• Register
  • Login
  • Forgot Password?
  • My Profile
  • Choose An Icon
  • Upload An Icon
  • Messenger
  • Member Search
  • Who's Online
    Members: 1601

    Members: 0
    Anonymous: 0
    Today: 26
    Newest Member:
  • You are here: Blogs Directory / Devotionals / serola's blog Welcome Guest
    serola's blog
          Beloveds, we must clear up the lie that when the Lord told Joshua he would have good success through obeying the Law, that this was meant for Christians today. The Lord told this to Joshua that in obeying the Old Covenant of the Law God would give him success in conquering certain lands and taking these lands for the nation of Israel: Joshua 1: 5 There shall not any man be able to stand before thee all the days of thy life: as I was with Moses, so I will be with thee: I will not fail thee, nor forsake thee. 6 Be strong and of a good courage: for unto this people shalt thou divide for an inheritance the land, which I sware unto their fathers to give them.
          Also in keeping the Old Covenant of the Law, (which is all they had from God), he would not face the wrath of God and die as Aaron and Moses did for their disobedience to God in not keeping the Old Covenant of the Law: Num. 27: 12 And the LORD said unto Moses, Get thee up into this mount Abarim, and see the land which I have given unto the children of Israel. 13 And when thou hast seen it, thou also shalt be gathered unto thy people, as Aaron thy brother was gathered. 14 For ye rebelled against my commandment in the desert of Zin, in the strife of the congregation, to sanctify me at the water before their eyes: that is the water of Meribah in Kadesh in the wilderness of Zin.
          Moses never preached that the Old Covenant of the Law would make anyone permanently righteous in the sight of God. Here is the truth, preached by our Saviour Jesus Christ: Jhn 5:46 For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me.
           Luk 24:44 And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me.

          Gal 2:21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, THEN CHRIST IS DEAD IN VAIN.
          See Galatians 3, which explains God’s purposes for the Law; and how Jesus Christ has delivered us from it for all time. Feel free to study on your own the numerous verses that fully declare that Jesus Christ is the eternal Saviour and final sole source of eternal salvation for all time for all who believe in Him. See John 14:6.


          Anyone willfully claiming salvation based on keeping the Old Covenant of the Law and/ or combining it with the New Covenant of Jesus Christ, or anything else is not considered a Christian according to the Bible.

          Gal 2:21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, THEN CHRIST IS DEAD IN VAIN.

          Gal 3:10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the CURSE: for it is written, CURSED is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. 11 But that NO MAN is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith.

          1Ti. 1:5 Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned:6 From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling;
          7 Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.

          1Ti 1:9 Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, 10 For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine; 11 According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust.

          John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.


    Fri, May 20th - 3:21PM

    H.R.3185 — 114th Congress (2015-2016)below tells the steps involved before this bill can become law. Shhh, the proponents of this law don’t want you to know about it. Can you imagine something of this magnitude being accidentally not told to the public?

    H.R.3185 - Equality Act114th Congress (2015-2016) | Get alerts

    You must sign in or create an account


    Hide Overview icon-hide


    Rep. Cicilline, David N. [D-RI-1] (Introduced 07/23/2015)


    House - Judiciary; Education and the Workforce; Financial Services; Oversight and Government Reform; House Administration

    Latest Action:

    09/08/2015 Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice.  


    This bill has the status Introduced

    Here are the steps for Status of Legislation:

    1. Introduced

    Array ( [actionDate] => 2015-07-23 [displayText] => Introduced in House [externalActionCode] => 1000 [description] => Introduced )

    2. Passed House

    3. Passed Senate

    4. To President

    5. Became law

    BrBrothers and sisters, even the secular world knows that there is more than something  just wrong with this legislative shenanigans. It is downright unacceptable and morally wrong. ( this is being addressed only in a secular sense at this time. The definition of these aberrant terms are quite nebulous. It could allow a guy to wake up one morning and dress in women's clothing and call himself transgender and legally enter a women's bathroom.  

    Security Guard Arrested in Alleged Assault of Transgender Woman


     A security guard at a Giant Food grocery store in Washington, D.C., has been charged with simple assault for allegedly pushing a transgender woman out of the store after trying to use the women's restroom, according to the Metropolitan Police Department.


    The incident happened around noon on Wednesday when Ebony Belcher -- who identified herself as a trans woman to ABC affiliate WJLA -- went to use the women's bathroom at a Giant grocery store in the city, according to a statement by Metropolitan Police Officer Tisha Grant filed with the Superior Court for the District of Columbia.


    A security guard -- identified to ABC News by a police spokeswoman as 45-year-old Francine Jones -- then approached Belcher and told her "she could not use the [women's] bathroom," the statement said. A verbal altercation ensued, during which Jones used a homophobic slur and told Belcher, "(you) need to get out of here," the statement continued.


     Belcher then left the bathroom and proceeded to walk to the main area of the store, but Jones then blocked her and pushed her out the door, according to the statement.


    My notes: (It is Francine Jones, the security guard, whom I believe is black that should have dialed 911 without touching the subject, since there is no law in effect-yet, allowing so called transgender women to use women’s bathrooms.)


    Once outside, Belcher called 911, the statement said. Jones was then "arrested for Simple Assault and transported to the First District Police Station for processing," according to the statement.

     Brothers and sisters can you see the deep levels of absurdity and irony here?    love, serola




    Comment (0)

    Wed, May 18th - 11:40AM

    Brothers and sisters the doj (department of justice) and the ocr (office of civil rights) administered through the U.S. dept. of education do not want anyone to know that they are flying by the seat of their respective pants in miss-applying rather falsely applying the civil rights act of 1964 to transgender, and homosexual etc. rights. Nothing in that act has anything to do with protecting the rights of transgender, or homosexuals from discrimination, nor even mentions such persons. How do they fix this, better read this and be warned: Proposed legislation of the 114th United States Congress.

     Equality Act of 2015

    Full title A bill to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation, and for other purposes


    Colloquial name(s) Equality Act


    On July 23, 2015, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) introduced the Equality Act of 2015 in the United States Senate.


    In January 2016, Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL) became the first Republican Senator to co-sponsor the bill.



    The Equality Act of 2015 has received support from Apple Inc., Dow Chemical Company, Human Rights Campaign, Levi Strauss & Co., American Airlines, Facebook, General Mills, Google, and Nike.

    This thing speaks for itself. Those intending to perpetrate this travesty will certainly wait for the elections to be over to avoid backlash. No doubt such a so called “equality act” will be wildly unpopular. The politicians are sly and cunning; to ensure their jobs they will wait until the danger of the elections have passed and then try to put this law into effect.

    Write and call your elected officials up for re or election to express your opposition. Let your dollars speak in not supporting businesses or organizations in favor of this law.



    Comment (0)

    Fri, May 13th - 8:25PM

    Brothers and sisters, we all as Christians can understand and know the laws that affect our lives. The question we have to ask is where did all this mess about trans-gender and or non-binary gender come from, since the federal laws are, passed by our elected members of congress.

    Well sit down because certain tinkerers have decided to go beyond the scope of law, and introduce and loosed these travesties upon an unsuspecting populace.  We have to understand somethings about the department of education first of all:

    Parents especially must know: What Is Not Part of the Department of Education’s Role?

    In creating the Department of Education, Congress specified that: No provision of a program administered by the Secretary or by any other officer of the Department shall be construed to authorize the Secretary or any such officer to exercise any direction, supervision, or control over the curriculum, program of instruction, administration, or personnel of any educational institution, school, or school system, over any accrediting agency or association, or over the selection or content of library resources, textbooks, or other instructional materials by any educational institution or school system, except to the extent authorized by law. (Section 103[b], Public Law 96-88)


    Thus, the Department does not

    •establish schools and colleges;

    •develop curricula;

    •set requirements for enrollment and graduation;

    •determine state education standards; or

    •develop or implement testing to measure whether states are meeting their education standards.*


    These are responsibilities handled by the various states and districts as well as by public and private organizations of all kinds, not by the U.S. Department of Education.

    I hope this will be an eye opener for many.



    Comment (0)

    Fri, May 13th - 2:22PM

    WASHINGTON, May 4 (Reuters) - The Department of Justice told North Carolina's governor that a new state law limiting restroom access for transgender people violates the U.S. Civil Rights Act.

    In a letter to Republican Governor Pat McCrory that was seen by Reuters, the Justice Department said the state was "engaging in a pattern or practice of discrimination against transgender state employees,"


    Later North Carolina filed suit against the feds and the doj (dept. of Justice) the core of their response being: “The lawsuit filed by Berger, North Carolina Senate president pro tempore and Moore, state House Speaker, reflected the views of many of the bill's supporters that people "expect to encounter only other people of the same biological sex" when they are in intimate setting such as public bathrooms.”

    This issue may reach the supreme court, as well as in other states where such laws are enacted. Brothers and sisters the doj is claiming such laws constitutes violation of the civil rights of transgender persons. Actually this is not true, I am posting title IX amendments of 1972, which has nothing to do with transgender et. Al. persons, but with the common understanding of sex as biologically based. This is a lot to read, but please be patient and read it for yourselves and be informed. I will post something even more interesting next time.


    Title IX Of The Education Amendments Of 1972

    20 U.S.C. Ё 1681 - 1688

    TITLE 20 - Education


    •Sec. 1681. Sex. ◦(a) Prohibition against discrimination; exceptions.

    ◦(b) Preferential or disparate treatment because of imbalance in participation or receipt of Federal benefits; statistical evidence of imbalance.

    ◦(c) "Educational institution" defined.


    •1682. Federal administrative enforcement; report to Congressional committees.

    •1683. Judicial review.

    •1684. Blindness or visual impairment; prohibition against discrimination.

    •1685. Authority under other laws unaffected.

    •1686. Interpretation with respect to living facilities.

    •1687. Interpretation of "program or activity".

    •1688. Neutrality with respect to abortion.




     This chapter is referred to in sections 1132f-1, 1232, 3041, 3042 of this title; title 29 sections 206, 1577; title 42 sections 290cc-34, 300w-7, 300x-7, 708, 1988, 2000d-7, 10406.

    Sec. 1681. Sex

    (a) Prohibition against discrimination; exceptions

    No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, except that:

    (1) Classes of educational institutions subject to prohibition in regard to admissions to educational institutions, this section shall apply only to institutions of vocational education, professional education, and graduate higher education, and to public institutions of undergraduate higher education;

    (2) Educational institutions commencing planned change in admissions in regard to admissions to educational institutions, this section shall not apply


    (A) for one year from June 23, 1972, nor for six years after June 23, 1972, in the case of an educational institution which has begun the process of changing from being an institution which admits only students of one sex to being an institution which admits students of both sexes, but only if it is carrying out a plan for such a change which is approved by the Secretary of Education or


    (B) for seven years from the date an educational institution begins the process of changing from being an institution which admits only students of only one sex to being an institution which admits students of both sexes, but only if it is carrying out a plan for such a change which is approved by the Secretary of Education, whichever is the later;



    (3) Educational institutions of religious organizations with contrary religious tenets


    this section shall not apply to an educational institution which is controlled by a religious organization if the application of this subsection would not be consistent with the religious tenets of such organization; (my personal notes on this is that any church being besieged by groups demanding "inclusiveness of homo-trans-etc. persons based on this Law is false.)

    (4) Educational institutions training individuals for military services or merchant marine

    this section shall not apply to an educational institution whose primary purpose is the training of individuals for the military services of the United States, or the merchant marine;

    (5) Public educational institutions with traditional and continuing admissions policy

    in regard to admissions this section shall not apply to any public institution of undergraduate higher education which is an institution that traditionally and continually from its establishment has had a policy of admitting only students of one sex;

    (6) Social fraternities or sororities; voluntary youth service organizations

    this section shall not apply to membership practices -

    (A) of a social fraternity or social sorority which is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of title 26, the active membership of which consists primarily of students in attendance at an institution of higher education, or

    (B) of the Young Men's Christian Association, Young Women's Christian Association, Girl Scouts, Boy Scouts, Camp Fire Girls, and voluntary youth service organizations which are so exempt, the membership of which has traditionally been limited to persons of one sex and principally to persons of less than nineteen years of age;

    (7) Boy or Girl conferences

    this section shall not apply to -

    (A) any program or activity of the American Legion undertaken in connection with the organization or operation of any Boys State conference, Boys Nation conference, Girls State conference, or Girls Nation conference; or

    (B) any program or activity of any secondary school or educational institution specifically for -

    (i) the promotion of any Boys State conference, Boys Nation conference, Girls State conference, or Girls Nation conference; or

    (ii) the selection of students to attend any such conference;

    (8) Father-son or mother-daughter activities at educational institutions

    this section shall not preclude father-son or mother-daughter activities at an educational institution, but if such activities are provided for students of one sex, opportunities for reasonably comparable activities shall be provided for students of the other sex; and

    (9) Institution of higher education scholarship awards in "beauty" pageants

    this section shall not apply with respect to any scholarship or other financial assistance awarded by an institution of higher education to any individual because such individual has received such award in any pageant in which the attainment of such award is based upon a combination of factors related to the personal appearance, poise, and talent of such individual and in which participation is limited to individuals of one sex only, so long as such pageant is in compliance with other nondiscrimination provisions of Federal law.

    (b) Preferential or disparate treatment because of imbalance in participation or receipt of Federal benefits; statistical evidence of imbalance

    Nothing contained in subsection (a) of this section shall be interpreted to require any educational institution to grant preferential or disparate treatment to the members of one sex on account of an imbalance which may exist with respect to the total number or percentage of persons of that sex participating in or receiving the benefits of any federally supported program or activity, in comparison with the total number or percentage of persons of that sex in any community, State, section, or other area: *Provided*, That this subsection shall not be construed to prevent the consideration in any hearing or proceeding under this chapter of statistical evidence tending to show that such an imbalance exists with respect to the participation in, or receipt of the benefits of, any such program or activity by the members of one sex.


    (c)"Educational institution" defined

    For purposes of this chapter an educational institution means any public or private preschool, elementary, or secondary school, or any institution of vocational, professional, or higher education, except that in the case of an educational institution composed of more than one school, college, or department which are administratively separate units, such term means each such school, college, or department. ( My notes, you can see clearly here there is nothing concerning "non binary sex" or  the aforementioned organizations traditionally serving one sex as being discriminatory.)  Series to be continued.



    Comment (0)

    Mon, May 2nd - 7:33AM

    Brothers and sisters we continue on in a secular sense: laws are put in place to try to stem the tide of increasingly chaotic and dangerous tampering with basic human biological understandings of gender since the dawn of man. Let us take a look at some aspects of the actual state of North Carolina current law which states this: North Carolina executive order No. 93 to protect privacy and equality:  Details

    WHEREAS, North Carolina’s rich legacy of inclusiveness, diversity and hospitality makes North Carolina a global destination for jobs, business, tourists and talent;

    WHEREAS, it is the policy of the Executive Branch that government services be provided equally to all people;

    WHEREAS, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 160A-499.2 permits municipalities to adopt ordinances prohibiting discrimination in housing and real estate transactions, and any municipality may expand such ordinance consistent with the federal Fair Housing Act;

    WHEREAS, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-422.2(c) permits local governments or other political subdivisions of the State to set their own employment policies applicable to their own personnel;

    WHEREAS, North Carolina law allows private businesses and nonprofit employers to establish their own non-discrimination employment policies;

    WHEREAS, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-128.2 requires each city, county or other local public entity to adopt goals for participation by minority businesses and to make good faith efforts to recruit minority participation in line with those goals;

    WHEREAS, North Carolina law allows a private business or nonprofit to set their own restroom, locker room or shower policies;

    WHEREAS, our citizens have basic common-sense expectations of privacy in our restrooms, locker rooms and shower facilities for children, women and men;

    WHEREAS, to protect expectations of privacy in restrooms, locker rooms and shower facilities in public buildings, including our schools, the State of North Carolina maintains these facilities on the basis of biological sex;

    WHEREAS, State agencies and local governments are allowed to make reasonable accommodations in restrooms, locker rooms and shower facilities due to special individual circumstances;

    NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority vested in me as Governor by the Constitution and laws of the State of North Carolina, IT IS ORDERED:

    Invite others to join in this study. Although it can be disturbing to some, this will give way and empower us to know we can face these issues without fear, and gain the knowledge we need to understand them ultimately within our Christian framework, to address them firmly, lovingly within the context of the truth of Jesus Christ.



    Comment (0)

    Sun, May 1st - 4:13PM

    Transgender is being used in a much looser term today. A so-called transgender woman may opt to retain the male fully functioning penis, and still be considered as transgender. This despite having a new birth certificate of being born a female. Anyone with a penis does not belong in the woman’s bathroom.   

    So we see that this kind of law is not fool proof so to speak.

    It is possible to present a birth certificate as one’s own when it is not. This kind of law is thought to close the door to allowing predators access to women and children. Who polices the bathrooms? who verifies the authenticity of the birth certificate? Who checks to see if the genitalia match the birth certificate? Who says it has to? Other troubling issues is that there is no clear definition of what or who can be a transgender. So transgender can be seen as an umbrella catch -all for those “transitioning” with the goal of hormone treatments and surgery to appear as their desired sex, to those who feel very strongly they were born in the wrong body and identify as the opposite gender with no desire for  surgical/hormonal interventions; to those who are so-called

    “gender fluid” identifying as male or female depending on how they feel at any given time to those who do not identify as any sex, or even a third sex.  Since the flood gates have been opened there are now people who identify as belonging to the animal kingdom, not human, with so much more to come. Because of the aforementioned issues, brothers and sisters, we can understand the bathroom laws as a means to return to common sense gender specific public bathroom use based on biology.

    Series to be continued.



    Comment (0)

    Back to Blog Main Page

    About Me

    Name: Dolores serola Rutherford
    ChristiansUnite ID: serola
    Member Since: 2007-08-19
    Location: , Texas, United States
    Denomination: The Bible commands all Christians to let there be NO divisions among us. Is Christ divided?
    About Me: I am a Christian. I absolutely believe that Jesus is the son of God who shed His sinless blood, died on the cross and rose again forever to forgive us forever of all our sins for everyone who believes and obeys Him. I pray to promote the truth that f... more

    May 2016
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7
    8 9 10 11 12 13 14
    15 16 17 18 19 20 21
    22 23 24 25 26 27 28
    29 30 31        
    prev   next

    Recent Posts
    Jul 2024
    Jun 2024
    May 2024
    Apr 2024
    Mar 2024
    Feb 2024
    Jan 2024
    Dec 2023
    Nov 2023
    Oct 2023
    Sep 2023
    Aug 2023
    Jul 2023
    Jun 2023
    May 2023
    Apr 2023
    Mar 2023
    Feb 2023
    Jan 2023
    Dec 2022
    Nov 2022
    Oct 2022
    Sep 2022
    Aug 2022
    Jul 2022
    Jun 2022
    May 2022
    Apr 2022
    Mar 2022
    Feb 2022
    Jan 2022
    Dec 2021
    Nov 2021
    Oct 2021
    Sep 2021
    Aug 2021
    Jul 2021
    Jun 2021
    May 2021
    Apr 2021
    Mar 2021
    Feb 2021
    Jan 2021
    Dec 2020
    Nov 2020
    Oct 2020
    Sep 2020
    Aug 2020
    Jul 2020
    Jun 2020
    May 2020
    Apr 2020
    Mar 2020
    Feb 2020
    Jan 2020
    Dec 2019
    Nov 2019
    Oct 2019
    Sep 2019
    Aug 2019
    Jul 2019
    Jun 2019
    May 2019
    Apr 2019
    Mar 2019
    Feb 2019
    Jan 2019
    Dec 2018
    Nov 2018
    Oct 2018
    Sep 2018
    Jun 2018
    May 2018
    Apr 2018
    Mar 2018
    Feb 2018
    Jan 2018
    Dec 2017
    Nov 2017
    Oct 2017
    Sep 2017
    Aug 2017
    Jul 2017
    Jun 2017
    May 2017
    Apr 2017
    Mar 2017
    Feb 2017
    Jan 2017
    Dec 2016
    Nov 2016
    Oct 2016
    Sep 2016
    Aug 2016
    Jul 2016
    Jun 2016
    Apr 2016
    Mar 2016
    Feb 2016
    Jan 2016
    Dec 2015
    Nov 2015
    Oct 2015
    Sep 2015
    Aug 2015
    Jul 2015
    Jun 2015
    May 2015
    Apr 2015
    Mar 2015
    Feb 2015
    Jan 2015
    Dec 2014
    Nov 2014
    Sep 2014
    Jul 2014
    Jun 2014
    May 2014
    Apr 2014
    Mar 2014
    Feb 2014
    Jan 2014
    Dec 2013
    Nov 2013
    Oct 2013
    Sep 2013
    Aug 2013
    Jul 2013
    Jun 2013
    May 2013
    Apr 2013
    Mar 2013
    Feb 2013
    Jan 2013
    Dec 2012
    Sep 2012
    Aug 2012
    Jul 2012
    Jun 2012
    May 2012
    Apr 2012
    Mar 2012
    Feb 2012
    Jan 2012
    Dec 2011
    Nov 2011
    Oct 2011
    Sep 2011
    Aug 2011
    Jul 2011
    Jun 2011
    May 2011
    Apr 2011
    Mar 2011
    Feb 2011
    Jan 2011
    Dec 2010
    Nov 2010
    Oct 2010
    Sep 2010
    Aug 2010
    Jul 2010
    Jun 2010
    May 2010
    Apr 2010
    Mar 2010
    Feb 2010
    Jan 2010
    Dec 2009
    Nov 2009
    Oct 2009
    Sep 2009
    Aug 2009
    Jul 2009
    Jun 2009
    May 2009
    Apr 2009
    Mar 2009
    Feb 2009
    Jan 2009
    Dec 2008
    Nov 2008
    Oct 2008
    Sep 2008
    Aug 2008
    Jul 2008
    Jun 2008
    May 2008
    Apr 2008
    Mar 2008
    Feb 2008
    Jan 2008
    Dec 2007
    Nov 2007
    Oct 2007

    More From ChristiansUnite...    About Us | Privacy Policy | | ChristiansUnite.com Site Map | Statement of Beliefs

    Copyright © 1999-2019 ChristiansUnite.com. All rights reserved.
    Please send your questions, comments, or bug reports to the