "Now
the priest of Midian had seven daughters. They came to draw water, and filled
the troughs to water their father's flock; but shepherds came and drove them
off. Moses rose to their defense, and he watered their flock. When they
returned to their father Reuel, he said: How is it that you have come back so
soon today? They answered: An Egyptian protected us from the shepherds; he even
drew water for us and watered the flock." (Ex 2:16-19) The
"offspring to come" was Isaac's and Jacob's rather than every last
one of Abraham's posterity. †. Gen 17:7b . . as an everlasting covenant
throughout the ages, Abraham's
covenant is permanent; has never been annulled, deleted, made obsolete,
abrogated, set aside, given to another people, nor replaced by another
covenant. In point of fact, even Christians benefit from Abraham's covenant.
(Eph 2:11-22 and Gal 3:26-28) God
promised Abraham He would guard the safety of this particular covenant Himself
personally. The covenant God made with Moses' people as per Deut 29:9-15
neither supersedes, amends, nor replaces the covenant God made with Abraham in
this chapter (Gal 3:17). Attempts been made to package all the covenants into a
single security like a Wall Street derivative similar to a collateralized debt
obligation (CDO). But that just creates a bubble and is really asking for
trouble. †. Gen 17:7c . . to be a god to you and to your
offspring to come. This
part of the covenant is somewhat conditional. It will only include those among
male Hebrews that undergo the circumcision coming up in the next few passages. †. Gen 17:8a . . I assign the land you sojourn
in to you and your offspring to come, Ownership
of the land is realized not only in Abraham's progeny alone. God said He
assigned the land not only to his offspring, but to "you" too.
Abraham didn't get to take possession of his promised holdings while he was
here, but in the future, he will. "You
will keep faith with Jacob, loyalty to Abraham, as You promised on oath to our
fathers in days gone by." (Mic 7:20) "And
I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down
with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven." (Matt 8:11) "By
faith Abraham, when called to go to a place he would later receive as his
inheritance, obeyed and went, even though he did not know where he was going.
By faith he made his home in the promised land like a stranger in a foreign
country; he lived in tents, as did Isaac and Jacob, who were heirs with him of
the same promise. For he was looking forward to the city with foundations,
whose architect and builder is God." (Heb 11:8-10) †. Gen 17:8b . . all the land of Canaan, as an everlasting
holding. Abraham's
progeny may not always occupy the land, and they may not always be in control
of it; but it remains deeded to them forever. †. Gen 17:8c . . I will be their god. The
wording of the covenant thus far hasn't been specific regarding the identity of
Abraham's offspring for whom El Shaddai will be their god. Later on it will
become clear that only the line through Isaac is effected. Neither Ishmael nor
any of the other brothers were granted rights to the land. †. Gen 17:9a . . God further said to Abraham:
As for you, The
next covenant is totally a guy thing; and incorporated into Israel's covenanted
law (Lev 12:2-3, John 7:22). The ladies are not a part of this one because
Abraham's progeny isn't engendered by the ladies; it's engendered by the guys.
The ladies are just baby mills. In the Bible, children inherit their tribal
affiliation and their family names from the fathers rather than the mothers. This
creates an interesting legality in Christ's case since there was no immediate
male involved in his conception. So then, the closest male in his biological
family tree defaults to Eli, his mother's father; which is how the Lord
obtained his biological position in the line of David and the tribe of Judah.
(The Lord's connection to the line of Solomon was via adoption rather than
genetics. I'll elaborate that issue when we get to Jacob's precedent in chapter
48) All
other considerations aside, the men of Abraham's line don't even have to mate
with women who are biologically related to Abraham because the ladies don't
perpetuate Abraham's line; the guys do. A Hebrew woman who bears the children
of a Gentile perpetuates Gentiles. Kids born in that situation are not
Abraham's offspring. Those are a Gentile man's offspring. "That
when an idolater or a slave cohabits with an Israelitish woman; their child is
illegitimate." (Yevamoth 99a, v36) In
other words, the child of a foreign man is not Abraham's biological progeny.
That fact alone should be very sobering for any Hebrew woman intent upon
marrying a Gentile. Her children won't be identified with Abraham. They will be
non Hebrews with no Divine connection to either Abraham, or to Abraham's
covenant. Her grandchildren will be Gentiles too; and on and on. Every
Hebrew woman who willingly, and willfully, bears the children of a Gentile is
nothing in the world but a traitor to Abraham's community, and spits upon the
sacred covenant that God made with her ancestor. She is no better than Esau who
valued his birthright on a par with a lousy bowl of soup. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Sun, Aug 9th - 7:49AM
Genesis
17:2-5 †.
Gen 17:2-3a . . I will establish My
covenant between Me and you, and I will make you exceedingly numerous. Abram
threw himself on his face; The
Hebrew word for "threw" is naphal
(naw-fal') and first appeared in Gen 14:10. It doesn't mean Abram dropped like
a sack of ready-mix concrete. It just means he lowered himself face down into a
prone position. This
is the very first time it's recorded that Abram (or anyone else) got into a
face-down prone position in the presence of God. But why would Abram do that?
In what way did God appear to him that motivated that reaction? The institution
of the covenant of circumcision is, in point of fact, the only other instance
where it's recorded that Abram met with God in the (deliberate) prone. When
Moses met God at the burning bush (Ex 3:2) he only turned away so he wouldn't
look at God; but didn't lie down. He stayed on his feet; but was told to remove
his sandals: a requirement which is seen only twice in the entire Old
Testament: once at Ex 3:5 and the other at Josh 5:15; the reason being that
Moses and Joshua met with God on holy ground. The
Hebrew word for "holy" is qodesh
(ko'-desh) and it has no reference whatsoever to sanitation. It simply means
consecrated; viz: a sacred place or thing dedicated to God for His own personal uses. In
many homes in the Orient; it's the custom to remove your shoes before entering
people's domiciles because shoes track in filth from the outside that hosts
want neither in their homes nor on their floors and rugs. True, holy ground is
dirt; but it's God's dirt, and apparently He doesn't want somebody else's dirt
soiling His: thank you very much. Abram
may have ordinarily met with God via voice only; but this instance may have
been a close encounter of a third kind. Some have suggested God appeared to
Abram as the Shekinah of 1Kgs 8:10-11; which, even that can be quite disturbing
for some. I
don't think Abram learned the prone posture in church, Sunday school, yeshiva,
or synagogue. It was a spontaneous, voluntary reaction on his part. Apparently
God was okay with it because He didn't scold Abram nor order him back up on his
feet. People
react differently to the Bible's God. Some, like Abram, Daniel, and Jesus
sometimes get down prone on their faces. We needn't worry too much about it
though. Most of us will never have a close encounter with The Almighty. But if
it ever happens, I don't think you'll need someone to tell you what to do.
Unfortunately though, there are people inclined to stare at God like a
curiosity. That is not wise. "Now
Mount Sinai was all in smoke, for the Lord had come down upon it in fire; the
smoke rose like the smoke of a kiln, and the whole mountain trembled violently.
The blare of the horn grew louder and louder. As Moses spoke, God answered him
in thunder. The Lord came down upon Mount Sinai, on the top of the mountain,
and the Lord called Moses to the top of the mountain and Moses went up. The Lord
said to Moses: Go down, warn the people not to break through to the Lord to
gaze, lest many of them perish." (Ex 19:18-21) Word
to the wise: If God appears? Don't look . . . unless invited to. †.
Gen 17:3b-4 . . and God spoke to him
further: As for Me, this is My covenant with you: You shall be the father of a
multitude of nations. That
announcement regards nations rather than individuals. Abram is well known as
the father of the Jews, but he is also father of more than just them. The
majority of Abram's progeny is Gentile and a very large number of those are
Arabs. Besides
Ishmael and Isaac, Abraham also engendered Zimran, Jokshan, Medan, Midian,
Ishbak, and Shuah. Over the years millions of people have descended from those
eight men who are all Abram's blood kin; both Jew and Gentile. †.
Gen 17:5 . . And you shall no longer
be called Abram, but your name shall be Abraham, for I make you the father of a
multitude of nations. Abraham's
original name was 'Abram (ab-rawm')
which means: high, or exalted father. In other words: a daddy; as the
respectable head of a single family unit. Abram's new name 'Abraham (ab-raw-hawm') means: father of a multitude of family
units. In other words: not just the paterfamilias of a single family unit; but
the rootstock of entire communities. Abraham
is a father on two fronts. He's a biological father to the people of Israel due
to their natural association with Jacob; and he's a non-biological father to
Christians due to their supernatural association with Christ. "If
you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the
promise." (Gal 3:29) Some
people try to construe Gal 3:29 to mean that Gentile Christians are somehow
spiritual Jews. But according to Eph 2:11-22 and Gal 3:26-28 that just isn't
true. And besides: Abraham was a Gentile. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Sat, Aug 8th - 9:13AM
Genesis
17:1 Thirteen
years go by since Ishmael's birth; enough time for Abram to easily forget God's
covenanted promises. Abram was prospering materially, Ishmael was growing into
young manhood, the land was at peace, and quite possibly Abram and Sarai had by
now given up all hope of ever having any children of their own because Sarai,
at 89, is past the age of bearing children. Abram
had no way of knowing, but God was just insuring that Sarai couldn't possibly
have children of her own except by a miracle, rather than via natural
reproduction. In other words; it appears to me that it was God's wish that He
be the paterfamilias of Sarai's one and only son; and therefore the
paterfamilias of the special line that descends from the son; viz: Jacob. Till
now, God spoke of a covenant with Abram only one time (Gen 15:18). In this
chapter God will use that word no less than thirteen-- nine times it will be
called "My" covenant, three times it will be called an
"everlasting" covenant and once it will be called "the covenant
between Me and you" †. Gen 17:1a . .When Abram was ninety-nine
years old, the Lord appeared to Abram and said to him: I am El Shaddai. "Shaddai"
is from Shadday (shad-dah'-ee) which
means: almighty. The word "El" is not actually in the original Hebrew
text but was penciled in by translators. God's declaration could just as well
be worded: I am all-mighty. Webster's
defines almighty as: having absolute control over everything; which of course
includes power over not just money and politics; but also power over all that
there is; e.g. magnetism, electricity, gravity, inertia, wind, thermodynamics,
pressure, fusion, radiation, light, and of course the power of life; which is a
power that nobody yet as of this date has been able to figure out. Humanity
knows even less about the power of life than it knows about the nature of dark
matter and dark energy. Anyway;
this is the very first occurrence of the word Shadday in the Bible; and from
here on in, from Genesis to Malachi, without exception, it will always refer to
the supreme being; and used to identify no other person. Almighty became a name
of God (cf. Rev 1:8) and was God's special revelation of Himself to Abram. Although
Abram was aware of God's other name Yhvh it was not by that name that Abram
became familiar with his divine benefactor. Abram's progeny would get to know
God better by the name Yhvh because it's a name of God with special emphasis
upon the aspect of rescue; whereas Shadday has special emphasis upon
providence. †. Gen 17:1b . .Walk in My ways and be
blameless. The
Hebrew word translated blameless is somewhat ambiguous. A common meaning is
"without blemish". Abram of course wasn't free of blemishes; but
according to Gen 26:5, God was satisfied with his performance. Walking
with God was introduced back at Gen 5:22-24. Enoch had it down pat; but
apparently Abram had a ways to go. Very few qualify as the kind of people with
whom God prefers to associate. He's picky that way. A
principle woven throughout both the Old Testament and the New is that worship
is meaningless when it's unaccompanied by pious conduct. Take for example the
first 23 verses in the first chapter of the book Isaiah. Moses'
people were attending Temple services on a regular basis. They were bringing
sacrifices and offering. They observed all the feasts, and all the holy days of
obligation. They prayed up a storm; and they kept the Sabbath. But Yhvh
rejected every bit of their covenanted worship because their personal conduct
was unbecoming. In other words: their conduct didn't compliment their worship.
Yhvh was disgusted with their hypocrisy: they made Him angry and gave Him a
headache; so to speak. Another
way then, that we might translate Gen 17:1b, is like this: "Walk
in My ways and be consistent." =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Fri, Aug 7th - 8:47AM
Genesis
16:13-16 †. Gen 16:13a . . And she called Yhvh who spoke
to her: You Are El-roi The
author of Genesis was privy to the identity of the mysterious person speaking
with Hagar but she wasn't, and that's why she gave him a name of her own. But I
cannot be certain what it is because there seems no consensus among translators
how best say it in English; neither in Jewish bibles nor in Christian bibles.
In Hebrew; the words are: 'Ataah 'Eel
R'iy The
1985 JPS Tanakh translates it: You are El-roi The
Stone Tanach translates it: You are the God of Vision Chabad.org
translates it: You are the God of seeing The
KJV translates it: Thou God seest me The
NIV Translates it: You are the God who sees me The
2011 Catholic Bible translates it: You are God who sees me. Hagar,
familiar with many gods in the Egyptian world, was unsure of the identity of
this particular divine being speaking with her so she gave it a pet name of her
own. I like it because her god is a personal god, one that meant something just
to her-- rather than some scary alien way out in space who doesn't care one
whit about individuals. Hagar's god knew about the baby and gave the little guy
a name. That is a very personal thing to do and must have been very comforting
to a girl at the end of her rope. What
took place between these two travelers is very precious. They met as strangers,
but before they parted, one named the other's baby and became godfather to a
runaway slave's child. The other gave her new god a pet name to remember him
by. Hagar's experience was very wonderful. †. Gen 16:13b . . by which she meant: Have I
not gone on seeing after He saw me! The
rendering of 16:13b is more or less an educated guess because the Hebrew in
that verse is very difficult. She could have said: Have I here seen him here
who sees me? In other words: The god who knows me is in this place? I can
appreciate her surprise. You might expect to find God in a grand Italian
cathedral, but certainly not along a dusty road in the middle of nowhere. And
you might also expect a divine being to speak with a President or a Pope, but
certainly not to an insignificant nobody who meant very little to anybody. †.
Gen 16:14 . .Therefore the well was
called Beer-lahai-roi; it is between Kadesh and Bered. Heretofore,
this particular source of water had no specific name. Beer-lahai-roi is another
Hebraic toughie. It could mean: The well of him who knows me. Kadesh
is located nearby El Quseima Egypt about 15 miles south of the border town of
Nizzana. Just northeast of there is the wilderness of Shur; a region adjoining
the Mediterranean to the north and the Suez canal to the west. Shur extends
somewhat south along the eastern shore of the Gulf of Suez. But
the well wasn't there. It was between Kadesh and Bered. The Onkelos Targum
renders Bered as Chaghra', which is the usual equivalent of Shur, while the
Jerusalem Targum renders it Chalutsah, which is also Shur (Ex 15:22). So
precisely where Hagar's well was located is totally unknown so far. It was just
somewhere between Kadesh and Shur. » I don't
think those of us living in modern industrialized countries like the U.S.A.
appreciate the importance of water in Hagar's part of the world. Those of us in
the Pacific Northwest and/or Hawaii sure don't. But without water; people die,
plants wither, birds fall out of the sky, and livestock eventually drops dead. Water,
in the form of humidity, fog, and/or liquid is literally life itself in some
parts of the world; ergo: to have that celestial being meet with Hagar at a
source of water in the Mideast is very significant; and only one of many such
meetings people in the Bible experienced with God and/or His designated
messengers. †. Gen 16:15 . . Hagar bore a son to Abram, and
Abram gave the son that Hagar bore him the name Ishmael. Hagar
must have told her master about the experience and darned if the old man didn't
believe her story and comply with God's choice of name for the boy. Taking part
in naming a boy was serious business in those days. In doing so, Abram
officially and publicly accepted Ishmael as his legal son. The boy was supposed
to be Sarai's son too, but there's no record she ever really accepted the lad. †. Gen 16:16 . . Abram was eighty-six years old
when Hagar bore Ishmael to Abram. That
was about eleven years after Abram entered Canaan (Gen 12:4) and 14 years
before Isaac's birth (Gen 21:5). Both of Ishmael's parents were Gentiles. Hagar
was an Egyptian and Abram was a Babylonian. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Thu, Aug 6th - 9:27AM
Genesis
16:9-12 †. Gen 16:9 . . And the angel of the Lord said
to her: Go back to your mistress, and submit to her harsh treatment. That
was no doubt the last thing Ms. Hagar would consider doing; even in a pinch.
But the Lord had plans for Hagar's baby about which she was unaware up to this
point. †.
Gen 16:10-11 . . And the angel of The
Lord said to her: I will greatly increase your offspring, and they shall be too
many to count. The angel of Yhvh said to her further: Behold, you are with
child and shall bear a son; you shall call him Ishmael, for Yhvh has paid heed
to your suffering. I
don't think any of us can possibly imagine just how incredulous Hagar must have
been at the stranger's words. He as much as assured her that the pregnancy
would go well and she would deliver safely. He even suggested a name for her
baby; which the angel predicted would be a boy. His name, by the way, would be [i]Yishma'
e'l[/i] (yish-maw-ale') which means: God will hear; or just simply: God hears;
or: God is aware. In other words: God had a sympathetic awareness of Hagar's
distress; together with a desire to alleviate it; which is pretty much the
definition of compassion. What
a great day for Hagar! She actually met a divine being who cared about her
state of affairs and was favorably inclined to do something about it. And every
time she called out little Ishmael's name, it would remind her to pray and
share her feelings with the god she met on the road to Shur. The angel would
make it possible for her to endure Sarai's harsh treatment; so He sent her
straight back to it. (cf. Gen 24:40, Gen 48:16, 2Cor 12:7-9) And
besides; though the circumstances weren't perfect, little Ishmael would fare
better under his father Abram's kindly patronage and mentoring than among the
irreverent polytheists down in Egypt. Abram was also very wealthy, so that
Ishmael lacked nothing during the approximately 17 years of his life in Abram's
home. †. Gen 16:12a . . He shall be an untamed-burro
of a man; Some
people just can't be domesticated-- right fresh out of the womb, they're
mustang-defiant to the bone. Poor Hagar. Her boy was going to be difficult. My
wife is a kindergarten teacher and every so often she gets kids in her class--
just little five year olds, and almost always boys --that cannot be controlled.
Their parents fear them, and they frighten the other kids. They're demon seeds--
stubborn, strong willed, totally self centered, self absorbed little Czars who
see no sense in either doing as they're told or concern for the feelings of
others. They are dangerous, and thank God my wife gets them while they're
small. Heaven help the teachers who cope with them in the upper grades. †. Gen 16:12b . . his hand against everyone,
and everyone's hand against him; T.E.
Laurence (Laurence of Arabia) discovered for himself the truth of that
prediction. After all of Laurence's work to unite the Arabs and lead them in
combat to drive the Turks out of Damascus, the various tribes simply could not
come to terms upon a central government for managing the city. So the task
defaulted to the British; viz: the Arabs won the conflict, but England won the
city. Anyway,
Mr. Ishmael was definitely not a team player by nature. This is the kind of guy
that supervisors dread. They're defensive, assertive, confrontational; and
don't do well in groups-- always generating friction and discontent. It's
either their own way, or the highway; and they do not like to be told what to
do. That's
not always a bad thing if people like that are channeled into occupations that
require rugged individualism. Nowadays these people can be enrolled in
sensitivity classes and taught how to be civil. And there are seminars available
for those who have to work with difficult people. Unfortunately, most of the
problem is hereditary so it's not an easy thing to make go away. However, it's
not impossible for these strong-willed, toxic types to learn a measure of
civility and self discipline when they put their minds to it. Ishmael's
personality-- which was engendered by one of the most holy men who ever lived;
not by some evil minded career criminal --must have passed along to his progeny
because the Arab world has never been famous for uniting and getting along
amongst themselves. No one would ever dream of criticizing Abram's parenting
skills, but here is a difficult child that came from the old boy's own genes;
thus demonstrating again that otherwise good parents can produce a demon seed
and shouldn't be blamed for the way the seed ultimately turns out. Ishmael
is well known as the father of the Arab world. But does that mean each
individual Arab is a wild burro? No, of course not. Stereotyping and/or
profiling, is a very bad thing because it's an oversimplified opinion, and
fails to take into account individual qualities. The Arab people as a whole
could safely be characterized as Ishmael-ish, but certainly not each and every
one. †. Gen 16:12c . . He shall dwell alongside of
all his kinsmen. Ishmael
would dwell "alongside" his brethren, but not necessarily amongst
them. This was no doubt a portent of the difficulty of uniting Arabs; which has
been attempted a number of times with The United Arab Republic, The Arab
Federation of Iraq and Jordan, the Federation of Arab Republics, the Arab
Islamic Republic, and the United Arab Emirates. Probably
the religion of Islam has done more to unite Arabs than any political
arrangement of the past has managed to do. Unfortunately, Muslims themselves
can't even get along all that well and their regional differences have become a
major impediment to peace in the Mid East. I
can't lay all the blame for the Mid East's troubles at the door of Arabs; but
of one thing I am totally convinced: there is never going to be peace in that
part of the world until (1) the religion of Islam is eradicated; and (2) the
Arabs' wild-burro personality is neutralized. "They
shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain: for the earth shall be full
of the knowledge of Yhvh, as the waters cover the sea." (Isa 11:9) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Wed, Aug 5th - 8:50AM
Genesis
16:4-8 †. Gen 16:4 . . He cohabited with Hagar and she
conceived; and when she saw that she had conceived, her mistress became lower
in her esteem. Before
this incident, Hagar knew her place and was humble and self effacing around
Sarai, but afterwards she regarded her mistress as somewhat less of a woman
than herself. There's no record of Hagar gloating over Sarai, but sometimes
women communicate just as effectively with "looks" as they do with
words. †. Gen 16:5 . . And Sarai said to Abram: The
wrong done me is your fault! I myself put my maid in your bosom; and now that
she sees that she is expecting, I am lowered in her esteem. The Lord decide
between you and me! Sarai
attempted to take the high moral ground by insinuating that had Abram been a
real man, he would've seen that sleeping with Hagar was a bad idea and refused.
Therefore it was his fault for not putting a stop to her idea before things got
out of hand. People
accuse God of the very same thing all the time. In their mind's eye, if God
were really as wise, loving, omniscient, and all-powerful as He's alleged to
be, then He would never have put the tree of the knowledge of good and evil in
the garden to begin with; and when the Serpent tempted Eve, He would have
stepped in and put a stop to it before things got out of hand. Therefore, they
conclude, it's not the human race's fault for being what it is: it's God's
fault for not protecting us from our own stupidity. †. Gen 16:6a . . Abram said to Sarai: Your maid
is in your hands. Deal with her as you think right. Abram
should never have given Sarai carte blanche to do as she pleased with Hagar. In
her mood, it would surely get out of hand and go too far. But he was stuck
between a rock and a hard place. Abram had to live with Sarai. He could get by
without Hagar's good will; so hers was sacrificed to keep peace in the home. Most
men would do the very same thing in his place because it isn't easy for a man
to live with an indignant woman. In point of fact, I would put an indignant
woman even higher on the graph of difficulty than a weeping woman. Note
that Abram didn't refer to Hagar as "my wife"; nor even as "my
concubine". He referred to her as "your maid". It's sad, but
obvious that Abram was ashamed of himself for sleeping with Hagar just to make
his wife happy; and took care to distance himself from Sarai's maid so she
wouldn't get any ideas that Abram had an attachment for her. †. Gen 16:6b-7 . .Then Sarai treated her
harshly, and she [Hagar] ran away from her. An angel of the Lord found her by a
spring of water in the wilderness, the spring on the road to Shur, Old
Testament angels aren't necessarily celestial beings; seeing as how the Hebrew
word simply indicates a deputy and/or a messenger. The
road to Shur went south from Abram's camp; so possibly Hagar's intent was to
return home to Egypt. At this point, she was a runaway slave and must have been
feeling very lonely, very unimportant, and very unsure of her future. No one
cared for her soul, whether she lived or died-- and, where was she to go? Maybe
her parents would take her back in when she got home. But how was she to
explain the baby? Genesis
doesn't say, but Hagar could have hitch-hiked a ride with a caravan. It's hard
to believe a woman in that day would dare attempt a journey that far on foot,
and all by herself. Shur
is the name of a desert region east of the Suez Canal and extending down along
the eastern shore of the Gulf of Suez. Shur means "wall" and may
refer to the mountain wall of the Tih plateau as visible from the shore plains.
The position of Shur is defined as being "opposite Egypt on the way to
Assyria" (Gen 25:18). After crossing the Red Sea, the people of Israel
entered the desert of Shur (Ex 15:22) which extended southward a distance of
three days' journey. The region is referred as being close, or adjacent, to
Egypt. (1Sam 15:7 and 1Sam 27:8) †. Gen 16:8a . . the angel said: Hagar, slave
of Sarai, It
should be pointed out that the angel didn't refer to Hagar as Abram's wife; but
as Sarai's slave-- additional clues that Hagar and Abram were never married
otherwise her status would be that of Abram's spouse rather than Sarai's slave. This
is the very first instance in the Bible record where somebody addressed Ms.
Hagar by name. What I like best is that although her human masters aren't
recorded calling her by name, a messenger of God-- higher in dignity and rank
than either Abram and Sarai --did call out to her by her own name. †. Gen 16:8b . . where have you come from, and
where are you going? At
first the angel probably impressed Hagar as just another friendly traveler. But
there was something very unusual about this mysterious stranger. He knew
Hagar's name, and he knew she was a slave; and he knew her mistress' name too.
And he also knew Ms. Hagar was preggers. That had to break the ice quite nicely
don't you think? †. Gen 16:8c . . And she said: I am running
away from my mistress Sarai. Somehow
the angel won Ms. Hagar's confidence, and she was comfortable talking about
herself. There's a very real possibility that the angel was the first person to
take a genuine interest in Hagar's feelings for a long, long time. In
my 76+ years journeying through this life, I've discovered there are lots of
people out there aching for someone to take them seriously. They don't like
being marginalized; they don't like being made to feel unimportant, inferior,
unnecessary, expendable, mediocre, and stupid-- they want to count; they want
to matter, they want to be noticed and they want to be heard. I've no doubt
that is the very reason behind the success of social networking; e.g. blogs,
twittering, online forums, FaceBook, MySpace, and Instagram, et al. One
of the four common characteristics of seemingly level-headed Muslim men who
become suicide bombers is the wish to devote themselves to a cause higher than
themselves; viz: they desire to make their lives count for something. Those
kinds of personalities are good candidates for martyrdom. NOTE: An extreme
case of what we're talking about here is Ted Kaczynski, a.k.a. the Unabomber.
Ted isn't an especially violent man. He has some ideas and the only way the
friendless, isolated loner could think of to get the world to listen was blast
people to pieces at random. Ted's
frustration kind of reminds me of a friend who, when he was in grammar school,
had a crush on the little girl sitting in front of him. My friend couldn't
think of a way to talk to the girl, so he spit on her hair. It sure got her
attention, and that right quick. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Tue, Aug 4th - 7:45AM
Genesis
16:1-3 †. Gen 16:1 . . Sarai, Abram's wife, had borne
him no children. She had an Egyptian maidservant whose name was Hagar. It's
entirely possible that Abram purchased Ms. Hagar while they were all down in
Egypt during the famine back in chapter 12. The
word for "maidservant" is shiphchah
(shif-khaw') which is a female slave (as a member of the household). So, Hagar
wasn't just another skull in the slave pool. As a member of the household
staff, she merited a measure of respect. Hagar probably seemed like a daughter
to ol' Abram in spite of her slave status. It's
my guess that Hagar was Sarai's personal assistant similar in status to that of
Anna: lady Mary's maid in the popular television series "Downton
Abbey". The
duties of a lady's maid typically include helping her mistress with make up,
hairdressing, clothing, jewelry, shoes, and wardrobe maintenance. I think
all-in-all; Hagar had it pretty good; that is, until this fertility issue came
along to spoil everything. †. Gen 16:2a . . And Sarai said to Abram: Look,
the Lord has kept me from bearing Sarai's
logic, at least from a certain point of view, was reasonable. She was likely
familiar with Gen 1:22 and 1:28, where fertility was stated to be a blessing;
therefore, in her mind at least, infertility was an evidence of God's disfavor. There's
a rare defect in women that is just astounding. I read about it in the Vital
Signs column of Discover magazine. The defect, though rare, is most common in
otherwise perfectly gorgeous women-- girls like Sarai --and seems to be
somewhat hereditary. Their birth canal is a cul-de-sac; viz: a blank pouch.
There's no ovaries, no fallopian tubes, no uterus, and no cervix. One of the
first clues to the presence of the defect is when girls are supposed to start
menstruating, but don't. The
story I saw was of a young Mexican girl (I'll call her Lupé). Young, beautiful,
and filled out in all the right places; Lupé came to a clinic for an
examination to find out why she wasn't having periods and that's when they
discovered she didn't have any generative plumbing. Lupé
was devastated, not only with the news that she would never have any children
of her own, but to make matters worse; in her home town's culture, fertile
girls are highly valued and respected, while the sterile ones are treated like
expendable grunts-- char-girls and slave labor. Lupé left the clinic with the
full weight upon her heart that in spite of being a ten, and in spite of her
feelings to the contrary, she would have to spend the rest of her youth solo because
no man in her community would want her; and even among her own kin Lupé would
be looked upon as cursed and untouchable. I'm
not insisting Sarai had the same problem as Lupé. It's only one possibility
from any number of fertility problems; e.g. hostile womb, anovulation, tubal
blockage, uterine issues, etc. But unbeknownst to Sarai, God wanted her
biological progeny to be a miracle baby rather than a natural baby; and why God
didn't keep Abram informed about that I can only speculate: but won't. †. Gen 16:2b . . Consort with my maid; perhaps
I shall have a son through her. This
is the very first instance in the Bible of the principle of adoption. According
to the customs of that day, a Lady had the right, and the option, to keep a
female slave's children as her own if the Lady's husband sired them. No one
bothered to ask Ms. Hagar how she might feel about it because slaves had no say
in such arrangements. †. Gen 16:2c . . And Abram heeded Sarai's
request. Sarai
wasn't specifically named in God's original promise of offspring; so Abram may
have figured that any son he produced could qualify as the promised seed. This
is one time he really should have gone to one of his altar and inquired of The
Lord what to do. But it was an innocent mistake, and totally blindsided Abram
because what he and Sarai did wasn't out of the ordinary in their own day. †. Gen 16:3 . . So Sarai, Abram's wife, took
her maid, Hagar the Egyptian-- after Abram had dwelt in the land of Canaan ten
years --and gave her to her husband Abram as concubine. Hagar
no doubt was attracted to any one of a number of fine unattached young men in
Abram's community; but due to circumstances beyond her control, she was doomed
to a lonely limbo of unrequited love. Her lot in life, though no doubt very
comfortable and secure, was, nonetheless, probably tainted with an unfulfilled
longing that robbed her of true peace and contentment. Abram
was ten years older than Sarai; so he was 85 at this point in time; which is
equivalent to about 43 of our own years of age. The
word translated "concubine" is 'ishshah
(ish-shaw') --a nondescript word for women (cf. Gen 2:22-23) which just simply
indicates the opposite side of the Adam coin. Concubines
in those days weren't adulteresses. They had a much higher status than that.
Webster's defines a concubine as: a woman having a recognized social status in
a household below that of a wife. So they weren't quite as low on the food
chain as a mistress or a girl toy. They at least had some measure of
respectability and social acceptance; and they had a legitimate place in their
man's home too. But, at the same time, they were not a real wife. They were, in
fact, quite expendable. When a man was tired of a concubine, he could send her
away with nothing. They shared no community property, nor had rights of
inheritance. If
Hagar had truly been Abram's wife, then she would have enjoyed equality with
Sarai as a sister-wife. But she didn't. Hagar continued to be a slave, and
there is no record that she and Abram slept together more than the once. She
didn't take up a new life married to Abram; and Abram never once referred to
her as his spouse. He always referred to Hagar as Sarai's slave. The tenor of
the story is that Sarai gave her maidservant to Abram as a wife, but not to
actually marry him. Sarai's intention was that Hagar be a baby mill; nothing
more. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Mon, Aug 3rd - 7:49AM
Genesis
15:15-21 †. Gen 15:15a . . As for you, Abram
must have begun to wonder if maybe he too was in danger of oppression and
slavery. †. Gen 15:15b . .You shall go to your fathers
in peace; Have
you ever wondered how you'll die-- by accident, poison, in a violent mugging,
disease, cancer, car wreck, a fall, hit in the head by a tree limb, or from a
random bullet in a drive-by shooting? People often die suddenly and totally
unexpected. Many people die a very unhappy death-- miserable, alone, unloved,
and unfulfilled. God
promised Abram that he would not die like that. His death would be tranquil and
calm and actually quite satisfactory. He would experience no fears, no anxiety,
and no regrets. †. Gen 15:15c . .You shall be buried at a ripe
old age. Death
stalks each and every one of us like a hungry predator, waiting for its chance
to do us in. We just never know. "Jesus
told them: The right time for me has not yet come; but for you any time is
right." (John 7:6) Abram
had the envious advantage of knowing he would live a full life before he died.
Everyone should be so lucky! †. Gen 15:16 . . And they shall return here in
the fourth generation, for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet complete. God
mentioned only one of the nations living in Canaan. Why was He going to delay
transferring possession of the land until the iniquity of the
"Amorites" was brimming-- why them and not the others? Probably
because God promised Abram that He would bless those who blessed him. Well
. . the Amorite men-- Mamre, Eshkol, and Aner --were Abram's friends and allies
during the recent military campaign to rescue Lot; so that the ultimate destiny
of Canaan hinged upon the decadence of just one tribe: the Amorites. Sometimes
it really pays to have God-fearing friends in this world; for example: Jacob: "And
Laban said to him: Please stay, if I have found favor in your eyes, for I have
learned by experience that Yhvh has blessed me for your sake". (Gen 30:27) "The
little you had before I came has increased greatly, and Yhvh has blessed you
wherever I have been". (Gen 30:30) and
Joseph: "When
Joseph's master saw that Yhvh was with him and that Yhvh gave him success in
everything he did, Joseph found favor in his eyes and became his attendant.
Potiphar put him in charge of his household, and he entrusted to his care
everything he owned. . . . From the
time he put him in charge of his household and of all that he owned, Yhvh
blessed the household of the Egyptian because of Joseph. The blessing of Yhvh
was on everything Potiphar had, both in the house and in the field". (Gen
39:3-5) †. Gen 15:17 . .When the sun set and it was
very dark, there appeared a smoking oven, and a flaming torch which passed
between those pieces. The
Hebrew word for "oven" is tannuwr
(tan-noor') which means: a fire pot. But it's not just a simple bucket of
coals. It was actually portable kitchen equipment, especially for baking fresh
bread. There are several passages in the Bible where ovens are connected with
Divine judgment. (e.g. Ps 21:9-10, Mal 3:19-21, Matt 13:40-43) †.
Gen 15:18a . . On that day the Lord
made a covenant with Abram, This
is now the second covenant that God made with His creation. The first one was
with every living creature back in chapter nine. That one is often called
Noah's Covenant. But this covenant, well known as Abraham's Covenant, is somewhat
different. It's not made between God and every living creature, but between God
and one specific human being and his progeny. †. Gen 15:18b . . saying: To your offspring I
assign this land, The
word for "offspring" is zera'
(zeh'-rah) which means: seed; figuratively, fruit, plant, sowing-time, and
progeny. Zera' is one of those words that is both plural and singular-- like
the words sheep and fish. One sheep is a sheep, and a flock of them are called
sheep too. So the context has to be taken into consideration; and even then
there can still be ambiguity Here's
an instance where the meaning of zera' is obviously one child. "Adam
knew his wife again, and she bore a son and named him Seth, meaning: God has
provided me with another offspring in place of Abel. For Cain had killed
him". (Gen 4:25) Here's
an instance where the meaning is clearly more than one child. "And
He said to Abram: Know well that your offspring shall be strangers in a land
not theirs, and they shall be enslaved and oppressed four hundred years"
(Gen 15:13) Sometimes
the context contains both the singular and the plural. "Abram
said further: Since You have granted me no offspring, my steward will be my
heir. The word of the Lord came to him in reply: That one shall not be your
heir; none but your very own issue shall be your heir. Yhvh took him outside
and said: Look toward heaven and count the stars, if you are able to count
them. And He added: So shall your progeny be". (Gen 15:3-5) †. Gen 15:18c-21 . . from the river of Egypt to
the great river, the river Euphrates: the Kenites, the Kenizzites, the
Kadmonites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Rephaim, the Amorites, the
Canaanites, the Girgasites, and the Jebusites. If
you have a map handy, it's instantly apparent just how huge a piece of real
estate that God assigned to Abram and his offspring. It's very difficult to precisely
outline the whole area but it seems to encompass a chunk of Africa east of the
Nile, (including the delta), the Sinai Peninsula, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Onan,
UAE, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria. The
"river of Egypt" is very likely the Nile since there was no Suez
Canal in that day. The Euphrates is Iraq's eastern border. The distance from
Cairo Egypt to Al Basrah Iraq is about 983 miles as the crow flies. That's
roughly the distance from San Diego to Abilene Tx. The distance from Aden Yemen
to Hilab Syria is about 1,698 miles as the crow flies; which is just a tad
under the crow-distance from Los Angeles to Chicago. I'm
talking about some serious square mileage-- roughly 1,538,370 of them; which is
more than Ireland, United Kingdom, Scotland, Spain, France, Germany, Sweden,
Norway, and Finland combined! Currently, Israel, at its widest east to west
dimension, across the Negev, is less than 70 miles; and south to north from the
Gulf Of Aqaba to Shemona, about 260; comprising a square mileage of only 8,473:
a mere half of 1% of the original land covenanted to Abram. God
has yet to give Abram's seed complete control over all of his covenanted land.
In point of fact, the boundaries were very early on temporarily reduced for the
time being. (Num 34:1-12) The
temporary boundaries run from the Mediterranean Sea eastward to the Jordan
River; and from the southern tip of the Dead Sea northward to a geographic
location which has not yet really been quite accurately identified. Ezk 47:15
says the northern border passes along "the way of Hethlon" which some
feel is very likely the valley of the Nahr al Kubbir river which roughly
parallels the northern border of modern day Lebanon, and through which a
railroad track lies between An Naqib on the Mediterranean coast to Hims Syria. The
next event in Abram's life has repercussions all the way to the World Trade
Center-- September 11, 2001. The son produced by his union with Hagar went on
to become the father of the Arab world; and ultimately, Muhammad: the inventor
of Islam. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Sun, Aug 2nd - 9:59AM
Genesis
15:11-14 †. Gen 15:11 . . Birds of prey came down upon
the carcasses, and Abram drove them away. The
only responsibility that Abram had in this ritual was to set it up. So it was
his job to protect the carcasses from damage and keep the scene clear of
interference from people and critters who had no business there. †. Gen 15:12 . . As the sun was about to set, a
deep sleep fell upon Abram, and a great dark dread descended upon him. At
this point, Abram is placed in a condition that is much more powerful than a
trance. It's the sleep of anesthesia-- the very same kind of sleep that God put
Adam into when he amputated organic tissue from his side to make the woman at
Gen 2:21-22. In
this condition, Abram is totally powerless to either participate or to
interfere; nor would he want to anyway. It's God who's putting His name on the
dotted line; not Abram. This entire ritual is for Abram's benefit; and his
alone, because Abram didn't have to reciprocate and promise God one single
thing in return. God is the one who voluntarily obligated Himself, and now He
is going to notarize his word per Abram's request; to set Abram's mind at ease
regarding a biological heir, and the heir's possession of Canaan. This
pact, that God made with Abram, is totally unconditional. No matter what Abram
did from now on, nothing would place himself in breach of contract because God
alone is in obligation. There is nothing in the pact for Abram to live up to;
therefore it was impossible for Abram to endanger either his own, or his
posterity's, permanent possession of the land of Palestine. They may lose their
occupation of it from time to time, but never their possession. And best of
all, the contract that Moses' people agreed upon with God as per Deut 29:9-5
cannot endanger the security of this covenant because theirs was introduced too
late to make a difference. "And
this I say, that the law, which was four hundred and thirty years later, cannot
annul the covenant that was confirmed before by God in Christ, that it should
make the promise of no effect. For if the inheritance is of the law, it is no
longer of promise; but God gave it to Abraham as a promise." (Gal 3:17-18) Law
grants blessings on condition, but promises grant blessings with no strings
attached and nothing asked in return. "As
far as the gospel is concerned, [God's people] are enemies on your account; but
as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs,
for God's gifts and His call are irrevocable." (Rom 11:28-29) †. Gen 15:13 . . And He said to Abram: Know
well that your offspring shall be strangers in a land not theirs, and they
shall be enslaved and oppressed four hundred years; God
predicted three things concerning Abram's offspring (not Abram himself) that
would occur over a 400 year period: (1)
They would be resident aliens, (2) They would be oppressed, and (3) They would
be slaves. From
the time Jacob moved his family down to Egypt, until the day Moses' people left
under Moses' leadership, was only about 210 years. But according to Ex 12:40-41
the people of Israel were supposed to have dwelled in Egypt 430 years. Paul
said that Israel's covenanted law, (enacted about a month after the people of
Israel were liberated from Egypt) came 430 years after Abram's covenant. (Gal
3:16-18) The
data is somewhat sketchy, but from what exists, it appears that an all
inclusive 430-year period began with Abram's covenant scene in Gen 15. But God
didn't say Abram himself would be effected by the prediction. He said Abram's
progeny would be. Ishmael doesn't count as Abram's progeny in respect to the
land. So the holy progeny began with the birth of Isaac; which occurred about
30 years after Abram's covenant was ratified. So the 400 year period of Gen
15:13 apparently began with Isaac. Even though he himself was never a slave in
Egypt, Isaac was nevertheless an alien in lands not belonging to him; and
later, his son Jacob would be too. Abram's
holy progeny were resident aliens in at least three places-- Canaan, Egypt, and
Babylonia. Jacob lived, not only in Canaan and Egypt, but also on his uncle
Laban's ranch in Haran; which is up in Turkey. Precisely
why the entire 430 year period is reckoned in Ex 12:40-41 as "the length
of time that the Israelites lived in Egypt" is totally unknown; except
that it reflects the Septuagint's version; which is a Greek derivative of
ancient Hebrew texts no longer available. †. Gen 15:14a . . but I will execute judgment
on the nation they shall serve, That
of course refers to the famous plagues that occurred in Egypt during Moses'
confrontation with one of its Pharaohs; culminating in the death of the
firstborn of man and beast during the Passover. †. Gen 15:14b . . and in the end they shall go
free. Actually
they didn't "go" free like the English text suggests; but rather,
were set free-- viz: liberated --because on their own, they would never have
been able to do it. It was at that time that the people of Israel learned the
true connotation of the name Yhvh. It's not just another divine moniker. It
identifies God as a savior; which Webster's defines as a rescuer. "God
also said to Moses: I am Yhvh. I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac and to Jacob as
'El Shadday, but by my name Yhvh I did not make myself known to them." (Ex
6:2-3) Those
three men knew the moniker; but their association with 'El Shadday wasn't on
the basis of a savior. Their association was on the basis of a provider; viz:
providence; which can be defined (in their case) as God's kindly patronage. †. Gen 15:14c . . with great wealth. The
"great wealth" was in the form of voluntary plunder. (Ex 11:1-3, Ex
12:33-36) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Sat, Aug 1st - 7:52AM
Genesis
15:7-10 †. Gen 15:7a . .Then He said to him: I am The
Lord who brought you out from Ur of the Chaldeans God
here identifies Himself as Yhvh. That may seem unimportant but there are those
who claim Abram was unaware of that name because of Ex 6:3. But it just goes to
show you that sometimes the Bible is not all that easy to understand. One
thing we should never overlook about Abram is that, although he was a Hebrew,
he was never a Jew. He and his wife Sarai were both Gentiles whom God selected
to engender the people of Israel. There was nothing particularly special about
Abram. In fact he came from a city, and a family, of idolaters. (Josh 24:2) So
God began by reminding Abram of his roots. Abram was a Babylonian; and it was
God who took an interest in him, and the one who got him out of there and gave
him a future. It wasn't Abram's idea to re-invent himself; nor was it Abram's idea to pack up and leave his
native country. Actually, if not for God's interference, Abram would've still
been back at Ur, living like a pagan. †. Gen 15:7b . . to assign this land to you as
a possession. God
gave this man a future. Abram was a nobody, going nowhere in Ur. Of His own
sovereign volition, God moved into Abram's life and made a difference. He'll do
the very same thing again later on with Jacob. Some
Gentile Christians are way too puffed up with religious pride. It wouldn't hurt
a few of them to consider their own roots once in a while too because they have
absolutely nothing to brag about. "As
for you, you were dead in your transgressions and sins, in which you used to
live when you followed the ways of this world and of the ruler of the kingdom
of the air, the spirit who is now at work in those who are disobedient. All of
us also lived among them at one time, gratifying the cravings of our sinful
nature and following its desires and thoughts. Like the rest, we were by nature
objects of wrath. . . . But because
of his great love for us, God, who is rich in mercy, made us alive with Christ
even when we were dead in transgressions-- it is by grace you have been saved.
And God raised us up with Christ and seated us with him in the heavenly realms
in Christ Jesus, in order that in the coming ages he might show the
incomparable riches of his grace, expressed in his kindness to us in Christ
Jesus." (Eph 2:1-7) "Therefore,
remember that formerly you who are Gentiles by birth and called
"uncircumcised" by those who call themselves "the
circumcision" (that done in the body by the hands of men)-- remember that
at that time you were separate from Christ, excluded from citizenship in Israel
and foreigners to the covenants of the promise, without hope and without God in
the world. But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far away have been brought
near through the blood of Christ." (Eph 2:11-13) †. Gen 15:8 .
. And he said: O Lord God, how shall I know that I am to possess it? When
men struck deals in those days, they gave each other a token of their word.
What Abram requested was sort of akin to a notarized signature. That's
interesting because though Abram believed God's promise of a biological heir;
he didn't really have all that much confidence in God's promise of the heir
possessing Canaan. In other words: Abram wanted a token of God's good faith. During
this dialogue, Abram has been calling God by the title 'Adonay (ad-o noy') which
means Lord, Sovereign, and/or Master (as a proper name for only God) This is,
in point of fact, the very first instance in the Bible of somebody addressing
God by that title. It is precisely what everyone should call God only when they
are serious about living in compliance with His will. So
please don't ever address your maker as Lord, Sovereign, and/or Master unless
you mean it. It is very insulting, and quite meaningless, to refer to someone
as your commander when you have no intention of doing what they say or if
you're going about it in a half-hearted manner. "And
why do you call me Lord and Master and do not what I say?" (Luke 6:46) "A
son honors his father, and a servant his lord. If I am a father, where is the
honor due me? If I am a lord, where is the respect due me?-- protests the Lord
of Hosts." (Mal 1:6) †. Gen 15:9-10 . . He answered: Bring Me a
three-year-old heifer, a three-year-old she-goat, a three-year-old ram, a
turtledove, and a young bird. He brought Him all these and cut them in two,
placing each half opposite the other; but he did not divide the [young] bird. A
full grown "turtledove" is a towr
(tore). Young birds are a gowzal (go-zawl');
a nestling, quite possibly still covered in chick down. Of all the animals that
God specified, the gowzal is the only one that wasn't mature. How Abram knew to
cut the mature ones in two pieces is not stated. The
ritual that is about to take place amounted to a notary public. Abram wanted
God's name on the dotted line and this is the way God chose to do it. This
ritual may look silly and barbarous to modern Man, but it was serious business
and may very well have been a common custom for sealing pacts in the Canaan of
that day. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Back to Blog Main Page
|
|

About Me | 
|
Archives
|

|
|