• Register
  • Login
  • Forgot Password?
  • My Profile
  • Choose An Icon
  • Upload An Icon
  • Messenger
  • Member Search
  • Who's Online
    Members: 1602

    ONLINE:
    Members: 0
    Anonymous: 1
    Today: 17
    Newest Member:
    Robert Coskrey
  • You are here: Blogs Directory / Ministries / Arnold's Blog Welcome Guest
    Arnold's Blog
          "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" (Galatians 4:16)

    Sat, Sep 6th - 10:24AM

    HOW MUCH DOES THE LIBERAL MEDIA IMPACT YOUR BELIEFS?



    Remember, the Bible encourages you to use your mind. (Proverbs 2:3-11; consider Romans 12:2; Colossians 2:8; I Thessalonians 5:21; Hebrews 5:14)

    Remember these points: Propaganda is merely information in favour of a cause and can be good or evil, honest or dishonest, and informative or misleading; the danger is that propaganda serves the function of self-delusion in the absence of critical thinking. Leftist ideology normally looks and sounds ideal or correct until you ask pointed questions, make comparisons, look for hard evidence, and consider the costs and repercussions. There are times when science appears to contradict Scripture UNTIL you ask or look for hard evidence, and all too often common knowledge and official narratives are merely oft-repeated myths. Heresies often sound like Bible truths until you ask pointed questions and interpret Bible passages in relation to immediate context and the whole Bible and pay close attention to words and grammar.

    Consider a few myths and unproved theories promoted by the left that have had a big impact on viewpoints:

    · Evolution is a scientific fact, and creationism is merely religion and not genuine science because it involves faith. (If you believe this, can you give one example of hard evidence supporting the theory of evolution that does not have to be accepted by faith? How do you reconcile the theory of evolution with the DNA Code Barrier, Gene Depletion, & Natural Selection? How can a mutation result in a change from one species into another since a mutation takes away from a genetic code but never adds to it? Have you ever read a book or magazine that teaches or promotes evolution and took note of how heavily the theory of evolution relies on logic fallacies and mathematical absurdities?)

    · The age of the universe and heavenly bodies can be calculated by using the speed of light as a metric. (The speed of light is not constant and therefore is not a reliable metric for this.)

    · Guns and poverty cause crime. (During the Great Depression there was more of both and a lower crime rate.)

    · Lincoln freed the slaves. (Abraham Lincoln was not against slavery, he just opposed the spread of slavery, and he was planning to deport all black people, and this plan was hindered by his assassination. Both sides of The War of Northern Aggression (1861-1865) had slaves until the Thirteenth Amendment. Slavery did not become an issue of the war until about two years after the war started, and Abraham Lincoln made it an issue because he needed a moral high ground as the armed invasion of the Confederate States of America was carried out without constitutional or congressional authorization. The Emancipation Proclamation gave the Confederate States the choice to quit fighting and keep slavery or their slaves would be freed if they kept fighting and gave them a deadline of January 1, 1863. The Emancipation Proclamation only called for the emancipation of slaves in areas where the US government had no power to do anything about slavery and specified the areas, even counties. It was not ratified until December 6, 1865, and was merely a propaganda tool that did not free a single slave. Slavery was abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment, not the Emancipation Proclamation.)

    · The Voting Rights Act of 1965 gave Black people the right to vote in Southern States. (If black people were not allowed to vote in Alabama and other Southern States prior to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, then how do you explain the black counties and black cities in Alabama and other Southern States with black public officials and all-black electorates prior to 1965? The Voting Rights Act of 1965 secured the vote for illiterates. Prior to 1965 the state of Alabama and other Southern States required basic literacy and a basic knowledge of the US Constitution and State government to be eligible to vote.)

    · Abortion is not killing a baby because an unborn child is just a clump of cells. (Every human, born or unborn, young or old, is a clump of cells.)

    · Abortion is a choice, not murder. (Murder is always a choice. If it is not a choice it is not murder.)

    · Premarital sex and illicit cohabitation are good preparation for marriage. (Think about it: How meaningful and secure is a relationship based on freedom to leave? Premarital sex normally leads to selfishness, disrespect, and distrust after a couple marries, and couples that live together before marriage usually end up divorced.)

    · Male and female think and feel the same about sex. (The myth about male and female sexual equality makes both sexes more vulnerable to exploitation and manipulation. While each gender has just as strong a libido as the other, and both sexes desire sex and affection, their responses and priorities tend to differ. Generally, men trade affection for sex and women trade sex for affection. While neither gender is immune to lust, and both genders can be verbally and visually stimulated, women tend to be more verbally stimulated, and men tend to be more visually stimulated. Men tend to fall in love with, or lust for, what they see, and women tend to fall in love with what they hear.)

    · In marriage, compatibility in everything is essential and incompatibility is an acceptable ground for divorce. (In other words, differences nullify commitment, which is convenient as it is not possible to find someone that always likes or dislikes the same things and always agrees on every point. Ironically, several extensive secular studies on marriage and divorce concluded that the differences normally blamed for incompatibility are not problems for married couples that share the same religious and moral values.)

    · Emotions are acceptable grounds for divorce. (“I’m not happy,” “I’m not in love anymore,” etc. Love is a choice: You choose to love or not love someone.)

    · The Age Gap in the Prefrontal Cortex Theory. (Please note that "an intelligent person with a big college degree said the human brain is not developed till the age of 25" is not hard evidence that proves anything. Was this conclusion reached because of the weight of evidence or merely because someone wanted it to be true? Also note that I am not claiming to have the last word on this, I am hoping to encourage you to research and analyze the data on this.)

    · Homosexuals are born that way. (What is the hard evidence that homosexuals are born that way? What is the hard evidence that there is such a thing as homosexual orientation? What is the hard evidence that homosexuality is an immutable characteristic? What is the hard evidence that homosexuality is an inherited trait and not distorted love needs and learned behaviour?)

    The examples could continue, but these should suffice for now to make the point.

    Know-it-alls, the young, and people with a victim mentality are especially vulnerable to left-wing propaganda because the left always appeals to wishful thinking and intellectual arrogance, and a victim mentality makes people more receptive to left-wing victim narratives.

    Be expecting the left to try to persuade you to believe reality is debatable and their arguments and assertions are absolute but remember that the truth can withstand questions, criticism, and critical analysis.

    Keep in mind that the left seeks to change or distort core beliefs and values because a person without principles is more easily controlled and manipulated, and if a community (local, State, or national) is without principles, it is easier to replace self-government with submission to tyranny. 

    The left has a vested interest in promoting the pagan worldview (and downplaying or denying the authority of Scripture), and this is obviously promoted by schools, colleges, and news and entertainment media. All too many Christians do not recognise this propaganda as propaganda because they are not alert to it. The pagan concept of man and government (pagan worldview) makes man (corporate man, the state) the standard of truth and the ultimate authority, which puts it in conflict with God and those who believe that God is the standard of truth and the present ruler of the earth (the Christian worldview), and sees the individual as a mere servant of the state whose value is determined by his usefulness to the state, thus making encroachments upon God-given rights inevitable. Socialism and leftism (which significantly overlap) are modern versions of ancient paganism. (Ecclesiastes 1:9-10) 

    Socialism is not always recognised or understood because of the facades and misconceptions. For example, many believe that fascists (e.g., Nazis) are right-wingers, and fascism is a right-wing movement because they merely compare fascism to communism. This is like comparing a scalene triangle and an isosceles triangle without comparing any other shapes. If you compare the triangles to each other, it is only possible to notice the differences, but if you compare both triangles to a rectangle or a circle the similarities between the two triangles stand out. If we merely compare fascism and communism with each other, the superficial appearance of free enterprise can make fascism appear to be right-wing, but if we compare fascism and communism to the social system of free enterprise and limited constitutional government it becomes clear that fascism and communism are different forms of socialism.

    All too often there is a tendency to place the opinions of experts (e.g., scientists, psychologists, historians, theologians, etc.) in the status of inerrancy, especially when the opinion of some expert happens to support the left or what the left wants you to think. While we do need experts, try to keep a balanced view of experts (and do research and apply critical thinking). When you come across the argument or assertion that the findings or conclusions of certain experts in a certain field are inaccurate or wrong merely because they differ from the findings or conclusions of other experts, or even most experts in that field, or merely because an essay or thesis did not pass a peer review, it is important to keep in mind that most expert (even scientific) findings or conclusions are educated opinions and reviewers are often biased. At any time and on any subject, there are disagreements among qualified experts in the same fields, and they cannot all be right. A majority opinion is still an opinion, and all too often the majority opinion of experts in a particular field is considered proof or verification of assertions or theories even though whatever is the majority opinion of experts in certain fields changes often enough to make the majority opinion dubious. (For example, if a teacher or professor used a fifty-year-old textbook to teach evolution he would be teaching theories that were disproved by evolutionists years and decades ago.) Experts are fallible humans and are just as vulnerable to emotional pressure and the influence of preconceived ideas as anyone else. Experts are just as capable of dishonesty and distorting facts to support their pet theories as other humans, and many experts have been caught deliberately deceiving the public. When presented with the facts ordinary people can and often do come to better conclusions than experts, which is one reason that a trial verdict is decided by a jury of ordinary citizens and not a panel of legal experts.

    An old trick of tyrants and empires is to keep different ethnic groups pitted against each other to keep them from recognising their common enemy. The liberal media and public schools often try to make it appear that centralised US government, US government intrusions, and increased police powers of the US government were and are necessary by pointing to examples of racial problems in history, but when the whole story and all sides of the issues are considered, those examples usually illustrate the evils of big government and the importance of limited constitutional government. 

    When a character in a movie or TV show gives statistics or data or talks about scientific findings or historical events or opinions of psychologists or otherwise appears to make an intelligent argument or assessment, do your own homework before you accept the argument or assessment as valid or correct. This is a method the left uses to persuade the public to accept myths and delusions as reality and dismiss facts and logic as misinformation or fantasy.

    While we should be concerned about current events and taking a stand on issues, it is important to watch for crisis manipulation, a simple method to achieving specific goals, justifying control, or creating a police state that has been used by governments and would-be tyrants throughout history. (e.g., Nimrod, Napoleon, Lenin, Hitler, etc.) First, a crisis-type situation or emergency is utilized or created. (Terrorism, high crime rate, child abuse, counterfeiting, sex trafficking, drug money laundering, contagious disease, etc.) The "crisis" (which could be real, imagined, or exaggerated) is emphasized and propagandized until it becomes a great concern to a significant percentage of the population. Then the government or would-be tyrant and accomplices appear to come up with the best or most effective solution to the crisis so many are concerned about. (Of course, the "solution" just happens to increase government intrusion and police power or eliminate safeguards against governmental abuse.) At this point the average citizen is so concerned with dealing with the crisis and finding or implementing a solution that he is willing to go along with what appears to be a good solution without considering the costs and repercussions. Here are just a few red flags:

    · Be wary of “solutions” offered by “experts” that sound more like a left-wing wish list than facts, logic, or actual science. (Look for facts and hard evidence, and remember that the truth can withstand questions, criticism, and analysis.)

    · Be wary of so-called solutions to crises, emergencies, and social maladies that depend on an assumed natural goodness of man, or an assumed goodness or benevolence of human government, for the solutions to work.  (How many parents reading this ever had to teach a child how to be bad? Humans can choose to do right but sin comes naturally because of natural depravity. History demonstrates that any human government, even good government, is dangerous, which is why government must be limited and restricted.)

    · Keep in mind that we do not live in a perfect world and there are no perfect solutions.

    The phrase "(one) just doesn't get it" or "(they) just don't get it" typically refers to something that affects the speaker emotionally. If you feel this way about those who disagree with you this does not necessarily mean you are wrong, but this tends to imply that you are convinced due to allowing emotional appeals and other logic fallacies detract you from critical thinking.

    Has the media persuaded you to accept unscriptural and misguided teachings, theories, and ideas? You might be surprised. Try applying these questions to specific beliefs and issues, including beliefs that you consider settled:

    · Have you personally studied or researched this belief or teaching, and can it withstand questions and critical analysis? (Acts 17:11; 1 Thessalonians 5:21)

    · What would be your response if an unbeliever asked you why you believe this? (2 Timothy 2:14-15; 3:16-17)

    · How important is this in relation to other matters and what Bible truths and principles or standards apply? (Matthew 23:24; Romans 14; 2 Thessalonians 5:21; 1 Timothy 1:5-7)

    · Is this what the Bible says, or is this what someone thinks the Bible ought to say? (Proverbs 30:5-6; Isaiah 29:13; Matthew 15:9)

    · Was this true in the distant past and will this still be true in the distant future? (Psalm 33:11; 119:89; Proverbs 19:21; Ecclesiastes 1:9-10)

    · What is the origin of this teaching or belief? Can you verify this with Scripture or is it necessary to use the arguments of the world? (Psalm 33:10; Romans 12:2; 1 Corinthians 1:20; 2:5; Colossians 1:9; 2:8)

     



    Comment (0)

    Tue, Aug 26th - 5:04PM

    Gossip



    “Keep thy tongue from evil, and thy lips from speaking guile.” (Psalm 34:13)

    “He that is void of wisdom despiseth his neighbour: but a man of understanding holdeth his peace. A talebearer revealeth secrets: but he that is of a faithful spirit concealeth the matter..” (Proverbs 11:12-13)

    “A froward man soweth strife: and a whisperer separateth chief friends.” (Proverbs 16:28)

    “He that goeth about as a talebearer revealeth secrets: therefore meddle not with him that flattereth with his lips.” (Proverbs 20:19)

    “Where no wood is, there the fire goeth out: so where there is no talebearer, the strife ceaseth.” (Proverbs 26:20)

    “If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion is vain.” (James 1:26)

    I remember when I was in kindergarten the teacher showed the class a game called Gossip. She had everyone sit in a circle. She would whisper something to a student, who would then whisper what he heard to the right ear of the student to his left, and subsequently each student did likewise. Whenever the rumor got around to the last student, he told the class what he heard, and it was completely different from what the first student was told. The same thing happens with real world gossip; even if an element of truth remains, the story changes as it gets passed around. Sometimes a rumor starts with someone telling a lie, sometimes a rumor starts with someone betraying a confidence, and very often a rumor starts when someone overhears a conversation, assumes they got the whole story, and believes others need to hear the story.

    Here's one way to deal with gossipers: Years ago, at the workplace one of the local gossipers approached me and said she heard that I had been fornicating with a thirteen-year-old girl. I tried to hand her my cell phone and told her to call the police, and she wondered why. I told her that if she believes the rumor is true then reporting me to the police would make a lot more sense than running her mouth to people that cannot legally do anything about it except run their mouths. She stayed away from me for a long time.

    Let me share another experience from over thirty years ago: I moved from Carrollton, Georgia, to Bremen, Georgia, and moved my letter from a church in Carrollton to a church in Bremen. At the new church I became friends with an old preacher who was also a barber. He was a good friend, but he was not careful to get details right before playing matchmaker. At my new church there was a young lady who attended with her mother and attended the old church with her dad; her parents were divorced. While getting a haircut I mentioned that I knew that girl's dad and thought highly of him, and he asked if I ever thought of dating that girl. I told him I would probably pursue her if we are both still single when she is older, and he said that should not matter. I told him I had the impression that a lot of modern evangelicals think it's wrong for teenage girls to date and marry or think an age gap of a few years is a big deal, and I would not want to offend her parents. He assured me that her parents would not object and told me she was older than I thought she was (she wasn't). I had other interests, but he would tell me that girl we discussed at the barber shop would be a better choice, and eventually I agreed with him. He suggested that I write her a letter and gave me her address. After mailing the letter I had opportunity to talk with her at the skating rink in Carrollton that night. I told her I liked her, and she told me she had a boyfriend, and I thought that was the end of the story until I received a threatening letter from her dad, which did not include a forwarding address or phone number. For years I occasionally heard stories from the grapevine about me and what "happened."

    Here are a few questions you should ask someone sharing gossip with you (and not necessarily in this order): Do you KNOW this to be true? Have you talked about this with the person you are talking about? Why are you sharing this with me?



    Comment (0)

    Tue, Jul 15th - 7:08PM

    WITNESSIING TO JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES & THEIR CHILDREN



    When witnessing to Jehovah’s Witnesses, whether at your door or social situations, remember that the goal is to win hearts and minds, not arguments. If you are hostile or argumentative with a Jehovah's Witness you will only convince him that he is right.

    Also, keep in mind that even if their children are not Jehovah's Witnesses and are not convinced that Jehovah's Witnesses have the only true Christian religion and that the Watchtower Society is God's channel of truth, the children of Jehovah’s Witnesses are normally under tremendous emotional pressure to conform, and Jehovah’s Witnesses require their children to identify themselves as Jehovah's Witnesses, teach Watchtower teachings, and sell Watchtower literature or distribute free tracts. If you come across a child or youth like that and you are hostile or argumentative this may help convince him that Jehovah’s Witnesses are right and that he should join the cult.

    Be friendly and show that you care about them as you share your testimony and the gospel and thought-provoking questions, and, while you should not be expecting to convert anyone overnight, you can expect them to think seriously about what you said for a long time, even if they initially shrug it off.

     



    Comment (0)

    Tue, Jul 1st - 8:00PM

    KEEP A BALANCED VIEW OF BIBLE PROPHECY



    Christians should occupy till Jesus comes and stop obsessing over things they do not and cannot know; the Bible does not teach any visible or verifiable signs that precede the Second Advent. “And as they heard these things, he added and spake a parable, because he was nigh to Jerusalem, and because they thought that the kingdom of God should immediately appear. He said therefore, A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return. And he called his ten servants, and delivered them ten pounds, and said unto them, Occupy till I come.” (Luke 19:11-13) “And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.” (Acts 1:7)
    When it comes to the study of Bible prophecy what do we often see? New Testament passages that clearly identify the New Testament Church as the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies concerning Israel are ignored and replaced with Zionism, and we often see the historical and poetic books of the Old Testament, the Gospels, and Epistles of the New Testament interpreted in relation to theories about the interpretation of passages of prophecy in prophetic books (especially Daniel, Zechariah, and Revelation) instead of interpreting difficult or obscure Bible passages in relation to clear Bible passages. Passages of New Testament prophecies about the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD are taken out of context and applied to current events in the Middle East. In many Christian circles a popular and growing trend in the study of eschatology has been to interpret passages of Bible prophecy through the lens of current headlines, distort facts and scriptures to make every passage of Bible prophecy appear to be a literal narration of end time events, try to make every current event fit the mold of pet theories about the fulfillment of Bible prophecy, support theories and predictions by cross referencing unrelated passages of Bible prophecy, and try to make dispensationalist theories into criteria for Christian fellowship. Many insist that their pet theories are above scrutiny and base their teachings, plans, goals, and decisions on things they obviously do not and cannot know, and are not revealed in Scripture, and this tends to detract from important truths and issues and make Christianity look silly. What is wrong with this picture? The Holy Bible is the final authority and Scripture itself, comparing Scripture with Scripture, is the key to understanding Scripture: Bible passages must be understood in relation to context and the whole Bible, and difficult passages must be understood in relation to clear passages. (Psalm 119:130; 1 Corinthians 2:13; 2 Timothy 2:15; 3:16)
    Theories on eschatology that have become popular in Christian circles often promote a neutrality or isolation that rejects or prevents interaction between Christianity and culture and encourages believers to withdraw from society and be neutral because of preoccupation with speculations about things which they obviously do not and cannot know. (Consider Acts 17:6-7) Those who study Bible prophecy merely to find a schedule of future events have missed the purpose of prophecy: Prophecy (even prophecies fulfilled long ago) teaches us about God and His truths, principles, standards, and Providence. (Ephesians 1:11) Rather than seeing history as HIS story and recognising God as the present ruler of the earth Who intervenes in human history and ultimately controls everything, many have adopted a worldly view of history, such as the Humanist, Cyclical, and Marxist views of history. (Romans 12:2; Colossians 2:8) Many even insist that world conditions must continually go from bad to worse because they believe Satan rules the Earth, but nothing in the Bible ever indicates that God has ever abdicated His throne and turned rulership over to Satan. (1 Chronicles 29:11-12) Many Bible prophecies that are being applied to the second coming of Christ are fulfilled prophecies (e.g., Return from Babylonian captivity, destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, etc.). When someone makes a ministry of making predictions and one or some of his predictions come true it is often assumed that this puts him and all his teachings above scrutiny. (Making a correct prediction could be considered inevitable if someone keeps making predictions. This certainly is not rightly dividing the Word of God but is putting men and theories of men above God’s Word.)
    Prophecy preachers and theorists often predict a world where demonised and satanic people hold public offices after the rapture, but this has been a characteristic of the world for thousands of years. (Consider Matthew 4:8-10) Satan rules in the hearts of unbelievers, the wicked world system, but God is the present ruler of the Earth and ultimately controls everything, and nothing in Scripture indicates that God ever abdicated his throne or turned it over to Satan. (2 Corinthians 4:4; 1 Chronicles 29:11-12) Salt cleanses, purifies, preserves, and makes people thirsty, and light dispels darkness and exposes that which was hidden in darkness; government corruption and social maladies are signs of a lack or decline in Christian influence or an increase in exposure of corruption, not signs of the Second Advent. (Matthew 5:13-16)
    Whenever anyone reminds Christians that they have a duty to impact society and culture for righteousness there are usually professed Christians insisting that Christians should not do that or be concerned about that because there is no time to accomplish anything or because this would contradict their pet theories and speculations about things they do not and cannot know. It is often difficult to convince modern Christians that God is not obligated to submit to any schedule they have set for Him.
    Let us take a closer look at passages often used to support the view that the New Testament says we can know the Second Advent is near:
    “Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching.” (Hebrews 10:25) “The day approaching” obviously refers to the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple in 70 AD. Hebrews was written before the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD; note that the temple was still in operation when the Epistle of Hebrews was written. (Hebrews 8:4; 13:10)
    What is the basis for insistence that Philippians 4:5 does not say “the Lord is at hand” in the sense that God is near His people? (Psalm 46:1; 145:18)
    What is the basis for insistence that “the end of all things” in 1 Peter 4:7 is not an obvious reference to the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple around which the Jewish world revolved in the first century?
    “He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus." (Revelation 22:20; etc.) While many use this and similar passages to support their theory about an assumed nearness of Christ’s return, Bible skeptics point to passages like this as evidence of error in Scripture since this was written nearly two thousand years ago. It could appear to be an error and could appear to be saying when Christ will come until you examine the meaning of words and grammar. For example, “quickly” (Greek: Tachu) does not necessarily mean that the action will take place immediately or even soon but can also be a description of the speed or suddenness of the action once the action has been initiated.
    Do references to the “last days” give signs or conditions to indicate to people of our generation that the end of the world is near, or does the term "last days" refer to the Christian era? (Compare Joel 2:28-32 & Acts 2:16-21; 2 Timothy 3:1; Hebrews 1:1-2; 2 Peter 3:2-3. Christ was upon the earth during the “last days.” -Genesis 49:1 & 10; Hebrews 1:1-2; 9:26. The instruction "from such turn away" indicates that the previously described conditions in chapter three of Second Timothy existed at the time this epistle was written. -2 Timothy 3:5)
    If 2 Timothy 3:2-5 is a list of signs or conditions prior to the rapture, then how many times has the rapture occurred over the last two thousand years?
    If God wanted 2 Timothy 3 to be a warning or reminder that the advance of Christianity would be accompanied by efforts of enemies of the Gospel to thwart the Lord’s work, through persecution from without and corruption from within, and a warning of perilous times resulting from conditions that have been characteristic of the world in greater and lesser degrees throughout Christian history, how would he have changed the wording of 2 Timothy 3?
    How do you reconcile the teaching that in Matthew 24:4-33 Christ gave signs of the Second Advent to be seen by people living centuries later with Matthew 24:34? (After verse thirty-four the subject changes to the second coming of Christ and the discourse does not give us any visible signs or verifiable events to precede the Second Advent except people carrying on with their lives unaware. -Matthew 24:36-39)
    What is the basis for insisting that “This generation” in Matthew 24:34 did not refer to people then living? (Consider Matthew 11:16; 12:39; 17:17; 23:36)
    If Christ wanted Matthew 24:34 to mean that Matthew 24:4-33 would be completely fulfilled within the lifetime of people then living how would he have changed the wording of Matthew 24:34 and the context thereof?
    How is Matthew 24:14 the Great Commission given in Matthew 28:18-20? (In any language words often have various possible meanings which depend on context. Matthew 24:14 is part of a prophecy about the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD and is saying the gospel would be preached throughout the Roman Empire before the destruction; compare the use of word "world" elsewhere. For example, did Caesar Augustus tax everyone on the entire planet or everyone in the Roman Empire? [Luke 2:1] Matthew 28:18-20 refers to the entire inhabited earth and verse twenty refers to the Second Advent as Christ began with "All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Go ye therefore ...." Matthew 24:14 was fulfilled before the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. [Romans 1:8; 16:25-26; Colossians 1:5-6, 23])
    Many assume that their pet theories and the assumed relation of current events to their interpretations of passages of Bible prophecies are above scrutiny and make their pet theories into criterion for Christian fellowship and base their plans, goals, and decisions on things they obviously do not and cannot know and are not revealed in Scripture, and this tends to detract from important truths and issues and make Christianity look silly. (Consider Acts 1:6-8; Matthew 23:24; Romans 14:1; 1 Timothy 1:5-7)


    Comment (0)

    Wed, Jan 1st - 8:45AM

    SIGNS THAT A RELIGIOUS GROUP IS ON THE WRONG TRACK



    Here we will examine five characteristics of cults. Many are quick to point to cults when discussing professed believers that are on the wrong track, but it should be noted that many modern evangelicals and evangelical churches have these characteristics in common with cults. 

    A LACK OF HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
    Some groups believe Christians were all in darkness for eighteen or nineteen centuries and now they alone possess the truth. Sometimes evangelicals are guilty of making the same assumption. Certainly, there have been times in Christian history when some truths were more or less widely known or understood than other times, but God has always had dedicated believers that, although imperfect and not all-knowing, preserved the faith, safeguarded the truth, and upheld the authority of Scriptures. For example, long before Martin Luther began teaching the doctrine of justification by faith there were already Christians in the mountains of Germany teaching justification by faith. (Consider Ephesians 4:11-15)

    DISTORTED VIEW OF THE HOLY BIBLE
    How is it that cult members and liberal theologians sincerely believe obvious heresies even though they often appear to study more than most? The problem lies with what they respect as the final authority or the standard of truth. When someone puts the words of men above the word of God, they naturally interpret Scriptures in relation to publications and human theories instead of interpreting Bible passages in relation to context and the whole Bible. (1 Timothy 1:5-7; 2 Timothy 2:15; 2 Peter 3:16)

    First-hand Bible knowledge from personal Bible study is essential. We do need ministers, teachers, Christian fellowship, and Christian literature to help us, and there are difficulties in the Bible, but for the most part the Bible is self-explanatory and self-interpreting when one is familiar with its contents. (Psalm 119:130; Proverbs 2:3-6; 2 Timothy 2:15; 3:16-17; Ephesians 4:11-15; 1 Peter 2:2)

    Christ deliberately bypassed the religious elite and highly educated to reveal truths to ordinary people, and the Apostles commended and encouraged personal study and discernment. The Bible was written to be read and understood by ordinary people and God's truth is not hidden from everyone except for a few clever individuals. The Bible is the complete word of God and the final authority, and the truth can withstand questions and criticism. So why should we assume that God intended for us to accept the teachings of people claiming to have some special key to understanding Scripture without personal study and discernment on our part to verify their teachings? (Acts 17:11; 1 Thessalonians 5:21; 2 Timothy 3:16)

    “But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.” (1 John 2:27) As is true today, when John wrote the First Epistle of John there were a lot of divisions, programs, heresies, and fads spreading throughout Christendom, and many false teachers working to corrupt the churches. (Acts 20:29-30; 2 Corinthians 11:14-15; 2 Peter 2; Jude) Deceivers often claim to have a special enlightenment or illumination, superior insight, or special key to understanding, or claim that one needs a superior spirituality or special revelation (which they claim to have) to know the truth, which is the reason for the warning in 1 John 2:27. While there is more to life in Christ than the initial experience (new birth) that occurs at faith and repentance, and God does bestow wisdom and spiritual gifts to make someone more effective in the Lord’s work, this does not mean that some have a special key to understanding Scripture that other genuine believers do not have. While there are difficulties in the Bible and we occasionally need help, for the most part the Bible is self-interpreting and self-explanatory when one is familiar with its contents.  (Incidentally, if your theology, religious experience, or "spiritual gift" does not make you love more, hunger for the word of God, and have a burden for lost souls, this is another sign that you are on the wrong track.)

    “But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.” (1 Corinthians 2:14) Deceivers like to use this passage to insist that it takes a special enlightenment or key to understanding (which they claim to have) to understand Scripture. This passage does not say the Bible can only be understood by certain gifted individuals, it says that though natural men can understand what the words in the Bible mean they decide that what the Bible says is foolish. A good example of this can be seen when atheists argue with what they know and acknowledge that the Genesis account of creation says; it means nothing to them because of their lack of spiritual discernment. The Bible was written to be read and understood by ordinary people and God's truth is not hidden from everyone except for a few clever individuals. The Holy Bible is the final authority, and the truth can withstand questions and critical analysis. (Psalm 119:130; Acts 17:11; 1 Thessalonians 5:21; 2 Timothy 2:15; 3:16-17)

    A DESIRE TO CAUSE DIVISION
    In a war it often makes sense for a country to ally with other countries that are fighting for the same cause. We can apply this principle to Christian work and spiritual warfare. We should be careful not to hinder the cause of Christ through a spirit of competition.

    The purpose of the church is to exalt Christ in the community and the world, and Bible-believing, Gospel-preaching churches that agree on fundamental doctrines and moral absolutes should be considered allies. (Personally, I have never met anyone with whom I always agree on every point, especially minor points of belief.)

    This is not suggesting that we compromise truth and convictions or compromise with heresy, but rather a reminder that it is often possible to tolerate differences without compromising truths and convictions. For example, if we lead a lost soul to Christ and he conscientiously chooses to join another Bible-believing church this is still cause for rejoicing.

    In the Old Testament, ancient Israel was not one tribe but was divided into different tribes so that the different tribes would cheque and balance each other; this is an obvious reason for different denominations.

    Jesus is the way, not a human organization. (John 14:6) While we should not compromise with heresy or immorality, beware of those who teach an us-only pride or a we-versus-they complex. (Psalm 119:63; Mark 9:38-42; Acts 20:29-30; Romans 16:17-18; Philippians 1:18)

    TENDENCY TO MAJOR ON MINORS
     Beware of those that are so preoccupied with riding religious hobby horses and proving they are right and everyone else is wrong that they lose perspective on the basic truths and message of the Bible. (Matthew 23:23-24; Romans 14; 1 Timothy 1:3-7) 

    RETURN TO PAST ERRORS
     Beware of those that insist on disputing teachings that were settled, not by force but by diligent and prayerful studies and discussions ages ago, such as the virgin birth and complete deity of Christ, the triunity of God, salvation through the blood, etc. While you should study and be prepared to defend Bible doctrines, you should question the motives behind a return to past errors.

    P.S. I owe thanks to Richard W. De Haan, who wrote the RBC Booklet “How To Recocognize A Good Church,” and in the booklet outlined five marks of a cult. That booklet inspired me to write this blog article.


    Comment (0)


    About Me

    Name: Arnold Saxton
    ChristiansUnite ID: ajsaxton
    Member Since: 2010-03-30
    Location: Fruithurst, Alabama, United States
    Denomination: Baptist
    About Me: It would be difficult to give all details so I will touch on just a few things. I was born in the Midwest (Pontiac, Michigan), and I have Southern ancestry, so I sometimes get prejudice from both sides. Ex-JW (Grew up in a JW family. Baptized as JW 1... more

    Sept. 2025
      1 2 3 4 5 6
    7 8 9 10 11 12 13
    14 15 16 17 18 19 20
    21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    28 29 30        
    prev   next
    Blog Roll
    Arnold Saxton (YouTube)
    Arnold's Blog
    The Baptist Faith & Message
    A Balanced View Of Separation
    A DEFENSE OF POSTMILLENNIALISM (OPTIMISTIC AMILLENIALISM)
    A NEED FOR CAUTION
    A PIG & A LAMB
    A Response To “The United Pentecostal Church and the Evangelical Movement”
    A SIMPLE WAY TO SHARE THE GOSPEL
    Abortion
    AMERICAN INDIAN WARS
    ANOTHER GENERATION WHICH KNEW NOT THE LORD
    Attention Deficit Disorder
    AUTHORITY OF SCRIPTURE IS THE CRITICAL ISSUE
    Avoid Witch Hunts
    BACHELORS BEWARE!
    BACHELORS, TRY NOT TO BE STUPID
    BACHELORS, TRY NOT TO BE STUPID
    BAPTISMAL REGENERATION
    Big Bang Theory
    Black Conservatives
    Books I Recommend
    Can You Trust The Holy Bible?
    Christian Concern?
    Christians & The World
    CHRISTIANS SHOULD BE INVOLVED IN POLITICS & COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
    Church Bus Ministry
    CHURCH MEMBERSHIP
    COMPLETE SALVATION or THE TRIUNITY OF MAN
    Concerns About The Air Force & The United Nations
    DATING & COURTSHIP
    David & Bathsheba
    Dealing with Public Schools
    DID ANGELS INTERBREED WITH HUMANS?
    DID SAUL SPEAK WITH A DECEASED PROPHET OR A DEVIL?
    Did The “Last Days” Begin In 1914 AD as Taught in Watchtower Publications?
    DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SHEEP & GOATS
    DIFFICULTIES IN DETERMINING THE ETHNICITY OF PEOPLE IN SCRIPTURE
    Dinah's Mistake
    DOES HEBREWS 12:14-15 SAY SALVATION CAN BE LOST?
    Does The Bible Promote Sexual Abuse?
    DON'T ROMANTACIZE THE PAST TOO MUCH
    Don’t Park Your Mind
    Enemies or Allies?
    EQUAL WORK FOR EQUAL PAY
    EVERY JEHOVAH'S WITNESS SHOULD BE ASKED THESE QUESTIONS
    FACADES & MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT SOCIALISM
    Feminism Degrades Women
    Francis E. Willard
    God Can Effectively Use A Few Or One
    Gossip
    He Ain’t Heavy, He’s My Brother
    Hell - Refuting The Watchtower Teaching Of Annihilationism
    Help For Ex-Jehovah's Witnesses
    Homosexuality In The Armed Forces
    HONOUR THY FATHER AND MOTHER
    How A Police State Is Created
    HOW MUCH DOES THE LIBERAL MEDIA IMPACT YOUR BELIEFS?
    HOW TO WITNESS TO JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES
    ILLICIT COHABITATION
    IMPORTANCE OF LIMITED GOVERNMENT
    Imputation
    It Makes One Wonder
    Jehovah's Witnesses & "New Light"
    Jehovah's Witnesses & The Heavenly Hope
    Jehovah's Witnesses & The Trinity
    JOHN WAYNE WAS NOT A WHITE SUPREMACIST OR A DRAFT DODGER
    Judgement Must Begin At The House Of God
    KEEP A BALANCED VIEW OF BIBLE PROPHECY
    KEEP A BALANCED VIEW OF EXPERTS
    Key To Revival
    Liberty
    Liberty
    Modesty & Unisex Appearance
    Movies I Recommend
    My Exodus From The Watchtower Organization
    MY EXPERIENCE WITH TRYING TO FIND A MATCH VIA INTERNET
    Nothing Is Really New, Just Revivals Of The Old
    Old-Fashioned Values
    Patriarchy
    PERSONAL BIBLE STUDY
    Pharisees & Sadducees
    POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IS A WEAPON OF THE LEFT
    Premarital Sex
    PRIORITIES & DOUBTFUL DISPUTATIONS
    PROBLEMS WITH CHRISTIAN ZIONISM
    PROVE ALL THINGS
    PUTTING WOMEN IN THE ARMED FORCES IS WRONG
    QUESTIONS FOR EVOLUTIONISTS
    QUESTIONS FOR JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES
    Reaching & Influencing Public Officials
    REAP THE WHIRLWIND
    Remembering Lot
    Repeat After Me Prayer
    Romans 10:13 in the New World Translation
    Safe Sex?
    SAME-SEX MARRIAGE & THE LGBTQ+ MOVEMENT
    SETTLING PERSONAL DIFFERENCES
    Seventh Day Sabbath?
    Sex Education
    Sheep & Goats
    Sheep & Goats
    SOMETHING FOR MOTHERS TO CONSIDER
    Something For Teenagers To Consider
    Sound Of Freedom
    Spiritual Warfare
    STATE SECESSION IS NOT IMMORAL OR UNCONSTITUTIONAL
    Term Limits?
    The Accusation Of Racism
    The Biblical Worldview
    The Bodily Resurrection
    THE COMPANY YOU KEEP
    THE DEMONISATION OF THE SOUTH AND CONFEDERATE SYMBOLS
    The Destiny of The Earth
    The Devil’s Devices
    The Freedom Summer Murders
    THE FRUITS OF BAD COUNSEL
    The Holy Bible or Watchtower Publications?
    The Impact of The Entertainment Media on The Family
    The Importance of Fundamental Doctrines
    THE INFLUENCE OF EVOLUTION ON RACE RELATIONS IN THE SOUTH & THE FAILURE OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT
    THE ISSUE OF HOW TO TRANSLATE THE HEBREW TETRAGRAMMATON INTO ENGLISH
    The Last Days
    THE LAW & THE GOSPEL OR THE NEED FOR BOTH THE OLD & NEW TESTAMENTS
    THE MOVEMENT TO CONFUSE THE SEXES AND GENDER ROLES
    The Name Jehovah Is Not In The New Testament
    The Natural Use Of Women
    The Natural Use Of Women
    The New Age Movement
    The New Age Movement
    THE OLIVET DISCOURSE
    The Only True Christian Religion?
    The Promise Of Genesis 12:3
    THE PROPER VIEW OF KNOWLEDGE
    THE THREAT OF COMMUNISM
    The Two-Witness Rule
    The Watchtower Gospel
    The Watchtower Interpretation of Exodus 3:15
    The Watchtower Prohibition Against Holidays & Birthdays
    They Are Not Above Scrutiny
    Thinking About Trains & Salvation
    TYRANNOSAURUS REX
    Unrealistic Expectations
    Unsaved Church Members
    US Constitution Versus Modern US Government (or Is the modern US government still a constitutional republic?)
    US Intrusions Into Race Relations In The South
    Was the Star of Bethlehem a demon as taught in Watchtower Publications?
    WATCHTOWER ANTITRINITARIANISM REFUTED
    Watchtower Neutrality Refuted
    Watchtower Shunning
    Watchtower Teachings About The Second Coming
    WATCHTOWER TEACHINGS ON 1975 & SIX THOUSAND YEARS OF HUMAN HISTORY ARE FLAWED
    WHAT HAPPENED TO YOUNG ADULTS?
    What Is Wrong With Federal Courts?
    Why Contend?
    WHY DID MOSES TELL THE ISRAELITES TO PRESERVE THE MIDIANITE VIRGINS?
    WHY DO AMERICAN MEN MARRY FOREIGN BRIDES?
    WHY DO OLDER MEN LIKE YOUNGER WOMEN?
    Why I Cannot Become A Mormon
    WHY MANY UNMARRIED CHRISTIAN MEN DO NOT APPROACH WOMEN IN CHURCH
    WHY WAS IT EASIER IN THE PAST?
    WITNESSING TO JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES & THEIR CHILDREN
    WOMEN IN THE ARMED FORCES
    Youth Ministry


    More From ChristiansUnite...    About Us | Privacy Policy | | ChristiansUnite.com Site Map | Statement of Beliefs



    Copyright © 1999-2025 ChristiansUnite.com. All rights reserved.
    Please send your questions, comments, or bug reports to the