Wed, Sep 30th - 7:28AM
Genesis
25:27c-28 †.
Gen 25:27c . . who stayed in camp. Does
that mean Jacob never ventured outdoors? No. After all, his family was
pastoral; they lived in tents and spent their whole lives working outdoors.
Staying in camp only means Jacob would rather come on home when the day was
over, take a hot shower, eat dinner with his family, brush his teeth, and sleep
between clean sheets rather than needing a bath out under the stars on the
ground with creepy-crawlies. Esau
wasn't dependable; and probably off away from home on one safari after another.
But Jacob was always nearby, ready to lend a hand with the chores, shear the
sheep, mend the fences, and help his mom get in a load of wood and water. He
was like the ranchers in the movie Shane-- hard working and dependable --very
unlike his wild and wooly brother who very likely scorned animal husbandry and
thought of it as a life for losers. Jacob
was a lot like his mom Rebecca. Although she too came from a family with
servants, it wasn't below her to bring in the evening water when it was time.
Jacob could have kicked back and lived the life of a spoiled rich kid and never
lifted a finger to help out around the ranch, leaving it all up to the
servants. But he didn't do that. No. Jacob was a working rancher: he pitched in
wherever he could because it was his nature to make himself useful and
productive. †. Gen 25:28a . . Isaac favored Esau because he
had a taste for game; The
Hebrew word for "favored" is from 'ahab
(aw-hab') or possibly 'aheb
(aw-habe') which mean: to have affection for. Family
counselors will tell you that favoritism is harmful: and who from a large
family doesn't already know that. But nevertheless it's just about near
impossible to prevent favoritism. People are only human after all. Up
to this point, Esau seems an okay kind of guy. No really serious faults are
readily apparent. And he seems affable enough. On the pages of Old Testament
Scripture, he isn't said to be a friendless loner, or an angry sociopath; nor
into bad habits like drinking, gambling, murder, robbery, lies, laziness,
fighting, disrespect for his parents, blasphemy, selfishness, foul language, or
anything else like that. The
only apparent difference between Esau and Jacob-- up to this point --is Esau's
preference for roaming the great outdoors instead of putting in a day's work
around the ranch. Jewish folklore lays some pretty heavy sins upon Esau. but
none of them are listed here in chapter 25. For
now, neither Isaac nor Rebecca have voiced any gripes against either one of
their boys. Isaac does favor Esau more, but only because of the venison that he
prepared for his dad on occasion-- which of course would appeal to Isaac
because it was wild game rather than the meat of domestic animals. Guys
sometimes feel more manly when they eat meat taken in hunting rather than from
a local super market. Isaac is one of those men for whom this proverb rings
true: The way to a man's heart is through this stomach. †. Gen 25:28b . . but Rebecca favored Jacob. Well,
that's understandable. Jacob was religious, temperate, conscientious, and
helpful: attributes Rebecca would certainly value; whereas Esau was secular,
out hunting, and saw no value in his dad's religion whatsoever (Heb 12:15-17).
And Jacob was very likely home a whole lot more than Esau; and made good
company too. Guys like Esau tend to be center-of-attention addicts; and eclipse
everyone else in the room to the point where you get the feeling they believe
themselves the only ones in the whole wide world that count and the only
justification for your existence is to be their audience. Rebecca
was a no-nonsense kind of girl. I think she was very impressed by Abraham's
chief steward because he was serious about his business and got right to it
with no fooling around; plus he was a man of prayer too. I think all of that
had a great deal of influence on Rebecca's decision to leave home with him. I
suspect Rebecca saw that very same kind of character in Jacob; and it had more
appeal to her than the swash buckling, great white hunter attitude that
compelled Esau to go off on safari so often. Not that an adventurer's nature is
bad or anything like that. But Rebecca preferred the company of disciplined,
level headed, temperate men who take care of their families and put them first.
The kind who take their responsibilities seriously and don't shirk. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Tue, Sep 29th - 9:24AM
Genesis
25:26c-27b †. Gen 25:26c . . Isaac was sixty years old
when they were born. Isaac
married Rebecca at forty (Gen 25:20). If Becky was 18 at her wedding, she would
have been 38. Imagine waiting twenty years to have your first child? Quite a
few modern marriages end long before then. †. Gen 25:27a . .When the boys grew up, Esau
became a skillful hunter, a man of the outdoors; Esau
was the macho kind of boy dads are usually very proud of. He was a rugged,
athletic man who preferred to sleep on the ground, under the stars, rather than
between sheets. A real he-man; who, in our own day, would very likely own
several guns; some of which would be brutal calibers like a .44 magnum revolver
or a 10 ga. shotgun. But
Esau was totally physical. The poor lad had no brain at all. He was brave,
adventurous, and a natural at hunting, but that is about all you could say for
him-- kind of like professional sports stars who only got into college because
of their athletic ability, not especially for any academic accomplishments. Esau
pegged the mark in virility; but at the same time rated a big fat zero in sense
and sensibility-- a Neanderthal knuckle-dragger kind of guy. There was really
no need for Esau to kill wildlife for fresh meat: as if the family were
desperate for food; after all, Isaac was very wealthy in livestock. No.
Esau hunted for sport, and his goal was not to help support the family, but to
show-off his prowess, and to impress himself, and those around him. Esau
excelled in outdoor survival skills: he was very definitely one-up on Jacob in
that sphere; plus it gained him a level of admiration from his dad that
exceeded the esteem Isaac held for Jacob. But
for all his natural athletic ability, Esau placed no importance whatsoever upon
things of eternal value. He was the classic man under the sun; viz: earthly,
secular to the bone, and his so-called "needs" took the highest
priority over everything. (cf. 1Cor 2:14) "See
to it that no one comes short of the grace of God; that no root of bitterness
springing up causes trouble, and by it many be defiled; that there be no
immoral or impious person like Esau, who sold his own birthright for a single
meal." (Heb 12:15-16) †. Gen 25:27b . . but Jacob was a mild man What's
Genesis saying? That Jacob was a wimp; some kind of a mommy's boy? No. Far from
it. The word for "mild" is from tam
(tawm) which means: gentle; viz: temperate. The
Bible's God holds gentleness in very high regard. "For
yet a little while, and the wicked shall not be: yea, thou shalt diligently
consider his place, and it shall not be. But the meek shall inherit the earth;
and shall delight themselves in the abundance of peace." (Ps 37:10-11) "Blessed
are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth." (Matt 5:5) The
koiné Greek word for "meek" in the third beatitude is praus (prah-ooce') which means
essentially the very same thing as tam; viz: temperate; mild. Moses
was meek (Num 12:3) and Christ was meek. (Matt 11:29, Matt 21:5) Webster's
defines mild as: gentle in nature or behavior; viz: temperate; in other words:
agreeable, approachable, reasonable, calm, mellow, and self-controlled. Non-temperate
people could be characterized as moody, grudging, irritable, emotional,
thin-skinned, unreasonable, irrational, reactive, defensive, confrontational,
assertive; and around whom one has to walk on egg shells all the time. A
temperate person, though mellow in demeanor, should never be assumed lacking in
strength, courage, conviction, or self confidence. Anybody who's studied the
lives of Moses and Jesus can easily testify that neither of those men were
either timid, wimpy, or vacillating; no, they walked softly and carried a big
stick. Jacob
and his dad Isaac were temperate men; but could be assertive when the situation
called for it. Temperate people like Jacob and Isaac pick their battles
carefully, and avoid getting all riled up over trifles. That's
all saying Jacob was mature and sensible; in contrast to his brother Esau who
was carnal, immature, sensuous, and acted more like an adolescent than a grown
man. Mature men take their responsibilities seriously, and their priorities are
far different than a guy like Esau who just wants to have fun and adventure all
the time. So
anyway, in the economy of God, a person with tam is to be admired way over and
above a rugged athletic he-man. It's okay to be a rugged athletic he-man.
There's nothing eo ipso wrong in that. After all, David was a rugged he-man
himself. But it's not okay to be one without tam. Well, that was Esau-- the
picture of health and male virility, but he lacked tam. Esau was a rude, lewd,
crude bag of pre-chewed food dude. Jacob
was very different. It's true he was crafty, and maybe a bit dishonest at
times; but he was no wimp I can assure you; and, on the whole, a very good man. Jacob
was mellow: he didn't need to show off and win the applause of the crowd to
feel good about himself. He was the strong silent type who enjoyed home life
and ranching. He was productive, and that's where he found the most contentment
in life. Jacob
had the qualities that many good women look for in a husband. He was stable,
enjoyed being at home with his family, worked an honest day's work, loved his
mom, had no issues with women, and appreciated the value of religion. Jacob
wasn't a grand-stander, nor a narcissistic show-off; nor the kind of guy to run
off on adventures all the time or constantly move to where the grass was
greener. He didn't leave home till he was 75, and even then it was only because
he was on the lamb. Jacob was the kind of man who buys a home and stays in the
same neighborhood until his kids are out of school. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Mon, Sep 28th - 8:13AM
Genesis
25:23b-26b †.
Gen 25:23b . . One people shall be mightier than the other, and the older shall
serve the younger. Esau
will come out first; therefore, chronologically, he's the eldest son. However,
the right of primogeniture was taken from him and given to Jacob. That was
God's sovereign prerogative as the paterfamilias of Moses' people. Biblically, the firstborn son's birthright
isn't inalienable; rather, quite transferable to a younger sibling e.g. Rueben
and Joseph (1Chrn 5:1), Mannasah and Ephraim (Gen 48:13-19), and David and
Jesus (Ps 101:1 cf. Matt 22:42-45) †.
Gen 25:24 . .When her time to give birth was at hand, there were twins in her
womb. Multiple
births in human beings arise either from the simultaneous impregnation of more
than one ovum or from the impregnation of a single ovum that divides into two
or more parts, each of which develops into a distinct embryo. Plural offspring
developing from a single egg are known as "identical"-- they are
always of the same gender, resemble one another very closely, and have similar
fingerprints and blood types. Offspring
produced from separate ova are "fraternal"-- not necessarily of the
same gender; they have the usual family resemblance of brothers and sisters. Precisely
of which type Jacob and Esau were, is difficult to tell. However, they are
definitely not identical; either in physical appearance nor in personality, nor
in speech. †.
Gen 25:25a . .The first one emerged red, like a hairy mantle all over; The
word for "red" is 'admoniy (ad-mo-nee') which can refer to either red
hair or to a reddish, rosy complexion. In Esau's case, it's difficult to know
for certain which applied. That he was a hairy kid right from birth is
uncontested. However, to avoid the association with red hair; some feel that
the conjunction "and" should be inserted just after the comma, so
that the verse would read: The first one emerged red, and hairy all over like a
mantle. Jacob
looked like most babies do at birth: a little cherub; bald and smooth skinned. Esau,
in contrast, was not only hairy, but because of his fur, he was rough to the
touch; sort of like a woolen G.I. blanket. Esau wasn't your typical cuddly
little tykester. When Rebecca held him, it wasn't like holding a little boy, it
was more like holding a grizzly bear cub, so to speak. Maybe that was a
contributing factor in Rebecca's favoritism of Jacob? How many mothers can really
warm up to a baby who looks like he'll morph into a werewolf any second? †.
Gen 25:25b . . they named him Esau. The
Hebrew word for Esau is from 'Esav
(ay-sawv'); the meaning of which isn't known for certain. Some say it means
rough-- like rough to the touch. Others think it might mean to cover, or
envelop like a blanket --a distinct possibility given Esau's appearance as one
covered with hair all over his body. (maybe even on his little tush too.) †.
Gen 25:26a . .Then his brother emerged, holding on to the heel of Esau; Sibling
rivalry between the two baby brothers was very intense. Jacob undoubtedly held
on to Esau's heel to slow him down so he wouldn't get too far ahead-- and also
an aggressive attempt to stop him from going first even though Esau was legitimately
first in line to be born. †.
Gen 25:26b . . so they named him Jacob. The
Hebrew word for Jacob is from Ya' aqob
(yah-ak-obe') which means: heel-catcher. Esau
defined a heel-catcher like this: "Esau
said: Was he, then, named Jacob that he might supplant me these two times?
First he took away my birthright and now he has taken away my blessing!"
(Gen 27:36) Supplanters
take things by coup, usurping, artifice and/or treachery; e.g. Ray Kroc and the
McDonalds® fast food chain. Right
from the womb, Jacob desired supremacy over his brother Esau and struggled to
get out ahead of him. How male infants can be so competitive at such an early
age is a total mystery; but not impossible. Boys are competitive by nature, and
don't like to come in second place; especially against a brother. For some
strange reason, it is much easier for a boy to suffer defeat by a non-kin male
opponent than by his own sibling. Jacob
is one very Tricky Ricky who knows how to trip people up, and how to keep them
from getting ahead, and how to cleverly separate them from what is rightfully
theirs. That
boy was born way too soon. He should have been on Wall Street; manipulating
stocks, marketing derivatives, and raiding corporations. Jacob isn't usually
portrayed in Scripture as a man of muscle and brute strength, but as a man of
cunning and determination, a man who gets what he wants by patience, stealth,
intelligence, and/or trickery rather than by brute force. Maybe he should have
been a corporate lawyer? =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Sun, Sep 27th - 8:21AM
Genesis
25:23a †. Gen 25:23a . . and the Lord answered her:
Two nations are in your womb, two separate peoples shall issue from your body; The
Hebrew word for "nations" is from gowy
(go'-ee); or the short version goy (go'-ee) which means: (in the sense of
massing) a foreign nation; hence, Gentiles; also (figuratively) a troop of
animals, or a flight of locusts. The
words gowy and goy, are commonly used by modern Jews in referring to people who
aren't Jewish. But the words goyim and goy do not especially mean non-Jews.
Those words apply to all manner of people masses; both Jew and Gentile. There
are other Bible examples where those words unmistakably apply to not only non
Jews, but Jews too. For example: "I
will make of you a great nation" (Gen 12:2). That
promise was made to Abraham regarding his progeny. The word for
"nation" in that verse (which in this case clearly refers to the
people of Israel) is gowy, the same word describing both Jacob and Esau. Another
example is Gen 18:17-18 where both Hebrews and Gentiles are referred to as
goyyim: "Now
the Lord had said, Shall I hide from Abraham what I am about to do, since
Abraham is to become a great and populous nation and all the nations of the
earth are to bless themselves by him?" In
another instance; God gave His word that, while the universe exists, the people
of Israel would never cease to be goy. "Thus
said the Lord, Who established the sun for light by day, the laws of moon and
stars for light by night, Who stirs up the sea into roaring waves, Whose name
is Lord of Hosts: If these laws should ever be annulled by Me-- declares the
Lord-- only then would the offspring of Israel cease to be a nation before Me
for all time." (Jer 31:35-36) So
the people of Israel are still goy even to this very day. Gen
25:23a is an interesting development. God chose Sarah to be the one through
whom Abraham's covenant would perpetuate-- likewise He chose Rebecca for the
same purpose. It was through her that the covenant would perpetuate too. But
Rebecca is somehow different. For reasons of His own, God waited for her to
come along before getting down to business multiplying the seed promised in Gen
13:16. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Sat, Sep 26th - 7:49AM
Genesis
25:21--22 †. Gen 25:21b . . and the Lord responded to his
plea, and his wife Rebecca conceived. The
twins Jacob and Esau were born when Isaac was 60 years old. So Isaac and
Rebecca had been trying to have children for about 19 years. There is no record
that Abraham ever prayed concerning Sarah's infertility. He dealt with the
problem in another way. Isaac,
rather than follow the example of papa Abraham and sleep with one of the maids;
did the wise thing by electing to petition God to cure his wife so they could
have their own baby. There is of course no guarantee prayer will work for
everyone, but it was just the ticket for them. Youngsters
can learn from their parents mistakes. If there was one thing you can bet Isaac
did not want in his family, it was another Ishmael. Not that Ishmael was a bad
seed, but his place in Abraham's home was a catalyst in generating much
friction and rivalry, and also caused an inheritance problem for Isaac; not to
mention Abraham's eventual heartbreak of finally emancipating Hagar and thus
sending her and Ishmael off to fend for themselves. †. Gen 25:22a . . But the children struggled in
her womb, The
word for "struggled" is from ratsats
(raw-tsats') which means: to crack in pieces, literally or figuratively Haw-Haw-Haw-Haw-Haw.
Those little tiny babies were trying to bust each other's skulls in there! The
word ratsats is used just like that in a couple of places. (e.g. Jgs 9:53, Ps
74:12-13) But
I think it is more likely that each wanted to dominate the other. A common use
of the word ratsats is oppression. (e.g. Deut 28:33-34, Jgs 10:6-8) †. Gen 25:22b . . and she said: If so, why do I
exist? That
rendering is a bit murky. I think it would be better to paraphrase it: "If
this is the case; then what am I doing here?" Although
Genesis revealed in verse 22a that Rebecca was carrying more than one child,
and that the children were struggling for domination in the womb, the author
wrote from inspiration and hind sight while Rebecca herself had no way of
knowing what was going on at the time. It must have appeared to her that she
was having a difficult pregnancy and in grave danger of dying in child birth. That
of course would make no sense at all to Rebecca because she was chosen for
Isaac's wife by Divine providence; and her pregnancy was the result of Isaac's
intercession. What was the point of going to all that trouble if she was only
going to die right along with their first baby? In her mind, she certainly
would have been much better off to have remained up north with her family than
leave home with the servant to marry Isaac and lose her life bearing his child. †. Gen 25:22c . . She went to inquire of the
Lord, Went
where? Well . . Isaac had settled near Beer-lahai-roi, the very water source
where Hagar met with God for her very first time. This record is the very first
time Rebecca met with God too, and she very likely met with God right at the
same place Hagar did. Hagar
gave that spring of water its name Beer-lahai-roi in honor of her new best
friend-- 'Ataah 'Eel R'iy --the god who was aware of her problems, and
who was also interested in helping her deal with them. In
the movie "Titanic" after looking at drawings a passenger made of
some unusual women in Paris, and listening to him relate intimate details about
them, the heroine turned and said: "You have a gift Jack. You see
people." Well,
God sees people too. Beer-lahai-roi was Hagar's secret garden, and I sometimes
wonder if Isaac didn't settle there because of that. I believe that is where
Rebecca went to talk with God about her boys. And why not? That spring had good
karma. And if God was sympathetic with Hagar there, then why wouldn't He be
sympathetic with Rebecca there too? 'Ataah 'Eel R'iy is the very best kind of
god to have-- one who sees people. But
suppose Rebecca had instead opted to pray from inside her tent? Would God have
heard her from there? Yes, He would have heard (cf. Ps 139:7-12, Matt 6:6). It
isn't necessary to resort to a special sanctuary, or a shrine, or take your
case to a professional priesthood for mediation. People often pray from very
unusual places; and get good results. (e.g. Jonah 2:1-3) If
Jonah could pray and be heard from inside a smelly ol' fish's tummy, and if God
can be worshipped elsewhere than a church (John 4:21-24) then I guess it should
be okay if Rebecca prayed from inside her tent-- and it should be okay if
somebody prayed from their car, or bedroom, or in the mountains on a hike, or
even in the restroom at work. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Fri, Sep 25th - 7:58AM
Genesis
25:19-21a †. Gen 25:19 . .This is the story of Isaac, son
of Abraham. Abraham begot Isaac. The
word for "son" is ben
(bane) and is used like American's use a middle name. Isaac's whole name is:
Isaac ben Abraham. It's a common idiom in the Old Testament, and found in the
New Testament too. "They
said: Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know?
How can he now say? "I came down from heaven" (John 6:42) The
Lord's Greek name is lesous
(ee-ay-souce') which is equivalent to the Hebrew name Yehowshuwa'
(yeh-ho-shoo'-ah) which means: Joshua. His
dad's name in Greek is loseph
(ee-o-safe') which is equivalent to the Hebrew name Yowceph (yo-safe') which
means Joseph. So "Jesus, the son of Joseph" in hybridized English and
Hebrew: is Joshua ben Joseph. NOTE: The English
spelling of Hebrew words often disagree with the spellings used by Orthodox
Jews because there is no set standard for rendering Hebrew words in English
form as yet so it's not uncommon for discrepancies to occur. †. Gen 25:20a . . Isaac was forty years old
when he took to wife Rebecca, Forty
years-old might seem a bit late in life to get married for the first time, but
in those days, a forty year-old man was still quite young. The
life expectancy of the average US male born in 2007 is 75.4 years. Isaac lived
to 180; so at his marriage to Rebecca, he was about the equivalent of a modern
17 year-old. Jacob himself didn't marry Leah and Rachel and until he was over
80-- attesting to the robust health and longevity that men enjoyed in those days. †. Gen 25:20b . . daughter of Bethuel the
Aramean of Paddan-aram, sister of Laban the Aramean. The
identity of Rebecca's mom remains a total mystery. By the time of Moses, uncle
Laban was a large figure in Jewish history and you can safely bet the people of
Israel were very familiar with that old rascal's ways. He mistreated not only
Jacob, but also Leah and Rachel too, so he's not too popular with the people of
Israel even today; seeing as how he was unkind and dishonest with their sacred
ancestors and all. The
holiday of Purim commemorates an Agagite named Haman, who tried to exterminate
the Jews in Esther's day. Maybe there should be a memorial for Laban too.
Although he wasn't a villain on the scale of Haman, he nevertheless made ol'
Jacob's life pretty miserable there for a while. †. Gen 25:21a . . Isaac pleaded with the Lord
on behalf of his wife, because she was barren; Oh
no. Not again! It seems like all the really attractive girls among Terah's
female grandchildren had some sort of infertility condition. Supposing
Isaac never prayed for Rebecca. Would she have children? Absolutely! God gave
his word to Abraham in Gen 17:19 that Isaac would become a very numerous
people. So Rebecca, Isaac's divinely selected wife, was going to be a mommy; it
was only a matter of time. But about one thing I think we can be sure of: Isaac
didn't want to wait until Rebecca was ninety years old like his mom before
having their first baby. This
is now the second time that the people of Israel were perpetuated by a miracle--
proving they are no ordinary people, but a people who wouldn't exist at all if
God hadn't willed them into existence and into perpetuity. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Thu, Sep 24th - 8:13AM
Genesis
25:11-18 †. Gen 25:11a . . After the death of Abraham,
God blessed his son Isaac. With
the death of Abraham, the covenant torch is passed on to the next patriarch.
The promises now shift into Isaac's possession and it becomes his
responsibility to take over as the family priest too. †. Gen 25:11b . . And Isaac settled near
Beer-lahai-roi. Everyone
else from Abraham's camp settled there too now that Isaac is the new godfather.
All of Abraham's servants, all his livestock, all the camels, all everything;
the whole shebang is Isaac's and follows Isaac wherever Isaac tells them to go.
You know, it's very difficult to forget Hagar while the Bible continues to
mention a very sacred spot dear to her own heart. But this is the very last
mention of Beer-lahai-roi. It's as if Abraham's era is closing and now we move
forward into Isaac's. †. Gen 25:12 . .This is the line of Ishmael,
Abraham's son, whom Hagar the Egyptian, Sarah's slave, bore to Abraham. Never
once is Hagar listed as one of Abraham's wives. She was Sarah's slave; and
nothing more. Genesis gives Ishmael's line only passing mention because the
real focus lies along the covenant line. So we won't follow Ishmael's exploits
after listing his progeny. †. Gen 25:13-16 . .These are the names of the
sons of Ishmael, by their names, in the order of their birth: Nebaioth, the
first-born of Ishmael, Kedar, Adbeel, Mibsam, Mishma, Dumah, Massa, Hadad,
Tema, Jetur, Naphish, and Kedmah. These are the sons of Ishmael and these are
their names by their villages and by their encampments: twelve chieftains of as
many tribes. Twelve
tribes; just as God had foretold in Gen 17:20. These twelve
"encampments" were little more than nomadic tent communities as
compared to the more permanent fortified towns and hamlets that were common in
the Canaan of Isaac's day. †. Gen 25:17 . .These were the years of the life
of Ishmael: one hundred and thirty-seven years; then he breathed his last and
died, and was gathered to his kin. When
Ishmael was "gathered to his kin" it wasn't to Abraham's clan but to
his own: the Ishmael line. However, Abraham remained Ishmael's biological
father whether Ishmael was legally his son or not. You can never change who
sired you. Your genetic origin is impossible to reverse or alter; though it can
be legally dissolved. †. Gen 25:18 . .They dwelt from Havilah, by
Shur, which is close to Egypt, all the way to Asshur; they camped alongside all
their kinsmen. The
"they" in this verse are the kin of verse 17 unto whom Ishmael was
gathered. Even
though Ishmael's line isn't actually legal kin to Abraham's progeny, the line
is still related to the other boys by blood and therefore genetic kinsman. The
expression "all the way to Asshur" is probably better rendered
"as you go to Asshur" or "on the way to Asshur"-- ancient
Assyria, now modern day Iraq. The Ishmaelites lived along the main caravan route
leading from Egypt to Assyria; which would be very advantageous if you were
into international trading, which they were (cf. Gen 37:25-28). The
precise locations of the Havilah and Shur of verse 18 are unknown; although
it's fairly safe to assume that Havilah (sandy), and Shur delineated a region
stretching from portions of modern day Jordan and Saudi Arabia, past Elat,
across the northern Sinai Peninsula, and on over to Suez. In the time of Saul,
Ishmael's territory was controlled by a people called Amalekites (1Sam 15:7). =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Wed, Sep 23rd - 8:12AM
Genesis
25:8c-10 †. Gen 25:8c . . and he was gathered to his
kin. Burials
always follow the phrase "gathered to his kin". So the gathering
happens as soon as the person dies; and prior to their funeral. The difference
between gathering and burial is quite distinct in Jacob's case; who was
interred no less than forty days after his passing, yet was gathered to his kin
immediately upon expiring. (Gen 49:33-50:3) It
would seem, therefore, that the employment of this idiom-- like the
corresponding figure of speech: to lie down with one's fathers --refers to an
ancient belief that despite Man's mortality, he possesses a rather durable
component that survives beyond the death of his body. In other words: assassins
may terminate the life of a human body; but they cannot terminate the life of a
human soul. Not that it's impossible; it's just that only man's maker has the
power to pull that off. "Don't
be afraid of them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but
rather be afraid of Him which is able to destroy both soul and body in
hell." (Matt 10:28) †. Gen 25:9a . . His sons Isaac and Ishmael
buried him Isaac
and Ishmael were by far the oldest of all the boys. At the time, they lived
reasonably close to each other and I would not be surprised if Ishmael came up
to visit Abraham quite often and was always aware of his health. Abraham was 86
years old when his first son was born; so Ishmael would be going on 90 when his
dad died. (cf. Gen 16:16, Gen 25:7) Like
Isaac, Ishmael was an only child; that is until Isaac came along. But at first,
he had Abraham all to himself for at least fifteen years. Both
of these guys were older and wiser men by this time. I'm sure Ishmael
understood that the loss of his birthright due to his mother's emancipation wasn't
Isaac's fault. And Isaac harbors no ill will towards his half-brother for
anything he may have done as a kid. After all, grown-ups are no longer the kids
they grew from. The kids they were are long gone. It's not a good thing to hold
grudges against people for the things they did when they were underage and
didn't know any better. †. Gen 25:9b-10 . . in the cave of Machpelah,
in the field of Ephron son of Zohar the Hittite, facing Mamre, the field that
Abraham had bought from the Hittites; there Abraham was buried, and Sarah his
wife. No
doubt when Abraham negotiated for this property, he anticipated his own
eventual interment. Well, this cave is big enough to become a family crypt.
Later, more of his progeny would follow him there. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Tue, Sep 22nd - 8:30AM
Genesis
25:7-8a †. Gen 25:7 . .This was the total span of
Abraham's life: one hundred and seventy-five years. Abraham
resided in Canaan for 100 years; and outlived Sarah by 48. That's not the way
it usually happens here in modern America. Wives typically outlive their
husbands; and if you don't think that's true, just visit any one of a number of
retirement communities. Men over 80 who can still walk on their own, and drive
a car, are like the proverbial fox in a henhouse. As of 2009, the male/female
ratio for people aged 85 and older was twice as many women as men. †. Gen 25:8a . . And Abraham breathed his last, Abraham
lived to see Jacob's and Esau's fifteenth birthday. The twins were born when
Isaac was sixty. And Abraham died when Isaac was seventy-five. So the boys got
to know their grandpa pretty good before the old master passed on. Abraham
lived a very brief life in comparison to his forbearers. From Noah's point of
view, who lived to 950, Abraham practically died as a child. Out ahead in the
new world, a man of a hundred years old will be considered just a kid. (Isa
65;19-20) The
human life span has steadily declined since Noah's day, and now the average
American, even with all the food, and the most advanced medical care in the
world, only lives on average about 77 years or so. †. Gen 25:8b . . dying at a good age, old and
contented; Too
many people die at a bad age; viz: too soon-- for example all the teens who
died in the Viet Nam war, and the ones currently being killed in Afghanistan. The
word for "contented" is from sabea'
saw-bay'-ah) which means: satiated. In other words: Abraham didn't die unfulfilled;
he lived a very satisfying life: he touched all the bases. Thoreau
once said that the mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. Well; that
doesn't fit Abraham. He never wished his life had turned out differently. "Piety
with contentment is great gain." (1Tim 6:9) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Mon, Sep 21st - 2:09PM
Genesis
25:1-6 †. Gen 25:1 . . Abraham took another wife,
whose name was Keturah. According
to 1Chrn 1:32, Ms. Keturah wasn't really a full-fledged wife as Sarah had been,
but was a wife of a different color altogether. She was a piylegesh (pee-leh'-ghesh) which means: a mistress or a paramour;
viz: a concubine. So that Gen 25:1 really should be translated: "Abraham
took another woman" It
was considered okay in those days for men to sire children by concubines and
nobody seemed to think much of it. But at Abraham's age!? Wow! Earlier, at Gen
17:17, Abraham considered himself much to old to father a child; and in truth,
he was. "By
faith Abraham, even though he was past age-- and Sarah herself was barren --was
enabled to become a father because he considered him faithful who had made the
promise. And so from this one man, and he as good as dead, came descendants as
numerous as the stars in the sky and as countless as the sand on the
seashore." (Heb 11:11-12) Not
only was Sarah miraculously made fertile in her old age, but so was her husband
Abraham. In fact his libido, and his fertility, were so well repaired that the
old boy couldn't leave the ladies alone even after he was more than 140 years
old! So the comment at Gen 24:1 wasn't meant to convey the idea that Abraham
lacked vigor. †. Gen 25:2-4 . . She bore him Zimran, Jokshan,
Medan, Midian, Ishbak, and Shuah. Jokshan begot Sheba and Dedan. The
descendants of Dedan were the Asshurim, the Letushim, and the Leummim. The
descendants of Midian were Ephah, Epher, Enoch, Abida, and Eldaah. All these
were descendants of Keturah. According
to a web site called Mr. Showbiz, Tony Randall, the Odd Couple sitcom star,
became a first-time father at age seventy-seven in May of 1997 when his wife,
then twenty-seven-year-old Heather Harlan, gave birth to their daughter Julia.
A second baby came in June 98. Mr. Randall would have been ninety-eight when
the first one graduated from college in 2019 had he lived. Others
have brought children into the world during their later years too-- e.g. Clint
Eastwood, Charlie Chaplin, and Cary Grant. Anthony Quinn had his thirteenth
child at the age of eighty-one. Some men can father children late in life;
although it's very risky. The chances for schizophrenia and other birth defects
increase as men get older. Keturah's
age is uncertain. But she was obviously young enough to have children; and in
that day, women retained their strength pretty far up into life. However, by
the time Sarah was ninety, she was past menopause. Where
did Abraham find Keturah? Was she an Egyptian like Hagar? Was she maybe a local
Canaanite; possibly from Ephron's clan, the guy who sold Abraham a plot for
Sarah's cemetery? No. If Abraham wouldn't let Isaac marry a women of Canaan,
then he sure wasn't going to sleep with one himself. Was she from Haran;
Rebecca's home town? Nobody really knows and it doesn't even matter anyway.
None of Keturah's children would share in the ownership of Eretz Israel-- only
Isaac's progeny. It all went to him by Divine fiat. †. Gen 25:5 . . Abraham willed all that he
owned to Isaac; Abraham
had already willed all that he owned to Isaac even before any of Keturah's boys
were born. The servant told Becky's family so back in chapter 24. This verse is
just to make sure nobody forgets that Isaac is the only son that really
matters. †.
Gen 25:6a . . but to Abraham's sons by
concubines Abraham gave gifts while he was still living, When
Ishmael was cut loose back in chapter 21, there was no mention of gifts. In
fact, they left home with hardly anything at all. Apparently, later on, Ishmael
returned to visit his dad on occasion and Abraham eventually compensated him
for the loss of his firstborn rights. Abraham's generosity towards his sons was
a right thing to do. "If
anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for his immediate
family, he has denied the faith and is worse than an infidel." (1Tim 5:8) Rather
than stipulate his sons' inheritances in a written will, Abraham took care of
them all while he was still alive; probably to make sure there was no
squabbling over his estate in probate after he was dead and thereby possibly
jeopardizing Isaac's future. †. Gen 25:6b . . and he sent them away from his
son Isaac eastward, to the land of the East. The
"land of the East" is a general name for Arabia, which stretched away
to the southeast and east of the point where Abraham resided in the south of
Palestine. The northern part of Arabia, which lay due east of Palestine, was
formerly more fertile and populous than now. Sending
someone away is not really the same as driving them off; but more like a
send-off; viz: a bon voyage (e.g. Gen 24:59). It's far more likely Abraham
helped them all get settled outside of Canaan rather than leave them to the
whims of fate. Once settled into their own territories, the other boys would be
less inclined to muscle in on Isaac's turf or freeload off him in the event
they fell onto hard times. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Sun, Sep 20th - 8:09AM
Genesis
24:64b-67 †. Gen 24:64b . . She alighted from the camel Suspecting
that the man up ahead just might be her future husband, Rebecca took no chances
of getting off on the wrong foot with impropriety. She could always get back up
on the camel if it turned out the man wasn't her Isaac; but just in case . . . †. Gen 24:65a . . and said to the servant: Who
is that man walking in the field toward us? And the servant said: That is my
master. Well;
the man approaching was much too young to be Abraham, and there was only one
other person on the whole planet that Abraham's servant would ever call his
master-- the heir apparent. †. Gen 24:65b . . So she took her veil and
covered herself. Becky's
veil was a full body wrap, similar to a burqa; not just a stylish hijab or a
cute little semi-transparent scarf in front of her face. In Akkadian, the bride
on her wedding day was called kallatu
kutumtu, (the veiled bride). Also,
in Akkadian; she was called pussumtu,
(the veiled one), which means the same as kallatu, (bride). In that day,
Rebecca's veil had both symbolic and socio-legal significance. It
was an unmistakable signal to Isaac that among all those ladies riding along
with his dad's servant that day; the burqa-ette was to be his wife. This
meeting is interesting. We spent quite a bit of time viewing the character, the
background, and the beauty of a really outstanding young woman in the beginning
of this chapter. But it's all under wraps now in the presence of the groom.
Becky is doing absolutely nothing to attract Isaac at this point. In fact,
Isaac can't even see past the veil to what a gorgeous package of womanhood that
Becky really is. The
anonymous steward who went north to speak with Becky on Isaac's behalf, will
now speak with Isaac on Becky's behalf. Thus, Abraham's steward will be an
ambassador for both Isaac and Rebecca; and when he's done, Becky will know all
she needs to know at this point about Isaac, and Isaac will know all he needs
to know at this point about Rebecca; even before they meet each other for the
very first time. †. Gen 24:66 . .The servant told Isaac all the
things that he had done. The
steward's responsibility was to canvas Abraham's kin for a bridal candidate,
engage the girl to marry Isaac, gain her consent to leave home, and then
transport her safely back to Palestine. Next hurdle: Isaac's acceptance of the
candidate. The marriage still isn't set in concrete yet until Isaac meets Becky
and voluntarily accepts her to be his wife. But
this phase of the romance is out of the steward's jurisdiction. It's not his
responsibility to make the couple like each other. He only had to bring them
together. (cf. John 6:44) †. Gen 24:67a . . Isaac then brought her into
the tent of his mother Sarah, That
tent was once Abraham's home. His choice to donate it for Becky's temporary
quarters was very thoughtful, and must have meant a lot to her; since at this
point, Becky was far from home, family, and friends; and her future was in
doubt. Meeting one's future in-laws can prove a bit scary for some. To be given
Sarah's tent was a very good indication that Isaac's dad was pleased, and that
the girl was okay by him. She,
and her nurse, and her maidens would live in the donated domicile until such a time as the marriage
was performed, or (if Isaac didn't like her) until she was sent back home.
There's more to marriage than just business; after all, marriage is a union of
two people-- and people have feelings. It's one thing to do your duty, but it's
quite another to feel loved-- and marriage really ought to have some love in it
after all. †. Gen 24:67b . . and he took Rebecca as his
wife. The
literal of that verse is: he took Rebecca and she became his wife. The meaning
of "he took" Rebecca, is that Isaac accepted her. The meaning of
"she became his wife" is that Rebecca accepted Isaac. So that the
marriage was between two people who truly accepted each other; rather than
between two people who were stuck with each other. It turned out that those two
went together like a pair of old shoes: quite literally a match made in heaven. †. Gen 24:67c . . Isaac loved her, The
word for "love" is from 'ahab
(aw-hab') and means: to have affection for. This instance is only the second
time in the first twenty-four chapters of Genesis where that word appears. The
other was in chapter 22, just prior to the Akedah, when God asked Abraham to
"Take your son, your favored one, Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land
of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the heights that I
will point out to you." So
Isaac was genuinely fond of Rebecca just as much as Abraham was genuinely fond
of Isaac The couple's union wasn't just another arranged marriage like so many
of the others in that day; theirs was truly a romance. †. Gen 24:67d . . and thus found comfort after
his mother's death. All
too often, men experience very little happiness with their mothers during
boyhood. A callous mom can easily become a boy's worst influence, and
permanently warp his attitude towards women for the remainder of his life; even
leading to male frigidity. But
Isaac's mom wasn't like that at all. Sarah was not only a good mother to Isaac,
but she was also a really good buddy too. In spite of her domineering
personality, Sarah and Isaac had somehow managed to become good friends; and
her loss left a big hole in his heart. It would take a very special girl to
repair that hole. Well, Rebecca was just the one to do it. She not only
replaced Sarah in the matriarchy, but she also replaced Sarah as the female
buddy in Isaac's life. NOTE: Wasn't that
a good story? Joseph's story is pretty good too. You know: Genesis is no
country for a drudge. Only people with a heart can truly appreciate this book.
For anybody else; it's just academic fodder for a bull session. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Sat, Sep 19th - 8:39AM
Genesis
24:61b-64a †. Gen 24:61b . . So the servant took Rebecca
and went his way. The
500 mile trip to Isaac's camp, which must have taken at least two weeks, was a
great opportunity for Rebecca to become familiar with the manager of her
spouse's goods. People bond well under hardship and under close knit
circumstances. In the years to come, the friendship and trust that developed en
route with Rebecca and the man, would really come in handy after she took over
Isaac's home. We can easily guess what the primary topic of conversation was on
the way back-- Mr. Isaac. "Oh,
do tell me more about him. What's his favorite food? His favorite color? When's
his birthday? Has he been a playboy, dating lots of girls? Is he mellow or is
he thin-skinned and easily angered? What does he do in his spare time? How tall
is he? Does he have many pet peeves? What color is his hair and eyes? How old
is he? Does he have a sense of humor? Would he get upset if I burned the toast?
Is he affable and approachable? Is he reasonable? Is he despotic? Is he
generous with his money, or a miserly tight wad? Do you really think he will
like me?" All
those things, and lots, lots more, are very important to most brides and I have
no doubt that Rebecca pried a great many things out of Abraham's steward
concerning her Isaac. By the time they arrived, all of Becky's anxieties and
fears about her future husband were resolved, and she was in love with that man
before even meeting him for the very first time. You
know, Becky only had the steward's word that there really was an Isaac. She
herself had never seen him, her family had never seen him, in fact no one in
her whole town had ever seen him. What if the entire story were a big hoax and
the man was not telling the truth. Perhaps he was a smooth con man who actually
had in mind to sell Becky into slavery down in Egypt. The
farther and farther she got from home, the more danger Becky was in. The land
was strange and hostile, Becky had no friends and no one to turn to if she
might try an escape. She was in fact trusting her very life to an almost
complete stranger. (cf. Phil 1:6) But
that man's speech and his bearing were powerfully persuasive. He was able to
convince Becky that he was genuinely Abraham's steward and that there really
was an Isaac waiting for her at trail's end. Becky left home with one stranger
to marry yet another stranger. But by the time they arrived, Abraham's trusty
steward had proved himself to Becky that her escorts were all trustworthy men
and only meant good by her. †. Gen 24:62 . . Isaac had just come back from
the vicinity of Beer-lahai-roi, for he was settled in the region of the Negeb. Beer-lahai-roi
was the source of water where Hagar met God for the very first time; and her
experience caused the well to be named the way it was in Gen 16:13-14. Hagar's
water source became not only somewhat of a holy monument, but also an important
watering hole for people with flocks and herds down there in the Negev; thanks
to a runaway slave girl. †. Gen 24:63a . . And Isaac went out walking in
the field toward evening The
precise location of this field is uncertain. Since Isaac's ranch was in the
Negev, near Hagar's well, that might be where this next scene occurred. There
lacks a consensus opinion among Jewish scholars as to the precise meaning of
the Hebrew word laasuwach, which is
translated "walking" in some Bibles; and "meditate" in
others. The JPS rendering, "walking" is based upon the Arabic saha. Tradition has it that Isaac was
out in the field for reflection and prayer. What might he be praying about? Well,
most likely about his impending marriage to a mail-order bride. If Rebecca was
at all nervous, you can bet Isaac was just as nervous himself. These two were
going to be joined at the hip for the rest of their lives and they had yet to
even meet. †.
Gen 24:63b-64a . . and, looking up, he
saw camels approaching. Raising her eyes, Rebecca saw Isaac. I've
heard the wording suggests a simultaneous meeting of the eyes. Isaac saw
Rebecca just when she saw him. Rebecca couldn't be positive at that moment the
man she saw was her future husband; but one thing Isaac knew: his dad's servant
didn't leave home with female passengers. One of those women out there on the
camels had to be meant for him. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Fri, Sep 18th - 11:31AM
Genesis
24:54-61a †. Gen 24:54-55 . .Then he and the men with him
ate and drank, and they spent the night. When they arose next morning, he said:
Give me leave to go to my master. But her brother and her mother said: Let the
maiden remain with us some ten days; then you may go. Their
request was reasonable. After all, this was all so sudden. They didn't even
have a chance to announce the engagement nor organize a bridal shower. Becky's
friends would all want to come over to the house and ooo and ahhh the jewelry
and go nuts over the exotic fashions from Canaan. And they would all want to
give her one last hug and wish blessings on her new life. What's so wrong with
that? There's nothing wrong with that; but Abraham's wishes have to take
priority in this matter. (cf. Luke 9:61-62) †. Gen 24:56-57a . . He said to them: Do not
delay me, now that The Lord has made my errand successful. Give me leave that I
may go to my master. Abraham
probably had a pretty good idea how long his servant should be gone; and if the
return was delayed, Abraham might begin to become anxious and wonder what was
going on up there in Haran what with no internet email, telephones, HAM radio,
telegraph, nor even any way to send a post card back home. Becky
has now agreed to be Isaac's bride. She made that decision the moment she
accepted clothing and jewelry that were offered to her in Isaac's name. The big
question now is: how much longer does she wish to remain a maiden before
becoming a married woman with a home of her own? †.
Gen 24:57b-58 . . And they said: Let
us call the girl and ask for her reply. They called Rebecca and said to her:
Will you go with this man? And she said: I will. Exactly
what so strongly motivated Becky to agree to leave home on such short notice is
open to speculation. Some feel it was because, unknown to the writer of
Genesis, she had been praying for The Lord's providence in this very matter of
finding the right man. The events of the previous evening were enough to
convince Becky that this was truly divine providence; and she wasn't about to
procrastinate now and louse up her chances for God-given happiness and
security. That man was leaving, and the soon-to-be Mrs. Isaac ben Abraham was
not going to miss her ride; uh-uh, no way! †. Gen 24:59a . . So they sent off their sister
Rebecca The
word for "sister" is from 'achowth
(aw-khoth') and isn't limited to siblings. It applies to all manner of female
kin-- sisters, daughters, aunts, nieces; even to a lover, as in Song 4:9-12. You
can imagine the flurry that went on in that house getting Becky's bags packed
on such short notice. You can bet there was no joy around there that morning.
An air of sadness marked her departure. Everyone was no doubt well aware they
would likely never see Becky ever again. In those days, when somebody moved 500
miles away, they might just as well have gone to Pluto. †. Gen 24:59b . . and her nurse along with
Abraham's servant and his men. The
word for "nurse" is from yanaq
(yaw-nak') and implies wet nursing. This may be an indication that, for reasons
unspecified, Rebecca's mom was unable to breast feed her children. In
Mesopotamia, wet nurses frequently had the additional duties of bringing up the
child and acting as their guardian; viz: a nanny. The nurse (whose name is
Deborah; Gen 35:8) was probably either Becky's first choice as personal
assistant, or Deborah herself just couldn't part with her little Becky and
volunteered to go along as a chaperon. It's not unusual for mentors, like Helen
Keller's tutor Anne Sullivan, to become permanently bonded and dedicated to
their charges. †. Gen 24:60 . . And they blessed Rebecca and
said to her: O sister! May you grow into thousands of myriads; may your
offspring seize the gates of their foes. That
prophetic bon voyage was undoubtedly an acknowledgement of the promises God
made to Abraham following the Akedah (Gen 22:15-18). Abraham's steward spent
the night in Becky's home; and while eating dinner and chatting, no doubt
shared many wonderful events from Abraham's and Isaac's lives to which Becky's
family must have listened just as spellbound as all of us who study Genesis in
our own day and age. The
Akedah surely must have been to them almost beyond belief that God would ask
Abraham to sacrifice the very son in whom all the promises would be fulfilled.
No wonder Becky was so ready to go. She just had to get on down there and see
this man in whom God had taken such a particular interest. †. Gen 24:61a . .Then Rebecca and her maids
arose, mounted the camels, and followed the man. The
word for "maids" is from na'arah
(nah-ar-aw') and means a young, underage girl. A Bible maid is just a lass, not
really a grown up adult woman. She could be a pre teen or a late teen and any
age in between. It wasn't unusual for a woman from a family of means to have a
retinue of young girls in attendance. Becky's maids possibly were the children
of her home's adult servants. Then
too, young girls were often indentured into maid service. Sometimes it was
because of parental greed, but often it was because the family was in poverty
and desperate. In the last decade alone, many families in Afghanistan were
forced to sell their children just to survive the Taliban ruin of their
country. Sometimes young girls were fortunes of war in Becky's day and could be
bought and sold at market; for example the Jewish damsel in 2Kgs 5:1-3 who
helped Naaman get his leprosy cured. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Thu, Sep 17th - 7:56AM
Genesis
24:34-53 †. Gen 24:34 . . I am Abraham's servant: he
began. I
think it's commendable that this man, so far from home, didn't introduce
himself by his own name but rather by the name of the one whom he represented. †. Gen 24:35 . .The Lord has greatly blessed my
master, and he has become rich: He has given him sheep and cattle, silver and
gold, male and female slaves, camels and burros. I
love the way this man gives credit to Yhvh for Abraham's good fortune rather than
to idols, heathen deities, dumb luck, brute force, fortuitous circumstance,
and/or Abraham's business skills. It
was important that the man tell Becky's family about Abraham's religion, and
about his wealth, because in a moment he's going to drop a 2,000 pound bunker
buster that will change their lives forever. †. Gen 24:36a . . And Sarah, my master's wife,
bore my master a son in her old age Curiously,
he doesn't mention Sarah's passing. But then, the Scriptures don't record every
word that people ever spoke-- just excerpts really. Back in verse 30, Becky's
entire experience at the spring is recounted in a very simple phrase:
"Thus the man spoke to me." If
Becky wasn't listening before, you can just bet your equity line that her
little ears perked up like a NORAD radar station at the mention of Abraham's
son. And not just a son, but a son born in Sarah's old age; which would mean
that Abraham's boy was relatively young, or at least age-appropriate for her
liking-- and maybe available too. Americans
don't take marriage serious enough. It was life or death in those days. Ancient
women didn't have the advantages of education, special rights, open
promiscuity, and independence like the women in twenty-first century America.
Family life was all that really mattered to the women of old. It was their
career goal and it was their old age security. Single women were failures and
most likely headed for poverty. And some even felt it was an evidence of Divine
disfavor to become an old maid-- which only served to aggravate their despair
even more. So when those women got married and/or had a baby; it was a very big
cause for celebration. †. Gen 24:36b . . and he has assigned to him
everything he owns. It's
no doubt obvious by now to everyone in the house where the servant is going
with his narrative. Why else would he tell of the son's inheritance if not to
impress Becky's family in order to secure her for the son's bride? †.
Gen 24:37-41 . . Now my master made me
swear, saying: You shall not get a wife for my son from the daughters of the
Canaanites in whose land I dwell; but you shall go to my father's house, to my
kindred, and get a wife for my son. And I said to my master: What if the woman
does not follow me? . . . He
replied to me: The Lord, whose ways I have followed, will send His angel with
you and make your errand successful; and you will get a wife for my son from my
kindred, from my father's house. Thus only shall you be freed from my
adjuration: if, when you come to my kindred, they refuse you--only then shall
you be freed from my adjuration. The
"kindred" who might refuse the servant, includes the potential bride
herself because Abraham said so at Gen 24:8. In
the ancient East, daughters were often given in arranged marriages without
their consent. And normally, if Becky's kin were to say she was going to marry
Isaac, well then she was going to marry Isaac and that was the end of
discussion. Up ahead, we'll see that very fate befall Becky's nieces: Rachel
and Leah. But
Abraham didn't want Isaac's bride to be purchased. No. In this case, Abraham
broke with tradition and mandated the prospective bride herself cast the
deciding vote. So if Becky refuses, the servant can't be blamed for dereliction
of duty; and nobody is going to handcuff Becky and ship her off to Palestine
via UPS ground. Abraham wants her to come down there of her own volition; and
if not, then he'll look elsewhere . . . and no hard feelings about it. †.
Gen 24:42-48 . . This portion is
pretty much what went on before except that in this version, the family is told
how Becky came to have the nose ring and the arm bands. Becky
hadn't known till just now that the servant prayed for special providence prior
to her arrival at the spring-- the part concerning drinking the maiden's water,
and her serving the camels. Becky must have been totally astonished to think
that the actual True God led that man, not just to her doorstep, but right
smack dab to her footsteps. Wow! But
she had no say in the negotiations at this point. Proposals were made to the
senior members of the family in those days, not to the girl. †. Gen 24:49-51 . . And now, if you mean to
treat my master with true kindness, tell me; and if not, tell me also, that I
may turn right or left. Then Laban and Bethuel answered: The matter was decreed
by Yhvh; we cannot speak to you bad or good. Here is Rebecca before you; take
her and go, and let her be a wife to your master's son, as the Lord has spoken. Actually
Bethuel himself didn't say anything. Laban spoke in proxy for him in the same
way that the steward was now speaking as Abraham in Isaac's best interests.
Bethuel and Laban may have had a quiet pow-wow off to the side and then Laban
came forward and announced their decision. At
this point, Becky would have normally become legally engaged to marry Isaac.
But Abraham would not permit the marriage to be set in stone until the girl
actually consented for herself. So it's not over yet. †. Gen 24:52 . .When Abraham's servant heard
their words, he bowed low to the ground before the Lord. Abraham's
steward is one of the most pious men in the Bible, and people like him can be
very influential for God. If you've ever been in the presence of someone like
him you know what I'm saying. All the prayers I learned as a child were rote;
just a memorized litany of chant-like mantras. The first time I overheard
someone pray candidly, from the heart, it was very moving. †. Gen 24:53 . .The servant brought out items
of silver and gold, and garments, and gave them to Rebecca; and he gave
presents to her brother and her mother. The
gifts were a good-faith token that the servant meant what he said; and I've no
doubt that had Becky ultimately refused, he would not have demanded them back. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Wed, Sep 16th - 8:30AM
Genesis
24:23-33 †. Gen 24:23-25 . . Pray tell me; he said:
whose daughter are you? Is there room in your father's house for us to spend
the night? She replied: I am the daughter of Bethuel the son of Milcah, whom
she bore to Nahor. And she went on: There is plenty of straw and feed at home,
and also room to spend the night. That
did it. The identity of Becky's family was the final chop that felled the tree.
Abraham's steward had no more doubts about the Lord's providence. At this
point, he put the ring in Becky's nose and the bands on her arms. †. Gen 24:26-27 . .The man bowed low in homage
to The Lord and said: Blessed be The Lord, the God of my master Abraham, who
has not withheld His steadfast faithfulness from my master. For I have been
guided on my errand by The Lord, to the house of my master's kinsmen. How
utterly astounded Becky must have been that this stranger would give her all
that gold for doing nothing more than watering him and his camels; and then his
prayer to boot. I'm
guessing that at this point, Becky began to suspect that something was up.
There were men with Abraham's steward who were no doubt all intently observing
this scene and gauging Becky's reactions throughout the whole incident. Looking
at them, looking at the man, looking at his camels loaded down with all manner
of stuff, and that there were more saddled camels than men to ride them; I
think Becky began to get nervous because right then she took off out of there
for home like a United passenger with scarcely seconds to spare to catch their
connection from Chicago to Seattle. †. Gen 24:28 . .The maiden ran and told all
this to her mother's household. Becky
told the story to her mom's side of the family, which suggests that her dad
Bethuel may have kept a concubine as well as a wife. Here's
a possible scenario of what happened next. Becky's
mom (whose name isn't given) has become anxious-- it's getting late, and her
baby hasn't returned yet with the evening water supply. Then,
WHAM! as sudden and unexpected as a California earthquake: an excited, out of
breath Becky-girl comes crashing through the door with a shriek and a squeal;
dropping her jug on the floor with a thud, sloshing water over the floor,
accompanied by the incomprehensible jabbering of a flock of magpies-- gasping
for air, lungs burning; she spits her tale as arms flash with gold, and the
ring in her nose sparkles like a glimmering salmon lure every time she turns
her head; which is quite often. At
first, in dazed silence, everyone is paralyzed and nobody moves. Then,
BOOM! the whole place erupts and people start scrambling. Chairs get knocked
over, tables bumped out of their places, lamps teeter, and doors slam with the
whump and concussion of incoming mortar rounds. People out in the courtyard are
barking orders to the servants at the tops of their voices; as everyone bolts
off from ground-zero in ten different directions like panicked North Koreans
making emergency preparations to put Kim Jong-Un up for the night. Meanwhile,
Becky's brother Laban (who just happens to be infected with a severe case of
unbridled avarice) ignites the afterburners and sails out the door at Mach 2 on
his way to fetch Abraham's steward. †.
Gen 24:29-30a . . Now Rebecca had a
brother whose name was Laban. He ran out to the man at the spring when he saw
the nose-ring and the bands on his sister's arms, and when he heard his sister
Rebecca say: Thus the man spoke to me. There's
no record that Laban ever actually met Abraham in person, but Bethuel surely
must have talked about him around the dinner table-- how the god of Noah had
called uncle Abram to leave Mesopotamia and head south to the frontier. And
caravans arriving from Egypt surely passed through Abraham's region, picking up
news and information about the great sheik's exploits and the fact that
Abraham's camp was very large; a community of at least a thousand people. Then;
Shazaam! Abraham's steward seemingly materializes out of nowhere-- totally
unexpected like Forrest Gump's friend Jenny after a long absence --with samples
of Abraham's prosperity. That must have been really exciting: akin to news from
early-day Texas oilfields. †. Gen 24:30b-31a . . He went up to the man,
who was still standing beside the camels at the spring. He said: Come in, O
blessed of The Lord; The
word for "Lord" is actually YHVH and is the very name of deity the
steward used in his prayer. Laban
didn't actually worship Yhvh nor serve Him either. The steward's god was Yhvh;
so for now, Yhvh would be Laban's god too. Becky's brother was a clever,
Machiavellian manipulator. By feigning respect for the steward's god; Laban no
doubt hoped it would work to advantage. Later we're going to discover that
Laban's own personal religion was actually idolatry. He kept a supply of divine
figurines in his home-- little statuettes called teraphim. †.
Gen 24:31b . . why do you remain
outside, when I have made ready the house and a place for the camels? Unlike
Abraham's home, where Abraham ruled supreme, the daddy in Becky's home doesn't
seem to have much voice or power in it. Bethuel's son, is the principle
spokesman. He and his mom together seemed to run the place. Some husbands are
happy with that kind of an arrangement so what the hey, if it works for them?
It could be too that the daddy's health was not all that good and so he
preferred letting his family manage the home. †. Gen 24:32 . . So the man entered the house,
and the camels were unloaded. The camels were given straw and feed, and water
was brought to bathe his feet and the feet of the men with him. In
those days, when somebody "entered the house" they actually entered a
gateway into a courtyard bordered by living quarters and stables. Who
took care of the animals? Probably servants. Which would indicate that Bethuel
had done pretty well for himself in life. His home was spacious enough to
shelter the servant and his detachment; plus he had enough provender and
bedding for at least ten camels. Hmmmm.
Makes one curious why Becky was out there fetching water. Why did she have to
do it if they had servants? Well, I don't think she really had to; but Isaac's
future bride was no narcissistic prima donna: she was one of those people who
don't mind pitching in and getting their hands dirty. Privileged or no
privileged; that girl was something. †. Gen 24:33a . . But when food was set before
him, he said: I will not eat until I have told my tale. Always
one for business, the man got straight to the point. †. Gen 24:33b . . He said: Speak, then. Who
was it said: speak? Well, the nearest antecedent is Laban. You know, that boy
reminds me of Sonny Corleone; the eldest brother in Mario Puzo's book "The
Godfather". Sonny was headstrong, outspoken, and a slave to his passions;
just like ol' Laban. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Tue, Sep 15th - 9:05AM
Genesis
24:16d-22 †.
Gen 24:16d . . She went down to the
spring, filled her jar, and came up. The
"spring" in this case was a small pool of water fed by an aquifer,
which is different than an artesian well; they gush, while aquifers seep. Some
of the shafts of ancient man-made wells in that part of the world resemble mini
open-pit mines; with steps hewn into the sides to facilitate access to the
water for dipping jars and buckets. Becky's spring was likely constructed like
that. †. Gen 24:17a . .The servant ran toward her The
Hebrew word for "ran" is the same word used in Gen 18:2 and 18:7 to
describe Abraham's movement when the three men appeared in his camp. Abraham
was about 99 years old at the time and it's very doubtful he was able to move
his legs all that fast. It's far more likely he just hastened. In
any case, it was nevertheless essential that Abraham's steward not waste any
time because Becky had strong legs and would surely be gone away home in a
blink. †. Gen 24:17b . . and said: Please, let me sip
a little water from your jar. It's
amazing that a gorgeous young girl like Becky would allow a total stranger to
approach her without protest or without screaming for help. Was she naïve? Was
she foolish? Well
. . maybe in that day, and around her town, you could trust people. But it
would not be wise to do that in some parts of New York or Los Angeles. A
seemingly honest appeal for assistance could very well be a distraction while
an accomplice sneaks up behind you. Although
Becky arrived first, ahead of the other girls, by now there may have been
several others milling around the spring because that was the time of day for
them to be there. In groups, they could all watch out for each other. Genesis
doesn't tell about any of the others though because the spotlight is totally on
Isaac's future bride. †. Gen 24:18a . . Drink, my lord: she said, The
Hebrew word for "lord" is
'adown (aw-done') and is suitable for courteously addressing a male
superior; whether actual or assumed; viz: fathers, aged men, kings, husbands,
and/or God. †. Gen 24:18b . . and she quickly lowered her
jar upon her hand and let him drink. The
word for "quickly" is from mahar
(maw-har') which means: to be liquid or flow easily; viz: nimble (the opposite
of that would be the sluggishness of molasses in January) and implies to act
promptly. I really like the way Becky responded. When people do things
grudgingly, they often stonewall, perform slowly, and drag their feet just to
show you they're annoyed. But Becky didn't hesitate. She gave water to the man
whole-heartedly, sharply, and immediately. Whether
she actually let him drink out of her hand is doubtful. Lowering the jar upon
her hand merely indicates it was previously up on her shoulder or maybe on top
of her head. Becky probably just supported it from underneath with one hand
while tilting the top with the other so the contents would pour out and
Abraham's steward could slack his thirst. †. Gen 24:19-20 . .When she had let him drink
his fill, she said: I will also draw for your camels, until they finish
drinking. Quickly emptying her jar into the trough, she ran back to the well to
draw, and she drew for all his camels. Flo-Jo
Becky-- scurrying all over the place like a US Navy SEAL trainee in hell week.
No time to waste if she was going to water all those camels before dark. The
Arabian camel can drink more than twenty gallons of water in one sitting when
it's very thirsty. I hope that man gave them some water earlier because he had
ten camels and Becky could be hauling as much as 200 gallons. If her pitcher
held five gallons, the weight would be about 41 pounds of water for each one of
the forty trips she would have to make down and back up out of that spring. Wow
that girl was fit! Well, she did it-- and all without any grousing about it. †. Gen 24:21 . .The man, meanwhile, stood
gazing at her, silently wondering whether The Lord had made his errand
successful or not. That
man must have been totally blown away. The very thing about which he prayed
barely five minutes ago was occurring right before his eyes and all so brisk
and sudden too. This was just too easy and just too unbelievable. Could this
really be of The Lord? He dared not let himself enjoy any success yet until he
knew for sure. †. Gen 24:22 . .When the camels had finished
drinking, the man took a gold nose-ring weighing a half-shekel, and two gold
bands for her arms, ten shekels in weight. The
word for "nose-ring" is nexem
(neh'-zem) which just means ring, or jewel. Without a modifier, there is no way
of knowing for sure if the ring is for the nose or the ear. However, in verse
47 up ahead, Abraham's steward will say he installed the ring in Becky's nose. The
half shekel was a unit of weight and a media of exchange in those days. It
weighed about 6.019 grams which is
equal to about 92.87 grains. Typical
.22 caliber lead bullets weigh
approximately 40 grains apiece, so it would take at least two and a third of
them to equal the weight of the ring. That's really not much, but if it's stuck
in your nose or hanging on your ear I guess it would become noticeable after a
while. The
combined weight of the two bands was ten shekels, which is twenty times the
weight of the ring; or about 1,857 grains; which is equivalent to forty-six .22 cal lead bullets. 1,857
grains + 93 grains = 1,950 grains; which is equivalent to 4.06 troy ounces of gold. ( a troy ounce is equal to 480 grains) As
of June 07, 2020 the commodity value of gold was roughly 1,687 US dollars per
troy ounce. So to date, Becky's gold, in commodity value, was worth roughly 6,852
US dollars. (6,044 Euro) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Mon, Sep 14th - 10:06AM
Genesis
24:11-16c †. Gen 24:11 . . He made the camels kneel down
by the well outside the city, at evening time, the time when women come out to
draw water. "evening
time" is from an ambiguous word that indicates any time between high noon
and sunset as opposed to morning which can indicate any time between sunrise
and high noon. †. Gen 24:12 . . And he said: O Lord, God of my
master Abraham, grant me good fortune this day, and deal graciously with my
master Abraham: This
steward was truly a God-fearing man, and truly faithful to the one who sent him
on this errand. His prayer is not self centered, but centered upon the best
interests of his master's son. Incidentally, this is the very first prayer
recorded in the Bible of any individual clearly requesting Divine providence. †.
Gen 24:13-14 . . Here I stand by the
spring as the daughters of the townsmen come out to draw water; let the maiden
to whom I say "Please, lower your jar that I may drink" and who
replies "Drink, and I will also water your camels"-- let her be the
one whom You have decreed for Your servant Isaac. Thereby shall I know that You
have dealt graciously with my master. This
man didn't beat around the bush, nor begin reading from a siddur, nor a missal,
nor did he chant by rote, nor blather in tongues. He gets right down to
business and spells out his concerns in plain language. Let me say something
very clearly: If you are the kind of person who has to pray in tongues because
you don't have enough command of your own native language to express yourself
in any other way, then maybe you should go back to school for a while. Of
great interest is the steward's apparent lack of concern regarding the prospective
bride's looks. Only God truly knew who would be right for Isaac, and Abraham's
steward is not going to select a bride for his master's son like as if she's
flesh on the line the way the sons of God did back in Gen 6:2. No; she must be
hand-picked by God alone because He alone knows what's in a heart. If the girl
that God chooses for Isaac is attractive; well that will be a bonus, but
absolutely not the deciding factor. †. Gen 24:15 . . He had scarcely finished
speaking, when Rebecca-- born to Bethuel, the son of Milcah the wife of
Abraham's brother Nahor --came out with her jar on her shoulder. As
fortune would have it, the very first girl to arrive is Becky. Although she's
related to Abraham, at this point Abraham's steward doesn't know who she is
yet. In fact he's probably expecting to conduct many tiresome interviews;
testing one girl after another until the right one shows up. †. Gen 24:16a . .The maiden was very beautiful, Some
chafe at that passage and refuse to believe Genesis is talking about Becky's
physical assets. However, later on, in Gen 26:6-7, Isaac will attempt his dad's
old trick and say Becky is his sister; in order to save his skin. The reason
Isaac gives for the lie is he believed the men of Gerar would be tempted to
kill him because Becky was attractive. It is highly unlikely pagan men would
take Becky away from Isaac just because she had a beautiful personality. As a
rule, ancient men didn't fight over the nice girls; they battled for the
alluring ones. †. Gen 24:16b . . a virgin Becky
is three girls in one: a maiden, a virgin, and a virgin. What the heck you say?
How is she two virgins? The
word for "virgin" in 24:16 is bethuwlah
(beth-oo-law') which can indicate a virgin, a bride; and also a city or state.
Technically, bethuwlaw doesn't necessarily indicate a girl who's never slept
with a man. The primary denotation is chronological, and the word simply
indicates a mature young woman of marriageable age whether she is married or
not; e.g. Joel 1:8, where a bethuwlah laments the husband of her youth. †. Gen 24:16c . . whom no man had known. That
kind of wording says that Becky is not only all grown up, but she's a bethuwlah
who still has her virginity. We have before us a gorgeous peach, not living
with a man, neither has ever slept with a man. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Sun, Sep 13th - 8:39AM
Genesis
24:3c-10 †. Gen 24:3c-4 . . that you will not take a
wife for my son from the daughters of the Canaanites among whom I dwell, but
will go to the land of my birth and get a wife for my son Isaac. The
words "land of my birth" can also mean "to my country and to my
relatives." That is exactly how the steward understood them because that
is how he will narrate Abraham's instructions in Gen 24:38. I
just bet Abraham was fully aware of the fate of the men of God who married the
daughters of men back in the early parts of Genesis. Those men of God all died
in the Flood right along with their impious wives. The
influence of a non God-fearing spouse could prove fatal to Isaac's future. If
he's going to serve and worship his dad's god, then he is going to have to
marry a girl who fully appreciates and supports the prophecies regarding
Abraham's progeny. Spouse
hunting demands a level head and cold steel discernment or there is real risk
in ending up like Solomon, one of the greatest of God's men, who was ruined by
his marriages to women who didn't share his religious beliefs. (1Kgs 11:1-10) †. Gen 24:5-6 . . And the servant said to him:
What if the woman does not consent to follow me to this land, shall I then take
your son back to the land from which you came? Abraham answered him: You must
not, for any reason, take my son back there! I
think Abraham knew only too well just how much like sheep men are. When they
fall in love, they'll literally sacrifice their lives to keep a woman; which is
exactly what Jacob did. Rachel was a good girl; but she cost Jacob fourteen
years of his life away from home in a foreign land with a bad influence: uncle
Laban. Suppose
Isaac went up north and feasted his glims on Rebecca? Well, up ahead we're
going to find out that she was young, cute, and filled out in all the right
places. I've seen what that does to men. I worked with a married man once who
kept a young love on the side. He often used his wages to buy that girl jewelry
while his wife and two little kids were housed in a ramshackle rental unit. It
was too risky to let Isaac go up there. He might be tempted to remain with
Rebecca if she refused to live so far off from her family. Isaac's future was
in the land deeded to Abraham on oath; not up there in Mesopotamia; and his
bride's place was with him and Yhvh; not with her family and Laban's idols. †. Gen 24:7 . .The Lord, the God of heaven, who
took me from my father's house and from my native land, who promised me on oath,
saying "I will assign this land to your offspring" He will send His
angel before you, and you will get a wife for my son from there. The
identity of "His angel" is interesting. It's not referred to as one
of His angels; just His angel. Jacob knew His angel as Yhvh; the divine
benefactor he encountered on the way north during his flight from Esau. (Gen
28:12-15, Gen 48:17) NOTE: I sincerely
believe that God Himself has never even once been to the Earth in person. He
stays put, secluded in a sort of forbidden city somewhere apart from the cosmos
and His business down here is conducted by a supreme celestial being who has
the authority to speak for God, to speak as God, and to be respected as God.
This supreme celestial being is curious in that it is capable of appearing in a
fully functioning human body, viz: a living avatar. (eg. Gen 18:1-33, Ex
24:9-11, John 1:18) †. Gen 24:8-10a . . And if the woman does not
consent to follow you, you shall then be clear of this oath to me; but do not
take my son back there. So the servant put his hand under the thigh of his
master Abraham and swore to him as bidden. Then the servant took ten of his
master's camels Nobody
is quite sure exactly when camels were domesticated. The earliest depiction of
them in relief and cuneiform text as beasts of burden and transportation is
sometime around 1100 BC. †.
Gen 24:10b . . and set out, taking
with him all the bounty of his master; The
servant will need to demonstrate to the bride, and to the bride's family, that
she'll be well taken care of. The servant of course didn't take along
everything Abraham owned in total, but merely an adequate representation of his
abundant wealth; which by inheritance, would all be Isaac's some day; and, by
association, his future wife's too. Additional
men accompanied the servant (Gen 24:32) who were very likely all armed (Gen
14:14); not only for the caravan's protection, but for the bride's as well. No
doubt included among the camel's burdens were tents, victuals, provender,
water, and appropriate accommodations for the bride's comfort on the journey
back to Canaan. It was at least five hundred miles from Hebron up to Abraham's
people in Mesopotamia, so the return trip couldn't possibly be made in a single
day on camels and would necessitate overnight bivouacs in rugged country. †. Gen 24:10c . . and he made his way to
Aram-naharaim, to the city of Nahor. The
Greek translation renders naharaim in dual form meaning, "two
rivers", and from that arose the name Mesopotamia-- the land between the
two rivers. Some feel that the name naharaim really means "the land along
the river" or "the land within the river". It's
a territory bounded approximately on the east by an imaginary north/south line
drawn from Ar Raqqah Syria to Urfa Turkey. The southern and western borders are
delineated by the Euphrates as it runs from Ar Raqqah Syria towards Gaziantep
Turkey: an area within which at one time lay the kingdom of Mitanni. This is
called Naharain in the Egyptian texts, and Naharima in the El-Armana letters. The
details of the journey are passed over. It would have been fun to hear about
the caravan's adventures. How they had to dodge a flock of ostriches that ran
out in the road, and maybe how a lion came around at night and spooked
everybody, or how one of the men fell asleep at the wheel and his camel ran off
the road and hit a tree; stuff like that. But Genesis has priorities; and the
journey's details were not one of them. In a blink, the caravan arrives; a trip
that took maybe two weeks or so; and Rebecca rapidly becomes the prime focus.
This chapter, after all, about the bride; rather than the groom. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Sat, Sep 12th - 9:22AM
Genesis
24:1-3b †. Gen 24:1a . . Abraham was now old, advanced
in years, Abraham
was 100 when Isaac was born (Gen 21:25). The lad was 40 when he married Rebecca
(Gen 25:20). So that makes Abraham 140 at this point in the record. But
although Abraham was worn; he wasn't worn out. Abraham still had plenty of
vigor left in him and would go on to live another 35 years and even father more
children. As far as the Scriptural record goes, Abraham enjoyed excellent
health at this point in his life and still had his wits about him too. †.
Gen 24:1b . . and the Lord had blessed
Abraham in all things. The
"all things" at this point in the narrative would pertain to
Abraham's economic prosperity because that's how his steward will represent him
at verse 35. †.
Gen 24:2a . . And Abraham said to the
steward of his household, who had charge of all that he owned, It
is impossible to identify the steward because his name isn't disclosed anywhere
throughout chapter 24. It could be the Eliezer of Gen 15; however, many years
have gone by since then. Abraham was eighty-six when Ishmael was born in chapter
16, and he is 140 in this chapter; so it has been more than 54 years since the
last mention of Eliezer. The steward at this point in Abraham's home may even
be Eliezer's son by now, but nobody really knows for sure. Abraham's
steward is going to act as an ambassador-- not for Abraham, but for Isaac.
Abraham, for reasons undisclosed, can't leave Canaan to do this himself. So the
steward is dispatched as a proxy for Abraham to act in his son Isaac's best
interests. †. Gen 24:2b-3a . . Put your hand under my
thigh and I will make you swear Some
Bible students construe Jesus' words at Matt 5:33-37 to mean that taking an
oath is intrinsically a sin. But that's not the tenor of his words at all. What
he really said in that passage is that taking an oath sets you up for a fall
because for one thing; people are too quick to swear, and for another human
beings cannot guarantee that unforeseen circumstances won't prevent them from
making good on their oath. In other words: the nature of promises is that they are
immune to changing circumstances. So unless you can see the future, then if at
all possible, make your promises without sealing them with an oath because if
you drag God into your promise; He's going to expect you to make good on it
come hell or high water or risk getting called on the carpet to explain why you
think so little of His name. "If
a man vow a vow unto the Lord, or swear an oath to bind his soul with a bond;
he shall not break his word, he shall do according to all that proceeds out of
his mouth." (Num 30:2) Anyway:
if taking an oath were intrinsically a sin, then God himself would be a sinner
(e.g. Gen 22:15-18, Ps 89:3-4, Ps 89:35-37, Ps 110:4, Isa 14:24, Isa 45:23, Isa
54:9, Heb 4:3, et al). Jesus too would be in contradiction of his own teachings
because he testified under oath that he was the Messiah; God's son. (Matt
23:63-65) †.
Gen 24:3b . . by Yhvh, the God of
heaven and the God of the earth Exodus
6:3 makes it appear that Abraham wasn't supposed to be aware of the name Yhvh.
But here in Gen 24, Abraham made his steward swear by that very appellation; so
there can be no doubt he was fully aware of it. The
word for "thigh" is from yarek
(yaw-rake') and has a couple of meanings. It can be the actual thigh (e.g. Gen
32:26, Song 7:1) and it can mean a man's privates. (e.g. Gen 46:26, Num 5:21) In
those days, men didn't always raise their right hands to take an oath with each
other-- sometimes they held sacred objects in their hand like we do today when
a swearer puts their hand upon a Bible or a Torah Scroll. In this particular
case in Genesis, the object held in the hand was a holy patriarch. Only twice
in the entire Old Testament is an oath recorded taken in this manner. The first
is here, and the other is Gen 47:29. NOTE: The
similarities between the procurement of Isaac's bride, and that of the bride of
Christ are remarkable. Neither of the fathers of the grooms go themselves to
woo the brides; but rely upon a nameless servant who can be trusted to
faithfully look out for the grooms' best interests. Guided by providence, the
servants locate candidates, give them some gifts, explain their missions, tell
of the wealth of the fathers, tell of the inheritances of the grooms, tell the
candidates something of the grooms' genealogies; and are especially careful to
explain the circumstances of the grooms' miraculous births. The
candidates never see any photos or pictures of their potential husbands, are
given no information disclosing the grooms' personalities, and are permitted to
know only certain general details about the grooms and nothing more-- at first.
At this point, the servants then press for a response, and proceed no further
until the candidates make their decision. However, no one can force the bridal
candidates to accept the grooms. The candidates must consent to join him of
their own volition. After
the candidates consent to go and be with the grooms, the servants then cull the
candidates from their native people, and from their native lands, and safely
escort them to the lands and peoples of the grooms. The grooms, upon receipt of
the candidates, accept them just as they are, give them a nice home, and love
and care for them to the very end. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Fri, Sep 11th - 8:34AM
Genesis
23:10b-20 †. Gen 23:10b-11 . . saying: No, my lord, hear
me: I give you the field and I give you the cave that is in it; I give it to
you in the presence of my people. Bury your dead. Ephron's
generosity was no doubt sincere, but merely one more formality towards closing
a deal on the property. Not wanting to appear a greedy beast profiteering on
the loss of a man's wife, he first offered it to Abraham for free. That
was actually a very kind show of respect for Abraham's grief. Abraham will pay
for the property, and I have no doubt both men fully expected a monetary
settlement; but not before Ephron first has an opportunity to make certain
everyone in town sees him pay his respects for the dead of one of the most, if
not the most, highly respected men in all of Canaan. †. Gen 23:12-15 . .Then Abraham bowed low
before the people of the land, and spoke to Ephron in the hearing of the people
of the land, saying; If only you would hear me out. Let me pay the price of the
land; accept it from me, that I may bury my dead there. And Ephron replied to
Abraham, saying to him; My lord, do hear me. A piece of land worth four hundred
shekels of silver-- what is that between you and me? Go and bury your dead. The
shekel of Abraham's day wasn't coinage; but rather, a unit of weight equal to
20 gerahs (Ezk 45:12) which is equivalent to 10 English pennyweights or 1/2
ounce troy. So it would take two of Abraham's shekels to equal one troy ounce
of silver. The
average value of a troy ounce of silver as of June 04, 2020, was around 17.66 US dollars. So 400 full shekels
would be worth about 3,532 of today's US dollars (3,148 Euro) No
doubt Ephron had mixed feelings about the property. On the one hand, he, as
well as his countrymen, would prefer it not be sold to a non Hittite. Yet they
all admired Abraham and didn't want to disappoint him, especially during a time
of bereavement. Ephron
didn't actually ask for four hundred shekels. He merely told Abraham what the
property was worth, but that its value meant nothing between friends; as if
Abraham could have it for free. But it was really a subtle way of naming a
price without actually coming right out and naming it; know what I mean? †.
Gen 23:16 . . Abraham accepted
Ephron's terms. Abraham paid out to Ephron the money that he had named in the
hearing of the Hittites-- four hundred shekels of silver at the going
merchants' rate. In
those days they used a balance scale to weigh out precious metals for trading
purposes. Merchant rates are typically less than consumer rates. So Abraham's
400 shekels would have been weighed out with a lighter set of counterweights
than normal in order for him to buy the land at wholesale. †. Gen 23:17-18 . . So Ephron's land in Machpelah,
near Mamre-- the field with its cave and all the trees anywhere within the
confines of that field --passed to Abraham as his possession, in the presence
of the Hittites, of all who entered the gate of his town. Abraham's
purchase of Hittite territory was done in the presence of a goodly number of
blue-blooded Hittite witnesses so there would be no basis for anyone to contest
his rightful ownership. Abraham didn't purchase just the cave, but also the
wooded grounds around it so that Sarah's gravesite was originally a very nice
cemetery. But
if you want to visit her burial site today, be forewarned. The region in and
around Hebron is a political strife zone these days. The monumental shrine
erected over the cave in which Abraham was buried makes this one of the great
sights for visitors with an interest in scriptural history; but since there are
frequently violent clashes between Arabs and Israelis in Hebron it is essential
before visiting the town to check up on the current situation with the tourist information
office in Jerusalem. Sarah's
gravesite today (if indeed anybody knows where it really is) is covered by an
Islamic structure called Al-lbrahimi Mosque; in honor of Abraham, Ishmael's
dad. It should be pointed out that the Mosque isn't intended to promote
Judaism's Yhvh, but rather, Islam's Allah. †. Gen 23:19-20 . . And then Abraham buried his
wife Sarah in the cave of the field of Machpelah, facing Mamre-- now Hebron --in
the land of Canaan. Thus the field with its cave passed from the Hittites to
Abraham, as a burial site. Not
only a burial site, but also as a permanent real estate holding-- the people of
Israel's very first piece of their very own country; which gives them
legitimate roots there even prior to the Exodus; and way ahead of the
Palestinians. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Thu, Sep 10th - 7:51AM
Genesis
23:1-10a †.
Gen 23:1-2a . . Sarah's lifetime-- the
span of Sarah's life --came to one hundred and twenty-seven years. Sarah died
in Kiriath-arba-- now Hebron --in the land of Canaan; This
is the only woman in the entire Old Testament for whom an age is given at the
time of her death. Isaac was 37 at this point, having been born when Sarah was
90 (Gen 17:17) and Abraham was 137 since he and Sarah were ten years difference
in age (Gen 17:17). She lived in Canaan with her husband for 62 years and they
never once owned their own home. They moved there when he was 75 and she was 65
--and Abraham at this point has 38 years on the clock yet to go. NOTE: If we were
to assume Sarah's death immediately followed the Akedah, then Isaac would have
been 37 when he and Abraham went to the mountain seeing as how his mom was
ninety when the lad was born. †. Gen 23:2b . . and Abraham proceeded to mourn
for Sarah and to bewail her. Some
people think it's weak and unspiritual to mourn for the dead. However; it is
the very best way to let them go. People shouldn't stifle their heartbreak, nor
steel themselves against it. I would rather see people get angry and withdrawn
at the loss of their loved ones than to blow it off as just another passing
phase of life. Sarah
had quite a life you know. She was a strong pioneer woman-- taken into the
palaces of a Pharaoh and a King. And she was selected by Almighty God to be the
mother of the people of Israel, and of Messiah: Israel's ultimate monarch.
Sarah was also a genetic path to the seed promised Eve back in Gen 3:15. We
can't just put her in the ground as if she was a commoner no different than
anybody else. †. Gen 23:3a . .Then Abraham rose from beside
his dead, and spoke to the Hittites, Who
is the most famous Hittite in the Old Testament? Give up? It's Uriah,
Bathsheba's first husband; whose unwarranted death David instigated. (2Sam
11:1-27) †. Gen 23:3b-4 . . saying: I am a resident
alien among you; sell me a burial site among you, that I may remove my dead for
burial. Abraham
had no ancestral claim upon the land. So he had to appeal to the Hittites'
sensibilities; and beg for some property. They, on the other hand, were in a
straight because the land was their heritage and selling off some of their
holdings would diminish the inheritances to be received by their heirs, and
plus, the land would be lost forever; and to an alien yet. †. Gen 23:5b . . And the Hittites replied to
Abraham, saying to him: Hear us, my lord: you are the elect of God among us. The
word for "God"-- 'elohiym --is
not really in that verse; an editor took the liberty to insert it. And the word
for "elect" is from nasiy'
(naw-see') which doesn't mean elect at all but means an exalted one; viz: a
king or sheik. The Hittites had great respect for Abraham; and in their
estimation he earned the right to a potentate's reception. †. Gen 23:5b . . Bury your dead in the choicest
of our burial places; none of us will withhold his burial place from you for
burying your dead. By
donating a sepulcher, instead of selling the land, the Hittites would retain
ownership of the real estate and thus none would be lost to their posterity. In
the future, they could pave over it for a mall, or dig up the whole thing with
earth-moving machinery for a residential
sub division. †. Gen 23:7 . .Thereupon Abraham bowed low to
the people of the land, the Hittites, How
many Jews today would bow to a Hittite, or to any other Gentile for that
matter? Abraham was indeed a very humble man who never let his connection to
God go to his head nor give him a superiority complex. Pride and Prejudice are
two of the Jews' most widely known attributes in modern times; but they didn't
get it from their ancestor; that's for sure. †. Gen 23:8 . . and he said to them: If it is
your wish that I remove my dead for burial, you must agree to intercede for me
with Ephron son of Zohar. The
sons of Heth (who were Hittites themselves) would act as the mediator between
Ephron (a fellow Hittite) and Abraham (an Eberite: thus an outsider). It was
only a formality, but nonetheless, an important cultural protocol in those
days. †. Gen 23:9 . . Let him sell me the cave of
Machpelah that he owns, which is at the edge of his land. Let him sell it to
me, at the full price, for a burial site in your midst. The
location is favorable for Ephron because it's at the edge of his property line,
so Abraham won't need an easement to access the site, nor will it be an eyesore
stuck out in the middle. †.
Gen 23:10a . . Ephron was present
among the Hittites; so Ephron the Hittite answered Abraham in the hearing of
the Hittites, all who entered the gate of his town, Ephron
didn't have to answer personally; but chose to of his own volition. People
who actually lived in a town's proper, were the upper crust-- the merchants,
bankers, judges, city managers, the mayor, and like that. It was important that
those "who entered the gate of his town" be involved in a decision
regarding property sales because of the potential impact upon their own
interests. In
those days, land owned by a clan like the Hittites defined the boundaries of
their territory; and each family within a clan owned parcels of it. So when one
of the families, like Ephron's for example, sold some of their parcel to a
foreigner, the whole community suffered a permanent loss of territory. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Wed, Sep 9th - 10:11AM
Genesis
22:13-24 †. Gen 22:13 . .When Abraham looked up, his eye
fell upon a ram, caught in the thicket by its horns. So Abraham went and took
the ram and offered it up as a burnt offering in place of his son. The
covenant that Moses' people agreed upon with God as per Exodus, Leviticus,
Numbers, and Deuteronomy a few centuries later would not have allowed Abraham
to substitute a ram for Isaac. (Lev 27:28-29) According
to a documentary I recently watched on NetFlix; approximately 2,000 Muslim
butchers assemble for Mecca every year and slaughter something like 700,000 to
800,000 sheep to commemorate the ram that Abraham sacrificed in his son's
stead. Islam of course believes the son was Ishmael instead of Isaac. The
animals aren't consumed by the hajis. Instead; they're processed, packaged, and
shipped to poor people around the world. Well; it would be nice if some of the
people of Somalia and North Korea got a number of those sheep because they
could sure use them. Ironically, Islamic militants have been thwarting efforts
to get aid to the Somalian people. Where's the spirit of Mecca in that? †. Gen 22:14 . . And Abraham named that site
Adonai-yireh, whence the present saying: On the mount of God there is vision. Chabad
dot org translates that like this: "And Abraham named that place, The Lord
will see, as it is said to this day: On the mountain, the Lord will be
seen." †. Gen 22:15-18 . .The angel of God called to
Abraham a second time from heaven, and said: By Myself I swear, God declares;
because you have done this and have not withheld your son, your favored one, I
will bestow My blessing upon you and make your descendants as numerous as the
stars of heaven and the sands on the seashore; and your descendants shall seize
the gates of their foes. All the nations of the earth shall bless themselves by
your seed, because you have obeyed My command. Abraham
obtained God's oath because "you have obeyed My command". What
command was that? The command to offer his son as a burnt offering (Gen 22:2).
See? Abraham didn't make a mistake. He understood God perfectly; and would have
slit Isaac's throat and burned him to ashes had not God pushed the stop button
in the final moments. Far
from being scolded for offering a human sacrifice, Abraham is highly commended
for complying; and the promises God made in previous chapters are now
reaffirmed. He lost nothing; but the rather, gained a spiffy bonus: the
Almighty's oath. Concerning
those promises: the first time around, God merely gave His word (which is
normally good enough, and in and of itself quite immutable). Another time He
passed between the pieces; thus notarizing the promises (double whammy). But
this time, God anchored the promises with an oath (grand slam). That is
extremely notable. Would
Abraham have failed to obtain the promises had he refused to offer his son? No.
He would still have obtained them because the original promises-- made prior to
the oath --are unconditional and guaranteed by the immutability of God's
integrity. What Abraham would have failed to obtain was the oath. So
then, God has gone to every possible length to assure Abraham's seed of the
certainty of those original promises with: 1) His testimony, 2) His passing
between the pieces, and 3) His oath. You won't find God taking oaths very often
in the Bible. This
particular oath is part and parcel of the covenant that Moses' people agreed
upon with God as per Deut 29:9-15. †.
Gen 22:19 . . Abraham then returned to his servants, and they departed together
for Beer-sheba; and Abraham stayed in Beer-sheba. Isaac
isn't specifically named in either the return or the departure, except that the
words "departed together" are highly suggestive of the very same
togetherness of verses 6 and 8. And back in verse 5, Abraham told the servants
that he and Isaac would both return. If Isaac had not been with Abraham on the
return trip, the servants would have surely asked where he was. The
Targums have a pretty interesting postscript at this point. T. And the
angels on high took Izhak and brought him into the school (medresha) of Shem
the Great; and he was there three years. And in the same day Abraham returned
to his young men; and they arose and went together to the Well of the Seven,
and Abraham dwelt at Beira-desheva. And it was after these things, after
Abraham had bound Izhak, that Satana came and told unto Sarah that Abraham had
killed Izhak. And Sarah arose, and cried out, and was strangled, and died from
agony. (Targum Jonathan) †. Gen 22:20 . . Some time later, Abraham was
informed: Milcah too has borne children to your brother Nahor: Just
exactly how much time had passed after The Akedah until this announcement is
uncertain but it was likely at least three days because that's how long it took
Abraham's party to get back home. (Gen 22:4) Nahor
was one of Abraham's brothers and Milcah was Abraham's niece through Haran,
another brother: who was also Lot's dad. Milcah was Nahor's real wife. He also
had a concubine named Reumah. †. Gen 22:21-24 . . Uz the first-born, and Buz
his brother, and Kemuel the father of Aram; and Chesed, Hazo, Pildash, Jidlaph,
and Bethuel”-- Bethuel being the father of Rebecca. These eight Milcah bore to
Nahor, Abraham's brother. And his concubine, whose name was Reumah, also bore
children: Tebah, Gaham, Tahash, and Maacah. Bethuel
and Rebecca are the only two who really stand out in that list. However,
Genesis records everybody because God, apparently for reasons of His own,
thinks they're all important in some way. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Tue, Sep 8th - 8:42AM
Genesis
22:11-12 †.
Gen 22:11 . .Then an angel of God
called to him from heaven: Abraham! Abraham! And he answered: Here I am. This
particular celestial messenger is not only going to speak about God, and speak
for God, but will also speak for itself as God. †. Gen 22:12a . . And he said: Do not raise
your hand against the lad, or do anything to him. There
are some who feel that the angel stopped Abraham at this point because he
misunderstood the instructions God gave to him back in verse 2; which were:
"Take your son, your favored one, Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land
of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering" But
an interpretation of that nature impugns the quality of Abraham's spiritual
acumen as a man whom God said in Gen 20:7 was a prophet. Abraham no doubt
understood his Master perfectly and knew just what he was expected to do. He
had three days to pray about it and request confirmation. Abraham
was supposed to kill Isaac, and that is exactly what he tried to do, and would
have done; had not the angel stopped him in the nick of time. And the angel
stopped him not because it was wrong. No. The angel stopped Abraham from
killing Isaac because He had seen enough. †. Gen 22:12b . . For now I know that you fear
God, since you have not withheld your son, your favored one, from Me. The
angel first speaks about God, and then he speaks for himself. In other words:
if the angel isn't God; then he is certainly a very close approximation of God. Someone
usually wants to know how a supposedly omniscient God didn't know till then
that Abraham would go through with it. Well; in the Bible; the word
"know" isn't limited to academic information. It often refers to
experiential knowledge; like the difference between reading about the Atacama
Desert in National Geographic and actually walking there, tasting the dust and
feeling the sunshine on your arms. By
omniscience, God has seen the future already even before it takes place. It's
all laid out before him like an open road map. He can see every avenue and
every city all in one glance. However; like a traveler; God hasn't actually
been to each place yet. David,
in Psalm 139, said God's spirit is omnipresent, i.e. God is everywhere and
every place all at once in the now. However, I have yet to see a scripture
clearly, conclusively, and without ambiguity attesting that God is everywhere
and every place all at once in the past, present, and future, viz: the ability
to transcend time, i.e. travel in time. God
no doubt already knew ahead of time every single thing that would take place
the day Abraham and Isaac were on that mountain. None of that took God by
surprise. He saw it all ahead of time-- but; God had yet to be there and take
part when it actually happened. Afterwards; God not only knew in His head that
Abraham feared him; but God knew it in His heart too via personal experience;
i.e. God's personal participation in the event confirmed in His heart what He
already knew in His head. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Mon, Sep 7th - 8:27AM
Genesis
22:9b-10 †. Gen 22:9b . . Abraham built an altar there;
he laid out the wood; This
was a place where, apparently, Abraham had never worshipped before because he
had to build an altar. †. Gen 22:9c . . he bound his son Isaac; If
Isaac was old enough, and strong enough, to shoulder a load of firewood (Gen
22:6) then he was old enough, and strong enough, to get away from Abraham, who,
at the time, was past 100 years old. NOTE: If
perchance Gen 23:1 took place immediately following the Akedah, then Abraham
would have been 137 at this point in the narrative seeing as how he and Sarah
were ten years apart in age. (Gen 17:17) If
they had not already talked it over, then when Abraham pulled out his rope and
assayed to bind Isaac; the lad would surely request an explanation; don't you
think? Had
Isaac not consented to the ritual, then he could have easily escaped because
Abraham was alone; he had no one to assist him to restrain Isaac: the servants
having remained behind with the burro. Besides, Isaac had to agree or the whole
affair would disintegrate into a ritual murder. Binding
was for Isaac's own good. No doubt he was willing enough to die; but nobody is
comfortable with injury. When the knife would begin to make an incision in Isaac's
neck to sever his carotid artery, he might reach up and grab his father's hand,
the meanwhile twisting and thrashing in a natural response to pain and fear--
similar to what most anybody would do in a dentist's chair without Novocain. The
binding would help keep him still and avoid collateral damage; otherwise,
Abraham might accidentally cut off Isaac's nose or poke him in the eye and
quite possibly disfigure him horribly instead of succeeding in killing the lad
in a humane fashion. †.
Gen 22:9d . . he laid him on the
altar, on top of the wood. That
may seem impossible for a man of Abraham's age, but no specifications for
altars existed at that time. They could be two feet high, ten, or just a
rudimentary hearth of stones laid right on the ground like a campfire or in a
shallow excavation like a wood pit barbecue. At
that moment, even before Isaac was dead, and even before the tiniest spark of a
fire was kindled: Abraham's offering of
his son was complete. In other words: had God not wanted Abraham to sacrifice
his son, He would have stopped the proceedings before Abraham laid his son on
the wood because once that happens the offerer relinquishes control over his
offering. From
that point on; the offering belongs to God; and it becomes His prerogative to
do with it as He pleases-- to kill Isaac or not to kill him was God's exclusive
right and privilege. Bottom line is: it wasn't necessary for Isaac to be dead
in order to count as a sacrifice: he only had to be laid on the wood of the
altar to count. "By
faith Abraham, when he was tested, offered up Isaac, and he who had received
the promises offered up his only begotten son (Heb 11:17-18) "Was
not our ancestor Abraham considered righteous for what he did when he offered
his son Isaac on the altar?" (Jas 2:21) It's
easily seen from those passages in James and Hebrews that not all human
sacrifice is evil. In point of fact, in certain cases; it's the right thing to
do. But the point is: James and Hebrews makes it clear that Isaac counted as an
offering even though he was not slain. I
just don't know why it is that people think that the 22nd chapter of Genesis
teaches God's supposed abhorrence for all manner of human sacrifice when it is
so obviously meant to convey the quality of Abraham's confidence in God's promise
made at Gen 15:2-6. In
other words: if Abraham was to go on to generate a posterity through his son
whose numbers would be too many to count; then God would have to restore Isaac
to life in order to make good on the promise; and according to Heb 11:17-19
Abraham was counting on that very thing. In other words: according to Jas
2:21-23, Abraham's willingness to kill his son validates Gen 15:2-6 where it's
stated that Abraham believed God. †. Gen 22:10a . . And Abraham picked up the
knife Abraham
didn't just pick the knife up and hold it in his hand in some sort of symbolic
gesture. No, he picked it up with the full intention of using it on his boy; as
these next words of the narrative fully indicate. †. Gen 22:10b . . to slay his son. Do
you think Abraham was messing around? I guarantee you he was NOT. He fully
intended to slit Isaac's throat. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Sun, Sep 6th - 8:41AM
Genesis
22:6b-9a †. Gen 22:6b-7 . . He himself took the
firestone and the knife; and the two walked off together. Then Isaac said to
his father Abraham: Father! And he answered: Yes, my son. And he said: Here are
the firestone and the wood; but where is the sheep for the burnt offering? Oops!
That's kind of like going out to a picnic and forgetting the hot dogs and
hamburger buns. The Tanakh's translation of the Hebrew word 'esh (aysh) as firestone was probably an
educated guess. 'Esh just simply means fire, with no stone implied. A
convenient way to transport fire in those days was with a portable oven; viz: a
fire pot (cf. Gen 15:17). So rather than a stone, which implies striking
sparks, they most likely just brought along the camp stove, which held a
receptacle for live coals. Fire pots in those days were the equivalent of
modern propane-fueled camping equipment. Since
Abraham was the patriarch, it was his prerogative, as well as his
responsibility, to actually kill the burnt offering and set it afire; so he
quite naturally took custody of the weapon and the coals; as Isaac no doubt
fully expected him to. The
word for "sheep" is either she
(seh) or sey (say) which means: a
member of a flock, which can be either a sheep or a goat. Neither the age nor
the gender mattered in this instance because Scripture up to this point in time
had not yet specified age or gender for a burnt offering. Abraham
could have used kids and lambs, or ewes, nannies, or rams; it made no
difference. Actually, Abraham might have offered birds too. Noah did in chapter
8-- but there was something special about this instance that Isaac somehow knew
required something quite a bit more substantial than a bird. †. Gen 22:8a . . And Abraham said: God will see
to the sheep for His burnt offering, my son. Little
did Isaac know the sheep of that day was to be him. Ol' Abraham and his half
truths are at it again. †. Gen 22:8b . . And the two of them walked on
together. This
is now the second time Genesis says they walked together. Neither one led, nor
brought up the rear, as in the case of so many husbands who leave their wives
dragging along behind at the malls. Incidentally, the dialogue that took place
between Isaac and his dad in verses 7 and 8 are the only recorded words they
ever spoke to each other in the whole Bible. Arguments
from silence insist that if something isn't clearly stated in the Bible, then
it's inferred from the silence that there was nothing to state. In other words:
according to the logic of an argument from silence, verses 7 and 8 are the only
words that Isaac and Abraham ever spoke to each other their entire lives: which
of course is highly unlikely. †. Gen 22:9a . .They arrived at the place of
which God had told him. When
did that happen . . God telling him? Genesis doesn't say. Jewish tradition says
the site had an aural glow which Abraham and Isaac were enabled to see from a
distance. Anyway
it was now time to tell Isaac the real purpose of their pilgrimage. I
can almost hear Isaac ask; "Dad, if I'm dead, then how will God make of me
a great nation whose numbers exceed the stars of heaven? You told me He
promised you that". Yes; God did promise Abraham that in Gen 15:4-5, and
Gen 17:18-21. It
is here where Isaac's great faith is revealed; but not so much his faith in
God: rather, faith in his dad. Abraham's influence upon Isaac was astonishing;
so much so that no doubt the lad believed right along with his dad that his
death would only be temporary. Isaac was convinced that God would surely raise
him from the dead in order to make good on His promises to Abraham. That
young man really had fortitude; and incredible trust in his dad too. I'll tell
you what: those two men deserve our deepest admiration. What an incredible
display of faith and courage; both on the part of Abraham and on the part of
his son Isaac. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Sat, Sep 5th - 7:42AM
Genesis
22:2d-6a †. Gen 22:2d . . on one of the heights that I
will point out to you. Precisely
where the land of Moriah was, and the specific height God chose, is impossible
to tell for sure. Abraham knew where the land was but he wouldn't know the
exact spot until he got there. It's
just as well to keep it a secret or otherwise somebody would turn it into a
shrine; sort of like the so-called Garden Tomb, where people come from all over
the world and make fools of themselves kissing the ground. Some would even take
home souvenir jars of dirt too; so that by now, likely so much dirt would be
gone that the site of Moriah would look more like a quarry than a high place. †. Gen 22:3a . . So early next morning, Abraham
saddled his burro and took with him two of his servants and his son Isaac. The
Hebrew word for "saddled" is ambiguous. It doesn't necessarily
indicate a device meant for transporting personnel; more likely tackling for
cargo. Whether
or not the servants were armed, Genesis doesn't say. And why only two I don't
know either. But that was enough to look after the burro while Abraham and
Isaac were gone. And it's not wise to leave one man all alone in the outdoors;
especially in the wild country of early day Palestine what with no phone
service nor radios, nor cars to flag down for help in that day. †. Gen 22:3b . . He split the wood for the
burnt offering, It
wouldn't be unreasonable to assume that the servants did the actual wood
cutting with Abraham supervising. †. Gen 22:3c-4 . . and he set out for the place
of which God had told him. On the third day Abraham looked up and saw the place
from afar. Apparently
everyone hiked on foot. The burro was just used as a pack animal to haul food,
water, tents, supplies, and the wood. Though
it's stated Abraham "looked up" it doesn't necessarily mean the site
was elevated above him. When Lot surveyed the Jordan valley, he was said to
have "lifted up" his eyes. But the valley was about three thousand
feet down below his vantage at the time. Lifting up one's eyes just simply
means to look around, and survey the scene. Those
three days gave Abraham plenty of time to think about what God expected him to
do. Abraham must surely have been giving Isaac's future some serious thought.
And he no doubt pondered the promises God made concerning the great nation that
was to issue from his boy. It was very likely at this time that Abraham's faith
in God's promises sustained his determination to obey and take Isaac's life. "By
faith Abraham, when he was tested, offered up Isaac, and he who had received
the promises offered up his only begotten son, of whom it was said "In
Isaac your seed shall be called" concluding that God was able to raise him
up, even from the dead," (Heb 11:17-19) In
other words: Abraham was so confident that God was going to somehow make of his
son's progeny a great nation that he assumed, quite correctly, that though he
slay Isaac and cremate his remains, the lad wouldn't stay dead for very long. †. Gen 22:5 . .Then Abraham said to his
servants: You stay here with the burro. The lad and I will go up there. We will
worship and we will return to you. Worship
can be defined as respect paid to a better-- like when Abraham ran and bowed to
the three men who came to his tent in chapter 18, and up ahead when he will bow
to the sons of Heth in chapter 23. When
we let a senior citizen go through a door ahead of us, we are saying we regard
that person as better than we are. And when we move aside for a presidential
motorcade, we say the same thing. That's a kind of worship. It's not an
attitude of equality nor one of parity. True worship is an attitude of
humility, inferiority, subordination, submission, and admiration. The
God of the Bible is so superior and respectable that the seraphs in His throne
room cover their faces and dare not gaze upon God. True worship recognizes
God's supremacy and respects the sanctity of His person. Sinners are never
allowed to barge in like drunken sailors, to gape and swagger, unwashed and
uninvited. No, they crawl in, recognizing the depravity of Man and the extreme
dignity of God. The burnt offering shows that Man not only risks death and
incineration in God's presence: he fully deserves it. There
exists adequate proof that Abraham was capable of dishonesty, so it's difficult
to tell at this point if he was actually predicting their return, or misleading
everyone with a fib so nobody would become alarmed and throw a monkey wrench
into the works. It was Abraham's full intention to slay Isaac but I'm sure you
can understand why he wouldn't want anyone to know that. However,
Abraham was confident that Isaac wouldn't stay dead; that much is known for
certain so I vote to give Abraham the benefit of the doubt and say he really
did believe that he and Isaac come back together. †. Gen 22:6a . . Abraham took the wood for the
burnt offering and put it on his son Isaac. Were
Isaac not quite a bit grown up at this time I don't think Abraham would have
made him carry the wood. But
why not let the burro haul the wood to the site? Well; if you have never heard
a burro bray up close and personal, I guarantee you would not want one to do it
during a solemn church service. They are LOUD! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Fri, Sep 4th - 8:10AM
Parenthesis Rabbis
are quite divided as to the true meaning of Gen 22:2. Some feel Abraham was
supposed to kill Isaac, and some feel he wasn't. There are some who feel that
the angel stopped Abraham at this point because he was making a big mistake--
that Abraham misunderstood the instructions God gave to him back in verse 2;
which were: And He said, “Take your son, your favored one, Isaac, whom you
love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering Targums,
which were commonly taught in the synagogues prior to, during, and after Jesus'
day, paraphrased that verse to mean just exactly what it implies: that Isaac
was supposed to die. T. And He
said: Take now thy son, thy only one whom thou lovest, Izhak, and go into the
land of worship, and offer him there, a whole burnt offering, upon one of the
mountains that I will tell thee. (Targum Jonathan) The
verb "offer" is from 'alah
(aw-law') which means: to ascend. Yosef Hallel, a rabbi who lived one or two
generations before the Common Era, noted that 'alah is the same verb used with
reference to a qorbanot offering, and does, in fact, imply "to
slaughter" (e.g. Lev 17:8). Another
rabbi, Zalman Sorotzkin, who lived in pre war Poland and post war Israel, said:
"Abraham's going joyfully to slay his son [pre] atoned for his descendants
refusal to go to the Holy Land." There are Midrash commentaries very
similar to that line of thought. Some
ancient Jewish commentators did in fact credit the father, Abraham, for slaying
his son and they also credited Isaac for not only willingly offering his body,
which was implied turned to ashes, but also for offering ¼ of his blood too.
(Midrash HaGadol on Gen 22:19), (Sifra, 102c; b. Ta'anit 16a) and also
(Mekhilta d'Rashbi, p.4; Tanh. Vayerra, sec.23) For
what, or for whom, did Isaac willingly offer his body and blood? Was it for
himself? Was it for his father Abraham? According to the Targums, it was for
his future progeny, the people of Israel. T. And Abraham
prayed in the name of the Word of the Lord, and said: Thou art The Lord who
seest, and art not seen. I pray for mercy before Thee, O Lord. It is wholly
manifest and known before Thee that in my heart there was no dividing, in the
time that Thou didst command me to offer Izhak my son, and to make him dust and
ashes before Thee; but that forthwith I arose in the morning and performed Thy
word with joy, and I have fulfilled Thy word. . . . And now I
pray for mercies before Thee, O Lord God, that when the children of Izhak offer
in the hour of need, the binding of Izhak their father Thou mayest remember on
their behalf, and remit and forgive their sins, and deliver them out of all
need. That the generations who are to arise after him may say, In the mountain
of the house of the sanctuary of the Lord did Abraham offer Izhak his son, and
in this mountain of the house of the sanctuary was revealed unto him the glory
of the Shekinah of the Lord. (Jerusalem Targum) in
another Targum: T. Now I pray
for mercy before You, O Lord God, that when the children of Isaac come to a
time of distress You may remember on their behalf the Binding Of Isaac their
father, and loose and forgive them their sins and deliver them from all
distress. (Fragmentary Targum) The
same thought is also carried over in a prayer, still included in the additional
service for the Jewish new year, Rosh Hashanah, which culminates with these
words: Remember today the Binding Of Isaac with mercy to his descendants. The
rabbis attested that the final resurrection of the dead would take place
"through the merits of Isaac, who offered himself upon the altar."
(Pesikta deRav Kahana, 32) NOTE: That
comment asserts Isaac was consenting; which is probably very true. Some,
completely ignoring Tradition, Midrashim, and the Talmud, have really gone off
the deep end by claiming Gen 22:2 should be translated like this: And He said;
“Take your son, your favored one, Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of
Moriah, and offer [with] him there a burnt offering." Doctoring
the Scripture by inserting the word "with" impugns Abraham's
intellect as a man whom God testified in Gen 20:7 to be a prophet. Abraham no
doubt understood his Master perfectly and knew just what he was expected to do.
He had three days to pray about it and ask for confirmation. Abraham was
supposed to kill Isaac, and that is exactly what he tried to do. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Thu, Sep 3rd - 8:28AM
Genesis
22:1-2c †. Gen 22:1a . . Some time afterward, God put
Abraham to the test. This
particular section of scripture deals with an ancient incident known in sacred
Jewish literature as The Akedah (the binding of Isaac). The Akedah portrays the
very first human sacrifice ever performed in the Bible by someone who is
extremely important to the people of Israel. The
test coming up wasn't meant to measure Abraham's loyalty; rather, to ascertain
the quality of his trust in the promise that God made to him concerning Isaac's
future. "Sarah
thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed; and thou shalt call his name Isaac: and
I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his
seed after him." (Gen 17:19) †. Gen 22:1b-2a . . He said to him: Abraham. And he answered:
Here I am. And He said: Take your son, your favored one, Isaac, whom you love, The
Hebrew word for "favored one" is yachiyd
(yaw-kheed') which means sole. So then, Isaac wasn't just Abraham's favored
son; he was also Abraham's only son because when the old gentleman emancipated
Ishmael's mom Hagar, he relinquished legal kinship with her children. Relative
to nature; Ishmael is Abraham's son, but relative to the covenant; he's no son
at all. "Abraham,
when he was tested, offered up Isaac; and he who had received the promises was
offering up his only begotten son" (Heb 11:17) The
Greek word translated "only begotten" is monogenes (mon-og-en-ace') which never refers to a special child,
rather, always to an only child. Examples are located at Luke 7:12, Luke 8:42,
Luke 9:38, John 1:14, John 1:18, John 3:16, John 3:18, and 1John 4:9. Isaac
was about three to five years old when Hagar and Ishmael moved out. Some time
has gone by; and in this chapter, Isaac is now old enough to shoulder a load of
wood, and to ask an intelligent question based on experience and observation;
so he wasn't a little kid in this incident. Why
did God say; whom you love? I think it's so we'd know how Abraham felt about
Isaac. There can be no doubt that he would sorely miss this boy if ever
something should happen to him. When
people truly love their kids, they will die protecting them. They'll quite
literally run into a burning building if need be and/or step in front of a bus. Normal
parents are very protective like that when they truly love their kids. People
who love their kids don't drown them to please a boy friend, don't leave them
unattended in the car and go inside a bar for a drink; don't let them go off
with strangers, and don't let them go to the mall or to the playground all by
themselves when they're little. †. Gen 22:2b . . and go to the land of Moriah, There
are only two places in the entire Old Testament where the word Moriah appears.
One is here in Genesis and the other in 2Chrn 3:1. According
to tradition, Genesis' land of Moriah is the same as the mount Moriah in 2nd
Chronicles-- the site of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem --which is bordered by
the world famous Wailing Wall. Some justification for the tradition is found in
verse 14, where Abraham named the location Adonai
yireh, from which came the expression; "On the mount of the Lord there
is vision". However,
Jerusalem's temple site isn't a three day trek on foot from Beer sheba; nor
would it have been necessary for Abraham to pack in his own wood since
Jerusalem's locale was well-forested in his day. In
reality; the precise geographic location of the land of Moriah remains to this
day a total mystery; which is probably for the best because by now there'd
likely be an Islamic mosque constructed on the site were its location known. †. Gen 22:2c . . and offer him there as a burnt
offering The
Hebrew word for "burnt offering" is 'olah (o-law') which is a very different kind of offering than
those of Cain and Abel. Theirs were minchah
(min-khaw') which are usually gifts rather than atonements. They're also
voluntary and bloodless. Some
say that Abraham's offering shouldn't be translated "burnt" and
others say it should. No
doubt the best translator of 'olah within the context of the Akedah is the
prophet Abraham himself. The very fact that he hewed wood, took a source of
fire with him up the mountain, constructed an altar, put the wood on the altar,
and then bound and positioned Isaac upon the wood and the altar; tells me that
Abraham fully understood that when his divine master said 'olah He meant for the
man to cremate his son. The
evidence that Isaac also fully understood that 'olah implied incineration is
when he asked his dad: "Father; here are the wood and the fire: but where
is the sheep?" There
are some who insist that Abraham misunderstood God. They say he was only
supposed to take Isaac along with him up on the mountain and they together were
to offer a burnt offering. What's the appropriate response to that? Well;
as I stated: Abraham was a prophet (Gen 20:7). Also; Abraham had three days to
think about what he was asked to do. Had Abraham the prophet any misgivings
about human sacrifice-- any at all --he surely would have objected and/or at
the very least requested a clarification. I'm confident that's true because of
the example of his rather impudent behavior recorded in the latter part of the
18th chapter of Genesis. God
ordered Abraham to offer his son as a burnt offering. That means he will have
to slit Isaac's throat; and then cremate his remains. Why isn't Abraham
recoiling and getting in God's face about this with a vehement protest? The
inference is quite obvious. Abraham didn't believe human sacrifice wrong. In
other words: for Abraham, human sacrifice was a non-issue or he would have
surely objected to it. NOTE: A technical
point often overlooked in the "human sacrifice" debate is that in
every instance banning the practice in the Old Testament, it is underage
children that are condemned as offerings-- innocent children; viz: babes; and
in particular, one's own. (e.g. Lev 18:21, Lev 20:2-5, Deut 12:31, Deut 18:10,
cf. 2Kgs 16:3, 2Kgs 17:31, 2Kgs 23:10, 2Kgs 21:6, Ps 106:34, Ezk 20:31, Ezk
23:37, Jer 7:31, Jer 19:4, Jer 32:35). I
have yet to encounter an instance where God expressed abhorrence at sacrificing
a consenting adult. FYI: There is no
record of God banning the practice of sacrificing consenting adults up to the
time of Abraham's day. Had God banned it later in Moses' day, the ban wouldn't
count because divine law doesn't have ex post facto jurisdiction; i.e. it isn't
retroactive. Also
to consider: were all adult sacrificing wrong, then Christ's crucifixion for
the sins of the world would be null and void. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Wed, Sep 2nd - 10:07AM
Genesis
21:22-34 †. Gen 21:22a . . At that time While
Hagar and Ishmael were busy re-inventing their lives; a seemingly trivial event
occurred in Abraham's life. These kinds of events may seem superfluous, but
they're actually pretty handy for giving us some insight into Abraham the man;
i.e. his personality. †. Gen 21:22b . . Abimelech It
is very possible that Abimelech is a royal title rather than a personal name,
sort of like Pharaoh or Caesar, since in the title of Psalm 34 the name
Abimelech is applied to the king of Gath, who is elsewhere known by his
personal name Achish. (1Sam 27:2-3) †. Gen 21:22c . . and Phicol, chief of his
troops, Phicol's
name sounds funny in Hebrew. It's Piykol
(pee-kole') which means: mouth of all. His name, like Abimelech's, could also
have been a title; especially since it implies that he was a spokesman. I'm
sure you've heard people say: "And I think I speak for all when I say
this; yada, yada, yada; etc, etc, etc." Maybe that's what his name
"mouth of all" implies. At any rate, he was Abimelech's chief of
staff and apparently his right hand man-- a military man, and trusted. †.
Gen 21:22d . . said to Abraham: The
gods are with you in everything that you do. Abimelech
knew first hand that Abraham could do no wrong. And even when he did, his god
was right there to bail him out. That is an extremely envious position. What if
you knew that God would protect you no matter how dumb, stupid, and clumsy you
were in life-- that in spite of your bad investments, accidents, poor judgment,
bad decisions, worthless friends, failed romances, and overspending, you still
came out on top? Well . . that is just how it went for Abraham. He was bullet
proof. †. Gen 21:23a . .Therefore swear chuckle)
Ol' Abimelech is nobody's fool. He was burned once by Abraham and wasn't about
to be suckered again. From now on he will accept Abraham's word only if he
gives his oath on it first. You know; trust is an easy thing to lose, and very
difficult to regain. †. Gen 21:23b . . to me here by the gods The
Hebrew word for "gods" is a nondescript label for any number of
celestial beings; both real and imagined. But I kind of suspect the one
Abimelech referred to was the god who appeared to him in the dream; in other
words; Abraham's god: Yhvh. †. Gen 21:23c . . that you will not deal
falsely with me or with my kith and kin, but will deal with me and with the
land in which you have sojourned as loyally as I have dealt with you. It's
a non aggression pact. But why would Abimelech go to all the trouble? And why
would he, a king, travel to Abraham's camp rather than summon him to appear?
Did he fear that Abraham, a man befriended by a supreme being, might become so
powerful that he would attempt to conquer Abimelech's kingdom? I think so.
Abraham's medicine was strong. He had a connection in the spirit world to a god
with the power to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah, and to strike people with serious
maladies. It would be perfectly human for Abraham to take advantage of his
supernatural affiliation and use it to advantage. With
a man like Abraham, Abimelech probably figured a preemptive strike would be out
of the question. It is better to strike a treaty while conditions permit. After
all, Abraham owed Abimelech one for letting him off after lying to him about
Sarah. Good time to call that in. †. Gen 21:24 . . And Abraham said: I swear it. NOTE: There are
Christians who would soundly condemn Abraham for swearing based upon their
understanding of Matt 5:33-37. I
can almost hear Abimelech and Phicol start breathing again. I think both of
those men were more than just a little worried about their safety on Abraham's
turf. That
settled, Abraham has a matter of his own to discuss; and now's a good time for
it, seeing as those men were being very humble; at least for the moment. NOTE: There are
well-meaning folk who feel it's wrong for God's people to be confrontational;
and base their reasoning on Matt 5:3, Matt 5:5, Matt 5:9, and Matt 5:39. But
other than Isaac, I don't think you could find a more gracious man in the Old
Testament than Abraham. He didn't have a hair-trigger temper, a spirit of
vengeance, nor did he declare war over every little disagreement. Abraham
picked his battles with care, and conducted them intelligently-- same with
Moses, of whom the Old Testament says: was very meek, above all the men which
were upon the face of the earth (Num 12:3). Jesus was meek too (Matt 11:29 and
Matt 21:5) but could be very confrontational when the circumstances called for
a heavy hand. (Matt 23:13 36) †. Gen 21:25-26 . .Then Abraham reproached
Abimelech for the well of water which the servants of Abimelech had seized. But
Abimelech said: I do not know who did this; you did not tell me, nor have I
heard of it until today. Abraham
may have previously reported the incident to a bureaucrat, who then tossed the
complaint in a file cabinet somewhere and soon forgot about it because this is
the very first time Mr. Abimelech has been made aware of the problem. Sometimes
you just have to cut through the red tape and go straight to the top. †.
Gen 21:27-29 . . Abraham took sheep
and oxen and gave them to Abimelech, and the two of them made a pact. Abraham
then set seven ewes of the flock by themselves, and Abimelech said to Abraham:
What mean these seven ewes which you have set apart? This
was not a local custom; whatever it is, because Abimelech is totally puzzled by
it. †. Gen 21:30 . . He replied: You are to accept
these seven ewes from me as proof that I dug this well. A
reasonable assumption is that Abraham-- thoroughly disgusted with Gerar's
bureaucracy, and having no confidence in Abimelech's oath --shrewdly purchased
a water right so the government's thugs would have to step off and leave him
be. †. Gen 21:31-32 . . Hence that place was called
Beer-sheba [well of seven], for there the two of them swore an oath. When they
had concluded the pact at Beer-sheba, Abimelech and Phicol, chief of his
troops, departed and returned to the land of the Philistines. Abraham
swore to live peaceably with Abimelech. And he in turn swore to let Abraham
keep the well that he dug. Did Abimelech swear by a god or just give his word?
Genesis doesn't say. But only Abraham's god is named in this pact. Possibly
they both swore by that one. †.
Gen 21:33 . . Abraham planted a
tamarisk at Beer-sheba, and invoked there the name of The Lord, the Everlasting
God. Actually,
that verse is supposed to read like this: "and invoked there the name of
Yhvh, the everlasting god." NOTE: It's
commonly assumed that because of Ex 6:2-3, Abraham wasn't supposed to have
known the name Jehovah; but obviously he did. The
word for "tamarisk" is 'eshel (ay'-shel)
which can mean a tamarisk tree; and it can also mean a grove of trees; of any
kind. The grove was probably somewhat like a private garden where Abraham could
have some solitude in prayer. Groves were popular as places of religious
devotion and worship and of public meetings in both Canaan and Israel. It was
in a garden where Jesus prayed his last great prayer in John 17 just before
being arrested. Backyards
can serve as "gardens" too. Here in the part of Oregon where I live,
row houses have become a common style of residential housing construction;
which is really sad. The people living in them don't have any backyard to speak
of like my wife and I do in an older home. When
we look out the big windows on the east side of our house, we see trees and
shrubs and grass and an old mossy playhouse I built for my son and his friends
many years ago; and lots of urban wildlife too: birds, raccoons, skunks, huge
banana slugs, and squirrels and such. That backyard gives us a feeling of
escape and privacy: it's very soothing; like a week-end getaway except that
it's every day. The
planners of New York City's central park had the very same idea in mind.
Opponents of the park groused about the valuable real estate that would be lost
to public recreation; but many of the residents of Manhattan wouldn't trade
their park for all the thousands and thousands of diamonds the De Beers company
is hoarding in their vaults. Not
long ago one of Manhattan's abandoned elevated rail lines was converted into a
park and it's already immensely popular as an escape. Human beings need their
tamarisks; even holy human beings need them. (cf. Mark 6:46 and John 6:15) †. Gen 21:34 . . And Abraham resided in the
land of the Philistines a long time. It
wasn't actually the Philistines' land in Abraham's day; but was theirs during
the times when one of the authors of Genesis edited this chapter. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Tue, Sep 1st - 8:19AM
Genesis
21:17-21 †. Gen 21:17a . . God heard the cry of the boy, I
don't think Ishmael, at near eighteen, was bawling his eyes out like a little
girl. The Hebrew word is qowl (kole)
and/or qol (kole) which basically means
a voice, a noise, or a sound. It's very first use in the Bible is at Gen 3:8
where the Lord was heard walking about in the garden of Eden. Ishmael's
"cry" was likely a plea for help; i.e. prayer; which wouldn't be
surprising seeing as how the lad was under Abraham's wing for something like seventeen
years. Also Abraham was highly recommended as his own family's rabbi. (Gen
18:21) NOTE: God
had promised Hagar and Abraham that He would multiply Ishmael (Gen 16:10, Gen
17:20). So, prayer or no prayer, God cannot allow Ishmael to die before
generating a posterity. †.
Gen 21:17b-18 . . and an angel of God called
to Hagar from heaven and said to her: What troubles you, Hagar? Fear not, for
God has heeded the cry of the boy where he is. Come, lift up the boy and hold
him by the hand, for I will make a great nation of him. Now
we're back on personal terms; and the angel speaks to Hagar by name rather than
by her previous status as a slave; which would be inappropriate at this point
because she's been emancipated. This
particular angel wasn't an apparition but rather just a voice-- granted a very
unusual voice. First it spoke for God, then it spoke as the God who would make
good on the promise that God made to Hagar at Gen 16:10-11 and the one He made
to Abraham at Gen 21:13. †. Gen 21:19 . .Then God opened her eyes and
she saw a well of water. She went and filled the skin with water, and let the
boy drink. I
bet the water was right there all the time but Hagar was so exhausted and
distraught that she hadn't seen it. Everybody gets that way once in a while.
Sometimes the answer to our problem is right under our noses but oftentimes
can't see it because we're just too upset and/or distracted at the time. †. Gen 21:20a . . God was with the boy and he
grew up; I
don't know why so many Christians and Jews have such a low opinion of Ishmael.
How many of his detractors are able to boast that God was with any of them as
they grew up? †. Gen 21:20b . . he dwelt in the wilderness
and became a bowman. Archery
must have become a traditional skill in Ishmael's family. One of his male
progeny, Kedar, produced a clan of bowmen who used their skills not only in
hunting, but also in warfare. (Isa 21:16-17) †. Gen 21:21a . . He lived in the wilderness of
Paran; The
Wilderness of Paran encompassed a pretty big area. It was south of the Negev,
on the Sinai peninsula, roughly between Elat on the east and the Suez canal on
the west. To
look at that region today you'd wonder what appealed to Mr. Ishmael; but
apparently it was a whole lot more pleasant in his day 3,900 years ago; which
wouldn't surprise me since the Sahara itself was at one time verdant, pluvial,
and inhabited. †.
Gen 21:21b . . and his mother got a
wife for him from the land of Egypt. A
girl from Egypt was apparently a better choice than the girls of Canaan; from
among whom Abraham would later not want a wife for his son Isaac (Gen 24:3-4). I
wonder how Hagar traveled to Egypt. Did she go on to become prominent in the
caravan business? I bet you one thing. She was very careful that her boy did
not get himself hitched to a Sarah-type personality. And no way would Hagar
ever have one for a mother-in-law either.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comment (0)
|
Back to Blog Main Page
|
|
About Me |
|
Archives
|
|
|