• Register
  • Login
  • Forgot Password?
  • My Profile
  • Choose An Icon
  • Upload An Icon
  • Messenger
  • Member Search
  • Who's Online
    Members: 1598

    Members: 0
    Anonymous: 1
    Today: 51
    Newest Member:
    Joseph Emmanuel Mahabir
  • You are here: Blogs Directory / Ministries / Arnold's Blog Welcome Guest
    Arnold's Blog
          "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" (Galatians 4:16)

    Sat, Jun 23rd - 1:38AM

    Watchtower Teachings Refuted

    Do Jehovah’s Witnesses Have the Only True Christian Religion?

    The Bible does not teach the us-only pride or the we-versus-they complex that characterize the so-called Jehovah’s Witnesses. (Psalm 119:63; Mark 9:38-42; Philippians 1:18) JWs believe they have the only true Christian religion and are part of God's organization and that they must be faithful to the Watchtower Organization to earn salvation. JWs point to Bible passages such as Matthew 7:13-14, 21, and Ephesians 4:5 to prove that there is only one true Christian religion. It is true that there is one way: Jesus is the way, not a man-made organization. (John 14:6) Watchtower publications say that certain identifying marks taught in Scripture verify that they are God’s organization, but the Watchtower Organization does not measure up to the marks that JWs say characterize true Christianity.

    "The main identifying quality by which true Christians are recognized is the outstanding love they have toward one another." (Aid To Bible Understanding, p.317) John 13:35 is a favorite JW proof text in this. They insist that love among themselves proves they are the only true Christian religion. Question for Jehovah’s Witnesses: Do you ever have difficulty getting along with other Jehovah’s Witnesses, and do you ever find it easier to get along with non-JWs than with Jehovah’s Witnesses?

    Watchtower publications use I Corinthians 1:10 to teach the importance of complete conformity to the teachings of the Watchtower Organization, and insist that such unity proves that JWs are the only true Christians and that those who do not have such unity are false Christians. Did the lack of unity among believers at Corinth mean that they were not Christians? (I Corinthians 1:2, 11-13) Where is there any reference to an organization in I Corinthians 1:10, and where in I Corinthians 1:10 (or the context thereof) are we told that unity is to be achieved by submitting to an organization?

    Now let's look at another so-called identifying mark: "Jehovah's Witnesses believe that the entire Bible is the inspired Word of God, and instead of adhering to a creed based on human tradition, they hold to the Bible as the standard for all their beliefs." (Reasoning From The Scriptures, p.199) Also: "Because Jehovah's Witnesses base all of their beliefs, their standards for conduct, and organizational procedures on the Bible, their faith in the Bible itself as God's Word gives them the conviction that what they have is indeed the truth. So their position is not egotistical but demonstrates their confidence that the Bible is the right standard against which to measure one's religion." (Reasoning From The Scriptures, p.203-204) Here are a few questions for Jehovah’s Witnesses: Do you ever find it difficult to understand how the Watchtower leadership concluded that any particular Watchtower teaching is based on the Bible or the clear teachings of Scripture? (Acts 17:10-11; I Corinthians 2:5; Colossians 2:8; II Timothy 2:15; 3:16, 17) Do you ever feel that the Watchtower Society or Watchtower leadership is intrusive in matters of personal preference or opinion where no genuine Bible truth, principle, or command is at stake? (I Peter 5:1-3; 4:15; Romans 14:1-13) Where does the Bible say that Jesus is Michael the Archangel or that Michael the Archangel is Jesus Christ? (Hebrews 1:5-6) If Jesus was hung on a single upright pole and not on a cross then why was more than one nail used to fasten His hands and why does the Bible say that the written charge was placed over His head and not above His hands? (John 20:25; Matthew 27:37) Where does the Bible forbid a medical blood transfusion to save a life? (Romans 4:15) Where does the Bible tell you to shun a friend or relative who conscientiously chooses to leave the Watchtower Organization? Where does the Bible tell you to shun a friend or relative who conscientiously chooses to join another denomination? Let’s examine some basic Watchtower teachings in relation to Scripture:

    The Necessity of the Watchtower Society

    Watchtower publications say that the anointed Christians among Jehovah's Witnesses are supposed to be God's collective "Faithful and Discreet Slave" (represented by the Watchtower Governing Body) that guides people in their understanding of Scripture and is God's only channel of truth. If this organization did not exist until the latter part of the nineteenth century then the Watchtower interpretation of Matthew 24:45-47 means that for eighteen centuries God did not have any true representatives on earth. (Consider Ephesians 4:11-16)

    Jehovah's Witnesses use II Peter 1:20-21 to discourage independent Bible study and insist that people must heed and submit to the teachings of the Watchtower Society, but this is another case of replacing what a Bible passage says with what the Watchtower Society says the passage means. Look carefully at the wording: II Peter 1:20-21 is dealing with the origin of Scripture and this is another way of saying that the Bible is inspired of God. (II Timothy 3:16)

    Watchtower publications use Acts 8:30-31 to say that the Watchtower Society is God's only Bible-interpreting organization and that people cannot understand Scripture without the Watchtower Society. While the Bible certainly does not condemn all use of Christian literature and Bible study helps, and Christian books and magazines (and other materials) can be helpful, where does the Bible indicate that Christians must submit to the infallible views and interpretations of an organization or its publications? While Acts 8:30-31 does indicate that people occasionally need help understanding Scripture, where in this passage or the context is there any indication of an organization? Since the Ethiopian eunuch never saw Philip again, where is there any indication that the Ethiopian eunuch had to join or submit to an organization or anyone? Did Philip use the Bible alone to expound upon the meaning of Scripture or did he use additional literature? If the Bible alone was sufficient for Philip and the Ethiopian eunuch, doesn't this indicate that the Bible itself is sufficient for us also?

    If Christ deliberately bypassed the religious elite and highly educated to reveal truths to ordinary people, and the Apostles commended and encouraged personal study and discernment, then why should we assume that God intended for people of our generation to receive (without question or doubt) the Word of God as interpreted by some religious elite claiming to have some special key to understanding Scripture that ordinary people don't have? If the Bible is the Word of God and the final authority, then why should we assume that God expects people of our generation to interpret Bible passages in relation to Christian literature or theologians instead of interpreting Bible passages in relation to context and the whole Bible?

    We certainly do need ministers, church fellowship, and Christian literature to help us, and there are difficulties in the Bible, but for the most part the Bible is self-explanatory and self-interpreting when one is familiar with its contents. (Psalm 119:130; Proverbs 2:3-6; II Timothy 2:15; Ephesians 4:11-15) Scripture itself is the key to understanding Scripture, comparing Scripture with Scripture. (I Corinthians 2:13; II Timothy 2:15)

    New Light

    Over the decades of their history the Watchtower Society has changed its official stand or doctrine on various issues, e.g., celebration of Christmas, the Great Pyramid being inspired of God like the Bible, that Black people are inferior to White people, the use of blood as medicine, the stand on the flag and service in the armed forces, the prohibitions against vaccinations and organ transplants, whether the second coming was in 1874 or 1914, predictions of dates for Armageddon that never came to pass, if or how much association with disfellowshipped persons is allowed, whether disassociated persons must be treated the same as disfellowshipped persons, etc.. However, if you point out the string of past errors and doctrinal flip-flopping to a Jehovah's Witness it is likely that he will respond that this proves that he is in God's organization and that God is making their light get brighter. Watchtower publications use Proverbs 4:18 to mean that the introduction of "New Light" proves that they are God's organization. "But the path of the righteous ones is like the bright light that is getting lighter and lighter until the day is firmly established." (Proverbs 4:18 NWT) However, this interpretation of Proverbs 4:18 ignores the context, which demonstrates that Proverbs 4:18 is not a justification for doctrinal changes or a reference to an organization but is a contrast with the way of the wicked. "The way of the wicked ones is like the gloom; they have not known at what they keep stumbling." (Proverbs 4:19 NWT)

    The requirement that any light from God has to be true is an obvious and essential part of the theory about the light getting brighter; the light is not supposed to extinguish the old light but merely adds to the old light. An examination of the history of Watchtower changes reveals that the "new light" has not always been true, and often the "new light" has actually been a re-introduction of "old Light" that had been previously discarded as error or falsehood.

    The Resurrection

    Jehovah's Witnesses and other cults and various liberal theologians deny the literal physical resurrection of Jesus Christ. (Romans 10:9-10; I Corinthians 15:13-18) The Gospel is the death, burial, and literal resurrection of Christ through which sinners can be declared righteous through faith in Jesus Christ when they repent. (John 3:13-15; Acts 4:15-19; I Corinthians 15:1-4) The Bible clearly teaches the physical resurrection of Christ and all dead. (Job 19:25, 27; Isaiah 26:19; John 5:28-29; Acts 24:15; I Corinthians 15:42-49; Philippians 3:21; Revelation 20:12-13) The resurrection was central to the preaching of the Apostles. (Acts 3:15; 4:1-2; 10:39-41; 17:18; 24:15) Jesus said that His body would be resurrected, and after the resurrection He verified this. (John 2:19-21; Luke 24:36-43) The redeemed will have a body like that of Christ; the body will be changed. (I Corinthians 15:51-52; II Corinthians 5:4; Philippians 3:20-21; I Thessalonians 5:23)

    Watchtower publications assert that Christ was raised up as a spirit creature, and that He materialized a body to make Himself visible. When JWs make this assertion, challenge them to show Scriptural evidence to back up this claim.

    JWs use two accounts about Christ not being recognized by those who knew Him as proof that He was resurrected in a different form. Watchtower publications claim that the disciples on the road to Emmaus did not recognize Christ because He was in a different form than when He was crucified. But this interpretation ignores the context. The disciples did not recognize Christ because He did not will it so. (Luke 24:16) After their faith was tested He opened their eyes and they recognized Him. (Luke 24:31) Watchtower publications claim that Christ appeared to Mary as the gardener. But the context makes it clear that it was Mary who made the mistake of thinking Christ was the gardener. (John 20:15-16)

    JWs also use I Peter 3:18 to discredit the bodily resurrection. The proposition is set forth that Christ was raised from the dead as a spirit. If JWs give you this interpretation of I Peter 3:18, then show them Romans 8:8-13, Galatians 5:24-25, Ephesians 6:18, Revelation 1:10, and I Peter 4:6.

    A favorite passage among JWs is I Corinthians 15:50, which says "flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God." The term "flesh and blood" occurs only five times in the New Testament, and in each case the reference is to natural man and not to literal flesh and blood. (Matthew 16:17; I Corinthians 15:50; Galatians 1:16; Ephesians 6:12; Hebrews 2:14) Natural man, man in his present earthly nature, cannot inherit the kingdom of God; natural man needs the new birth. (John 3:3-7; I Corinthians 15:39-50)

    Denial of the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ is calling Him accursed, for this would mean that He died under judgment of sin and is still under that judgment. (I Corinthians 12:3)


    The Jehovah's Witnesses deny the teaching of eternal punishment in Hellfire for the unsaved dead. They teach that death is a termination of existence and Hell is the common grave of mankind and a state of unconsciousness. What does the Bible teach?

    In the Bible the word soul is used to denote mere animal or physical life, as Watchtower literature points out, but it usually means the internal, immaterial aspect or ego of man. The Bible makes a distinction between the body and soul (a Bible Concordance will help you see this). Also, while the Bible does say that animals have souls, it does not say or indicate that they are immortal.

    Ezekiel 18:4 is a favorite JW proof text. The soul does die in the same sense that Adam and Eve died the very day they ate the forbidden fruit. (Genesis 2:17; 5:3-5) Death means separation: Physical death is the separation of the soul and body. (Genesis 35:18) Spiritual death is separation from God. (Romans 5:12, 17; Ephesians 2:1; Colossians 2:13; I Peter 4:6)

    Watchtower literature also says that the spirit is merely one's breath. In Acts 7:59 was Stephen asking Jesus to take away his bad breath?

    Ecclesiastes 9:5 & 10 are two more favorite JW proof texts. Hell is a place of unconsciousness and inactivity when it comes to bodily senses and the affairs of this world. (Isaiah 63:16; John 9:4; Revelation 14:13) While Ecclesiastes 9:5 & 10 may not prove there is conscious life after death, do these passages prove that there is no conscious life after death or could these passages and their context be dealing with the inevitability of physical death? (Ecclesiastes 9:2) Will all receive the same fate or destiny, whether they are faithful or wicked? Does the phrase “the remembrance of them has been forgotten” in Ecclesiastes 9:5 mean there will be no resurrection after this life for anyone?

    The word rendered destruction in II Thessalonians 1:9 is the Greek word olethros. Olethros means a ruin of one's state of being, and is used in I Timothy 6:9. Olethros does not mean a termination of existence.

    The word rendered destruction in Matthew 10:28 is the Greek word apollumi, which means ruin or loss of well-being. This word is used in Luke 5:37 regarding the destruction of wineskins, and does not mean a termination of existence.

    The word rendered everlasting in II Thessalonians 1:9 and Matthew 25:41 & 46 is the Greek word aioonios, which means never ceasing.

    The word Hell is the rendering of the Hebrew word Sheol, and the Greek words Hades, Gehenna, and Tartaroo. The verb Tartaroo means cast down to Tartarus; Tartarus means the deepest or lowest places. (II Peter 2:4 NWT) Sheol is the unseen state or world of the dead, whether lost or saved. (Genesis 37:35; Psalm 31:17; Isaiah 38:10) Hades is the unseen world of the dead, usually of the lost, and corresponds to Sheol. (Luke 16:23; Revelation 20:13-14) Hades is a place of disembodied souls of the dead. (Acts 2:31; Psalm 16:10) Paradise refers to a division of Hades (Sheol) reserved for the saved dead. (Job 3:13-19; Luke 23:43) At the time of the resurrection of Christ, Paradise was changed from beneath into heaven. (Isaiah 42:6-7; II Corinthians 12:2-4; Ephesians 4:8-9)

    JWs claim that the account of the Rich Man and Lazarus is a parable and does not relate an actual occurrence. (Luke 16:19-31) If this account is a parable (even though the context gives no indication of this), keep in mind that a parable is an example or picture which verifies something, and a symbol is a small representation of a greater reality. Watchtower literature says the Rich Man represents false religious leaders and Lazarus represents true Christians. If this is the case then who are the Rich Man's five brothers and why did he want Lazarus to witness to them? (Luke 16:27-31)

    Gehenna (Valley of Hinnom) is a valley near Jerusalem where Solomon and others built high places and sacrificed children to Moloch and Chemosh by burning them alive. (I Kings 11:7; II Chronicles 28:3; 33:6; Jeremiah 32:35) Gehenna eventually became a city dump and incinerator. (II Kings 23:10) Gehenna was considered an abomination and came to signify Hell in the modern sense of the word, and is used in the Bible to mean Hell. Were the Scribes and Pharisees thrown into the literal Valley of Hinnom? (Matthew 23:15, 33) Who is referred to in Luke 12:4-5, and why should anyone fear someone who can do more to him after the body is killed if death is a termination of existence? Is there still fire burning in the literal Valley of Hinnom? (Mark 9:47-48) Are there worms that never die in the literal Valley of Hinnom? (Mark 9:44, 46, 48) The Old Testament refers to the lost in Hell as worms or maggots, so we can assume that this is what Christ was meant. It is obvious that Gehenna is the Lake of fire and brimstone. (Mark 9:43-48; Revelation 21:8) The Lake of fire is called the second death because it is the final judgment of the unsaved dead after they have been physically resurrected. It is the conclusive and permanent separation from God. (Matthew 7:23; Hebrews 6:2; II Peter 2:4-9; Revelation 20:11-15)

    Why fire? Fire is purifying. (Numbers 31:23; I Peter 1:7; Revelation 3:18) Everything contaminated by sin must be purified, and those not washed in the blood of the Lamb must be purified by fire. But fire will not atone for sin or remove the sins of the lost, which is why the fire is eternal. (Matthew 3:12; 25:41, 46; II Thessalonians 1:7-9)

    The Second Coming

    JWs deny the Second Coming of Christ in bodily human form and teach that Christ returned invisibly in 1914 AD and that the Second Coming is invisible. JWs will inevitably refer to John 14:19. "A little longer and the world will behold me no more, but YOU will behold me, because I live and YOU will live." (John 14:19 NWT) The world in which Christ lived when He said this beheld Him no more. (Acts 1:9; consider II Peter 3:6) JWs will also refer to I Timothy 6:16. But notice this does not say that Christ is unapproachable and cannot be seen, it says this about the light He dwells in. The Bible does say that we no longer know Christ according to the flesh, but it also says this about fellow Christians. (II Corinthians 5:16-17) In heaven today Jesus Christ has a glorified human body. (Acts 1:9-11; 2:29-33; Colossians 2:9; I Timothy 2:5; Hebrews 10:12-13; I John 4:1-3) JWs will also point to Acts 1:9-11 and explain that something in a cloud is unseen and so this must mean that His return is invisible. But look at this text again: Did anyone see Christ ascend with their literal human eyes, and was Christ caught up into a figurative or imaginary cloud?

    How do they calculate 1914 AD to be the year of the return of Christ? The line of Kingdom rulers was interrupted in 607 BC when Jerusalem was destroyed by the Babylonian Army and God's kingdom of Judah fell. (Ezekiel 21:25-27) Seven times to pass until rule restored. (Daniel 4:32, 16, 17) Seven=2 x 3 1/2 times, or 2 x 1,260 days. (Revelation 12:6, 14; 11:2, 3) A day for a year, making 2,520 years. (Ezekiel 4:6; Numbers 14:34) To run until the kingdom's establishment. (Luke 21:24; Daniel 7:13-14) Now let's look at just a few problems with this. The prophecy about seven times to pass until the rule is restored was about Nebuchadnezzar and was fulfilled in Nebuchadnezzar's lifetime. (Daniel 4:30-36) All credible scholars give 586 BC as the year Jerusalem was destroyed by the Babylonian Army. Ask a JW to verify that this happened in 607 BC.. What did Jesus say to the Disciples when they asked if He was about to restore the kingdom to Israel? (Acts 1:6-7)

    How is it possible to reconcile the promise of Matthew 28:20 with the teaching that the return of Christ would be invisible and that He returned invisibly in 1914 AD?

    By observing the Memorial service (Lord’s Supper/Communion) Jehovah’s Witnesses contradict the teaching that Christ returned in 1914 AD and contradict the purpose of the ordinance, since this is to be observed "... until he arrives." (I Corinthians 11:26 NWT)

    The Bible clearly teaches that the return of Christ will be personal and visible. (Acts 1:11; Revelation 1:7)


    The Jehovah's Witnesses teach that only The Father is Jehovah, that Jesus Christ is a created angel, that the Holy Spirit is an impersonal force, and that the Trinity is a pagan teaching and "Not a Bible teaching." (Reasoning From The Scriptures, p.405)

    The Trinity is not a pagan doctrine. Ancient pagans did not worship any trinity, they worshipped triads. A triad is three distinct gods, while the Trinity is one God existing in three persons.

    The word Trinity is a combination of the word "trine," which means threefold or three times, and the suffix "-ity," which means state, character, or condition. In other words, God is not triplex (1+1+1), God is triune (1x1x1). (I John 5:7; II Corinthians 13:14; Ephesians 2:18, 22; I Peter 1:2) The triunity of God is seen in Bible teaching on salvation: As the Father, God originates salvation and made provision for salvation; as the Son, God paid the penalty for sin; as the Holy Ghost, God applies salvation. Consider that it comes natural to love oneself (Galatians 5:14; Ephesians 5:29), a Christian is obliged to bring his body into subjection (I Corinthians 9:27), and man is made in the image of God and is triune. (Genesis 1:26-27; I Thessalonians 5:23)

    Whether any of us completely understand or even accept a Bible truth does not determine if it is a Bible truth, and since God is our Creator and is so much higher than us we should not be surprised to find difficulties in understanding His nature. God reveals Himself to man through words, words in His Word. As the Spirit of God reveals truths to us through the Word of God He becomes more majestic to us, not simple. (Psalm 97:2)

    The Deity Of Christ

    JWs like to use I Corinthians 15:28 and similar passages to try to prove that Jesus Christ is inferior by virtue of His being subject. However, submission or subjection does not necessarily mean inferiority, it is often a form of love. A wife should submit to her husband because of love for God and her husband. (Ephesians 5:22-24; Colossians 3:18; I Corinthians 11:3) Jesus was subject to Mary and Joseph even though He is their Creator. (Luke 2:51; John 1:3)

    John 14:28 is another favorite JW proof text. Note that He did not say the Father is better, He said the Father is "greater," a reference to position and not nature. Also note that the MAN Christ Jesus is mediator. (I Timothy 2:5; also consider John 5:19; Acts 2:29-33; Colossians 2:9; Philippians 2:5-11; Hebrews 2:8,9; 10:12)

    JWs will also refer to Revelation 3:14 which says that Jesus is "the beginning of the creation of God." The word beginning here is the rendering of the Greek word Arche, which means first cause, origin or source, and is where we get the English word "architect."

    Watchtower literature often points to Bible passages which say that Jesus Christ is only-begotten. The word only-begotten is the rendering of the Greek word monogenes, which simply means the only one of a class or kind.

    JWs also refer to Colossians 1:15 which says Jesus Christ is "the firstborn of every creature" to prove that He was a created angel before He was conceived in Mary's womb. The term firstborn means the legal heir and does not always mean the eldest. The nation of Israel was called firstborn even though there were many other nations already in existence before Israel was formed. Psalm 89:27 calls King David firstborn even though David was the youngest son in his family.

    JWs will insist that Jesus Christ cannot be God and must be created because the Bible calls Him the Son of God. The term son is used in the Bible to denote or imply almost any kind of descent or succession, and the meaning of the word depends on the setting and context in which it is used. (Consider Exodus 2:10 and Hebrews 1:8) Son of God was a messianic title which signified the function of Deliverer. (E.g. Matthew 16:16) Note that the Devil tempted Christ by bringing against Him the popular Jewish conceptions of the Messiah. (Matthew 4:1-11)

    Ask a JW to show any passage of Scripture which says that Jesus Christ was a created angel before He was an embryo in Mary's womb. His humanity originated in Mary's womb, but not His deity. (Micah 7:2; Matthew 1:18-23; Luke 1:31-35; John 8:58; Galatians 4:4; Hebrews 7:3; 10:5) Christ is God veiled in human flesh. (Matthew 1:23; John 1:1-14; 10:30; 14:9-10; II Corinthians 5:19; Colossians 1:15; 2:9; I Timothy 3:16)

    JWs like to compare the unity of the Father and the Son to the unity of Christians. (John 8:28, 29; 10:30; 17:20-22; I Corinthians 1:10) But consider the context of I Corinthians 1:10; this was written because Christians, even believers who were members of the same congregation, were divided.

    JWs also point to John 1:18 which says "No man hath seen God at any time," and people did see Jesus Christ. No man hath seen God as He is, only visions or materializations of God, but there have been those who have seen God manifest in the flesh. (John 4:24; 6:46; 14:9; Philippians 2:6-7; I Timothy 3:16)

    In the New World Translation (the Watchtower Society's translation) John 1:1 says the Word was "a god." This is because the third stanza of the Greek text does not use the definite article, and it is therefore assumed that this must be translated indefinitely as "a god" or "divine." For John 1:1 to say that Jesus was a lesser form of deity the Greek word theios would have been used instead of theos. In the 282 New Testament references to God without using the definite article with the word theos the New World Translation usually renders theos as "God," such as in Luke 20:38 and verses 6, 12, 13, and 18 of chapter one of John. Should we change John 1:18 to say: "No man hath seen a god at any time?" Why isn't the same rule applied to John 1:1 in the New World Translation also applied to the other New Testament passages where Theos is used without the definite article?

    Watchtower publications say that only the Father is the one true God (Jehovah) based on John 17:3 and say that Jesus Christ is “a god” based on the New World Translation’s rendering of John 1:1. So is Jesus a true god or a false god? If Jesus is a true god how is it possible to reconcile this with John 17:3? If Jesus is a false god how is it possible to reconcile this with John 1:1?

    If only the Father is God and Jesus is "a god," then how many "gods" do JWs have in their religion? (Isaiah 43:10; Isaiah 44:8)

    Jesus Christ is the true God. (I John 5:20; Jeremiah 10:10)

    Jesus is called Mighty God. (Isaiah 9:6) Only Jehovah is God. (Isaiah 43:10; 44:6) Jehovah is called Mighty God. (Isaiah 10:20-21)

    Jesus is Jehovah of Hosts. (Isaiah 8:13-14; I Peter 2:7-8)

    Jesus is God the judge. (Ecclesiastes 12:14; I Corinthians 4:5; II Corinthians 5:10; II Timothy 4:1)

    Whose manifestation and whose kingdom is referred to in II Timothy 4:1?

    Whose glory did Isaiah see? (Isaiah 6:1; John 12:37-41)

    Jesus is Jehovah, the first and the last. (Isaiah 44:6; Revelation 1:8, 17-18; 2:8; 22:13, 16)

    Jesus is Jehovah, the light. (Psalm 27:1; Isaiah 60:19; I Timothy 1:1; Titus 1:3; 2:10,13; 3:4,6)

    Jesus is Jehovah, the Shepherd. (Psalm 23:1; John 10:11)

    Jesus is Jehovah, the Creator. (Isaiah 44:24; Psalm 102:24-27; Hebrews 1:8-12; John 1:3; Colossians 1:16,17)

    Jesus is Jehovah, the King. (Psalm 24:10; Acts 17:7)

    Who did Stephen pray to? (Acts 7:59-60)

    For Whom did John the Baptist prepare the way? (Isaiah 40:3; Matthew 3:1-3; Luke 1:76; also compare Malachi 3:1 and Matthew 11:10)

    The Deity of the Holy Spirit

    If someone lies to the Holy Spirit he lies to God. How is it possible to lie to an impersonal force? If you lie you lie to a person. (Acts 5:3-4) The Holy Spirit speaks (Acts 13:2-4; I Timothy 4:1), hears (John 16:13), makes intercession (Romans 8:26), has intellect (Romans 8:27), makes decisions (Acts 15:28), grieves (Ephesians 4:30), and has a will (I Corinthians 12:11). These are characteristics of a personality.

    The Holy Spirit is Jehovah. (Exodus 17:7; Hebrews 3:7-9) The Holy Spirit is Jehovah of Hosts. (Isaiah 6:3, 8-10; Acts 28:25-27) The Holy Spirit is Jehovah, Most High. (Psalm 78:17, 21; Acts 7:51) The Holy Spirit is Jehovah, Who promised the New Covenant. (Jeremiah 31:31-34; Hebrews 10:15-17)

    Does The Name Jehovah Occur In The New Testament?

    Jehovah's Witnesses, and sometimes ex-JWs, insist that the New World Translation of the New Testament is more accurate because it includes the Hebrew name of God. Is this a correct assumption?

    No ancient Greek manuscripts of the New Testament contain the Hebrew name of God.

    If I were to talk about Mosheh many readers would not immediately recognize that I was referring to Moses, even though Moses is an inaccurate rendering of the word Mosheh. The same would be true of other Hebrew names. The Hebrew name of God, the Tetragrammaton, is a Hebrew word that most Gentiles would probably not be able to pronounce even if the correct pronunciation were known.

    Consider that the name Jesus is the Latin counterpart of the Hebrew Yeshua, the Hebrew word Yeshua means "Jehovah-Savior" or "Jehovah is salvation" or "salvation of Jehovah," and in the Old Testament the New World Translation often renders Yeshua as merely "salvation," such as in Job 13:16 & Psalm 13:5.

    The New Testament is inspired of God, and Jesus Christ recognized and verified the inspiration and authority of the New Testament by way of anticipation. (John 14:26; 16:12-13) New Testament quotes of the Old Testament are translations of a Hebrew text into Greek, and under inspiration of God the New Testament Bible writers rendered the Hebrew name of God as Lord (Gr. Kurios) in their quotations of the Old Testament. Why? Because of the changeover of the authority and power of the name of Jehovah to the name of Jesus. (John 5:23; 17:11; Acts 4:12; Philippians 2:9-11; Hebrews 1:4)

    The Watchtower Society inserts the Hebrew name of God into the New Testament text of the New World Translation to support their doctrines and support their claim that only Jehovah's Witnesses are true Christians and that only Jehovah's Witnesses will be saved.

    The Watchtower Interpretation of Exodus 3:15

    "Then God said once more to Moses: 'This is what you are to say to the sons of Israel, "Jehovah the God of YOUR forefathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob, has sent me to YOU." This is my name to time indefinite, and this is the memorial of me to generation after generation.'" (Exodus 3:15 NWT) Watchtower publications insist that Exodus 3:15 is a command to always refer to God as Jehovah forever, and claim that the name Jehovah is the only name by which to address God.

    While God is known by the name Jehovah (or Yahweh), Jehovah is not the only name by which God is known. The Watchtower interpretation conflicts with the numerous Bible passages where God is identified in other ways besides the name Jehovah, such as the numerous times He is referred to as "the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob" without any mention of the name Jehovah. Jesus never addressed the Father as Jehovah or referred to the Father as Jehovah, and He thus demonstrated that Jehovah is not the only way that God can be addressed.

    Exodus 3:15 is dealing with more than the use of a word. God was telling Moses that He would be manifest in the nature expressed by that name, that is, He would manifest that in His true nature and being He is the eternally self-existent and sovereign God. (Consider I Kings 18:36-37)

    Romans 10:13 in the New World Translation

    "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." (Romans 10:13 KJV) "For 'everyone who calls on the name of Jehovah will be saved.'" (Romans 10:13 NWT) "For if you publicly declare that 'word in your own mouth,' that Jesus is Lord, and exercise faith in your heart that God raised him up from the dead, you will be saved." (Romans 10:9 NWT) "Let it be known to all of YOU and to all the people of Israel, that in the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene', whom YOU impaled but whom God raised up from the dead, by this one does this man stand here sound in front of YOU. This is 'the stone that was treated by YOU builders as of no account that has become the head of the corner.' Furthermore, there is no salvation in anyone else, for there is not another name under heaven that has been given among men by which we must get saved." (Acts 4:10-12 NWT)

    Although including the name Jehovah in Romans 10:13 indicates that Jesus is Jehovah when compared to Romans 10:9, this contradicts the teaching on salvation presented in Romans 10:9 and Acts 4:12. Since the name Jehovah does not occur in any ancient Greek manuscripts of the New Testament and every ancient Greek manuscript of the New Testament uses the Greek word Kurios (Lord) in Romans 10:13, what is the basis for inserting the name Jehovah into Romans 10:13 in the New World Translation? If God had wanted Romans 10:9-12 to make it clear that Jesus is the "Lord" being referred to in Romans 10:13 how would He have changed the wording of this text?

    Watchtower Neutrality

    The Watchtower Organization teaches that separation from the world means that Christians must not vote or otherwise participate in politics or public affairs, or serve in the military (not even to defend their nation against aggression). The separation taught in the Bible is godly conduct, distinctions, and relationships within society (separation from the sins of society), and is not isolation from society or neutrality concerning politics, community affairs, or even war. (Matthew 22:21; Romans 13:1-7; Ephesians 5:3-11; I Timothy 2:1-2; I Peter 2:11-12)

    Man is a natural-born sinner, inherently depraved. It is not human government that is sinful or wicked but rather those who comprise human government, which is why Christian influence is essential. Christians are the salt of the earth and the light of the world. Salt cleanses, purifies, preserves, and makes people thirsty, and light dispels darkness. Christians are supposed to be a cleansing and illuminating influence, impacting society and culture for righteousness. (Matthew 5:13-16) Should we interpret the words of Christ in Matthew 6:9-11 to mean that He was promoting laziness and idleness? No, a good job should be considered an answer to the prayer for basic necessities. The exhortation to pray for all men and for all that are in authority does not imply neutrality regarding politics and community affairs; opportunities to vote and otherwise influence and participate in public affairs should be considered answers to such prayers. (I Timothy 2:1-2)

    The Watchtower Society forbids JWs from joining the armed forces for any reason, and they will not baptize a member of the armed forces until he leaves the armed forces. (Anyone remember Cornelius? -Acts 10) Where in the Bible is any soldier told to resign from the armed forces? Having the armed forces is part of God's purpose for human government and a soldier is a representative of the government. (Romans 13:1-4) Granted, sometimes human governments (being composed of humans) abuse or exceed their authority, but that is another issue. The same God who said "Thou shalt not kill" also told His people to fight wars and execute various criminals, and a passage must be understood or interpreted in relation to its context and the whole Bible. In Exodus 20:13 the word rendered "kill" (Hebrew: Ratsach) means murder. Different Hebrew words are used for killing in self-defense, killing in the line of duty, etc... In the Old Testament, military service was the duty of all able-bodied adult males (with the exception of Levites), and the vast majority of them were what we refer to today as Reservists or National Guardsmen; the words of Christ that are often used to promote pacifism were initially spoken to people still living under the Old Covenant, and should be understood or interpreted accordingly. (Numbers 1; consider II Timothy 2:15; 3:16) What about Matthew 5:39? This is not condemning self-defense or military service, Christ was using an idiom. Note that the Greek word here rendered "smite" is Rhapizo, which means "slap." This does not imply anything against left-handed people, but the vast majority of people are right-handed and a right-handed person must approach someone from behind in order to slap the right cheek; this is dealing with backbiting. What about Matthew 26:52? Again, the passage must be interpreted or understood in relation to context. (Matthew 26:47-56) What about Isaiah 2:4 and similar passages? Bible passages dealing with the actions of nations that will be inevitable as a result of the absence of the threat of war and the universality of righteousness or godliness obviously do not relate to what we should be doing right now.

    Holidays & Birthdays

    Where does the Bible condemn celebrating birthdays and being happy that someone you love was born and lives, especially the birth of our Savior (regardless of whether we have the correct date or not)? What truth or principle is violated? The death, burial, and resurrection of Christ would not have been possible without the virgin birth. Watchtower literature points to two accounts of kings (Herod & Pharaoh) celebrating their birthdays and having someone killed. It must be noted that these ancient kings (dictators) had people killed every day, and not just on their birthdays. According to chapter one of Job (note verse one), Job and his family celebrated birthdays and had such a good time at this that Job felt compelled to offer sacrifices just in case they might have went too far in their merrymaking.

    If we are going to nit-pick on details we should forbid weddings rings since wedding rings have a pagan origin; wedding cakes have a pagan origin so we should probably prohibit them since the Bible never specifically authorizes wedding cakes; the names of the months and the days of the week have pagan origins so we should forbid calendars; we should forbid clocks and watches since the use of clocks and timepieces and the division of the day into the hours comes from astrology and the Bible never commands you to wear a wristwatch or hang a clock on the wall; etc.. The Bible forbids idolatry, not everything that pagans happened to do.

    Consider Romans 14:1, 4-6. This was initially written to Christians in Rome who lived in a culture which promoted pagan holidays (such as Saturnalia). The converted Gentiles there came from a background of pagan holidays and the converted Jews came from a background of Jewish holidays. If you happen to know someone who uses Christmas or Easter as opportunity to worship Baal or Tammuz I will agree that they are sinning and need to repent of idolatry. But it is not a sin to set aside a day unto the Lord to honour Him and enjoy fellowship.

    The Destiny of the Earth

    Jehovah's Witnesses deny that God will one day destroy the earth by fire. (II Peter 3:7) "If these texts (2 Peter 3:7,10 and Revelation 21:1) mean that the literal planet Earth is to be consumed by fire, then the literal heavens (the stars and other heavenly bodies) are also to be destroyed by fire. Such a literal view, however, conflicts with the assurance contained in such texts as Matthew 6:10, Psalm 37:29 and 104:5, also Proverbs 2:21, 22. Furthermore, what effect would fire have on the already intensely hot sun and stars? So the term "earth" in the above-quoted texts must be understood in a different sense." (Reasoning From The Scriptures, p.114) This Watchtower publication goes on to say that the terms "heaven" and "earth" are figurative and the "fire" is also symbolic.

    You should note that the cited proof texts do not conflict with the view that the earth will be destroyed by fire. Also, the same argument they employ could be used to say that their cited proof texts refer to a figurative "earth." If "earth" represents wicked human society, "heaven" represents the ruling powers or earthly governments, and "fire" represents annihilation in these texts, as Watchtower publications claim, then how is it possible to renew something which no longer exists? (Revelation 21:5)

    Watchtower publications say that if II Peter 3:7, 10 means that the literal earth will be destroyed by fire, then this means that the sun and stars (which are already intensely hot) will be destroyed by fire. But is this what the passage says? The word "heaven" is used in the Bible in several senses, and the setting and context must be considered to determine the meaning. "Heaven" does refer to the region in which the stars revolve in the New Testament. (Acts 7:42; Hebrews 11:12) Heaven also refers to the abode of God and Christ. (II Corinthians 12:2; Hebrews 9:24; I Peter 3:22) Heaven can also mean the sky or atmosphere, and in these prophecies about a new heaven and a new earth heaven obviously refers to the atmosphere surrounding the earth. (Matthew 6:26; 8:20; 16:1-3; 24:30; Luke 21:27; Acts 1:9-11; 14:17) It is noteworthy that Watchtower publications say that in the Bible the word "heaven" also refers to the sky or atmosphere surrounding the earth. (Make Sure Of All Things, p.228; Reasoning From The Scriptures, p.161; Aid To Bible Understanding, p.731)

    It should also be noted that the prophecy of a new heavens and a new earth in Isaiah 65 is a different context and setting than New Testament prophecy. Isaiah 65:17 (another JW proof text) and subsequent verses are part of a prophecy about restoration from Babylonian captivity and predict a transformation during which death still occurs while the New Testament predicts a sudden and complete destruction followed by renewal and no more death. (Isaiah 65:20; II Peter 3:7, 10; Revelation 21:1-4)

    Who Are The “Generation” Of Matthew 24:34?

    Watchtower publications teach that Matthew 24 is a prophecy about modern times beginning in 1914 A.D… While the discourse may go on to deal with futurist components, Matthew 24 is a prophecy about the end of the Jewish world which centered on Jerusalem and the temple (Destruction of Jerusalem 70 AD; the Lord's coming in judgment); consider the context and setting. (Matthew 24:1-3) There were many deceivers who claimed to be Christian (saying that Jesus is Christ), false prophets and false messiahs in the years and decades preceding the destruction of Jerusalem. (Matthew 24:4-5, 11, 24; Romans 16:17-18; II Corinthians 11:13-15; Titus 1:10) Wars, famines, and pestilences characterized the years preceding the destruction of Jerusalem. (Matthew 24:6-7; note also that WWI was not the first "world war" in history, and there were other wars preceding WWI that were far more destructive.) Matthew 24:14 was fulfilled before the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. (Romans 10:18; Colossians 1:6, 23) Matthew 24:29 uses an Old Testament figure of speech for national disaster. (Consider Isaiah 13:10; Ezekiel 32:7; Joel 2:10; 3:15) There were survivors of the destruction of 70 AD; thousands were taken captive, many of whom were sold into slavery. (Matthew 24:22, 40-41) Matthew 24:15 is an obvious reference to the earthly temple in Jerusalem then in operation. (Compare Hebrews 9:11-12, 24-25) In 66 A.D., Roman forces surrounded Jerusalem and made a thrust up to the temple walls and then withdrew for no apparent reason, and then the Christians in Judea fled to the mountains as instructed. (Matthew 24:16) Matthew 24:15-16 refers to the prophecy of the seventy weeks in Daniel 9:24-27. Calculating a day for a year (Ezekiel 4:6) means that 69 weeks (62 + 7) is 483 years, which would bring us to the year Christ was baptized and began His public ministry. (Daniel 9:25) Christ was crucified about 3 1/2 years later; in other words, "in the midst of the week" He was "cut off." (Daniel 9:26-27) "Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression...." (Daniel 9:24) Note that Stephen emphasized how Israel's response to God revealed character, and his death led to a persecution and a dispersal of Christians from Jerusalem. (Acts 7:51-53; 8:1-4; consider Matthew 23:33-36) "And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week...." (Daniel 9:27) Cornelius was converted about four years after the crucifixion of Christ, and until his conversion the preaching of the Gospel was limited to Jews, Jewish proselytes, and Samaritans who kept the Mosaic Law. Before Cornelius became a Christian it had not been revealed that Gentiles were to be received into the church as Gentiles and did not have to first become Jews in order to become Christians. (Acts 10:1-48; 11:18) "This generation" refers to people living when Christ uttered the prophecy, and Jerusalem was destroyed within the lifetime of people then living. (Matthew 24:34; compare Matthew 11:16; 12:39; 17:17; 23:36; etc...)

    The Heavenly Hope

    "And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise." (Luke 23:43 KJV) "And he said to him: 'Truly I tell you today, You will be with me in Paradise.'" (Luke 23:43 NWT) The word "Paradise" occurs three times in the New Testament: Luke 23:43, II Corinthians 12:4, and Revelation 2:7. JWs usually ignore the other two passages and insist that Luke 23:43 is a promise that the man to whom Jesus was speaking would be resurrected thousands of years later to live forever on an earth changed into one big beautiful garden park. The Watchtower interpretation is based on the placement of the comma in the words of Jesus; by placing the comma after the word "today" it appears that the resurrection in paradise that Jesus spoke of would be in the far future and not that day. Since there are no commas in the Greek text of these words the placement of the comma is left to the discretion of the translator. Most Bibles place the comma before the word "today," but the New World Translation puts the comma after the word "today." In the dozens of other New Testament passages where Jesus uses the expression "Truly I tell you" or "Truly I say to you" ("tell" and "say" are the same word in the Greek text) the New World Translation is consistent in the punctuation, but the New World Translation makes an exception in Luke 23:43. Why? If I were to vocally and personally say something to you right now it would be quite obvious that I would speaking "today;" where does the context of Luke 23:43 indicate any logical reason that Jesus would feel the need to verbalize the quite obvious fact that He was speaking those words on that very day?

    According to Watchtower teaching only a little flock of 144,000 from among mankind will go to heaven, while the other faithful Jehovah's Witnesses will live forever on earth. (Luke 12:32) But Christ spoke the words of Luke 12:32 when the disciples were still a small group, and He did not set a number. The Watchtower Society pulls the number 144,000 from Revelation 7:4 & 14:1-3. JWs believe that each group of 12,000 in Revelation 7:5-8 is figurative. How can twelve figurative or symbolic groups of 12,000 each add up to a literal number of 144,000?

    JWs believe that God stopped calling people into the body of Christ in 1935 (except to replace those of the anointed who proved unfaithful) and the new believers cannot be born again. (Consider Matthew 23:13) Where does the Bible say the call to the heavenly hope would end in 1935? It doesn't.

    Watchtower leadership use Biblical language to identify themselves as the anointed remnant of the little flock, and promote the idea that this unique status qualifies them to disperse instruction and salvation to the great crowd of other sheep who are outside of the little flock. (John 10:16) JWs believe the anointed remnant composes the "Faithful and discreet slave" of Matthew 24:45-47 (NWT) represented by the Watchtower Society's Governing Body.

    The context of John 10:16 indicates that the other sheep are Gentile Christians. While the Bible discusses the Old Covenant for Jews and the New Covenant for Christians, there is there no reference to a third arrangement for gathering a great crowd of other sheep after 1935 that do not have a heavenly hope. (John 17:20, 24; I Peter 1:3-4)

    Watchtower publications on the subject claim that the word temple in Revelation 7:15 refers to the courtyard of the Gentiles, and then explain that Gentiles were allowed in the outer courtyard of the temple in Jerusalem but not allowed in the inner sanctuary. It is then explained that only the 144,000 spiritual Israelites enter heaven while the other sheep who are not spiritual Jews are limited to the earthly courtyard of Jehovah's arrangement. The word rendered temple in Revelation 7:15 is the Greek word Naos, which refers to the inner sanctuary. If this passage were referring to the whole building or the courtyard of the Gentiles the Greek word Hieron would have been used.

    In Revelation7:9-11 you should note that the great crowd (NWT) is standing before God's throne in the company of angels. Also note that Revelation 19:1 in the New World Translation clearly places the great crowd in heaven.

    The Gospel

    "And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature." (Mark 16:15) "I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed." (Galatians 1:6-8)

    "But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him." (II Corinthians 11:3-4)

    It should be noted that the command of Mark 16:15 does not specify the method that Christians must use. I certainly do not say this to criticize or discourage visitation work or any church visitation programs; such efforts should be commended and encouraged. But Watchtower publications use Acts 20:20 to insist that house-to-house witnessing is a Christian obligation and that Jehovah's Witnesses are the only true Christians because other so-called Christian groups do not go witnessing door to door. Why does the Watchtower Society avoid the possibility that Acts 20:20 refers to house-churches, since the early Christians usually met for worship in private homes? (Romans 16:5; I Corinthians 6:19; Colossians 4:15; II Timothy 3:6; Philemon 2)

    The point is that the message is the main issue and not the method of proclaiming that message, and even if Jehovah's Witnesses were right about the method Christians are obligated to use to proclaim the Gospel, they have the wrong message. The Gospel preached by Christ, the Apostles, and Bible-believing Christians throughout Christian history is the death, burial, and literal resurrection of Christ through which sinners can be justified (declared righteous) through faith in the person and work of Jesus Christ when they repent. (John 3:13-15; Acts 4:15-19; I Corinthians 15:1-4)

    What is the Gospel being proclaimed by Jehovah's Witnesses?

    Let the honest-hearted person compare the kind of preaching of the gospel of the Kingdom done by the religious systems of Christendom during all the centuries with that done by Jehovah's Witnesses since the end of World War I in 1918. They are not one and the same kind. That of Jehovah's Witnesses is really "gospel," or "good news," as of God's heavenly kingdom that was established by the enthronement of his Son Jesus Christ at the end of the Gentile Times in 1914. (The Watchtower 5/1/81, p.17)

    Salvation is a personal experience with Jesus Christ and is through the finished work of Calvary. (John 3:13-16; Acts 2:21; 10:43; Romans 5:1-2,8-11; I Corinthians 15:1-4; II Corinthians 5:17-18; Titus 3:5-6; I Peter 1:3; I John 5:20) Jehovah's Witnesses do acknowledge that faith is essential for salvation but they add works to faith, and Watchtower publications teach that one must be an active Jehovah's Witness and obedient to the Watchtower Society to be saved. Is believing in Jesus Christ sufficient for salvation or must we combine faith and good works to qualify for salvation? Note that the New Testament says that salvation is by faith alone without works almost two hundred times. (Consider John 3:15; 5:24; 11:25; 12:46; 20:31; Acts 16:30-31; Romans 3:20; 4:5; Galatians 2:16; Ephesians 2:8-9; Titus 3:5; etc..; also compare Acts 16:31 with Acts 16:34 and note that believing in Jesus and believing in God are presented as identical acts) "Exercising faith" by doing good works is not what saves. Good works follow salvation but are not the cause of salvation. While genuine faith produces good works, it is faith alone that brings salvation and not good works. (John 3:16, 18; Romans 1:16-17; 4:5; I Corinthians 3:13-15; II Thessalonians 1:8-10; Titus 1:16; I Peter 1:3-10; James 2:14-16; consider Isaiah 64:6)

    Comment (0)

    Sat, Jun 2nd - 1:40PM

    Why I Am Not A Dispensationalist

    For the first few years of my Christian life I believed in a premillennial second coming and a pretribulation rapture. In 1990 or '91 an issue of "Israel My Glory" included an article refuting postmillennialism, and the author used so many logic fallacies and baseless assumptions that I began suspecting that there may be some substance to the opposing arguments if the author had to rely on emotion, assumption, and intellectual arrogance instead of Scripture and logic to prove his point. Besides, Scripture itself, comparing Scripture with Scripture, is the key to understanding Scripture: Bible passages must be understood in relation to context and the whole Bible, and difficult passages must be understood in relation to clear passages. (Psalm 119:104,130; Proverbs 2:6; I Corinthians 2:13; II Timothy 2:15; 3:16-17) For example, contradictions and wrong conclusions are inevitable when one tries to interpret the historical books of the Old Testament and the Gospels and Epistles of the New Testament in the “light” of pet theories about the interpretation of passages of prophecy in Daniel, Zechariah, or Revelation instead of interpreting difficult passages of Scripture in relation to clear passages. I began doing a detailed study of Bible prophecy using a Reference Bible and Bible Dictionary and frequently visiting the library to research the meaning of the language, grammar, setting, and historical background of passages, and was thus led to reject dispensationalism. (II Timothy 2:14-15; I encourage the reader to study the matter further.) Consider a few problems with the dispensational interpretation of Scripture:


    ·        The Bible does not say that world conditions will or must progressively go from bad to worse before the rapture, and the alleged signs of the second coming or signs of the end times have no Scriptural basis. For example, where does the Bible say that the establishment of the modern nation of Israel relates to the second coming or the end or fulfillment of "the times of the Gentiles?" Many Bible prophecies that are being applied to the second coming are fulfilled prophecies (e.g., Return from Babylonian captivity, destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, etc.). Many insist on interpreting every passage of Bible prophecy to be a literal narration of end time events regardless of context and setting. Many twist and distort facts and Scriptures to make every current event fit the mold of pet theories about the fulfillment of Bible prophecy. Many theories and predictions are the result of cross referencing unrelated passages of Bible prophecy. When someone makes a ministry of making predictions and one or some of his predictions prove to be correct it is often assumed that this puts him and all his teachings above scrutiny. This certainly is not rightly dividing the Word of God. (II Timothy 2:15)


    ·        Matthew 24 is a prophecy about the end of the Jewish world which centered on Jerusalem and the temple (Destruction of Jerusalem 70 AD); consider the context and setting. (Matthew 24:1-3) There were many deceivers who claimed to be Christian (saying that Jesus is Christ), and there were many false prophets and false messiahs in the years and decades preceding the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. (Matthew 24:4-5, 11, 24; Romans 16:17-18; II Corinthians 11:13-15; Titus 1:10) Wars, famines, and pestilences characterized the years preceding the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. (Matthew 24:6-7) Matthew 24:14 was fulfilled before the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. (Romans 10:18; Colossians 1:6, 23) "Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken." (Matthew 24:29) Matthew 24:29 uses an Old Testament figure of speech for national disaster. (Consider Isaiah 13:10; Ezekiel 32:7; Joel 2:10; 3:15) There were survivors of the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD; thousands were taken captive, many of whom were sold into slavery. (Matthew 24:22, 40-41) Matthew 24:15 is an obvious reference to the earthly temple in Jerusalem then in operation. (Compare Hebrews 9:11-12, 24-25) In 66 A.D., Roman forces surrounded Jerusalem and made a thrust up to the temple walls and then withdrew for no apparent reason, and then the Christians in Judea fled to the mountains as instructed. (Matthew 24:16) "Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled." (Matthew 24:34) "This generation" is obviously not a reference to some distant future generation, and Jerusalem was destroyed within the lifetime of people then living. (Matthew 24:34; compare Matthew 11:16; 12:39; 17:17; 23:36; etc...)


    ·        II Timothy 3:1-13 is not a description of world conditions during the end times. The term "last days" refers to the Christian era, and it should be noted that all the New Testament references to "last days" were written before 70 AD. (II Timothy 3:1; Joel 2:28-32; Acts 2:16-21; Hebrews 1:1-2; II Peter 3:2-3) Paul's instruction "from such turn away" indicates that the previously described conditions existed at that time. (II Timothy 3:5)


    ·        The argument for a completely literal hermeneutic is self-defeating as those who use this argument to prove dispensationalism also teach that some parts of the Bible are figurative, allegorical, or typical. For example, dispensationalists argue for a literal interpretation of every detail of the Book of Revelation but do not themselves interpret everything in Revelation literally. (E.g., Revelation 1:4, 20; 17:9-12; etc.)


    ·        If Revelation 20:4 speaks of a literal bodily resurrection then why did John specify that he "saw the souls?"


    ·        What is the basis for insistence that the Millennium of chapter twenty of the Book of Revelation is a literal one thousand year period? (Consider Psalm 50:10; II Peter 3:8)


    ·        “He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus." (Revelation 22:20) This refers to how and not when Christ will come. While dispensationalists use this and similar passages to support their theory, Bible skeptics point to passages like this as evidence of error in Scripture since this was written nearly two thousand years ago. It could appear to be an error and could appear to be saying when Christ will come until you examine the meaning of words and grammar. For example, “quickly” (Greek: Tachu) does not necessarily mean that the action will take place immediately or even soon but can also be a description of the speed or suddenness of the action once the action has been initiated.


    ·        "Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it." (Matthew 7:13-14) Matthew 7:13-14 is descriptive, not prescriptive. In the context of the time few Jews would recognize Jesus and many would be destroyed in the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. (Luke 19:44)


    ·        "Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof." (Matthew 21:43) Dispensationalism says that God is working through two distinct bodies of people, natural Israel and the Church, to fulfill His purposes concerning the second coming and the Millennium, and that the goal of the Church is to be raptured in a premillennial second coming, and God's plan for natural Israel is the establishment of an earthly kingdom after the second coming. As a result of the teaching that Jewish priority and privilege is perpetual the question of whether a Gentile could be a Christian without first becoming a Jew was one of the great issues of the first century. Christians were unfairly judging one another on the basis of the observance or neglect of circumcision, the seventh-day Sabbath, Jewish holidays, dietary restrictions, and other aspects of the Old Covenant that separated or distinguished natural Jews from Gentiles; those laws were based on principles and truths that did not change, but their application changed under the New Covenant. (Consider Matthew 5:17; Romans 3:31) The real issue was whether anyone could really be considered a Jew without first becoming a Christian; the Church is a continuing body in the Old Testament and the New Testament and the New Testament Church is the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy concerning Israel. (Acts 2:16-21; 15:12-17; Romans 2:28-29; 4:11-12; 9:6-8, 23-26; 11:11-32; Galatians 3:7-8, 13-14, 16-19, 24-29; 4:21-31; Ephesians 2:11-22; 3:5-6; Hebrews 10:15-17; 12:22-24; I Peter 2:9-12; Revelation 2:9) Natural Jews were and are being saved individually, but the Bible does not say that natural Israel will be saved as a nation. (Romans 11:1-2, 5) God's covenant with natural Israel was a conditional covenant. (Deuteronomy 4:23, 26-27; 28:15, 49-53; Jeremiah 31:36; Micah 3:9-12) The Old Testament requirement of the obedience of faith and genuine repentance removed Israel as a special nation, as natural Jews as a people cast off God's Word for their human traditions and rejected Christ. (Numbers 15:30-31; Matthew 15:1-9; 21:43; John 8:33-44, 47)


    ·        If Christ had offered the Jews a physical kingdom, as dispensationalism claims, they would not have rejected it. (John 6:15)


    ·        Old Testament prophecy about restoring Israel was fulfilled by the calling of the Gentiles to be God’s people. (Compare Amos 9:11-12 & Acts 15:13-17; compare Hosea 1:10; 2:23 & Romans 9:22-26)


    ·        The prophecy of the New Covenant that is made with the house of Israel is fulfilled in the New Testament Church. (Jeremiah 31:31-34; Matthew 26:26-28; Mark 14:22-24; Luke 22:19-20; I Corinthians 11:23-25; II Corinthians 3:5-6; Hebrews 8:6-13; 10:14-18)


    ·        The second coming of Christ will bring the sudden destruction of the heavens and the earth, not the establishment of an earthly kingdom. (II Peter 3:10-12)


    ·        There will be a general resurrection of the dead. (Matthew 5:29; I Corinthians 15:26, 51-55)


    ·        Dispensationalism promotes a neutrality or isolation that rejects or prevents interaction between Christianity and culture. It encourages believers to withdraw from society and be neutral as a result of preoccupation with speculations about things which they obviously do not and cannot know. (Matthew 5:13-16; Acts 17:6-7; 26:18; note that Christ came to destroy the works of the Devil – I John 3:8)


    ·        Jesus Christ is the present ruler of the earth and the end will come after He has destroyed all dominion, authority and power (Acts 2:30-36; 1 Corinthians 15:20-28; Ephesians 1:18-23; Hebrews 1:8, 13; 10:13; consider Acts 17:6-7)


    ·        Dispensationalism contradicts Scriptures on the growth of the kingdom. (Psalm 2:8; 22:27; 47:9; 72:11; 86:9-10; Daniel 2:35, 44; Isaiah 9:7; 11:9; 66:23; Matthew 13:31-33) Note that if you plant seeds in your garden or field and then later look at the seeds or watch your garden or field at any one particular point and time between planting and harvest it might appear that nothing is happening, and this is also true of the Christianization of the whole world. (Matthew 13:31-33; Mark 4:26-28; Luke 17:20)


    ·        Christians are commissioned to convert nations as well as individuals. (Matthew 28:18-20; Revelation 15:4; note that when Christianity has dominance it will be by consent – Luke 17:20-21)


    ·        Dispensationalism limits the scope of the Gospel. (John 3:16-17; 12:32; Romans 5:15-21; I Timothy 2:1-6; I John 2:2; 4:4; Revelation 5:9; 7:9; 14:6)


    ·        Scriptures present the Church as victorious while dispensationalism sees a mere remnant of believers remaining when Christ returns. (Matthew 16:17-19; John 12:31; 16:7-11; Luke 10:17-19; Acts 26:16-18; II Corinthians 10:3-5; Colossians 1:13-14; I John 4:4)

    Comment (0)

    Back to Blog Main Page

    About Me

    Name: Arnold Saxton
    ChristiansUnite ID: ajsaxton
    Member Since: 2010-03-30
    Location: Fruithurst, Alabama, United States
    Denomination: Baptist
    About Me: It would be difficult to give all details so I will touch on just a few things. I was born in the Midwest & I have Southern ancestry so I sometimes get prejudice from both sides. Ex-Jehovah's Witness. (Disassociated myself 1985) Christian since 1987.... more

    June 2012
              1 2
    3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    24 25 26 27 28 29 30
    prev   next
    Blog Roll
    A K Dart dot com - News & Information
    Arnold Saxton (YouTube)
    Bible Research
    Bible Study Tools Online - Verses, Commentaries, Concordances, Verses, Parallel Verses
    Brother Arnold's Blog
    Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry
    Christian Book Distributors
    ChristiansUnite.com - Christian Resources
    Creation Today
    Crosswalk - Christian Living Resources
    Faith & Heritage - Occidental Christianity For Preserving Western Culture & People
    Fallacy Detective
    Freedom Ministries - Pastor John Weaver
    Gospel Music Warehouse
    Grace Gems!
    Grace Online Library - Historic Baptist, Reformed & Puritan Resources
    GunCite: gun control and Second Amendment issues
    jeetfeet (Pastor John Weaver)
    KJIC 90.5 FM (Santa Fe, Texas) - Christian Music
    Ladies Against Feminism - Promoting Beautiful Womanhood!
    Logical Fallacies
    Natural News - Natural Health News & Scientific Discoveries
    News With Views - News & Information
    OnePlace.com - Free Online Radio Christian Radio Ministry Broadcasts
    Second Amendment Project
    SermonAudio - Library of free MP3 audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide
    StudyLight.org - Online Bible Study Tools and Resources
    The Blaze - News & Information
    The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood
    The New American - News & Information
    The Oak 90.9 FM (Lagrange, Georgia) - Christian Radio
    The Schwarz Report - A publication of the Christian Anti-Communism Crusade
    TowerWatch Ministries - Jehovah's Witness and Watchtower Information Online
    Townhall.com - News & Information
    Witnesses For Jesus, Inc. - For Witness to Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons (Latter-day Saints)
    WorldNetDaily - News & Information
    WSOF Christian Radio (Madisonville, Kentucky)
    A Balanced View Of Separation - by Arnold J. Saxton
    A Call To End Christian Prohibition, by Marcus Pittman
    A Godly Man is a Lover of the Word! - by Thomas Watson
    A Look At The Cults - By Arnold J. Saxton
    A NEED FOR CAUTION - by Arnold J. Saxton
    A Simple Way To Share The Gospel - By Arnold J. Saxtom
    Abolish Adolescence!, by Thomas Sowell
    Alledged Biblical Exceptions To The Biblical Norm Of Intra-Racial Marriage - by Arnold J. Saxton
    An Examination Of Dispensationalism - by William E. Cox
    Attention Deficit Disorder - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Avoid Witch Hunts - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Becoming Salt and Light, by Richard J. Krejcir
    Beware Of Philosophy - by Mike Ford
    Biblical Manhood and Womanhood and the Contemporary Collapse of Sexual Morals, By Peter Jones
    Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, by Chris Good
    Born Of Water: What Does It Mean?, by Colin Melbourne
    But Is It In The Bible? - by Gary DeMar
    Can You Trust The Holy Bible? - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Childish Labor Laws, by Thomas Sowell
    Christian Concern? - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Christians & The World - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Church Bus Ministry - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Church Membership - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Church Youth Groups, by David Crank
    Climate Change: Back to the Future? - by Mark Alexander
    Concerns About The Air Force & The United Nations - Arnold J. Saxton
    Confidence About the Earthly Triumph of Christ's Kingdom, By Dr. Greg Bahnsen
    Constitution of the Confederate States of America
    Contact Elected Officials
    Courageous Movie Scene: Nathan Meets Derrick by Arnold J. Saxton
    Criminalizing masculinity - by Paul Craig Roberts
    Daniel’s Seventy Weeks - By Dr. Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.
    David & Bathsheba - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Dealing with Public Schools - Arnold J. Saxton
    Declaration of Independence
    Did The “Last Days” Begin In 1914 AD as Taught in Watchtower Publications? - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Dinah's Mistake - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Dispensationalist Beliefs - The Scriptures, by William E. Cox
    Divine Providence, by Donald Townsley
    Division & Unity - True vs False, by Chris Good
    Does a lack of men lead to liberalism? - by David Murrow
    Does The Bible Promote Sexual Abuse? - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Domestic Tranquility - by E. Carolyn Graglia
    Dominion Mandate - by Henry Morris, Ph.D.
    Don't Judge, Lest you Be Judged!, By Chris Good
    Don't Touch the Lord's Anointed!, by Chris Good
    Election - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Enemies or Allies? - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Evaluating Premillennialism - by Cornelis P. Venema
    Evolutionists Believe in Magic - by Gary DeMar
    Facades & Misconceptions About Socialism - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Feeding Sheep or Amusing Goats? - by C. H. Spurgeon
    Feminism Degrades Women - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Four Arguments Against Euthanasia Or Mercy Killing, by David F. Reagan
    Francis E. Willard - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Free to Decide: Confessions of a Former Calvinist - by Brandon Cox
    From Liberty To Legalism - by Timothy S. Morton
    Fundamental Doctrines of the Bible - By David Allen Reed
    Gender Roles: The Image of God and the Sin of Unisex - by Ken Clark
    Georgia State Flag - Saint Andrews Cross is a Christian symbol
    God Can Effectively Use A Few Or One - by Arnold J. Saxton
    God's sovereignty and Man's Responsibility, by C.H.Mackintosh
    God's Willingness and Man's Unwillingness, by George Zeller
    Grieving or Quenching the Holy Spirit, by Chris Good
    Have the Charismatic Gifts Ceased?, by Matthew J. Slick
    Hell - Refuting The Watchtower Teaching Of Annihilationism - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Help For Ex-Jehovah's Witnesses - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Homosexuality In The Armed Forces - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Homosexuality: Fact and Fiction, by Joseph P. Gudel
    Hopelessly Patriarchal, by Steve M. Schlissel
    How A Police State Is Created - By Arnold J. Saxton
    How Some Christians Contribute to Election Losses - by Gary DeMar
    HOW TO CREATE A MONSTER - By Lynn Stuter
    How To Identify A Dangerous Religious Group
    Human Depravity, by R.C. Sproul
    Impartation, Anointing, and Manifestation - - by Leonard Bay and Rev. Rafael D Martinez
    Imputation - By Arnold J. Saxton
    In Defense of the Confederacy - By Alexander Massa
    Is Birth Control Biblical?, by Tony Warren
    Is it Sinful for Women to Have a Career? - By David J. Stewart
    Is It The Will of God For Me To Marry Or Remain Single?, by Gillis Triplett
    Is The Pretribulation Rapture Biblical? - by Brian Scwertley
    It Makes One Wonder - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Judgement Must Begin At The House Of God - Arnold J. Saxton
    Keep A Balanced View Of Bible Prophecy - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Keep A Balanced View Of Experts - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Key To Revival - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Legalists and Legalism, by Chris Good
    Lessons From Samson's Mistakes - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Liberty - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Materialism and the Believer, by David B. Curtis
    Millennial Views Debate
    Modernism and Biblical Inerrancy, by Brian M. Schwertley
    Modesty & Unisex Appearance - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Moses Or Christ? Paul's Reply To Dispensational Error - by Charles D. Alexander
    My Exodus From The Watchtower Organization - By Arnold J. Saxton
    My Liberation From Feminism - by Carolyn McCulley
    New Light - By Arnold J. Saxton
    No-Fault Divorce - Feminism's Crowning Achievement, by Rick Scarborough
    Nothing Is Really New, Just Revivals Of The Old - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Offend A Feminist: The Case For Repealing The 19th Amendment - by Robert Belvedere
    Old-Fashioned Values - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Oneness Pentecostalism - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Patriarchy - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Paul's Theology Of Israel's Future: A Nonmillennial Interpretation Of Romans 11 - by Lee Irons
    Personal Bible Study - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Pharisees & Sadducees - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Pledging Allegiance to the Omnipotent Lincolnian State - by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
    Postmillennialism: "In the days of these kings …" The Prophecy of Daniel - By Jay Rogers.
    Postmillennialism: Ezekiel’s Vision - By Jay Rogers.
    Postmillennialism: Of the increase of His government there shall be no end - By Jay Rogers
    Postmillennialism: Prophecies Regarding the Messianic Kingdom - By Jay Rogers
    Postmillennialism: Wishful Thinking or Certain Hope? - By Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., Th.D.
    Premarital Sex - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Priorities & Doubtful Disputations - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Prophetic Speculation Out of Kilter and Hurting the Bible’s Authority, by Gary DeMar
    Psychology: The Trojan Horse - by Gil Rugh
    Questions For Evolutionists - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Quit You Like Men - by James Thornton
    Rapture and Resurrection, by Greg L. Bahnsen
    Reaching & Influencing Public Officials - Arnold J. Saxton
    Reasoning with Jehovah's Witnesses - by Kevin Quick
    Rebellious Wives! - by David J. Stewart
    Remembering Lot - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Republicanism - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Restoring Freedom, by Franklin Sanders
    Romans 10:13 in the New World Translation - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Safe Sex? - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Safe Sex?, by Rusty Wright, B.S.
    Same-Sex Marriage - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Satan's Ministers - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Scientific Patriarchy, by Daniel Shaddox
    Selma to Montgomery, 30 Years Later - by Marian Evans
    Seventh Day Sabbath? - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Sex Education - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Sheep & Goats - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Spiritual Warfare - by Arnold J. Saxton
    State Secession Is Not Immoral or Unconstitutional - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Ten Lies Of Feminism, by Sue Bohlin
    Term Limits? - by Arnold J. Saxton
    The 14th Amendment Is Unconstitutional - by Judge L.H. Perez
    The Accusation Of Racism - by Arnold J. Saxton
    The Accusation Of Racism - by Arnold J. Saxton
    The Bible Doctrine Of Hell Examined - by Brian Schwertley
    The Blemished Bride, by Robert A. Wagner
    The Bodily Resurrection - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Christian Divorce Rate Myth, by Glenn T. Stanton
    The Christian Worldview - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Connection Between Evangelism and Gender Issues, by Randy Stinson
    The Dangers of Feminism, By David J. Stewart
    The Destiny of The Earth - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Devil’s Devices - by Arnold J. Saxton
    The Difference Between A "Personal Attack" And "Discernment," by Terry Bowers and Rev. Rafael D Martinez
    The Eternal Security Of All Blood Bought Believers - by J. M. Carroll
    The Feminization Of Society - by Dennis Prager
    The First Blast of the Trumpet, by John Knox
    The Freedom Summer Murders - by Arnold J. Saxton
    The Heavenly Hope - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Historical Setting of the Writing of Revelation, By Dr. Greg Bahnsen
    The Holy Bible or Watchtower Publications? - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Immorality of Liberals - Selwyn Duke
    The Impact of The Entertainment Media on The Family - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Importance of Fundamental Doctrines - Arnold J. Saxton
    The Letter Kills, But the Spirit Gives Life, by Chris Good
    The Name Jehovah Is Not In The New Testament - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Natural Use Of Women - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The New Age Movement - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Only True Christian Religion? - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Origin of Old-Earth Geology and its Ramifications for Life in the 21st Century, by Dr. Terry Mortenson
    The Person, Work, and Present Status of Satan By Dr. Greg Bahnsen
    The Post-Christian Generation - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Premillennial Deception - by Brian Schwertley
    The Rapture Problem, by Chuck Baldwin
    The Spoiling Of Christianity By Psychology, by David L. Brown
    The Star - by Arnold J. Saxton
    The Trinity - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Triumph Of The Church: A Biblical Defense Of Postmillennialism - by William Einwechter
    The Two Resurrections: John 5:19-29 and Revelation 20:4-6 - By Aaron Orendorff
    The Two-Witness Rule - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Use Of Tracts, by R. A. Torrey
    The Watchtower Gospel - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Watchtower Interpretation of Exodus 3:15 - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Watchtower Prohibition Against Holidays & Birthdays
    The [Prophecy] Matrix: Endtimes Virtuality - by Gregg Strawbridge
    They Are Not Above Scrutiny - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Thy Kingdom Come, by Kim Riddlebarger
    Tithing Is Biblical - by Kenneth Hemphill
    To Whom Does the Land of Palestine Belong? - by Thomas Williamson
    Toxicity Of Environmentalism - by George Reisman
    True Repentance Will Lead To Salvation, by Michael Bradley
    Understanding Feminists and Their Fantasies - by Phyllis Schlafly
    Unisex - by Jack Hyles
    Unrealistic Expectations - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Unsaved Church Members - By Arnold J. Saxton
    US Constitution Versus Modern US Government - By Arnold J. Saxton
    US Intrusions Into Race Relations In The South - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Victorious Eschatology By Jay Rogers
    Watchtower Disfellowshipping: A Biblical Perspective - By Rafael Martinez
    Watchtower Neutrality Refuted - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Watchtower Neutrality Refuted - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Watchtower Shunning - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Watchtower Teachings About The Second Coming - By Arnold J. Saxton
    WHAT HAPPENED TO YOUNG ADULTS? - by Arnold J. Saxton
    What is "optimistic amillennialism"? - By Jay Rogers
    What Is A Biblical Christian?, by Albert N. Martin
    What Is a Christian Nation? - by Frankin Sanders
    What Is Wrong With Federal Courts? - by Arnold J. Saxton
    What's Conservative about the Pledge of Allegiance? - by Gene Healy
    When Hiring Married Women Was Unacceptable - by Laura Wood
    When Prophecy Books Go Bad - by Gary DeMar
    Who Really Owns the 'Holy Land'? - By Robert L. Reymond
    Who Really Owns the Land of Palestine? - By Thomas Williamson
    Why Christians Should Have Nothing To Do With Snowmobiles, by Norman Street
    Why Contend? - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Why Cremation Is Unscriptural, by Paul P. Maher
    Why Doctrinal Preaching Declines, by Arthur W. Pink
    Why I Cannot Become A Mormon - by Arnold J. Saxton
    You Can Trust the Communists (to be Communists), by Dr. Fred C. Schwarz
    Youth Ministry - by Arnold J. Saxton
    Zionism versus the Bible - by Thomas Williamson
    ~ VIDEOS:
    ~Anti-Intellectualism is Not Biblical. (Spurgeon/Kielar)
    ~Big Jim Hamill - Apple Tree Song NQC 1998
    ~Dispensationalism, is the rapture Biblical? - Tim Conway
    ~Dr. Morey: Hating your enemies
    ~Dr. Morey: What is worldliness?
    ~Drive Thru Church - NewSong Edit
    ~Evaluating the Jehovah's Witness New World Translation (Video)
    ~Fred and Kate Gholson leave the Truth in 1986
    ~Immigration, World Poverty and Gumballs - Updated 2010
    ~Is Theology your idol? - Tim Conway
    ~Mind Control Cults
    ~Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984)
    ~Ron Paul exposes United Nations plan to destroy US (1990's?)
    ~SHOCKING DOCUMENTARY 1- False spirits invade the church - KUNDALINI WARNING - Andrew Strom -
    ~Silly Women
    ~So many Denominations, which one is true? - Tim Conway
    ~Tares and Wheat - by Bailey Smith
    ~Testimonies about 1975 from people who were Jehovah's Witnesses during the time
    ~The Battle With Sin: Who is the Greatest? - Tim Conway
    ~The Beast As Saint: The Truth About Martin Luther King Jr.
    ~The Consequences of Feminism
    ~The Israel Lobby
    ~The Lesters - "He Didn't Throw the Clay Away" - 1992
    ~The Myth Of The Chosen People
    ~The Watchtower's False Teachings About Christmas Exposed!
    ~Turn Your Eyes Upon Jesus by Alan Jackson
    ~Watchtower Circular Reasoning
    ~What A Friend We Have In Jesus - Alan Jackson
    ~What your 2nd Amendment right is all about
    ~Witnesses Of Jehovah (1986 Movie)
    ~~1975 -What the Watchtower doesn't want you to know

    More From ChristiansUnite...    About Us | Privacy Policy | | ChristiansUnite.com Site Map | Statement of Beliefs

    Copyright © 1999-2019 ChristiansUnite.com. All rights reserved.
    Please send your questions, comments, or bug reports to the