• Register
  • Login
  • Forgot Password?
  • My Profile
  • Choose An Icon
  • Upload An Icon
  • Messenger
  • Member Search
  • Who's Online
    Members: 1591

    Members: 0
    Anonymous: 0
    Today: 23
    Newest Member:
    Christian Believer
  • You are here: Blogs Directory / Ministries / Arnold's Blog Welcome Guest
    Arnold's Blog
          "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" (Galatians 4:16)

    Sun, Dec 20th - 5:02PM

    A Look At The Cults

    Many well-meaning ministers express a longing to return to the 1950s era, some even describing the 1950s as a golden age for Christianity in America, failing to realize that the cultural and religious trends of the 1950s (and previous decades) led to the accelerated and enormous increase in the cults, the occult, and modernism that characterized the 1960s and continues. Consider just a few examples:                               

     • Neglecting and denying the influence of the Bible and Christianity in American history in school textbooks and mass media.

     • Replacing Bible truths with humanism.

     • The teaching that Bible standards only apply to the religious (church) aspects of life and not the secular realm.

     • Acceptance of the theory of evolution in Christian circles, and endorsement of the theory of evolution by many respected clergy and mainline churches.

     • Replacing Biblical separation (godly relationships, conduct, and distinctions within society) with isolation and neutrality.

     • Using the Bible, Gospel music, and religious activities to escape reality instead of facing it.

     • Putting material prosperity, appearance, and social status above character in importance.

     • Replacing ministry and patriarchy with church programs.

     • Ministerial exemption from the draft encouraged cowards, unbelievers, heretics, and sexual perverts to pursue positions and careers in ministry.

     The list of cultural and religious trends of the 1950s and previous decades that increased the appeal of the cults could continue but these examples should suffice to help you see the point. Rather than romancing the past or longing for a return to the past, we should focus on how we can avoid the mistakes of the past.

    What leads so many into cults, especially since most initiates into cults come from a religious background in a mainstream church or denomination? Cults use the heart to trap the mind. Think of this in terms of fishing: Emotion (such as love-bombing) is the lure, doctrine (false doctrine mingled with truth) is the hook, and fear (along with guilt) is the barb or net that helps keep the "fish" from getting away. Cults replace personal study, discernment, and growth with a childlike dependence on a religious leader or group. The cults teach a faith, but not Biblical faith. Biblical faith is based on facts or knowledge of God's Word, and while feelings may result, feelings are not the basis of Biblical faith. Remember the pattern: 1.) Fact, 2.) Faith, 3.) Feelings; in cults and the occult this pattern is usually reversed. Faith, like love, always has an object, and cults present a wrong object of faith.

    The Hebrew word rendered "world" in Ecclesiastes 3:11 means eternity or the ages. In other words, humans are born with a natural need for spiritual guidance and an effective religion/belief system. Even though they are wrong, the cults do fill a basic need and provide answers. Hungry sheep will wander in search for food. Looking at church ads, and considering what people are being fed in many churches and through Christian radio, Christian television, and Christian literature, it should surprise us that the cults do not attract more 'wandering sheep' than they do. (Consider Acts 20:28) American students who were raised on English often have far more difficulty with English classes and English grammar than many foreign students who learned English when they were grown or almost grown. Often the students in a foreign language class having the most difficulty are the children of immigrants who speak that language as their native tongue; in many cases the children of immigrants know just enough of their parents' language to communicate with family and assume that they are fluent. We have a similar situation in Christian circles when it comes to doctrines and basic Bible knowledge. A typical cult recruit or initiate comes from a religious background but is not well-grounded in faith and knowledge.


    Comment (0)

    Thu, Dec 10th - 2:54AM


    For a long time in Christian circles a popular trend in the study of eschatology has been to interpret the historical and poetic books of the Old Testament and the Gospels and Epistles of the New Testament in the “light” of pet theories about the interpretation of passages of prophecy in prophetic books (especially Daniel, Zechariah, and Revelation), interpret passages of Bible prophecy through the lens of current headlines, distort facts and scriptures to make every passage of Bible prophecy appear to be a literal narration of end time events, try to make every current event fit the mold of pet theories about the fulfillment of Bible prophecy, support theories and predictions by cross referencing unrelated passages of Bible prophecy, and make dispensationalist theories into criteria for Christian fellowship. What is wrong with this picture? First of all, Scripture itself, comparing Scripture with Scripture, is the key to understanding Scripture: Bible passages must be understood in relation to context and the whole Bible, and difficult passages must be understood in relation to clear passages. (Psalm 119:130; I Corinthians 2:13; II Timothy 2:15)



    What is the basis for insistence that the Millennium of chapter twenty of the Book of Revelation, an extremely symbolic book, is a literal one-thousand-year period?

    Is the word "thousand" always used in the Bible in the absolute mathematical sense and never to mean a great number or amount? (E.g., Psalm 50:10; II Peter 3:8; etc.)

    Have you carefully studied to learn for yourself if Bible prophecies that are being applied to the second coming of Christ might be fulfilled prophecies (e.g., return from Babylonian captivity, destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, etc.)?

    How do you reconcile the teaching that Christ sitting on the throne of David is a future event with Acts 2:29-36? (Also, Matthew 28:18; I Corinthians 15:20-28; Ephesians 1:18-23; Hebrews 1:8)

    How do you reconcile the teaching of a gap between the resurrection of the saved and the resurrection of the unsaved with John 5:28-29?

    How do you reconcile the teaching that in Matthew 24:4-33 Christ gave signs of the Second Advent to be seen by people living centuries later with Matthew 24:34? (After verse thirty-four the subject changes to the second coming of Christ and the discourse does not give us any visible signs or verifiable events to precede the Second Advent except people carrying on with their lives unaware. -Matthew 24:36-39)

    What is the basis for insistence that “This generation” in Matthew 24:34 does not refer to people then living? (Consider Matthew 11:16; 12:39; 17:17; 23:36)

    If Christ wanted Matthew 24:34 to mean that Matthew 24:4-33 would be completely fulfilled within the lifetime of people then living how would he have changed the wording of Matthew 24:34 and the context thereof?

    Do references to the “last days” give signs or conditions to indicate to people of our generation that the end of the world is near, or does the term "last days" refer to the Christian era? (Compare Joel 2:28-32 & Acts 2:16-21; II Timothy 3:1; Hebrews 1:1-2; II Peter 3:2-3. Christ was upon the earth during the “last days.” -Genesis 49:1 & 10; Hebrews 1:1-2; Hebrews 9:26. The instruction "from such turn away" indicates that the previously described conditions in chapter three of II Timothy existed at the time this epistle was written. -II Timothy 3:5)

    If II Timothy 3:2-5 is a list of signs or conditions prior to the rapture, then how many times has the rapture occurred over the last two thousand years?

    If God wanted II Timothy 3 to be a warning or reminder that the advance of Christianity would be accompanied by efforts of enemies of the Gospel to thwart the Lord’s work, through persecution from without and corruption from within, and a warning of perilous times resulting from conditions that have been characteristic of the world, in greater and lesser degrees throughout Christian history, how would he have changed the wording of II Timothy 3?

    What is the basis for insistence that Philippians 4:5 does not say “the Lord is at hand” in the sense that God is near His people? (Psalm 46:1; 145:18)

    What is the basis for insistence that “the end of all things” in I Peter 4:7 is not an obvious reference to the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple around which the Jewish world revolved in the first century?

    What is the basis for insistence that the statement “Surely I come quickly" in the Book of Revelation supports theories about the assumed nearness of the Second Advent? (Revelation 22:20; etc. “Quickly” [Greek: Tachu] does not necessarily mean that the action will take place immediately or even soon but can also be a description of the speed or suddenness of the action once the action has been initiated.)

    If nearly two thousand years ago the New Testament taught that the Second Advent was near, wouldn’t that mean the Holy Bible contains error?

    Why did God use singular pronouns instead of plural pronouns when addressing Abraham in the Hebrew text of Genesis 12:1-3?

    Does a comparison of 1948 USA with modern America indicate that alliance with Israel brought blessings or curses?

    Where does the Bible say that the establishment of the modern nation of Israel relates to the Second Advent or the end or fulfillment of "the times of the Gentiles?"

    How do you reconcile the teaching that the Second Advent will bring about the establishment of an earthly kingdom of Israel with the New Testament teaching that the Second Advent will bring the sudden destruction of the heavens and the earth? (II Peter 3:10-12)

    How do you reconcile the teaching that God is still working through natural Israel and Jewish priority and privilege is perpetual with the Bible teaching that the Old Testament requirement of the obedience of faith and genuine repentance removed Israel as a special nation, as natural Jews as a people cast off God's Word for their human traditions and rejected Christ? (Numbers 15:30-31; Matthew 15:1-9; 21:43; John 8:33-44, 47; God's covenant with natural Israel was a conditional covenant. -Deuteronomy 4:23, 26-27; 28:15, 49-53; Jeremiah 31:36; Micah 3:9-12.)

    How do you reconcile the teaching that God is still working through natural Israel and Jewish priority and privilege is perpetual with the New Testament teaching that the Church is a continuing body in the Old Testament and the New Testament and the New Testament Church is the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy concerning Israel? (Acts 2:16-21; 15:15-17; Romans 2:28-29; 9:6-8; Galatians 3:7,16-19,24-29; 4:21-31; Hebrews 10:15-17; 12:22-24; I Peter 2:9. Note that while in the New Testament a church normally means a local body of Christians, the redeemed are also collectively referred to as the church. -Matthew 16:13-18; Hebrews 12:22-23; etc.)

    How do you reconcile the teaching that God is still working through natural Israel and Jewish priority and privilege is perpetual with the New Testament teaching that Old Testament prophecy about restoring Israel was fulfilled by the calling of the Gentiles to be God’s people? (Compare Amos 9:11-12 & Acts 15:13-17; compare Hosea 1:10; 2:23 & Romans 9:22-26)

    How do you reconcile the teaching that God is still working through natural Israel and Jewish priority and privilege is perpetual with the New Testament teaching that the prophecy of the New Covenant that is made with the house of Israel is fulfilled in the New Testament Church? (Jeremiah 31:31-34; Matthew 26:26-28; Mark 14:22-24; Luke 22:19-20; I Corinthians 11:23-25; II Corinthians 3:5-6; Hebrews 8:6-13; 10:14-18)



              The argument for a completely literal hermeneutic is self-defeating as those who use this argument also insist that some parts of the Bible are figurative, allegorical, or typical. (E.g., Revelation 1:4, 20; 17:9-12; etc.) Whether some parts of the Bible are figurative, allegorical, or typical is not the issue, which parts of the Bible are figurative, allegorical, or typical is the issue. The thousand years in Revelation 20 is in a context of obvious symbolism and is a figurative expression indicating an indefinitely long period of time.




    The Millennium of Revelation 20 began with the binding of Satan at the first advent. “And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years.” (Revelation 20:2) “But if I cast out devils by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God is come unto you. Or else how can one enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man? and then he will spoil his house.” (Matthew 12:28-29) “And the seventy returned again with joy, saying, Lord, even the devils are subject unto us through thy name. And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven. Behold, I give unto you power to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy: and nothing shall by any means hurt you. Notwithstanding in this rejoice not, that the spirits are subject unto you; but rather rejoice, because your names are written in heaven.” (Luke 10:17-20) “Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out.” (John 12:31) The Devil is bound in that he is unable to deceive the nations in the way he did prior to the first advent. (Revelation 20:3; Psalm 2:8-12; 72:1-19; Matthew 28:18-20; Acts 2:34-36; 14:27; Romans 16:25-26) Christ will return at the end of the millennium. (Revelation 20:7-9, 12-13; John 5:28-29; II Thessalonians 1:7-9)





    “And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.” (Revelation 20:4-6) The first resurrection is the new birth; those who are born again have been raised from the dead spiritually. There are two resurrections: one is taking place now through the salvation of sinners and the other is the future physical resurrection of the dead. (John 5:21-29; Romans 5:17, 21; 6:11-23; Ephesians 1:20-2:6; Colossians 3:1-3) There will be a general bodily resurrection of the dead at the Second Advent and the Bible does not teach a gap between the resurrection of the saved and the resurrection of the unsaved. (John 5:28-29)





    The Bible does not limit the scope of the Gospel. (John 3:16-17; 12:32; Romans 5:15-21; I Timothy 2:1-6; I John 2:2; 4:4; Revelation 5:9; 7:9; 14:6; 15:4) Did Christ limit the scope of the Gospel? "Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it." (Matthew 7:13-14) Matthew 7:13-14 is descriptive, not prescriptive. In the context of the time few Jews would recognise or acknowledge Jesus as the Christ and many would be destroyed in the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD and the Roman war against Judea. (Luke 19:41-44)

    Note that if you plant seeds in your garden or field and then later look at the seeds or watch your garden or field at any one point in time between planting and harvest it will likely appear that nothing is happening, and this is also true of the Christianisation of the whole world. (Matthew 13:31-33; Mark 4:26-28; Luke 17:20; also consider Psalm 2:8; 22:27; 47:9; 72:11; 86:9-10; Daniel 2:35, 44; Isaiah 9:7; 11:9; 66:2)

    Scriptures present the Church as victorious. (Matthew 16:17-19; Luke 10:17-19; John 12:31; 16:7-11; Acts 26:16-18; II Corinthians 10:3-5; Colossians 1:13-14; I John 4:4) Jesus Christ is the present ruler of the earth and the end will come after He has destroyed all dominion, authority and power. (Acts 2:30-36; 1 Corinthians 15:20-28; Ephesians 1:18-23; Colossians 2:10, 15; Hebrews 1:8, 13; 10:13; consider Acts 17:6-7; note that Christ came to destroy the works of the Devil – I John 3:8) The Second Advent will be after worldwide conversion (Psalm 22:27; Matthew 28:18-20; Acts 2:30-36; 3:21; 17:6-7; 1 Corinthians 15:20-28; Ephesians 1:18-23; Hebrews 1:8, 13; 2:5-9; 10:13)





    Recommended Books:

    “Victory In Jesus – The Bright Hope of Postmillennialism,” By Greg L. Bahnsen

    “The Millennium,” By Loraine Boettner



    Comment (0)

    Sun, Nov 22nd - 1:16PM

    Avoid Arguments & Bible Ping Pong With Jehovah’s Witnesses

    Many Christians think the key to leading Jehovah’s Witnesses out of darkness and into the truth is to merely show them Bible passages and win arguments. This idea is far removed from reality.

    First, it is important to be extremely patient with a Jehovah’s Witness. Disappointment is inevitable if you expect to convert someone overnight. It is likely to take a long time (weeks, months, even years) for him to recognize that his faith is misplaced or see that at least a few Watchtower teachings are wrong.

    When you try to relate and witness to a JW remember that a personal testimony is a powerful evangelistic tool, and you should look for opportunity to share your testimony ASAP. Tell him what the Lord Jesus Christ means to you and tell him about your salvation experience, and then ask him to tell you about his personal experience with Jesus Christ. This will throw him off his track. If he should try to give some sort of testimony this is a good sign that you may be able to eventually reach him with the gospel. If he should get angry or upset or decide to leave you alone the Lord can use your testimony to make him see his need for a personal relationship with Jesus Christ. Besides, how does one argue with a testimony?

    You should try to steer the conversation beyond minor issues and debatable points and toward matters of the heart and spirit, and try to carefully undermine the authority of the Watchtower Society for them to be more open to the true Gospel.

     When trying to respond or witness to JWs that come to their door many Christians like to use what could be called the Invasion or Blitzkrieg method of evangelism: They want to attack and destroy every heresy in the JWs belief system quick, fast, and in a hurry. While a Christian may feel that he scored a victory by winning an argument this rarely yields good results as far as leading anyone to Christ. It would be better to focus on one or two issues each time you meet with a JW and not force him to digest more than he can take in one sitting. If you would do this, and if you are friendly and respectful to him, he is more likely to ponder the information you give him instead of shrugging it off (as you might do if someone attacked every point of your belief system all at once), and he is more likely to make an appointment to return and discuss other issues with you and possibly keep returning (which is what you should want him to do).

    It is important to be kind and respectful to JWs and find a common ground, such as their commitment to God (even though they have an obviously heretical view of God) and respect for Bible standards (even though they have a twisted view of Scripture and believe in salvation by works). Note Paul's approach to the Athenians in Acts 17:22-23. Was he hostile or argumentative with the Athenians, and did he expect them to meet him where he was at in knowledge and spirituality? No, he found a common ground and approached them from there.

    It is a good idea to be prepared to use the New World Translation in discussions with JWs. For personal Bible reading and Bible study I recommend the KJV and not the NWT. But JWs believe the NWT is the most accurate translation and, ironically, the NWT often counters Watchtower teachings more effectively than the KJV. (More on this below.)

    Let's look at a typical scenario: During a discussion with a JW you and the JW agree that the Holy Bible is the final authority and his attitude and behaviour clearly indicate that he is sincere in his claim to believe the Bible and respect the Bible as the final authority. So, it appears that helping him see through Watchtower errors is just a matter of showing him passages of Scripture. You or the JW bring up a Bible teaching with which he disagrees, or he brings up a Watchtower teaching, and you happen to know a Bible passage that makes the truth crystal-clear. But when you show him a Bible passage he gives you an extremely flawed (yet sincere) explanation or dismisses your point entirely. Then he counters this by showing you a passage of Scripture and giving you a flawed interpretation. Then you show him another Bible passage and he either gives you a flawed interpretation or dismisses your point entirely, and he shows you another Bible passage and gives a flawed interpretation, and the discussion becomes a game of Bible ping pong. What happened? The JW sincerely believes that the Bible is the final authority and he sincerely believes that Watchtower teachings are Bible teachings and that the Watchtower Society is God's channel of truth. In his indoctrination a subtle switch was made from reliance on the word of God to reliance on the words of men (Watchtower publications). He is severely discouraged from studying the Bible independently of the Watchtower Organization and Watchtower publications, and for JWs Bible study means studying Watchtower publications. The JW is continually taught at meetings and in Watchtower publications how to respond to most arguments (even Scriptural reasons from Christians), he is continually taught Watchtower explanations of Scriptures and reasons to trust Watchtower insights as superior, and he has been taught (programmed) to look at the Watchtower organization through rose coloured glasses. When you show a Bible passage to the JW his conditioned and preprogrammed mind automatically replaces what the passage says with what the Watchtower Society says it means.

    Remember that the objective is to win hearts and minds, not win arguments or be right, and the goal is the eventual salvation of lost souls. A Christian who is argumentative with JWs should only expect to convince them that they are right.

    JWs believe Watchtower heresies because they have been taught (programmed) to not critically analyze Watchtower teachings, to trust Watchtower leadership and Watchtower publications to think for them, and to avoid or ignore criticisms of the Watchtower organization and Watchtower teachings. On the other hand, JWs feel compelled and obliged to answer sincere questions and help non-JWs understand and accept "the truth," Watchtower teachings, which is why good questions are an effective means of persuading them to think and start seeing the fallacies of Watchtower teachings and the truths of Scripture. For example, asking a JW to show you where the Bible says that Jesus Christ is Michael the Archangel instead of dogmatically asserting that Jesus Christ is not an angel could make him start wondering about this himself.

    Here are questions every Jehovah’s Witnesses should be asked when opportunities arise:

    Is there anything about the Watchtower Organization that you do not like or that you find difficult?

    Do you ever have difficulty getting along with other Jehovah’s Witnesses, and do you ever find yourself able to get along with non-JWs easier or better than you can get along with Jehovah’s Witnesses? (Watchtower publications say that true Christians have love among themselves, and that this love is one of the identifying marks of the only true Christian religion, God’s organization.)

    Why are Jehovah’s Witnesses instructed to ask people if they were on the wrong road would they let pride or stubbornness keep them from admitting it while they are told they must never ask this of themselves?

    Does it ever bother you that if you do not change your beliefs to line up with Watchtower teachings each time the Watchtower Society changes their teachings you could be considered an apostate and disfellowshipped?

    Since the truth never changes do you ever wonder if a change in Watchtower teachings or policies means they had the truth and lost or rejected it or were previously teaching a falsehood with which you were forbidden to disagree?

    Has anyone ever become convinced of Watchtower teachings and become a Jehovah’s Witness by just reading the Bible?

    Why is it important for everyone else to question their religion but forbidden for Jehovah’s Witnesses to question theirs?

    Do you ever find it difficult to understand how the Watchtower leadership concluded that any Watchtower teaching is based on the clear teachings of Scripture?

    Does the “New Light” always expound or add to the “Old Light,” or does the “New Light” ever completely replace or disprove the “Old Light?” (Psalm 33:11; 119:89; Proverbs 19:21; James 1:17)

    Does the Watchtower Society encourage personal study, discernment, and growth, or do they require a child-like dependence? What would happen if a JW followed the example of the Bereans and critically examined Watchtower teachings to personally discern if those teachings really are taught in Scripture? (Acts 17:10-11)

    While the Bible certainly does not condemn all use of Christian literature and Bible study helps, and Christian books and magazines (and other materials) can be helpful, where does the Bible indicate that Christians must submit to the infallible views and interpretations of an organization or its publications?

    While Acts 8:30-31 does indicate that people occasionally need help understanding Scripture, where in this passage is there any indication of an organization? Since the Ethiopian eunuch never saw Philip again, where is there any indication that the Ethiopian eunuch had to join or submit to an organization or anyone? Did Philip use the Bible alone to expound upon the meaning of Scripture or did he use additional literature? If the Bible alone was sufficient for Philip and the Ethiopian eunuch, doesn't this indicate that the Bible itself is sufficient for us also? Where in these passages is there any support for the teaching that people must join a particular organization, and submit to the interpretations of that organization? (Watchtower publications use Acts 8:30-31 to say that the Watchtower Society is God's only Bible-interpreting organization and that people cannot understand Scripture without the Watchtower Society.)

    If the Watchtower Governing Body is supposed to be God's "Faithful and Discreet Slave" that guides people in their understanding of Scripture and is God's only channel of truth, then does the Watchtower interpretation of Matthew 24:45-47 mean that for eighteen or nineteen centuries God did not have any true representatives on earth? (Consider Ephesians 4:11-16)

    Do you ever feel that Watchtower leadership (Governing Body or local Elders) is intrusive in matters of personal preference or opinion where no genuine Bible truth, principle, or command is at stake? (I Peter 5:1-3; 4:15; Romans 14:1-13)

    Are Jehovah's Witnesses loved and hated because of their loyalty to Jesus Christ and the word of God or because of teachings and practices peculiar to the Watchtower organization? (I Timothy 1:3-7)

    Is the Gospel being proclaimed by Jehovah’s Witnesses the same Gospel that was preached by Christ and the Apostles? (The Gospel preached by Christ, the Apostles, and Bible-believing Christians throughout Christian history is the death, burial, and literal resurrection of Christ through which sinners are justified through faith in the person and work of Jesus Christ when they repent, and the Gospel being proclaimed by Jehovah's Witnesses is the re-establishment of God’s kingdom commencing with the invisible return of Christ in 1914. -John 3:13-15; Acts 4:15-19; I Corinthians 15:1-4; II Corinthians 11:3-4; Galatians 1:6-8)

    Why does the Watchtower Society avoid the possibility that Acts 20:20 refers to house-churches, since the early Christians usually met for worship in private homes? (Romans 16:5; I Corinthians 6:19; Colossians 4:15; II Timothy 3:6; Philemon 2)

    Where is there any reference to an organization in I Corinthians 1:10, and where in I Corinthians 1:10 (or the context thereof) are we told that unity is to be achieved by submitting to an organization? Did the lack of unity among believers at Corinth mean that they were not Christians? (I Corinthians 1:2, 11-13; Watchtower publications use I Corinthians 1:10 to teach the importance of complete conformity to the teachings of the Watchtower Organization and insist that such unity proves that JWs are the only true Christians and that those who do not have such unity are false Christians.)

    Are you aware that the Trinity Doctrine means that God is triune (1x1x1) and not triplex (1+1+1)? Watchtower publications often point out that one plus one plus one is three and not one and insist that the Trinity is a pagan doctrine. Ancient pagans did not worship any trinity, they worshipped triads. A triad is three distinct gods, while the Trinity is one God existing in three persons. The word Trinity is a combination of the word "trine," which means threefold or three times, and the suffix "-ity," which means state, character, or condition. One God eternally existing in three persons is one God and not three Gods. God is characterized by interior personal relationships. (Genesis 1:26-27; 11:6-8) The terms Father, Son, and Holy Ghost each refer to an aspect of God's nature and activity in relation to man. (II Corinthians 13:14; Ephesians 2:18, 22; I Peter 1:2) Salvation is an example of this: As the Father, God originates salvation and made provision for salvation; as the Son, God paid the penalty for sin; as the Holy Ghost, God applies salvation. (Whether any of us completely understand or even accept a Bible teaching does not determine if it is the truth. As the Spirit of God reveals truths to us through the word of God, He becomes more majestic to us, not simple. -Psalm 97:2)

    Where in the Bible did Jesus Christ ever deny His deity?

    If John 20:17 means that the Father is God, then why doesn't John 20:28 mean that Jesus is God?

    If only the Father is God and Jesus is "a god," then just how many "gods" do JWs have? (John 1:1 NWT; Isaiah 43:10; 44:8)

    Why isn't the same rule that is applied to John 1:1 in the New World Translation, so that it says the word was “a god,” also applied to the other New Testament passages where Theos is used without the definite article? In the 282 New Testament references to God without using the definite article with the word Theos the New World Translation usually renders Theos as "God," such as in Luke 20:38 and John 1:18. Should John 1:8 be changed to say that no man has seen “a god?” (Incidentally, JWs also point to John 1:18 which says, "No man hath seen God at any time," and people did see Jesus Christ. No man hath seen God as He is, only visions or materializations of God, but there have been those who have seen God manifest in the flesh. -John 4:24; 6:46; 14:9; Philippians 2:6-7; I Timothy 3:16)

    Do you believe Jesus is “a god?” Do you believe Jesus is a true god? If Jesus is a true god how do you reconcile this with John 17:3? If Jesus is a false god how do you reconcile this with John 1:1? (Watchtower publications say that only the Father is the one true God (Jehovah) based on John 17:3 and they say that Jesus Christ is “a god” based on the New World Translation’s rendering of John 1:1.)

    If Jesus is not God, how do you reconcile this with Colossians 1:16 and Isaiah 44:24?

    How do you reconcile the New World Translations’ rendering of Colossians 1:16 with Isaiah 44:24, which says Jehovah was alone when Jehovah created everything? “Because by means of him all [other] things were created in the heavens and upon the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, no matter whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All [other] things have been created through him and for him. (Colossians 1:16 NWT) “This is what Jehovah has said, your Repurchaser and the Former of you from the belly: ‘I, Jehovah, am doing everything, stretching out the heavens by myself, laying out the earth. Who was with me?’” (Isaiah 44:24 NWT)

    Since there is no Bible verse that says explicitly that the Father is Jehovah should we assume that the Father is not Jehovah? (Watchtower publications deny the deity of Jesus Christ by saying that there is no Bible verse that says explicitly that Jesus is Jehovah.)

    How do you reconcile Isaiah 9:6, where Jesus is called Mighty God, with Isaiah 43:10 & Isaiah 44:6? (Also, compare Isaiah 10:20-21 NWT)

    Whose manifestation and whose kingdom is referred to in II Timothy 4:1?

    Who is the First and the Last? (Isaiah 44:6; Revelation 1:8, 17-18; 2:8; 22:13, 16 NWT) There is contradiction in Scripture unless Jesus is Jehovah.

    Who did Stephen pray to? (Acts 7:59-60)

    For whom did John the Baptist prepare the way? (Isaiah 40:3; Matthew 3:1-3; Luke 1:76; also, compare Malachi 3:1 and Matthew 11:10 NWT) There is a contradiction in Scripture unless Jesus is Jehovah.

    Who is Jehovah of Hosts? (compare Isaiah 8:13,14 with I Peter 2:7-8 and Isaiah 6:3, 8-10 with Acts 28:25-27 NWT) There is contradiction in Scripture unless Jesus is Jehovah.

    Who promised the New Covenant? (Jeremiah 31:31-34; Hebrews 10:15-17 NWT) There is a contradiction in Scripture unless the Holy Spirit is Jehovah.

    Where does the Bible say that the Holy Spirit is God's active force? Why did Peter say that Ananias had lied to the Holy Spirit when he had lied to God unless the Holy Spirit is God? (Acts 5:3-4) How is it even possible to lie to an impersonal force? (Acts 5:3)

    How do you reconcile the almost exclusive emphasis of JWs on the name Jehovah with Acts 1:8?

    Where in the New Testament did Jesus tell His followers to declare the name Jehovah?

    Where does the New Testament say that declaring the name Jehovah is a mark of true Christians?

    Which name is consistently uplifted in the New Testament (Jesus or Jehovah)?

    Why do you assume that the submission or subjection of Christ to the Father means inferiority? (I Corinthians 15:28; John 14:28) Does the Bible ever indicate that the husband's headship over the wife means that a woman is naturally inferior to men? Do you believe that compatibility between functional subordination and equality of being is possible? How do you reconcile the subjection of Christ to Joseph and Mary with the claim that Jesus Christ is inferior to the Father by His being subject? (Luke 2:51; John 1:3; I Corinthians 15:28)

    Where does the Bible say that Jesus is Michael the Archangel or that Michael the Archangel is Jesus Christ? (Hebrews 1:5-6)

    Why do you insist that being called “Son” means that Jesus was created? (Hebrews 1:5) The term "son" is used in the Bible to denote or imply almost any kind of descent or succession (consider Exodus 2:10 and Hebrews 1:5, 8), and “Son of God” was a messianic title which signified the function of Deliverer. (E.g. Matthew 16:16; Note that the Devil tempted Christ by bringing against Him the popular Jewish conceptions of the Messiah. -Matthew 4:1-11)

    How does being called “firstborn” mean that Jesus was created, since firstborn means pre-eminent or the legal heir? (Colossians 1:15; the nation of Israel was called firstborn even though there were other nations in existence before the nation of Israel was formed, and note that King David was called firstborn even though he was the youngest son in his family, and Joseph's son Ephraim is called the firstborn even though Ephraim was born after Manasseh. –Psalm 89:27; Jeremiah 31:9)

    Does the use of the word Arche with Almighty God mean that Almighty God was created? (Revelation 21:6; Watchtower publications use Revelation 3:14 to say that Jesus is a created angel. But the word "beginning" in Revelation 3:14 is the rendering of the Greek word Arche, which means first cause, origin, or source, and is where we get the English word "architect.”)

    Where does the Bible say that Jesus Christ was not bodily resurrected? (Luke 24:36-43; Acts 10:39-41)

    Where does the Bible say that in heaven today Jesus Christ does not have a glorified human body? (Colossians 2:9; I Timothy 2:5)

    Where does the Bible say that the return of Christ will not be in visible human form? (Acts 1:9-11) Did Christ ascend into a literal or figurative cloud? (Acts 1:9)

    Can you verify that Jerusalem was destroyed by the Babylonian army in 607 BC and not 586 BC? Does it concern you that the Watchtower calculations making 1914 the year Christ returned are based on a date they cannot verify and a prophecy about Nebuchadnezzar (Nebuchadnezzar’s recovery from lycanthropy) that was fulfilled in Nebuchadnezzar's lifetime? (Daniel 4:16, 30-36)

    How do you reconcile the promise of Matthew 28:20 with the Watchtower teaching that the return of Christ would be invisible and that He returned invisibly in 1914 AD?

    If the Second Coming is past and Christ returned in 1914 AD, why do Jehovah's Witnesses still observe the Memorial service, since this was to be observed "... until he arrives?" Doesn't this contradict the purpose of the Memorial? (I Corinthians 11:26 NWT)

    If Jesus was hung on a single upright pole, a torture stake, and not on a cross then why was more than one nail used to fasten His hands, and why does the Bible say that the written charge was placed over His head and not over His hands? (John 20:25; Matthew 27:37)

    While Ecclesiastes 9:5 & 10 may not prove there is conscious life after death, do these passages prove that there is no conscious life after death or could these passages and their context be dealing with the inevitability of physical death?  (Hell is a place of unconsciousness and inactivity when it comes to bodily senses and the affairs of this world. -Isaiah 63:16; John 9:4; Revelation 14:13) Do you believe that all will receive the same eternal fate or destiny, whether they are faithful or wicked? “All are the same in what all have. One eventuality there is to the righteous one and the wicked one, the good one and the clean one and the unclean one, and the one sacrificing and the one that is not sacrificing. The good one is the same as the sinner; the one swearing is the same as whoever has been afraid of a sworn oath.” (Ecclesiastes 9:2 NWT) Does the phrase “the remembrance of them has been forgotten” in Ecclesiastes 9:5 mean there will be no resurrection after this life for anyone?

    Have you considered the possibility that Ezekiel 18:4 refers to death in the same sense that Adam and Eve died the very day they ate the forbidden fruit? (Genesis 2:17; 5:3-5) “Look! All the souls—to me they belong. As the soul of the father so likewise the soul of the son—to me they belong. The soul that is sinning—it itself will die.” (Ezekiel 18:4 NWT; JWs use Ezekiel 18:4 to deny the immortality of the human soul.) Death means separation: Physical death is the separation of the soul and body. (Genesis 35:18) Spiritual death is separation of man from God. (Romans 5:12, 17; Ephesians 2:1; Colossians 2:13; I Peter 4:6)

    How do you explain Matthew 10:28 and other passages that make a distinction between the body and the soul?

    If by "destroy," in Matthew 10:28, Christ meant a termination of existence, then why did He use the Greek word "apollumi?" Christ used the same word apollumi in Luke 5:37 concerning the destruction of wineskins ("be ruined." NWT) If God had wanted the Bible to say or indicate that the soul and the body are distinct and that the soul is immortal how would He have changed such passages? (Also, note that while the Bible does say that animals have souls, the Bible does not say or indicate that animals have immortal souls.)

    In Acts 7:59 was Stephen asking Jesus to take away his bad breath? (Watchtower literature says that the spirit is merely one's breath.)

    If the account of Luke 16:27-31 is a parable and the Rich Man represents false religious leaders and Lazarus represents true Christians, as is taught in Watchtower publications, then who were the Rich Man's five brothers and why did he want Lazarus to witness to them, and why did Jesus portray Abraham as speaking to a man who no longer existed?

    If Luke 16:19-31 is a parable (even though the context gives no indication of this), have you considered that a parable is an example or picture which verifies something, and a symbol is a small representation of a greater reality?

    How can a copy, no matter how exact, be the original? Is a copy of a CD the original CD? Is a copy of a document the original document? If God created an exact duplicate of you today and gave it your exact thoughts, emotions, and memories, would you and your duplicate always have the same thoughts, emotions, and memories, or would you be separate people living separate lives? Would you be willing to die so that your duplicate could continue living your life without you around, since he would really be you and you would still be living and conscious because he would have your thoughts, emotions, and memories, your life pattern? (Watchtower publications deny that physical death is separation of the soul and body, and that resurrection is a reuniting of the soul and body, by teaching that resurrection means that God recreates a body with the same life pattern and memories, an exact copy.)

    Where does the Bible forbid service in the armed forces and where in the Bible is any soldier told to resign from the military?

    Where does the Bible forbid a medical blood transfusion to save a human life? (Romans 4:15)

    Where does the Bible forbid celebrating religious holidays, such as Christmas and Easter? (Romans 14:1, 4-6. Watchtower publications point out that there were pagan holidays on those days. If we are going to nit-pick on details, we should forbid weddings rings and wedding cakes as they have pagan origins, and we should forbid calendars, clocks, and watches because the names of the months and the days of the week have pagan origins and the use of timepieces and the division of the day into the hours comes from astrology. If you happen to know someone who uses Christmas or Easter as opportunity to worship Baal or Tammuz, I will agree that they are wrong. The Bible condemns idolatry but not everything pagans happened to do, and it does not condemn setting aside a day unto the Lord.)

    Where does the Bible forbid celebrating birthdays? (Watchtower literature points to two accounts of kings, Herod & Pharaoh, celebrating their birthdays and having someone killed. It must be noted that these ancient kings, dictators, had people killed every day and not just on their birthdays. But note that according to chapter one of The Book of Job, Job and his family celebrated birthdays and had such a good time at this that Job felt compelled to offer sacrifices just in case they might have gone too far in their merrymaking.)

    While the Bible teaches much about the Old Covenant for Jews and the New Covenant for Christians, where does the Bible teach a third arrangement of a "great crowd" of "other sheep" who do not have a heavenly hope? (John 17:20, 24; I Peter 1:3, 4) Where is the "great crowd" according to Revelation 19:1 in the New World Translation? “After these things I heard what was as a loud voice of a great crowd in heaven. They said: ‘Praise Jah, YOU people! The salvation and the glory and the power belong to our God.’” (Revelation 19:1 NWT) If God had wanted Revelation 19:1 to say that the "great crowd" has a heavenly hope, how would He have changed this passage to indicate that?

    If Christ had wanted to mean that the "other sheep" are gentile converts, how would He have changed the wording of John 10:16 and the context thereof?

    The New World Translation is consistent in the punctuation in the dozens of other New Testament passages where Jesus uses the expression "Truly I tell you" or "Truly I say to you" ("tell" and "say" are the same word in the Greek text); so why does the New World Translation make an exception in Luke 23:43 and put a comma after the word “today.” “And he said to him: ‘Truly I tell you today, You will be with me in Paradise.’” (Luke 23:43 NWT) “And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise.” (Luke 23:43 KJV) If I were to vocally and personally say something to you right now it would be obvious that I would be speaking "today;" where does the context of Luke 23:43 indicate any logical reason that Jesus would feel the need to verbalize the obvious fact that He was speaking those words on that very day?

    Did you know that the Watchtower Society originally taught that Charles Taze Russell was God’s “faithful and discreet slave” of Matthew 24:45-46, and how do you explain the Watchtower Society’s change of position on this fundamental issue?

    If the Jehovah’s Witnesses are the only true witnesses for God does this mean that God did not have a witness for over eighteen centuries, since the Jehovah’s Witnesses did not exist as an organization until the nineteenth century?

    According to Acts 2:32, Acts 3:15, Acts 4:33, and Acts 13:30-31, were the early Christians witnesses of Jehovah or of Jesus Christ?

    If the “faithful and discreet slave” of Matthew 24:45-46 that guides people in their understanding of Scripture did not exist until modern times does this mean that God did not care if anyone understood the Bible for all the previous centuries?

    How did anyone understand the Bible during the centuries prior to the existence of the Watchtower Society? What kind of God gives His people a Bible without any means of understanding it?

    If Christ deliberately bypassed the religious elite and highly educated to reveal truths to ordinary people, and the Apostles commended and encouraged personal study and discernment, why should we assume that God intended for people of our generation to receive (without question or doubt) the interpretations of people claiming to have some special key to understanding Scripture that ordinary people don't have? If the Bible is the complete Word of God and the final authority why should we assume that God expects people of our generation to interpret Bible passages in relation to Christian literature or a theologian instead of interpreting Bible passages in relation to context and the whole Bible? Scripture itself is the key to the interpretation of Scripture. While there definitely is need for ministers and Christian literature, and there are difficulties in the Bible, for the most part the Bible is self-interpreting and self-explanatory when one is familiar with its contents. (Psalm 119:104,105,130; Proverbs 2:3-6; Acts 20:28; Ephesians 4:11-12; II Timothy 2:15; 3:16-17)

    Have you ever taken time to personally look up all the Bible passages cited or referred to in a Watchtower publication to examine the relationship of each Bible passage to its context and see for yourself if they are rightly dividing God’s Word or misapplying and misusing Scripture texts?

    Does Romans 14:1-12 indicate that it is acceptable for Christians to differ on some religious issues, especially conscientious differences of opinion?

    According to John 5:39-40 is Bible knowledge sufficient for salvation, and what is required for salvation according to this passage?

    Where in the Bible did anyone record their time in witnessing on paper or have record cards of activity assigned as gauges or measurements of spirituality? "Jehovah's Witnesses believe that the entire Bible is the inspired Word of God, and instead of adhering to a creed based on human tradition, they hold to the Bible as the standard for all their beliefs." (Reasoning From The Scriptures, p.199) "Because Jehovah's Witnesses base all of their beliefs, their standards for conduct, and organizational procedures on the Bible, their faith in the Bible itself as God's Word gives them the conviction that what they have is indeed the truth. So their position is not egotistical but demonstrates their confidence that the Bible is the right standard against which to measure one's religion." (Reasoning From The Scriptures, p.203-204)

    Where does the Bible say that a prophet is no longer a false prophet if he admits he made a mistake after a prophecy fails? (Consider Deuteronomy 18:20-22; Watchtower publications say the Watchtower Society is Jehovah’s prophet.)

    Do the many failed predictions of the Watchtower Society ever make you question if they really are God’s channel of truth?

    Where does the Bible say that a person must belong to an organization that did not exist until the 19th century to survive Armageddon?

    How do you reconcile the Watchtower teaching that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob will not reside with Christ in His heavenly kingdom with Matthew 8:11?

    How could Christ preach to the “spirits in prison” who were alive during the days of Noah, and how was the gospel preached to “them that are dead,” if there is no consciousness after death? (I Peter 3:18-20; 4:5-6)

    If “the spirits in prison” in I Peter 3:19 refers to demons and not people who died before the resurrection of Christ, then why did Jesus preach to demons?

    Why did the Holy Spirit speak directly and refer to Himself as “me” and “I” in Acts 13:2?

    If Christ is not God, how do you reconcile John 17:5 with Isaiah 42:8 and Isaiah 48:11?

    If the NWT is the most accurate word for word translation of the Bible, why is the word “son” added to Acts 20:28 even though the word “son” is not in the Greek text of Acts 20:28?

    If Christ was created by God and is the wisdom of God, as taught in Watchtower publications, how is it possible that God was ever without wisdom? (Proverbs 8:1-4, 12, 22-31)

    If the Watchtower Organization can trace its roots all the way back to Christ, can you name one Jehovah’s Witness who lived before the 19th century?

    Why does the Watchtower Society withhold the names of the men on the New World Translation Committee who translated the Hebrew and Greek texts into English for the New World Translation so that nobody can see if they had any credentials that qualified them to produce a Bible translation?

    Why did Paul make a distinction between a person’s body and their soul in Acts 20:10?

    Why did Christ tell the early Christians they would be persecuted for the sake of His (Jesus’) name instead of Jehovah’s name? (Matthew 24:9; Mark 13:13; Luke 21:12, 17; Acts 9:16)

    If the human soul is the body, then how can the soul come out of the body? (Genesis 35:18)

    Why does the New World Translation put the name Jehovah in the New Testament even though it does not occur in the Greek text of the New Testament?

    While chapter five of I Corinthians outlines limiting association with Christians that persist in the specified sins, where is there an indication of strict shunning or application to family members?

    Why do Jehovah’s Witnesses avoid the possibility that “house” in II John 10 refers to a congregation, and that this passage is dealing with a qualification for church membership and occasion for church discipline and not who you can accept into your own private home, since the word “house” often refers to a church congregation in the New Testament? (Romans 16:5; I Corinthians 6:19; Colossians 4:15; II Timothy 3:6; Philemon 2) Why is the Watchtower interpretation of II John 10 only applied to ex-JWs? Do ever receive non-JW relatives or friends into your home?

    Where does the New Testament tell Christians to shun heathens and tax collectors? (Watchtower publications use Matthew 18:17 to support Watchtower shunning)

    Where does the Bible tell you to shun a friend or relative who conscientiously chooses to leave the Watchtower Organization?

    Where does the Bible tell you to shun a relative or friend who conscientiously chooses to join another denomination?

    Watchtower publications say that each creative day of chapters one and two of Genesis is 7,000 years long. How do you reconcile this teaching with Exodus 20:11?

    If the Watchtower Society began teaching that a medical blood transfusion is acceptable for a JW because this does not violate any Bible standard would you change your beliefs on this issue? If yes, then how can you be certain they are teaching the truth now? If no, then does it ever bother you that if you do not change your beliefs every time the Watchtower Society changes their teachings you could be considered an apostate and be disfellowshipped?

    If the Watchtower Society began teaching that any incident of rape or child molestation should be reported to the police as soon as possible even if the victim is the only eyewitness to the crime would you agree with that policy? How are you certain that their current teachings and policies on this are right?

    Remember to pray for Jehovah's Witnesses and other cults and pray for the potential convert who will eventually come to your door.




    New World Translation Online www.jw.org/en/library/bible



    Helpful Christian Resources & Information:

    Witnesses For Jesus, Inc. www.4witness.org

    AnswerJW.com www.answerjw.com

    MM Outreach Inc. www.mmoutreachinc.com

    TowerWatch Ministries www.towerwatch.com

    Six Screens of the Watchtower www.sixscreensofthewatchtower.com


    Comment (0)

    Tue, Nov 10th - 2:44AM

    My Exodus From The Watchtower Organization

     I was raised in the Watchtower cult, was baptized in that religion in 1979 when I was 16 and later disassociated myself in 1985. I had been taught that Jehovah’s Witnesses have the only true Christian religion because, unlike the churches of Christendom, Jehovah’s Witnesses adhere strictly to the Bible (supposedly), true Christians have love among themselves, and God’s clean organization stands out compared to the churches of Christendom. Over time I realized that, although there are good people among the Jehovah’s Witnesses, we were no better than the people we condemned; we were just trained to look at the Watchtower Organization through rose coloured glasses.

    Watchtower theology is much like a house of cards. When a JW sees that the Watchtower Society is wrong on a point, even insignificant points, he is likely to see through other errors. When I was a Jehovah's Witness, I eventually decided that the Watchtower Society is not God's channel of truth, but this did not happen overnight. Over time various things happened or came to my attention to make me reconsider this, and I would like to share a few examples.

     Watchtower publications teach that love among themselves and respect for the Bible proves that Jehovah’s Witnesses have the only true Christian religion. As time went by I observed that I usually got along with non-JW relatives, schoolmates and workmates better than I did with most JWs, and it became increasingly obvious that JWs put words of men above the Word of God. The Watchtower Organization is all about control, by Watchtower leadership and local elders, in every area of a JWs life, even areas where no Bible truth or principle is at stake, and this also helped me to see through the facade.

    The Watchtower magazine included articles to be studied in one of the congregation meetings each week. A few months after I was baptized a Watchtower study article taught that it is wrong to doubt the Watchtower Organization or question teachings and policies and condemned independent thinking. This bothered me since the truth can withstand questions and criticism, and over time I was often accused of independent thinking though I tried to hide this and ignore my doubts and questions. This also contradicted what was taught in the Watchtower book “The Truth that leads to Eternal Life” (A Watchtower book used for conducting Home Bible Studies) in the chapter about the importance of examining one’s religion.

     In 1981 a Watchtower article included the change in policy that people who voluntarily disassociated themselves were to be shunned the same as disfellowshipped persons. It bothered me that, whether the individual was right or wrong, there was no honourable way out.

    In my studies I often looked at older Watchtower publications, not to be critical but to find information and knowledge, and looking at older Watchtower publications would make me wonder how the truth could change so often. JWs explain changes in doctrine and policy as “New Light.” One of my peeves was that whenever there was New Light it always seemed to be something inconsequential, like the name of one of the meetings or the exact interpretation of some obscure passage of Bible prophecy, and I would wonder why it was such a major issue. I also observed that all too often the New Light did not illuminate or expound upon the Old Light but disproved or replaced the Old Light altogether, and often the New Light was actually an introduction of Old Light that had been previously discarded as false. A Watchtower study article pointed out that the truth doesn’t change and I thought this was ironic coming from the Watchtower Society, and when Watchtower leadership discouraged us from looking at older Watchtower publications I couldn’t help wondering about the motives behind that.

     In the early 1980s a Watchtower study article on sexual morality said that certain sex acts (oral sex, etc.) were immoral even in marriage and that married JWs guilty of willingly participating in those kind of sex acts with their spouse would be subject to a judicial hearing and would be disfellowshipped if unrepentant, and it struck me that this was getting too much into private lives. I figured a married couple could be happy without those kind of sex acts and I could see the point if this was dealing with abuse or coercion, but the article was not dealing with abuse or merely advising against something but was making a judicial matter out of things a married couple might mutually and willingly choose to do in private. While I still believed that the Watchtower Organization is the truth this did help make me look at things more critically.

    There used to be a lot of JWs who were policeman but then in the early 1980s The Watchtower said that JWs could no longer have guns for self-defense and JWs who were policemen could not continue to work for a police force if the job required them to carry a gun. I noticed that they were using the same proof texts that were used to teach that it is immoral for a Christian to join the armed forces for any reason. I began looking at those proof texts in context and began to realise that they did not condemn military service or using weapons for self-defense. Around that time an aunt's husband, who served in the US Army in WWII, explained to me that a soldier merely doing his duty is not a murderer. While this did not change my mind right away, I did think seriously about points he made.

    It used to be that Watchtower publications occasionally taught cautions about young relationships but did not condemn teenage marriage. Then in 1983 a study article in The Watchtower said it is wrong for people to date or marry till their twenties because First Corinthians 7:36 says they must be past the bloom of youth ("flower of age," KJV). This interpretation of First Corinthians 7:36 was especially noteworthy to me because both of my parents were JWs when they married, and my dad was in his twenties and my mother was a teenager. Throughout history most women (and many men) married in their teens. If this interpretation of First Corinthians 7:36 was correct it would have been noted in the annals of history that first century Christians taught that it is wrong for teenagers to marry and it is wrong to allow one’s teenage children to marry. www.gotquestions.org/marriage-age.html?fbclid=IwAR2L5DuW21bctvbodjiqzpsWs4a-OyrfLdrJl1Lz-ffGWkQO9mvoYCDiGHQ

     I remember that at a convention it was mentioned in one of the public talks that celebrating a religious holiday such as Christmas or Easter is a disfellowshipping offense because this is apostasy and I suddenly began to wonder what was so wrong about setting aside a day to worship God. I started to seriously question (in my mind) just how setting aside a day to worship and give gifts and enjoy fellowship made someone an apostate.

    In a public talk at a JW Convention in 1983 the song “He Ain't Heavy He’s My Brother” (The Hollies) was mentioned as a good example or description of the love Jesus talked about in John 13:34-35, and this got me to seriously wondering about the Watchtower teaching that John 13:35 is an identifying mark of the only true Christian religion as this was not what I observed. I observed that non-JWs were often easier to get along with than other JWs, among JWs I could not be sure who my real friends were or trust JWs to be honest, some teachings with which I was not allowed to disagree were obviously debatable opinions, and “new light” often involved things that were trivial or inessential, such as the exact interpretation of some obscure passage of Bible prophecy or the name of one of the weekly meetings, or intrusive rules with no Scriptural basis. The Watchtower Organization did not seem to me to be quite what it claims to be and didn’t seem to be better than people and groups we condemned, but I would pass this off as misunderstanding on my part or the Devil trying to deceive me.

     In the early 1980s The Watchtower magazine, in a study article, stated that the Watchtower Society never predicted that Armageddon would occur in 1975 and that a lot of Jehovah’s Witnesses merely misinterpreted what was said. I was old enough to remember the 1975 disappointment and had been passing this off as a mistake or a miscalculation on the part of the Watchtower Society, so that statement bothered me for a long time because that is not how I remembered things. Along with things I remembered reading in Watchtower publications I remembered that there were a lot of people who quit college or promising careers, delayed marriage or delayed having children, sold their houses to move where pioneers or missionaries were needed, and otherwise made sacrifices to devote themselves to proselytizing work in the remaining years and months till Armageddon. For a long time, I tried to convince myself that this was just a misunderstanding or misinterpretation of what was said and refused to believe the Watchtower Society would lie.

    Eventually, in 1984, I visited the Kingdom Hall library to look at pre-1975 Watchtower publications to see if my memory was wrong or not and I found in pre-1975 Watchtower publications that the Watchtower Society predicted 1975 quite clearly. Further research revealed that in previous decades the Watchtower Society had predicted dates for the end of the world and later denied those predictions. In the Kingdom Hall library was a copy of “The Finished Mystery,” a 1917 Watchtower book which the Watchtower Society pointed to as one of the reasons Christ chose the Watchtower Organization to represent him in 1919, as it was the primary book used to dispense truth and the Jehovah’s Witnesses (as they are now called) were the only religious group preaching the truth. Merely browsing over this book made me start to wonder why Christ would choose a group to represent him based on such absurd interpretations.

    At that time, I was a Regular Auxiliary Pioneer (A JW committed to 60 or more hours per month in witnessing work), and while doing door-to-door witnessing I met a nice couple who asked why Jehovah’s Witnesses believe they have the only true Christian religion. I explained this the way it was taught in Watchtower publications, that the Bible teaches that there is only one true Christian religion and that the Bible teaches identifying marks of that religion. It started bothering me that I was teaching this when I was not fully convinced that the Watchtower Organization measured up to those identifying marks. One evening I decided to resolve this issue in my mind by considering pros and cons and I took a notepad and divided a page into two columns, one column for reasons it is the truth and the other for reasons it is not, and by sunrise the next morning one column was full on both sides but the column for reasons it is the truth was blank because I could not honestly and objectively point to a solid concrete reason to believe it is the truth. I then decided that it was time to leave. I was burnt out on religion and avoided church for a long time, but I still wondered if there was a true Christian religion, and sometimes considered going back for the sake of family, and eventually I learned that salvation is a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and I was born again in January of 1987.

     If you are a Jehovah’s Witness reading this for whatever reason, you do not have to take my word on any of this. Study and research to see for yourself and remember that the truth can withstand questions and criticism.

    Comment (0)

    Sat, Oct 31st - 6:19PM

    How A Police State Is Created

    There is a simple method to creating a police state that has been used throughout history. (e.g., Nimrod, Napoleon, Lenin, Hitler, etc.) First, a crisis-type situation is utilized or created. (Terrorism, crime rate, child abuse, counterfeiting, sex trafficking, drug money laundering, contagious disease, etc.) The "crisis" is emphasized and propagandized till it becomes a great concern to a significant percentage of the population. Then the would-be tyrant or oppressive government and its accomplices or followers appear to come up with the best or most effective solution to the crisis so many are concerned about. (Of course, the "solution" just happens to increase government intrusion and police power or eliminate safeguards against governmental abuse.) At this point the average citizen is so concerned with dealing with the crisis and finding or effecting a solution that he is willing to go along with what appears to be a good solution without considering and analyzing the potential effects and repercussions.

    Some things we are seeing and hearing should alarm us more than a disease, such as:

    · Be wary of “solutions” offered by “experts” that sound more like a Marxist or fascist wish list than facts, logic, or actual science.

    · Be wary of so-called solutions to crises and social maladies that depend on an assumed natural goodness of man, or an assumed goodness or benevolence of human government, for the solutions to work.

    · Also, keep in mind that because humans are flawed from the start there are no perfect solutions, only trade offs.

    Comment (0)

    About Me

    Name: Arnold Saxton
    ChristiansUnite ID: ajsaxton
    Member Since: 2010-03-30
    Location: Fruithurst, Alabama, United States
    Denomination: Baptist
    About Me: It would be difficult to give all details so I will touch on just a few things. I was born in the Midwest & I have Southern ancestry so I sometimes get prejudice from both sides. Ex-Jehovah's Witness. (Disassociated myself 1985) Christian since 1987.... more

    Dec. 2020
        1 2 3 4 5
    6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19
    20 21 22 23 24 25 26
    27 28 29 30 31    
    prev   next
    Blog Roll
    A K Dart dot com - News & Information
    Arnold Saxton (YouTube)
    Bible Research
    Bible Study Tools Online - Verses, Commentaries, Concordances, Verses, Parallel Verses
    Brother Arnold's Blog
    Christian Answers Network
    Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry
    Christian Book Distributors
    ChristiansUnite.com - Christian Resources
    Creation Today
    Crosswalk - Christian Living Resources
    Faith & Heritage - Occidental Christianity For Preserving Western Culture & People
    Fallacy Detective
    Freedom Ministries - Pastor John Weaver
    Gospel Music Warehouse
    Grace Gems!
    Grace Online Library - Historic Baptist, Reformed & Puritan Resources
    GunCite: gun control and Second Amendment issues
    jeetfeet (Pastor John Weaver)
    KJIC 90.5 FM (Santa Fe, Texas) - Christian Music
    Ladies Against Feminism - Promoting Beautiful Womanhood!
    Logical Fallacies
    Natural News - Natural Health News & Scientific Discoveries
    News With Views - News & Information
    OnePlace.com - Free Online Radio Christian Radio Ministry Broadcasts
    Second Amendment Project
    SermonAudio - Library of free MP3 audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide
    StudyLight.org - Online Bible Study Tools and Resources
    The Blaze - News & Information
    The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood
    The New American - News & Information
    The Oak 90.9 FM (Lagrange, Georgia) - Christian Radio
    The Schwarz Report - A publication of the Christian Anti-Communism Crusade
    TowerWatch Ministries - Jehovah's Witness and Watchtower Information Online
    Townhall.com - News & Information
    Witnesses For Jesus, Inc. - For Witness to Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons (Latter-day Saints)
    WorldNetDaily - News & Information
    WSOF Christian Radio (Madisonville, Kentucky)
    A Call To End Christian Prohibition, by Marcus Pittman
    A Godly Man is a Lover of the Word! - by Thomas Watson
    A Look At The Cults - By Arnold J. Saxton
    A Simple Way To Share The Gospel - By Arnold J. Saxtom
    Abolish Adolescence!, by Thomas Sowell
    An Examination Of Dispensationalism - by William E. Cox
    Becoming Salt and Light, by Richard J. Krejcir
    Beware Of Philosophy - by Mike Ford
    Biblical Manhood and Womanhood and the Contemporary Collapse of Sexual Morals, By Peter Jones
    Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, by Chris Good
    Born Of Water: What Does It Mean?, by Colin Melbourne
    But Is It In The Bible? - by Gary DeMar
    Childish Labor Laws, by Thomas Sowell
    Church Membership - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Church Youth Groups, by David Crank
    Climate Change: Back to the Future? - by Mark Alexander
    Confidence About the Earthly Triumph of Christ's Kingdom, By Dr. Greg Bahnsen
    Constitution of the Confederate States of America
    Contact Elected Officials
    Criminalizing masculinity - by Paul Craig Roberts
    Daniel’s Seventy Weeks - By Dr. Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.
    Declaration of Independence
    Dispensationalist Beliefs - The Scriptures, by William E. Cox
    Divine Providence, by Donald Townsley
    Division & Unity - True vs False, by Chris Good
    Does a lack of men lead to liberalism? - by David Murrow
    Domestic Tranquility - by E. Carolyn Graglia
    Dominion Mandate - by Henry Morris, Ph.D.
    Don't Judge, Lest you Be Judged!, By Chris Good
    Don't Touch the Lord's Anointed!, by Chris Good
    Evaluating Premillennialism - by Cornelis P. Venema
    Evolutionists Believe in Magic - by Gary DeMar
    Feeding Sheep or Amusing Goats? - by C. H. Spurgeon
    For Teenagers- Are You A Child or A Young Adult? - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Four Arguments Against Euthanasia Or Mercy Killing, by David F. Reagan
    Free to Decide: Confessions of a Former Calvinist - by Brandon Cox
    From Liberty To Legalism - by Timothy S. Morton
    Fundamental Doctrines of the Bible - By David Allen Reed
    Gender Roles: The Image of God and the Sin of Unisex - by Ken Clark
    Georgia State Flag - Saint Andrews Cross is a Christian symbol
    God's sovereignty and Man's Responsibility, by C.H.Mackintosh
    God's Willingness and Man's Unwillingness, by George Zeller
    Grieving or Quenching the Holy Spirit, by Chris Good
    Have the Charismatic Gifts Ceased?, by Matthew J. Slick
    Help For Ex-Jehovah's Witnesses - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Homosexuality In The Armed Forces - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Homosexuality: Fact and Fiction, by Joseph P. Gudel
    Hopelessly Patriarchal, by Steve M. Schlissel
    How A Police State Is Created - By Arnold J. Saxton
    How Some Christians Contribute to Election Losses - by Gary DeMar
    HOW TO CREATE A MONSTER - By Lynn Stuter
    How To Identify A Dangerous Religious Group
    Human Depravity, by R.C. Sproul
    Impartation, Anointing, and Manifestation - - by Leonard Bay and Rev. Rafael D Martinez
    Imputation - By Arnold J. Saxton
    In Defense of the Confederacy - By Alexander Massa
    Is Birth Control Biblical?, by Tony Warren
    Is it Sinful for Women to Have a Career? - By David J. Stewart
    Is It The Will of God For Me To Marry Or Remain Single?, by Gillis Triplett
    Is The Pretribulation Rapture Biblical? - by Brian Scwertley
    Keep A Balanced View Of Bible Prophecy - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Keep A Balanced View Of Experts - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Legalists and Legalism, by Chris Good
    Liberty - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Materialism and the Believer, by David B. Curtis
    Millennial Views Debate
    Modernism and Biblical Inerrancy, by Brian M. Schwertley
    Moses Or Christ? Paul's Reply To Dispensational Error - by Charles D. Alexander
    My Exodus From The Watchtower Organization - By Arnold J. Saxton
    My Liberation From Feminism - by Carolyn McCulley
    No-Fault Divorce - Feminism's Crowning Achievement, by Rick Scarborough
    Nothing Is Really New, Just Revivals Of The Old - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Offend A Feminist: The Case For Repealing The 19th Amendment - by Robert Belvedere
    Old-Fashioned Values - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Paul's Theology Of Israel's Future: A Nonmillennial Interpretation Of Romans 11 - by Lee Irons
    Pledging Allegiance to the Omnipotent Lincolnian State - by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
    Postmillennialism: "In the days of these kings …" The Prophecy of Daniel - By Jay Rogers.
    Postmillennialism: Ezekiel’s Vision - By Jay Rogers.
    Postmillennialism: Of the increase of His government there shall be no end - By Jay Rogers
    Postmillennialism: Prophecies Regarding the Messianic Kingdom - By Jay Rogers
    Postmillennialism: Wishful Thinking or Certain Hope? - By Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., Th.D.
    Premarital Sex - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Prophetic Speculation Out of Kilter and Hurting the Bible’s Authority, by Gary DeMar
    Psychology: The Trojan Horse - by Gil Rugh
    Questions For Evolutionists - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Quit You Like Men - by James Thornton
    Rapture and Resurrection, by Greg L. Bahnsen
    Reasoning with Jehovah's Witnesses - by Kevin Quick
    Rebellious Wives! - by David J. Stewart
    Restoring Freedom, by Franklin Sanders
    Safe Sex?, by Rusty Wright, B.S.
    Same-Sex Marriage - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Scientific Patriarchy, by Daniel Shaddox
    Selma to Montgomery, 30 Years Later - by Marian Evans
    Ten Lies Of Feminism, by Sue Bohlin
    The 14th Amendment Is Unconstitutional - by Judge L.H. Perez
    The Bible Doctrine Of Hell Examined - by Brian Schwertley
    The Blemished Bride, by Robert A. Wagner
    The Christian Divorce Rate Myth, by Glenn T. Stanton
    The Christian Worldview - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Connection Between Evangelism and Gender Issues, by Randy Stinson
    The Dangers of Feminism, By David J. Stewart
    The Difference Between A "Personal Attack" And "Discernment," by Terry Bowers and Rev. Rafael D Martinez
    The Eli Syndrome - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Eternal Security Of All Blood Bought Believers - by J. M. Carroll
    The Feminization Of Society - by Dennis Prager
    The First Blast of the Trumpet, by John Knox
    The Historical Setting of the Writing of Revelation, By Dr. Greg Bahnsen
    The Immorality of Liberals - Selwyn Duke
    The Impact of The Entertainment Media on The Family - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Importance of Fundamental Doctrines - Arnold J. Saxton
    The Letter Kills, But the Spirit Gives Life, by Chris Good
    The Natural Use Of Women - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The New Age Movement - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Origin of Old-Earth Geology and its Ramifications for Life in the 21st Century, by Dr. Terry Mortenson
    The Person, Work, and Present Status of Satan By Dr. Greg Bahnsen
    The Post-Christian Generation - By Arnold J. Saxton
    The Premillennial Deception - by Brian Schwertley
    The Rapture Problem, by Chuck Baldwin
    The Spoiling Of Christianity By Psychology, by David L. Brown
    The Triumph Of The Church: A Biblical Defense Of Postmillennialism - by William Einwechter
    The Two Resurrections: John 5:19-29 and Revelation 20:4-6 - By Aaron Orendorff
    The Use Of Tracts, by R. A. Torrey
    The [Prophecy] Matrix: Endtimes Virtuality - by Gregg Strawbridge
    Thy Kingdom Come, by Kim Riddlebarger
    Tithing Is Biblical - by Kenneth Hemphill
    To Whom Does the Land of Palestine Belong? - by Thomas Williamson
    Toxicity Of Environmentalism - by George Reisman
    True Repentance Will Lead To Salvation, by Michael Bradley
    Understanding Feminists and Their Fantasies - by Phyllis Schlafly
    Unisex - by Jack Hyles
    Unsaved Church Members - By Arnold J. Saxton
    US Constitution Versus Modern US Government - By Arnold J. Saxton
    Victorious Eschatology By Jay Rogers
    Watchtower Disfellowshipping: A Biblical Perspective - By Rafael Martinez
    What is "optimistic amillennialism"? - By Jay Rogers
    What Is A Biblical Christian?, by Albert N. Martin
    What Is a Christian Nation? - by Frankin Sanders
    What's Conservative about the Pledge of Allegiance? - by Gene Healy
    When Hiring Married Women Was Unacceptable - by Laura Wood
    When Prophecy Books Go Bad - by Gary DeMar
    Who Really Owns the 'Holy Land'? - By Robert L. Reymond
    Who Really Owns the Land of Palestine? - By Thomas Williamson
    Why Christians Should Have Nothing To Do With Snowmobiles, by Norman Street
    Why Cremation Is Unscriptural, by Paul P. Maher
    Why Doctrinal Preaching Declines, by Arthur W. Pink
    You Can Trust the Communists (to be Communists), by Dr. Fred C. Schwarz
    Zionism versus the Bible - by Thomas Williamson
    ~ VIDEOS:
    ~Anti-Intellectualism is Not Biblical. (Spurgeon/Kielar)
    ~Big Jim Hamill - Apple Tree Song NQC 1998
    ~Dispensationalism, is the rapture Biblical? - Tim Conway
    ~Dr. Morey: Hating your enemies
    ~Dr. Morey: What is worldliness?
    ~Drive Thru Church - NewSong Edit
    ~Evaluating the Jehovah's Witness New World Translation (Video)
    ~Fred and Kate Gholson leave the Truth in 1986
    ~Immigration, World Poverty and Gumballs - Updated 2010
    ~Is Theology your idol? - Tim Conway
    ~Mind Control Cults
    ~Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984)
    ~Ron Paul exposes United Nations plan to destroy US (1990's?)
    ~SHOCKING DOCUMENTARY 1- False spirits invade the church - KUNDALINI WARNING - Andrew Strom -
    ~Silly Women
    ~So many Denominations, which one is true? - Tim Conway
    ~Tares and Wheat - by Bailey Smith
    ~Testimonies about 1975 from people who were Jehovah's Witnesses during the time
    ~The Battle With Sin: Who is the Greatest? - Tim Conway
    ~The Beast As Saint: The Truth About Martin Luther King Jr.
    ~The Consequences of Feminism
    ~The Israel Lobby
    ~The Lesters - "He Didn't Throw the Clay Away" - 1992
    ~The Myth Of The Chosen People
    ~The Watchtower's False Teachings About Christmas Exposed!
    ~Turn Your Eyes Upon Jesus by Alan Jackson
    ~Watchtower Circular Reasoning
    ~What A Friend We Have In Jesus - Alan Jackson
    ~What your 2nd Amendment right is all about
    ~Witnesses Of Jehovah (1986 Movie)
    ~~1975 -What the Watchtower doesn't want you to know

    More From ChristiansUnite...    About Us | Privacy Policy | | ChristiansUnite.com Site Map | Statement of Beliefs

    Copyright © 1999-2019 ChristiansUnite.com. All rights reserved.
    Please send your questions, comments, or bug reports to the