Sat, Sep 6th - 10:24AM
HOW MUCH DOES THE LIBERAL MEDIA IMPACT YOUR BELIEFS?
Remember, the Bible
encourages you to use your mind. (Proverbs 2:3-11; consider Romans 12:2;
Colossians 2:8; I Thessalonians 5:21; Hebrews 5:14)
Remember these points:
Propaganda is merely information in favour of a cause and can be good or evil,
honest or dishonest, and informative or misleading; the danger is that
propaganda serves the function of self-delusion in the absence of critical
thinking. Leftist ideology normally looks and sounds ideal or correct until you
ask pointed questions, make comparisons, look for hard evidence, and consider
the costs and repercussions. There are times when science appears to contradict
Scripture UNTIL you ask or look for hard evidence, and all too often common
knowledge and official narratives are merely oft-repeated myths. Heresies often
sound like Bible truths until you ask pointed questions and interpret Bible
passages in relation to immediate context and the whole Bible and pay close
attention to words and grammar.
Consider a few myths and
unproved theories promoted by the left that have had a big impact on
viewpoints:
· Evolution is a scientific fact, and
creationism is merely religion and not genuine science because it involves
faith. (If you believe this, can you give one example of hard evidence
supporting the theory of evolution that does not have to be accepted by faith?
How do you reconcile the theory of evolution with the DNA Code Barrier, Gene
Depletion, & Natural Selection? How can a mutation result in a change
from one species into another since a mutation takes away from a genetic code
but never adds to it? Have you ever read a book or magazine that teaches or
promotes evolution and took note of how heavily the theory of evolution relies
on logic fallacies and mathematical absurdities?)
· The age of the universe and heavenly
bodies can be calculated by using the speed of light as a metric. (The speed of
light is not constant and therefore is not a reliable metric for this.)
· Guns and poverty cause crime. (During the
Great Depression there was more of both and a lower crime rate.)
· Lincoln freed the slaves. (Abraham Lincoln
was not against slavery, he just opposed the spread of slavery, and he was
planning to deport all black people, and this plan was hindered by his
assassination. Both sides of The War of Northern Aggression (1861-1865) had
slaves until the Thirteenth Amendment. Slavery did not become an issue of the
war until about two years after the war started, and Abraham Lincoln made it an
issue because he needed a moral high ground as the armed invasion of the
Confederate States of America was carried out without constitutional or
congressional authorization. The Emancipation Proclamation gave the
Confederate States the choice to quit fighting and keep slavery or their slaves
would be freed if they kept fighting and gave them a deadline of January 1,
1863. The Emancipation Proclamation only called for the emancipation of slaves
in areas where the US government had no power to do anything about slavery and
specified the areas, even counties. It was not ratified until December 6, 1865,
and was merely a propaganda tool that did not free a single slave. Slavery was
abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment, not the Emancipation Proclamation.)
· The Voting Rights Act of 1965 gave Black
people the right to vote in Southern States. (If black people were not allowed
to vote in Alabama and other Southern States prior to the Voting Rights Act of
1965, then how do you explain the black counties and black cities in Alabama
and other Southern States with black public officials and all-black electorates
prior to 1965? The Voting Rights Act of 1965 secured the vote for illiterates.
Prior to 1965 the state of Alabama and other Southern States required basic literacy
and a basic knowledge of the US Constitution and State government to be
eligible to vote.)
· Abortion is not killing a baby because an
unborn child is just a clump of cells. (Every human, born or unborn, young or
old, is a clump of cells.)
· Abortion is a choice, not murder. (Murder
is always a choice. If it is not a choice it is not murder.)
· Premarital sex and illicit cohabitation
are good preparation for marriage. (Think about it: How meaningful and secure
is a relationship based on freedom to leave? Premarital sex normally leads to
selfishness, disrespect, and distrust after a couple marries, and couples that
live together before marriage usually end up divorced.)
· Male and female think and feel the same
about sex. (The myth about male and female sexual equality makes both sexes
more vulnerable to exploitation and manipulation. While each gender has just as
strong a libido as the other, and both sexes desire sex and affection, their
responses and priorities tend to differ. Generally, men trade affection for sex
and women trade sex for affection. While neither gender is immune to lust, and
both genders can be verbally and visually stimulated, women tend to be more
verbally stimulated, and men tend to be more visually stimulated. Men tend to
fall in love with, or lust for, what they see, and women tend to fall in love
with what they hear.)
· In marriage, compatibility in everything
is essential and incompatibility is an acceptable ground for divorce. (In other
words, differences nullify commitment, which is convenient as it is not
possible to find someone that always likes or dislikes the same things and
always agrees on every point. Ironically, several extensive secular studies on
marriage and divorce concluded that the differences normally blamed for
incompatibility are not problems for married couples that share the same
religious and moral values.)
· Emotions are acceptable grounds for
divorce. (“I’m not happy,” “I’m not in love anymore,” etc. Love is a choice:
You choose to love or not love someone.)
· The Age Gap in the Prefrontal Cortex
Theory. (Please note that "an intelligent person with a big college degree
said the human brain is not developed till the age of 25" is not hard
evidence that proves anything. Was this conclusion reached because of the
weight of evidence or merely because someone wanted it to be true? Also note
that I am not claiming to have the last word on this, I am hoping to encourage
you to research and analyze the data on this.)
· Homosexuals are born that way. (What is
the hard evidence that homosexuals are born that way? What is the hard evidence
that there is such a thing as homosexual orientation? What is the hard evidence
that homosexuality is an immutable characteristic? What is the hard evidence
that homosexuality is an inherited trait and not distorted love needs and
learned behaviour?)
The examples could continue, but these should suffice
for now to make the point.
Know-it-alls, the young,
and people with a victim mentality are especially vulnerable to left-wing
propaganda because the left always appeals to wishful thinking and intellectual
arrogance, and a victim mentality makes people more receptive to left-wing victim
narratives.
Be expecting the left to
try to persuade you to believe reality is debatable and their arguments and
assertions are absolute but remember that the truth can withstand questions,
criticism, and critical analysis.
Keep in mind that the
left seeks to change or distort core beliefs and values because a person
without principles is more easily controlled and manipulated, and if a
community (local, State, or national) is without principles, it is easier to
replace self-government with submission to tyranny.
The left has a vested
interest in promoting the pagan worldview (and downplaying or denying the
authority of Scripture), and this is obviously promoted by schools, colleges,
and news and entertainment media. All too many Christians do not recognise this
propaganda as propaganda because they are not alert to it. The pagan
concept of man and government (pagan worldview) makes man (corporate man, the
state) the standard of truth and the ultimate authority, which puts it in
conflict with God and those who believe that God is the standard of truth and
the present ruler of the earth (the Christian worldview), and sees the
individual as a mere servant of the state whose value is determined by his
usefulness to the state, thus making encroachments upon God-given rights
inevitable. Socialism and leftism (which significantly overlap) are modern
versions of ancient paganism. (Ecclesiastes 1:9-10)
Socialism is not always
recognised or understood because of the facades and misconceptions. For
example, many believe that fascists (e.g., Nazis) are right-wingers, and
fascism is a right-wing movement because they merely compare fascism to
communism. This is like comparing a scalene triangle and an isosceles triangle
without comparing any other shapes. If you compare the triangles to each other,
it is only possible to notice the differences, but if you compare both
triangles to a rectangle or a circle the similarities between the two triangles
stand out. If we merely compare fascism and communism with each other, the
superficial appearance of free enterprise can make fascism appear to be
right-wing, but if we compare fascism and communism to the social system of
free enterprise and limited constitutional government it becomes clear that
fascism and communism are different forms of socialism.
All too often there is a
tendency to place the opinions of experts (e.g., scientists, psychologists,
historians, theologians, etc.) in the status of inerrancy, especially when the
opinion of some expert happens to support the left or what the left wants you
to think. While we do need experts, try to keep a balanced view of experts
(and do research and apply critical thinking). When you come across the
argument or assertion that the findings or conclusions of certain experts in a
certain field are inaccurate or wrong merely because they differ from the
findings or conclusions of other experts, or even most experts in that field,
or merely because an essay or thesis did not pass a peer review, it is
important to keep in mind that most expert (even scientific) findings or
conclusions are educated opinions and reviewers are often biased. At any
time and on any subject, there are disagreements among qualified experts in the
same fields, and they cannot all be right. A majority opinion is still an
opinion, and all too often the majority opinion of experts in a particular
field is considered proof or verification of assertions or theories even though
whatever is the majority opinion of experts in certain fields changes often
enough to make the majority opinion dubious. (For example, if a teacher or
professor used a fifty-year-old textbook to teach evolution he would be
teaching theories that were disproved by evolutionists years and decades
ago.) Experts are fallible humans and are just as vulnerable to emotional
pressure and the influence of preconceived ideas as anyone else. Experts are
just as capable of dishonesty and distorting facts to support their pet
theories as other humans, and many experts have been caught deliberately
deceiving the public. When presented with the facts ordinary people can
and often do come to better conclusions than experts, which is one reason that
a trial verdict is decided by a jury of ordinary citizens and not a panel of
legal experts.
An old trick of tyrants
and empires is to keep different ethnic groups pitted against each other to
keep them from recognising their common enemy. The liberal media and
public schools often try to make it appear that centralised US government, US
government intrusions, and increased police powers of the US government were
and are necessary by pointing to examples of racial problems in history, but
when the whole story and all sides of the issues are considered, those examples
usually illustrate the evils of big government and the importance of limited
constitutional government.
When a character in a
movie or TV show gives statistics or data or talks about scientific findings or
historical events or opinions of psychologists or otherwise appears to make an
intelligent argument or assessment, do your own homework before you accept the
argument or assessment as valid or correct. This is a method the left uses to
persuade the public to accept myths and delusions as reality and dismiss facts
and logic as misinformation or fantasy.
While we should be
concerned about current events and taking a stand on issues, it is important to
watch for crisis manipulation, a simple method to achieving specific goals,
justifying control, or creating a police state that has been used by governments
and would-be tyrants throughout history. (e.g., Nimrod, Napoleon, Lenin,
Hitler, etc.) First, a crisis-type situation or emergency is utilized or
created. (Terrorism, high crime rate, child abuse, counterfeiting, sex
trafficking, drug money laundering, contagious disease, etc.) The
"crisis" (which could be real, imagined, or exaggerated) is
emphasized and propagandized until it becomes a great concern to a significant
percentage of the population. Then the government or would-be tyrant and accomplices
appear to come up with the best or most effective solution to the crisis so
many are concerned about. (Of course, the "solution" just happens to
increase government intrusion and police power or eliminate safeguards against
governmental abuse.) At this point the average citizen is so concerned with
dealing with the crisis and finding or implementing a solution that he is
willing to go along with what appears to be a good solution without considering
the costs and repercussions. Here are just a few red flags:
· Be wary of “solutions” offered by
“experts” that sound more like a left-wing wish list than facts, logic, or
actual science. (Look for facts and hard evidence, and remember that the
truth can withstand questions, criticism, and analysis.)
· Be wary of so-called solutions to crises,
emergencies, and social maladies that depend on an assumed natural goodness of
man, or an assumed goodness or benevolence of human government, for the
solutions to work. (How many parents reading this ever had to teach
a child how to be bad? Humans can choose to do right but sin comes naturally
because of natural depravity. History demonstrates that any human government,
even good government, is dangerous, which is why government must be limited and
restricted.)
· Keep in mind that we do not live in a
perfect world and there are no perfect solutions.
The phrase "(one)
just doesn't get it" or "(they) just don't get it" typically
refers to something that affects the speaker emotionally. If you feel this way
about those who disagree with you this does not necessarily mean you are wrong,
but this tends to imply that you are convinced due to allowing emotional
appeals and other logic fallacies detract you from critical thinking.
Has the media persuaded
you to accept unscriptural and misguided teachings, theories, and ideas? You
might be surprised. Try applying these questions to specific beliefs and
issues, including beliefs that you consider settled:
· Have you personally studied or researched
this belief or teaching, and can it withstand questions and critical analysis?
(Acts 17:11; 1 Thessalonians 5:21)
· What would be your response if an
unbeliever asked you why you believe this? (2 Timothy 2:14-15; 3:16-17)
· How important is this in relation to other
matters and what Bible truths and principles or standards apply? (Matthew
23:24; Romans 14; 2 Thessalonians 5:21; 1 Timothy 1:5-7)
· Is this what the Bible says, or is this
what someone thinks the Bible ought to say? (Proverbs 30:5-6; Isaiah 29:13;
Matthew 15:9)
· Was this true in the distant past and will
this still be true in the distant future? (Psalm 33:11; 119:89; Proverbs 19:21;
Ecclesiastes 1:9-10)
· What is the origin of this teaching or
belief? Can you verify this with Scripture or is it necessary to use the
arguments of the world? (Psalm 33:10; Romans 12:2; 1 Corinthians 1:20; 2:5;
Colossians 1:9; 2:8)
Comment (0)
|
Tue, Aug 26th - 5:04PM
Gossip
“Keep thy tongue from
evil, and thy lips from speaking guile.” (Psalm 34:13)
“He that is void of
wisdom despiseth his neighbour: but a man of understanding holdeth his peace. A
talebearer revealeth secrets: but he that is of a faithful spirit concealeth
the matter..” (Proverbs 11:12-13)
“A froward man soweth
strife: and a whisperer separateth chief friends.” (Proverbs 16:28)
“He that goeth about as a
talebearer revealeth secrets: therefore meddle not with him that flattereth
with his lips.” (Proverbs 20:19)
“Where no wood is, there
the fire goeth out: so where there is no talebearer, the strife ceaseth.”
(Proverbs 26:20)
“If any man among you
seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart,
this man's religion is vain.” (James 1:26)
I remember when I was in
kindergarten the teacher showed the class a game called Gossip. She had
everyone sit in a circle. She would whisper something to a student, who would
then whisper what he heard to the right ear of the student to his left, and
subsequently each student did likewise. Whenever the rumor got around to the
last student, he told the class what he heard, and it was completely different
from what the first student was told. The same thing happens with real world
gossip; even if an element of truth remains, the story changes as it gets
passed around. Sometimes a rumor starts with someone telling a lie, sometimes a
rumor starts with someone betraying a confidence, and very often a rumor starts
when someone overhears a conversation, assumes they got the whole story, and believes
others need to hear the story.
Here's one way to deal
with gossipers: Years ago, at the workplace one of the local gossipers
approached me and said she heard that I had been fornicating with a
thirteen-year-old girl. I tried to hand her my cell phone and told her to call
the police, and she wondered why. I told her that if she believes the rumor is
true then reporting me to the police would make a lot more sense than running
her mouth to people that cannot legally do anything about it except run their
mouths. She stayed away from me for a long time.
Let me share another
experience from over thirty years ago: I moved from Carrollton, Georgia, to
Bremen, Georgia, and moved my letter from a church in Carrollton to a church in
Bremen. At the new church I became friends with an old preacher who was also a
barber. He was a good friend, but he was not careful to get details right
before playing matchmaker. At my new church there was a young lady who attended
with her mother and attended the old church with her dad; her parents were
divorced. While getting a haircut I mentioned that I knew that girl's dad and
thought highly of him, and he asked if I ever thought of dating that girl. I
told him I would probably pursue her if we are both still single when she is
older, and he said that should not matter. I told him I had the impression that
a lot of modern evangelicals think it's wrong for teenage girls to date and
marry or think an age gap of a few years is a big deal, and I would not want to
offend her parents. He assured me that her parents would not object and told me
she was older than I thought she was (she wasn't). I had other interests, but
he would tell me that girl we discussed at the barber shop would be a better
choice, and eventually I agreed with him. He suggested that I write her a
letter and gave me her address. After mailing the letter I had opportunity to
talk with her at the skating rink in Carrollton that night. I told her I liked her,
and she told me she had a boyfriend, and I thought that was the end of the
story until I received a threatening letter from her dad, which did not include
a forwarding address or phone number. For years I occasionally heard stories
from the grapevine about me and what "happened."
Here are a few questions
you should ask someone sharing gossip with you (and not necessarily in this
order): Do you KNOW this to be true? Have you talked about this with the person
you are talking about? Why are you sharing this with me?
Comment (0)
|
Tue, Jul 15th - 7:08PM
WITNESSIING TO JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES & THEIR CHILDREN
When witnessing to
Jehovah’s Witnesses, whether at your door or social situations, remember that
the goal is to win hearts and minds, not arguments. If you are hostile or
argumentative with a Jehovah's Witness you will only convince him that he is right.
Also, keep in mind that
even if their children are not Jehovah's Witnesses and are not convinced that
Jehovah's Witnesses have the only true Christian religion and that the
Watchtower Society is God's channel of truth, the children of Jehovah’s
Witnesses are normally under tremendous emotional pressure to conform, and
Jehovah’s Witnesses require their children to identify themselves as Jehovah's
Witnesses, teach Watchtower teachings, and sell Watchtower literature or
distribute free tracts. If you come across a child or youth like that and you
are hostile or argumentative this may help convince him that Jehovah’s Witnesses
are right and that he should join the cult.
Be friendly and show that
you care about them as you share your testimony and the gospel and
thought-provoking questions, and, while you should not be expecting to convert
anyone overnight, you can expect them to think seriously about what you said
for a long time, even if they initially shrug it off.
Comment (0)
|
Tue, Jul 1st - 8:00PM
KEEP A BALANCED VIEW OF BIBLE PROPHECY
Christians should occupy till Jesus comes and stop obsessing over things they do not and cannot know; the Bible does not teach any visible or verifiable signs that precede the Second Advent. “And as they heard these things, he added and spake a parable, because he was nigh to Jerusalem, and because they thought that the kingdom of God should immediately appear. He said therefore, A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return. And he called his ten servants, and delivered them ten pounds, and said unto them, Occupy till I come.” (Luke 19:11-13) “And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.” (Acts 1:7) When it comes to the study of Bible prophecy what do we often see? New Testament passages that clearly identify the New Testament Church as the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies concerning Israel are ignored and replaced with Zionism, and we often see the historical and poetic books of the Old Testament, the Gospels, and Epistles of the New Testament interpreted in relation to theories about the interpretation of passages of prophecy in prophetic books (especially Daniel, Zechariah, and Revelation) instead of interpreting difficult or obscure Bible passages in relation to clear Bible passages. Passages of New Testament prophecies about the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD are taken out of context and applied to current events in the Middle East. In many Christian circles a popular and growing trend in the study of eschatology has been to interpret passages of Bible prophecy through the lens of current headlines, distort facts and scriptures to make every passage of Bible prophecy appear to be a literal narration of end time events, try to make every current event fit the mold of pet theories about the fulfillment of Bible prophecy, support theories and predictions by cross referencing unrelated passages of Bible prophecy, and try to make dispensationalist theories into criteria for Christian fellowship. Many insist that their pet theories are above scrutiny and base their teachings, plans, goals, and decisions on things they obviously do not and cannot know, and are not revealed in Scripture, and this tends to detract from important truths and issues and make Christianity look silly. What is wrong with this picture? The Holy Bible is the final authority and Scripture itself, comparing Scripture with Scripture, is the key to understanding Scripture: Bible passages must be understood in relation to context and the whole Bible, and difficult passages must be understood in relation to clear passages. (Psalm 119:130; 1 Corinthians 2:13; 2 Timothy 2:15; 3:16) Theories on eschatology that have become popular in Christian circles often promote a neutrality or isolation that rejects or prevents interaction between Christianity and culture and encourages believers to withdraw from society and be neutral because of preoccupation with speculations about things which they obviously do not and cannot know. (Consider Acts 17:6-7) Those who study Bible prophecy merely to find a schedule of future events have missed the purpose of prophecy: Prophecy (even prophecies fulfilled long ago) teaches us about God and His truths, principles, standards, and Providence. (Ephesians 1:11) Rather than seeing history as HIS story and recognising God as the present ruler of the earth Who intervenes in human history and ultimately controls everything, many have adopted a worldly view of history, such as the Humanist, Cyclical, and Marxist views of history. (Romans 12:2; Colossians 2:8) Many even insist that world conditions must continually go from bad to worse because they believe Satan rules the Earth, but nothing in the Bible ever indicates that God has ever abdicated His throne and turned rulership over to Satan. (1 Chronicles 29:11-12) Many Bible prophecies that are being applied to the second coming of Christ are fulfilled prophecies (e.g., Return from Babylonian captivity, destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, etc.). When someone makes a ministry of making predictions and one or some of his predictions come true it is often assumed that this puts him and all his teachings above scrutiny. (Making a correct prediction could be considered inevitable if someone keeps making predictions. This certainly is not rightly dividing the Word of God but is putting men and theories of men above God’s Word.) Prophecy preachers and theorists often predict a world where demonised and satanic people hold public offices after the rapture, but this has been a characteristic of the world for thousands of years. (Consider Matthew 4:8-10) Satan rules in the hearts of unbelievers, the wicked world system, but God is the present ruler of the Earth and ultimately controls everything, and nothing in Scripture indicates that God ever abdicated his throne or turned it over to Satan. (2 Corinthians 4:4; 1 Chronicles 29:11-12) Salt cleanses, purifies, preserves, and makes people thirsty, and light dispels darkness and exposes that which was hidden in darkness; government corruption and social maladies are signs of a lack or decline in Christian influence or an increase in exposure of corruption, not signs of the Second Advent. (Matthew 5:13-16) Whenever anyone reminds Christians that they have a duty to impact society and culture for righteousness there are usually professed Christians insisting that Christians should not do that or be concerned about that because there is no time to accomplish anything or because this would contradict their pet theories and speculations about things they do not and cannot know. It is often difficult to convince modern Christians that God is not obligated to submit to any schedule they have set for Him. Let us take a closer look at passages often used to support the view that the New Testament says we can know the Second Advent is near: “Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching.” (Hebrews 10:25) “The day approaching” obviously refers to the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple in 70 AD. Hebrews was written before the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD; note that the temple was still in operation when the Epistle of Hebrews was written. (Hebrews 8:4; 13:10) What is the basis for insistence that Philippians 4:5 does not say “the Lord is at hand” in the sense that God is near His people? (Psalm 46:1; 145:18) What is the basis for insistence that “the end of all things” in 1 Peter 4:7 is not an obvious reference to the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple around which the Jewish world revolved in the first century? “He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus." (Revelation 22:20; etc.) While many use this and similar passages to support their theory about an assumed nearness of Christ’s return, Bible skeptics point to passages like this as evidence of error in Scripture since this was written nearly two thousand years ago. It could appear to be an error and could appear to be saying when Christ will come until you examine the meaning of words and grammar. For example, “quickly” (Greek: Tachu) does not necessarily mean that the action will take place immediately or even soon but can also be a description of the speed or suddenness of the action once the action has been initiated. Do references to the “last days” give signs or conditions to indicate to people of our generation that the end of the world is near, or does the term "last days" refer to the Christian era? (Compare Joel 2:28-32 & Acts 2:16-21; 2 Timothy 3:1; Hebrews 1:1-2; 2 Peter 3:2-3. Christ was upon the earth during the “last days.” -Genesis 49:1 & 10; Hebrews 1:1-2; 9:26. The instruction "from such turn away" indicates that the previously described conditions in chapter three of Second Timothy existed at the time this epistle was written. -2 Timothy 3:5) If 2 Timothy 3:2-5 is a list of signs or conditions prior to the rapture, then how many times has the rapture occurred over the last two thousand years? If God wanted 2 Timothy 3 to be a warning or reminder that the advance of Christianity would be accompanied by efforts of enemies of the Gospel to thwart the Lord’s work, through persecution from without and corruption from within, and a warning of perilous times resulting from conditions that have been characteristic of the world in greater and lesser degrees throughout Christian history, how would he have changed the wording of 2 Timothy 3? How do you reconcile the teaching that in Matthew 24:4-33 Christ gave signs of the Second Advent to be seen by people living centuries later with Matthew 24:34? (After verse thirty-four the subject changes to the second coming of Christ and the discourse does not give us any visible signs or verifiable events to precede the Second Advent except people carrying on with their lives unaware. -Matthew 24:36-39) What is the basis for insisting that “This generation” in Matthew 24:34 did not refer to people then living? (Consider Matthew 11:16; 12:39; 17:17; 23:36) If Christ wanted Matthew 24:34 to mean that Matthew 24:4-33 would be completely fulfilled within the lifetime of people then living how would he have changed the wording of Matthew 24:34 and the context thereof? How is Matthew 24:14 the Great Commission given in Matthew 28:18-20? (In any language words often have various possible meanings which depend on context. Matthew 24:14 is part of a prophecy about the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD and is saying the gospel would be preached throughout the Roman Empire before the destruction; compare the use of word "world" elsewhere. For example, did Caesar Augustus tax everyone on the entire planet or everyone in the Roman Empire? [Luke 2:1] Matthew 28:18-20 refers to the entire inhabited earth and verse twenty refers to the Second Advent as Christ began with "All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Go ye therefore ...." Matthew 24:14 was fulfilled before the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. [Romans 1:8; 16:25-26; Colossians 1:5-6, 23]) Many assume that their pet theories and the assumed relation of current events to their interpretations of passages of Bible prophecies are above scrutiny and make their pet theories into criterion for Christian fellowship and base their plans, goals, and decisions on things they obviously do not and cannot know and are not revealed in Scripture, and this tends to detract from important truths and issues and make Christianity look silly. (Consider Acts 1:6-8; Matthew 23:24; Romans 14:1; 1 Timothy 1:5-7)
Comment (0)
|
Wed, Jan 1st - 8:45AM
SIGNS THAT A RELIGIOUS GROUP IS ON THE WRONG TRACK
Here we will examine five characteristics of cults. Many are quick to point to cults when discussing professed believers that are on the wrong track, but it should be noted that many modern evangelicals and evangelical churches have these characteristics in common with cults.
A LACK OF HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Some groups believe Christians were all in darkness for eighteen or nineteen centuries and now they alone possess the truth. Sometimes evangelicals are guilty of making the same assumption. Certainly, there have been times in Christian history when some truths were more or less widely known or understood than other times, but God has always had dedicated believers that, although imperfect and not all-knowing, preserved the faith, safeguarded the truth, and upheld the authority of Scriptures. For example, long before Martin Luther began teaching the doctrine of justification by faith there were already Christians in the mountains of Germany teaching justification by faith. (Consider Ephesians 4:11-15)
DISTORTED VIEW OF THE HOLY BIBLE How is it that cult members and liberal theologians sincerely believe obvious heresies even though they often appear to study more than most? The problem lies with what they respect as the final authority or the standard of truth. When someone puts the words of men above the word of God, they naturally interpret Scriptures in relation to publications and human theories instead of interpreting Bible passages in relation to context and the whole Bible. (1 Timothy 1:5-7; 2 Timothy 2:15; 2 Peter 3:16)
First-hand Bible knowledge from personal Bible study is essential. We do need ministers, teachers, Christian fellowship, and Christian literature to help us, and there are difficulties in the Bible, but for the most part the Bible is self-explanatory and self-interpreting when one is familiar with its contents. (Psalm 119:130; Proverbs 2:3-6; 2 Timothy 2:15; 3:16-17; Ephesians 4:11-15; 1 Peter 2:2)
Christ deliberately bypassed the religious elite and highly educated to reveal truths to ordinary people, and the Apostles commended and encouraged personal study and discernment. The Bible was written to be read and understood by ordinary people and God's truth is not hidden from everyone except for a few clever individuals. The Bible is the complete word of God and the final authority, and the truth can withstand questions and criticism. So why should we assume that God intended for us to accept the teachings of people claiming to have some special key to understanding Scripture without personal study and discernment on our part to verify their teachings? (Acts 17:11; 1 Thessalonians 5:21; 2 Timothy 3:16)
“But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.” (1 John 2:27) As is true today, when John wrote the First Epistle of John there were a lot of divisions, programs, heresies, and fads spreading throughout Christendom, and many false teachers working to corrupt the churches. (Acts 20:29-30; 2 Corinthians 11:14-15; 2 Peter 2; Jude) Deceivers often claim to have a special enlightenment or illumination, superior insight, or special key to understanding, or claim that one needs a superior spirituality or special revelation (which they claim to have) to know the truth, which is the reason for the warning in 1 John 2:27. While there is more to life in Christ than the initial experience (new birth) that occurs at faith and repentance, and God does bestow wisdom and spiritual gifts to make someone more effective in the Lord’s work, this does not mean that some have a special key to understanding Scripture that other genuine believers do not have. While there are difficulties in the Bible and we occasionally need help, for the most part the Bible is self-interpreting and self-explanatory when one is familiar with its contents. (Incidentally, if your theology, religious experience, or "spiritual gift" does not make you love more, hunger for the word of God, and have a burden for lost souls, this is another sign that you are on the wrong track.)
“But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.” (1 Corinthians 2:14) Deceivers like to use this passage to insist that it takes a special enlightenment or key to understanding (which they claim to have) to understand Scripture. This passage does not say the Bible can only be understood by certain gifted individuals, it says that though natural men can understand what the words in the Bible mean they decide that what the Bible says is foolish. A good example of this can be seen when atheists argue with what they know and acknowledge that the Genesis account of creation says; it means nothing to them because of their lack of spiritual discernment. The Bible was written to be read and understood by ordinary people and God's truth is not hidden from everyone except for a few clever individuals. The Holy Bible is the final authority, and the truth can withstand questions and critical analysis. (Psalm 119:130; Acts 17:11; 1 Thessalonians 5:21; 2 Timothy 2:15; 3:16-17)
A DESIRE TO CAUSE DIVISION In a war it often makes sense for a country to ally with other countries that are fighting for the same cause. We can apply this principle to Christian work and spiritual warfare. We should be careful not to hinder the cause of Christ through a spirit of competition.
The purpose of the church is to exalt Christ in the community and the world, and Bible-believing, Gospel-preaching churches that agree on fundamental doctrines and moral absolutes should be considered allies. (Personally, I have never met anyone with whom I always agree on every point, especially minor points of belief.)
This is not suggesting that we compromise truth and convictions or compromise with heresy, but rather a reminder that it is often possible to tolerate differences without compromising truths and convictions. For example, if we lead a lost soul to Christ and he conscientiously chooses to join another Bible-believing church this is still cause for rejoicing.
In the Old Testament, ancient Israel was not one tribe but was divided into different tribes so that the different tribes would cheque and balance each other; this is an obvious reason for different denominations.
Jesus is the way, not a human organization. (John 14:6) While we should not compromise with heresy or immorality, beware of those who teach an us-only pride or a we-versus-they complex. (Psalm 119:63; Mark 9:38-42; Acts 20:29-30; Romans 16:17-18; Philippians 1:18)
TENDENCY TO MAJOR ON MINORS Beware of those that are so preoccupied with riding religious hobby horses and proving they are right and everyone else is wrong that they lose perspective on the basic truths and message of the Bible. (Matthew 23:23-24; Romans 14; 1 Timothy 1:3-7)
RETURN TO PAST ERRORS Beware of those that insist on disputing teachings that were settled, not by force but by diligent and prayerful studies and discussions ages ago, such as the virgin birth and complete deity of Christ, the triunity of God, salvation through the blood, etc. While you should study and be prepared to defend Bible doctrines, you should question the motives behind a return to past errors.
P.S. I owe thanks to Richard W. De Haan, who wrote the RBC Booklet “How To Recocognize A Good Church,” and in the booklet outlined five marks of a cult. That booklet inspired me to write this blog article.
Comment (0)
|
|